logo
Military Digest: How China factor plays crucial role in Indo-Pak military confrontations, look no further than 1965

Military Digest: How China factor plays crucial role in Indo-Pak military confrontations, look no further than 1965

Indian Express27-04-2025

With India and Pakistan in a diplomatic stand-off due to the terror attack in Pahalgam in which 26 people were killed, it is a fit occasion to look back 60 years on the 1965 war between the two countries in which China tried its best to help Pakistan.
All strategic experts agree that the Pak-China military ties and the threatening postures that China adopts against India from time to time are major factors in deciding any military offensive against Pakistan. While China remained relatively silent in 1971, making limited aggressive postures in the Northeast, it was far more belligerent during the 1965 war.
Documents accessed from the United States State Department archives and declassified Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) files show that in the middle of the Indo-Pak war, on September 16, 1965, China formally warned India to dismantle all military installations on or over the China-Sikkim boundary within three days or face 'serious consequences'.
There was a background to this ultimatum, which was given when India was prosecuting war against Pakistan in Jammu and Kashmir and Punjab on a full scale. From September 1964, China intermittently charged India with building military structures on and across the Sikkim border.
The documents show that on October 4, 1964, China claimed that up to August 1964, Indian troops built up to 18 aggressive military structures (dugouts, shelters, bulwarks, etc.) on the Chinese side of the Nathu La pass or the boundary line (11 on the Chinese side and seven on the boundary line).
On January 3, 1965, China amplified and updated its charges to 31 structures, all within 5 km of the Natu La. This, in turn, was increased to 50 'aggressive structures and posted guards' by January 18, 1965. China's subsequent note of July 29, 1965, noted that New Delhi failed to dismantle the alleged structures as 'urged' by it.
Indian officials steadfastly denied all of the Chinese charges concerning the Sikkim border. India noted that the accusations were intentional fabrications designed to justify renewed Chinese military advances in the area.
The Chinese note, however, raised grave concern in New Delhi. 'The Chumbi valley is the best invasion route into India and a successful Chinese attack through it could carry into East Pakistan, thus isolating the Indian forces in Assam to the East. Although the Chinese are not specifically threatening such an attack, the Indians are prone to over-reaction, and the mere implication of an attack in this sensitive area confronts them with the dilemma of reinforcing their already sizeable forces in the area by drawing forces away from the Pakistan frontier, or taking the chance that any Chinese action will be limited in scope and pose no serious threat,' a CIA document noted.
It further said the immediate Indian reaction to the Chinese ultimatum was likely to be an urgent appeal for assurances from the US, the United Kingdom and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR). Should military action actually materialise, the Indian pleas for direct assistance, especially from the US, would become desperate, it added.
The declassified documents also contained remarks attributed to General Sam Manekshaw, then General Officer Commanding in Chief, Eastern Command, dated September 19, 1965.
'(1) North Sikkim:
No evidence of a significant Chinese buildup or activity north of the northern Sikkin border is known to him.
(2) Chumbi Valley:
Beginning September 17, small groups of Chinese soldiers began approaching Indian border control posts at Natu La and Jelep La. Numbers increased through the morning to high at noon of about one battalion (800 Chinese troops). Most come no closer than 100 yards although a small group came within two feet of Indian sentries at the border. They withdrew last night and are engaging in a similar build up this morning. The Chinese have three regiments in the Chumbi Valley.
(3) Bhutan:
There were no unusual Chinese movements north of the Bhutan border.
(4) NEFA:
There was no notable Chinese troop action as yet on the NEFA borders. Possible exception is in area of Rima where he said the Chinese have division strength immediately available.
(5) Ladakh:
He said that as a former corps commander in Ladakh he would consider Chinese military action in the Demchok area unlikely because of the strength of the Indian forces in the Indus Valley.'
While the Chinese threats failed to impact immediate military operations conducted on the western front, they did succeed in tying up a considerable number of troops in the east, which otherwise could have been moved to the west and given India a significant numerical and material advantage.
In fact, China continued to create trouble in the weeks after the ceasefire with Pakistan. The US archives contain the text of an aide memoire of then Indian Foreign Secretary C S Jha to the US Ambassador dated November 29, 1965.
The Foreign Secretary (FS) notes that on November 13, 1965, there was a serious incursion across the Dongchui la in Sikkim, resulting in the death of one Indian soldier.
'During the last few days the intrusions on the Sikkim border have become almost a daily occurrence. In the Western Sector the Chinese troops have practically re-militarised the 20 km demilitarised zone thereby violating the Colombo Proposals as well as China's own unilateral declaration,' the FS said.
These Chinese actions were clearly done to help Pakistan by keeping the Sino-Indian border aflame so as to put pressure on India not to proceed further against Pakistan, the note said.
In Ladakh, at certain points, the Chinese crossed the LAC and intruded into undisputed Indian territory like Tsaskur and Track Junction at Daulet Beg Oldi.
It is worth noting that the Chinese face-off in Ladakh began in 2020, barely a year after the Indian air strikes in Pakistan after the 2019 Pulwama terror attack. Thus, it is likely that in the present instance, too, the Chinese are unlikely to maintain a silent posture and will attempt to intimidate Indian positions all along the LAC to relieve pressure on Pakistan.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US Reaffirms Strong Support To India In Fight Against Terrorism: State Department
US Reaffirms Strong Support To India In Fight Against Terrorism: State Department

News18

time20 minutes ago

  • News18

US Reaffirms Strong Support To India In Fight Against Terrorism: State Department

Last Updated: The multi-party delegation led by Congress MP Shashi Tharoor met the US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau last week in Washington. The US reaffirmed its strong support for India's fight against terrorism and the bilateral strategic partnership during the visit of an Indian all-party parliamentary delegation last week, the State Department said. The multi-party delegation led by Congress MP Shashi Tharoor met the US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau last week in Washington. State Department Spokesperson Tammy Bruce said at a press briefing on Tuesday that Landau reaffirmed the US' strong support to India in the fight against terrorism and the strategic partnership between the two countries. The delegation visited the US as part of the government's global outreach efforts after Operation Sindoor. India launched the operation in retaliation to the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack that claimed 26 lives. Responding to a question, Bruce said that a Pakistani parliamentary delegation led by Bilawal Bhutto Zardari met officials of the State Department, including Under Secretary for Political Affairs Allison Hooker, during its visit to Washington last week. Hooker reiterated the US support for the ongoing cessation of on-ground hostilities '– as you might imagine, thank God – between India and Pakistan", Bruce said, adding that they also discussed important issues about the US-Pakistan bilateral relationship, including counterterrorism cooperation. 'So that meeting occurred." When asked if the US received any assurance from Pakistan that it will take action against terrorists, Bruce said she was not going to discuss the details of those conversations. In response to a question on President Donald Trump offering to 'mediate" on the issue of Kashmir, Bruce said, 'Well, I – obviously, I can't speak to what's on the mind or the plans of the President. What I do know is that I think we all recognise that President Trump in each step that he takes, it's made to solve generational differences between countries, generational war." Bruce added that it should not 'surprise" anyone that he would want to 'manage" something like that. 'So, while I can't speak to his plans, the world knows his nature, and I can't speak to any details of what he might have in that regard…But it is an exciting time that if we can get to a point in that particular conflict..," Bruce said adding that it is a 'very interesting time." India has rejected any mediation related to the dispute on Jammu and Kashmir with Pakistan and maintains that Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh are and will always remain an 'integral" part of the country. (This story has not been edited by News18 staff and is published from a syndicated news agency feed - PTI)

India's global outreach: 'Strong support' - US on fight against Pakistan-backed terrorism
India's global outreach: 'Strong support' - US on fight against Pakistan-backed terrorism

Time of India

time27 minutes ago

  • Time of India

India's global outreach: 'Strong support' - US on fight against Pakistan-backed terrorism

The United States reaffirmed its strong support for India in the fight against terrorism and the strategic partnership between the two countries. The delegation, with Congress MP Shashi Tharoor at its helm, held discussions with US deputy secretary of state Christopher Landau in Washington last week. While addressing Tuesday's press briefing, state department spokesperson Tammy Bruce confirmed that Landau emphasised America's firm support for India's anti-terrorism initiatives against the terrorism. "Deputy Secretary Landau met with the Indian parliamentary delegation last week, and he also reaffirmed the United States strong support of India in the fight against terrorism, and strategic partnership between those two countries," Bruce said. The delegation's US visit was part of the government's worldwide diplomatic initiative following Operation Sindoor, which India initiated in response to the April 22 Pahalgam terrorist incident that resulted in 26 casualties. Bruce noted that a Pakistani parliamentary group led by Bilawal Bhutto Zardari engaged with State Department officials, including Under Secretary for Political Affairs Allison Hooker, during their Washington visit last week. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like "I Had A Dad Bod - Until I Did This' Apex Labs Undo Hooker emphasised US support for the current pause in ground conflicts "– as you might imagine, thank God – between India and Pakistan", Bruce stated, noting discussions also covered key US-Pakistan bilateral matters, including anti-terrorism collaboration. "So that meeting occurred." When questioned about Pakistani assurances regarding action against terrorists, Bruce declined to elaborate on the conversation details. Although India had declined that US brokered the mediation between New Delhi and Islamabad, the United States President continued to claim that he did that. Regarding President Donald Trump's Kashmir mediation offer, Bruce stated, "Well, I – obviously, I can't speak to what's on the mind or the plans of the President. What I do know is that I think we all recognise that President Trump in each step that he takes, it's made to solve generational differences between countries, generational war." Bruce suggested it was unsurprising that he would want to "manage" such situations. "So, while I can't speak to his plans, the world knows his nature, and I can't speak to any details of what he might have in that regard. You can call the White House. I have a feeling they would have plenty to say. But it is an exciting time that if we can get to a point in that particular conflict, thank God but also thank Secretary Rubio and President Trump and the Vice President. It is – it's a very interesting time. And so it's – every day brings something new, and I hope perhaps something like that can also get resolved before the President. "

Will PM agree to have full debate in Parliament on countrys post-Pahalgam security, asks Congress
Will PM agree to have full debate in Parliament on countrys post-Pahalgam security, asks Congress

The Hindu

time27 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

Will PM agree to have full debate in Parliament on countrys post-Pahalgam security, asks Congress

The Congress on Wednesday (June 11, 2025) asked whether Prime Minister Narendra Modi, having met the members of the seven parliamentary delegations that were sent abroad, will now agree to have a full debate in the monsoon session of Parliament on the country's post-Pahalgam security and foreign policy challenges. The Opposition party also asked whether PM Modi will at least chair a meeting or a set of meetings of leaders of all political parties and take them into confidence on India's future strategy vis-a-vis both China and Pakistan. PM Modi on Tuesday (June 10, 2025) hosted the members of the multi-party delegations, comprising parliamentarians and former diplomats, who travelled to various world capitals over the past few weeks to convey India's message on the need to eradicate the menace of terrorism following the Pahalgam attack and Operation Sindoor. In a post on X, Congress general secretary in charge of communications Jairam Ramesh said now that the PM has himself met with the members of the seven parliamentary delegations that had been sent to various countries, will he at least now chair a meeting or a set of meetings of leaders of all political parties and take them into confidence on India's future strategy vis-à-vis both China and Pakistan and the strategic implications of the CDS' revelations in Singapore. His remarks were in reference to the comments made by Chief of Defence Staff (CDS) Gen Anil Chauhan in Singapore recently that India rectified tactics and hit deep inside Pakistani territory after suffering losses of aircraft in the recent military clashes with Pakistan. He had also dismissed as 'absolutely incorrect' Islamabad's claim of downing six Indian jets. Mr. Ramesh also asked if the PM will agree to have a full debate in the forthcoming monsoon session of Parliament on the country's post-Pahalgam security and foreign policy challenges since the request of the INDIA bloc parties for a special session has been most unfortunately rejected. Now that the PM has himself met with the members of the seven Parliamentary delegations that had been sent to 32 countries, will he at least now - 1. Chair a meeting or a set of meetings of LEADERS of all political parties and take them into confidence on India's future strategy… — Jairam Ramesh (@Jairam_Ramesh) June 11, 2025 He further asked whether the PM will redouble efforts to bring the Pahalgam terrorists, who were reportedly involved in three earlier terror attacks in Poonch (December 2023), and Gagangir and Gulmarg (2024), to justice. Mr. Ramesh also asked whether a group of experts like the Kargil Review Committee, which was chaired by the External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar's father K. Subrahmanyam, will be set up to analyse Operation Sindoor in detail and give its recommendations on the future of warfare, including emerging military platforms and technologies, and building national capacities for strategic communications in crisis. 'Will the report — after suitable redactions — be placed in Parliament like the report of the Kargil Review Committee was in Feb 2000?' Mr. Ramesh said. Also read: Will Modi government conduct Kargil Review Committee-type exercise on Pahalgam, asks Congress The Government had sent the multi-party delegations to convey a message of national unity in the fight against terrorism, with the likes of Congress MP Shashi Tharoor and AIMIM MP Asaduddin Owaisi joining the ruling alliance members in championing the Indian cause abroad. Prominent former parliamentarians in the delegations included ex-Union Ministers Ghulam Nabi Azad and Salman Khurshid. The Congress has also been urging the government to clarify U.S. President Donald Trump's claims about brokering a ceasefire between India and Pakistan and object to his hyphenation of India and Pakistan. The Government has maintained that issues between India and Pakistan will be resolved bilaterally and without any third-party intervention.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store