Britain needs a tax break: Labour's lavish spending hurts jobs, work and commerce, says ALEX BRUMMER
Economic output is trivialised if assessed as a sports league table. Any growth at all is welcome in an uncertain world of tariffs, fragmentation and geopolitical turmoil.
Raising taxes by £40billion and piling much of the cash into the public sector without productivity targets was a nonsense. Worse, the surcharge on employers' National Insurance (NI) contributions and levies on wealth penalised jobs, work and enterprise.
Latest forecasts from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) show that UK growth at 1.2 per cent this year and 1.4 per cent next will lag that of the US and Canada.
Despite nostalgia in some quarters for a return to the European Union, the UK's fleet-of-foot services-led economy outpaces Germany and France.
The IMF has upgraded forecasts for global output this year and in 2026. In April, the Fund's projections were overshadowed by Liberation Day tariffs. But Britain, Japan, India and the EU have limited damage.
The US and China are still working on a deal so, critically, a new era of beggar-thy-neighbour retaliatory actions has been averted.
The brakes on globalisation have been applied. Data from Yale University's Budget Lab shows that, after the EU deal, the average tariff for goods entering the US will be 17.3 per cent, the highest since the 1930s.
There is no mystery as to Donald Trump's remedy for dealing with stuttering growth. As master instructed pupil Keir Starmer in Scotland this week, the best way forward is lower taxes.
Lessons of October 2024 must be learned. Every tax increase outlined, from NI and capital gains to inheritance and stamp duties on lower priced homes, stymied commerce.
Simple changes to the tax system could help. Abolishing stamp duty on share trading would boost listings and confidence.
Including digital expenditure in full expensing of capital spending could light a fire under AI and biotech.
As wonderful as reviving tin production in Cornwall may be, spending money on an AstraZeneca plant just might have averted the pharma giant's American tilt.
Captain America
AstraZeneca boss Pascal Soriot has good reason to look across the Atlantic. A knighthood is one kind of recognition.
But Keir Starmer's government has still to come up with a credible pharma strategy. A fixation on steel, car making and renewables has left medicines, one of Britain's most dynamic industries, in the lurch.
Soriot remains tight-lipped on a move of Britain's largest listed company to New York. His current enthusiasm for America shows no bounds.
A £37billion US investment strategy and a promise of local manufacturing is his ace card. AstraZeneca has two world class R&D centres and a workforce of close to 20,000 in America.
It has good reason to double down on a market which represents 40 per cent of sales.
Speaking to CNBC, the Astra boss also praised the US for its science and innovation. There was barely a mention of home territories in the UK and Sweden.
AZ's pipeline of oncology drugs is as strong as ever with sales up 15 per cent at £9billion, contributing almost half of total revenues in the first half of the year.
Next on the agenda for Soriot is an oral compound designed to take on leaders Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly on weight loss.
He believes that his company can deliver Americans an oral medicine at a cheaper price than rivals.
The meltdown in first mover Novo Nordisk's share price suggests investors believe the weight loss tortoise could, eventually, catch the hare.
Trading places
Barclays is thriving despite a reputational hit from the Jes Staley-Epstein relationship. Goldman Sachs looks to be cooling off on the UK.
But Barclays retains its place as Europe's most influential investment bank.
It is a big beneficiary of volatility since Liberation Day with profits climbing by 23 per cent on the back of an industry beating 26 per cent gain on fixed interest, currencies, and commodity trading.
As chief executive Venkat reiterated, success should not be an excuse for Labour to clobber banks with more tax.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Guardian
4 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
Trump removes official overseeing jobs data after dismal employment report
Mr Trump, in a post on his social media platform, alleged that the figures were manipulated for political reasons and said that Erika McEntarfer, the director of the Bureau of Labour Statistics, who was appointed by former president Joe Biden, should be fired. He provided no evidence for the charge. 'I have directed my Team to fire this Biden Political Appointee, IMMEDIATELY,' Mr Trump said on Truth Social. 'She will be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified.' Mr Trump later posted: 'In my opinion, today's Jobs Numbers were RIGGED in order to make the Republicans, and ME, look bad.' The charge that the data was faked threatens to undercut the political legitimacy of the US government's economic data, which has long been seen as the 'gold standard' of economic measurement globally. Economists and Wall Street investors have long accepted the data as free from political bias. After Mr Trump's initial post, labour secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer said on X that Ms McEntarfer was no longer leading the bureau and that William Wiatrowski, the deputy commissioner, would serve as the acting director. 'I support the President's decision to replace Biden's Commissioner and ensure the American People can trust the important and influential data coming from BLS,' Ms Chavez-DeRemer said. Friday's jobs report showed that just 73,000 jobs were added last month and that 258,000 fewer jobs were created in May and June than previously estimated. The report suggested that the economy has sharply weakened during Mr Trump's tenure, a pattern consistent with a slowdown in economic growth during the first half of the year and an increase in inflation during June that appeared to reflect the price pressures created by the president's tariffs. 'What does a bad leader do when they get bad news? Shoot the messenger,' Democratic senate leader Chuck Schumer of New York said in a Friday speech. Ms McEntarfer was nominated by Mr Biden in 2023 and became the commissioner of the Bureau of Labour Statistics in January 2024. Commissioners typically serve four-year terms but since they are political appointees can be fired. The commissioner is the only political appointee of the agency, which has hundreds of career civil servants. The Senate confirmed Ms McEntarfer to her post 86-8, with now vice president JD Vance among the yea votes. Mr Trump focused much of his ire on the revisions the agency made to previous hiring data. Job gains in May were revised down to just 19,000 from a previously revised 125,000, and for June they were cut to 14,000 from 147,000. In July, only 73,000 positions were added. The unemployment rate ticked up to a still-low 4.2% from 4.1%. 'No one can be that wrong? We need accurate Jobs Numbers,' Mr Trump wrote. 'She will be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified. Important numbers like this must be fair and accurate, they can't be manipulated for political purposes.' Mr Trump has not always been so suspicious of the monthly jobs report and responded enthusiastically after the initial May figures came out on June 6 when it was initially reported that the economy added 139,000 jobs. 'GREAT JOB NUMBERS, STOCK MARKET UP BIG!' Mr Trump posted at the time. That estimate was later revised down to 125,000 jobs, prior to the most-recent revision down to just 19,000. The monthly employment report is one of the most closely-watched pieces of government economic data and can cause sharp swings in financial markets. The disappointing figure sent US market indexes about 1.5% lower Friday.
Reuters
5 minutes ago
- Reuters
IMF lowers bar for Argentina reserves accumulation, next review due after local October elections
NEW YORK, Aug 1 (Reuters) - The International Monetary Fund lowered the bar for Argentina's reserve accumulation targets through 2026 in its $20 billion program and removed a review that was due before the country's October legislative elections as detailed in a report published Friday. Net international reserves accumulation targets were lowered through 2026, leading to a steeper accumulation curve as the 2027 target was kept in place. "The NIR accumulation target for end-December 2025 has been lowered to mainly reflect the initial shortfalls, which are gradually being addressed through the agreed corrective actions," the report said. The announcement came a day after the IMF board completed the first review of the $20 billion program approved in April. Disbursements of around $14 billion have been made for Argentina so far as part of this new program. "While early efforts to re-access international capital markets are commendable, Argentina's capacity to repay its Fund obligations remains subject to exceptional risks and continues to hinge on strong policy implementation to improve reserve coverage and sustain market access (at more favorable terms) by the time repayments to the Fund come due," said the report from IMF staff.
Daily Mail
32 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Washington Commanders move step closer to $3.7bn DC stadium… but Donald Trump threat still looms large
The Washington Commanders have received the green light to build a new $3.7billion stadium in DC - despite Donald Trump 's threat to scupper those plans if they don't revert their name back to the Redskins. Trump says he intends to block federal support for the stadium project unless the Commanders change back to the name it formerly adopted before being axed in 2020 amid pressure from fans, sponsors and Native American groups who considered 'Redskins' a racial slur. 'I may put a restriction on them that if they don't change the name back to the original "Washington Redskins," and get rid of the ridiculous moniker, "Washington Commanders," I won't make a deal for them to build a Stadium in Washington,' the president said on Truth Social last month. With Trump's threat still looming large, the Commanders cleared another hurdle in their aim to return to the site of their former home, RFK Stadium, on Friday when the District of Columbia Council approved the legislation. The bill passed by a 9-3 vote, though it still must be approved a second time by the council before being sent to Washington Mayor Muriel Bowser, who negotiated the original plan with Commanders owner Josh Harris in April. Washington currently plays at Northwest Stadium in Landover, Maryland, but aims to open a new venue in 2030. After the bill was passed, Harris said on Friday: 'Today's approval by the Council is transformational for D.C. and brings the Commanders back to our spiritual home. Like many fans, RFK was the site of memories that fueled my love for this team and this city. Now we're closer than ever to reigniting that energy for a new generation. 'We're incredibly grateful to the Mayor and the Council throughout this process for their leadership and guidance. 'This is a historic moment. This project is about more than delivering a world-class stadium worthy of our players, fans and the region. It's about revitalizing a critical part of our city, creating thousands of jobs and unlocking long-term economic benefits for the District. We look forward to working with our fans, residents, community leaders and elected officials to deliver on this vision.' The ownership group led by Harris has been considering locations in Washington, Maryland and Virginia since buying the team from Dan Snyder in 2022. Congress passed a bill transferring the RFK Stadium land to the city that was signed by then-President Joe Biden in early January. That paved the way for making it possible to replace the old stadium with a mixed-use development, including the new playing field for the Commanders. Council Chairman Phil Mendelson's office recently estimated the redevelopment could generate $26.6bn in tax revenue over 30 years. The district would contribute $1bn toward the stadium project, while the team would fund the remaining $2.7bn. However, Trump is now threatening to stand in the way of the project if his Redskins wish is not fulfilled. That issue did not come up in Friday's council meeting. Fans and even some Native American groups have voiced support for the team's new ownership group to revert to 'Redskins.' Several public opinion polls of self-identified Native Americans have found most were not offended by the term, while critics have pointed to academic research by the University of Michigan and UC Berkeley that found the opposite was true. Trump appeared to reference the public polling in favor of a name change on Sunday. 'Our great Indian people, in massive numbers, want this to happen,' he claimed. 'Their heritage and prestige is systematically being taken away from them. Times are different now than they were three or four years ago. We are a Country of passion and common sense. OWNERS, GET IT DONE!!!' He also demanded the same from MLB's Cleveland Guardians, née: 'Indians.' 'Likewise, the Cleveland Indians, one of the six original baseball teams, with a storied past,' Trump wrote.
