New Zealand faces heat for tourism ad targeting Australians: ‘Sounds like we're in a clearance bin'
A New Zealand tourism campaign targeting Australian tourists is facing backlash for its blunt wording, with critics likening it to a clearance sale.
The NZD$500,000 (£227,742) campaign features the slogan 'Everyone Must Go' as a way to create urgency for Australian tourists to visit the country. However, critics, including Labour MP Cushla Tangaere-Manuel, have questioned the slogan's quality and cost.
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and tourism minister Louise Upston launched the campaign on Sunday, set to run across Australian airwaves and social media for about a month starting this week.
'What this Tourism New Zealand campaign says to our Aussie mates is that we're open for business, there are some great deals on, and we'd love to see you soon,' Ms Upston said.
Tourism New Zealand's CEO René de Monchy said the campaign was designed to create a sense of urgency for Australians – New Zealand's only short-haul market – to visit.
Authorities claimed the campaign would increase Australian visitor numbers from the current 88 per cent of pre-Covid levels to 93 per cent.
'The number of Australian arrivals in New Zealand increased by more than 90,000, up from 1.27 million to 1.36 million over the past year, but we know there's more room to grow,' Ms Upston said.
However, the tagline 'Everyone Must Go', paired with photographs of people sightseeing, quickly became the target of mockery in New Zealand, with opposition politicians and social media users comparing it to a clearance sale ad, a marketing campaign for the apocalypse, or a frantic plea for bathroom access.
Labour's tourism and hospitality spokesperson, Ms Tangaere-Manuel, said while the party supported the goal of growing the tourism industry, the government's initiative lacked long-term vision.
'The theme with the policies that have been rolling out across the board recently seem a bit knee-jerk to me,' she said.
'We need to be looking at how we leverage our amazing country and safeguard it as well.
'We've had the digital nomad announcement, now we've got this – and the attitude of anyone, anytime, anywhere, is concerning,' she said.
She was quoted as saying by RNZ: 'If we bring people and our infrastructure can't handle them, they're going to have a poor experience, and then they're going to take that messaging back to ... whichever part of the world they come from.'
Ms Tangaere-Manuel also expressed concern over the message conveyed by the 'Everyone Must Go' slogan, stating that when she first heard it, she thought, 'surely not'.
'I mean, it makes New Zealand sound like we're in a clearance bin at a sale ... the irony of that messaging is, that's how Aotearoa New Zealanders are feeling right now. There's been so many cuts, so people feel like 'well, what's not on the list of cuts'.' Aotearoa is the Māori name for New Zealand.
Green Party tourism spokesperson Celia Wade-Brown saw other connotations in the slogan. 'I think 'Everyone Must Go' might refer to the need for toilets in some of our high-tourist spots. I mean, the queues are ridiculous.
'I was up in Paihia for Waitangi, and people were saying when the cruise ship comes in it doesn't really benefit many tourism operators, because too many people here for too short a time.
'They don't go kayaking, they don't go diving, but, my goodness, they queue at the toilets.'
Launching the campaign, Mr Luxon said: 'Our job… is to make sure we get New Zealand to the top of the bucket list' for Australians.
'My message to Australians is it's time to swap thongs for jandals.'
Ms Upston said: 'We always love to see our Australian friends holidaying here… soaking up the great Kiwi experiences.'
But many New Zealanders mocked the messaging. One person joked that the slogan could be a subtle jab at the Australian government 's stance on deporting criminals who have ties with New Zealand. He said: 'Surely 'Everyone Must Go' is a subtle dig at the Australian government's intransigence concerning 501 deportees.'
Another person said: 'Can't believe that slogan cost half a million dollars. Is that the best our tourism can offer?'
Another noted: 'If I was in a [government] seeing record emigration I simply would not pick 'everyone must go' as a slogan.'
One X user wrote: 'How embarrassing. National and Co have made us look pathetic on the world stage. What a comedown from (Jacinda) Ardern's leadership.'
Others pointed out record emigration numbers. According to data from Statistics New Zealand, 131,200 people left New Zealand last year in the first half of the year, the highest number on record. One observer commented on X about the 'Everyone Must Go' campaign: 'Already a highly successful campaign: Tens of thousands of Kiwis have already gone.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
33 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Tricks to keep FULL £300 winter fuel allowance: JEFF PRESTRIDGE's guide to Labour's U-turn
What a bugger's muddle.' That is the term my late mother would have used to describe Labour's decision on Monday to unravel last year's clampdown on winter fuel payments to pensioners. And it is a phrase that keeps crashing into my mind as I get to grips with the financial mechanics behind Labour's decision to rip up last year's rules governing who does and who doesn't get the payment – and start all over again.
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Tottenham set deadline to appoint Thomas Frank as £10m talks progress rapidly
Tottenham Hotspur sacked Ange Postecoglou after his second season in charge of the club and are pushing to appoint Brentford boss Thomas Frank as the new coach in the coming days Tottenham are nearing an agreement with Brentford over Thomas Frank and could appoint the Bees boss as their new head coach in time for the weekend. Spurs quickly turned to Frank as their preferred candidate after sacking Ange Postecoglou last week. The north Londoners parted ways with the Australian coach despite winning the Europa League after a sub-par 17th place finish in the Premier League. And Daniel Levy looks to have taken a change in tact by looking to appoint Frank, who is deemed as a more pragmatic option. The move is set to cost Tottenham £10million but Frank could be confirmed as the club's new boss within the next 48 hours such is the positive feelings around negotiations, according to the BBC. There is will from both parties to get a deal finalised quickly. It is said new Spurs chief Vinai Venkatesham, previously of Arsenal, has been a key figure in the process alongside Levy. Venkatesham only started work at the club just over a week ago. And the positive talks are set to be tied up soon. Having said that, the £10m compensation cost could rise depending on how many members of backroom staff Frank looks to bring with him to north London. One such figure Spurs already said to be in talks over is assistant Justin Cochrane. Discussions are underway over Frank's backroom team with Cochrane's arrival particularly apt after he started his coaching career with the Europa League winners. Cochrane was previously touted as being in contention to succeed Frank at Brentford. Frank himself moved up from an assistant role under Dean Smith to take the job. The 51-year-old Dane is already thinking about the new squad that awaits him and set out a task for his future employers. Frank would like to see Brentford star Bryan Mbeumo join him across London. The Cameroon international, who scored 20 goals in 2024/25, is a target for Manchester United. The 25-year-old has already indicated his willingness to make the move to Old Trafford with a significant pay increase. Brentford want to bring in £60m for the signature of their star, who has also drawn interest from Newcastle United. And perhaps Frank's exit could provide a complicating factor. Ex-Manchester United goalkeeper Ben Foster reckons the forward will be better served following his coach across London. "I would say that if you want to be part of something that's going to make you a better footballer and work hard and be part of a team, then go to Spurs with Thomas Frank," the ex- Wrexham shot-stopper said on his Fozcast podcast. "If you are happy picking up your wages knowing that there's going to be an awful lot more pressure, a lot more eyes on you, a lot more judgement and failure is just part of what they do, then you'd go to Manchester United." Join our new WhatsApp community and receive your daily dose of Mirror Football content. We also treat our commgunity members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
EUAN McCOLM: Farage has tickled the tummies of Nationalist voters. He won't win the next election...but he may end SNP's reign
Reform leader Nigel Farage was supposed to be the perfect bogeyman. As last week's Hamilton, Larkhall, and Stonehouse by-election drew closer, First Minister John Swinney implored voters to back the SNP if they wished to keep Mr Farage's brand of politics out of Holyrood. A vote for Labour, said Mr Swinney, would hand the constituency to Reform. In the end, it was Labour's Davy Russell who took the seat, made vacant by the untimely death of sitting nationalist MSP Christina McKelvie, nudging the SNP's Katy Loudon into second. Reform's Ross Lambie came a very close third. Mr Swinney's claim that the by-election was a two horse race between his and Mr Farage's parties could not have been more wrong. Within minutes of last week's result being declared, the briefing against the First Minister was in full swing. SNP insiders muttered darkly about strategic errors and poor campaigning. Former SNP health secretary Alex Neil was among senior nationalists calling for Mr Swinney to go. The result, said Mr Neil, showed the current SNP leadership needed to be replaced, urgently. Political leadership requires the ability to be bullish in the face of disaster, something which Mr Swinney attempted during a SKY News interview. Speaking on Sunday Morning With Trevor Philips, the First Minister said, if current polls were to be believed, the SNP was on course to win its fifth consecutive Holyrood election next year and to remain - 'by a country mile' - the largest party at Holyrood. Snarkier sorts than me might be tempted to point out that, before voting opened last Thursday morning, Mr Swinney reckoned current polls showed Labour hadn't a hope of winning in Lanarkshire. It is routine for politicians, when confronted with polling that looks bad for them, to declare that the only poll that counts takes place on election day. Surveys, they say, are nothing more than a snapshot of a moment in time. With this in mind, perhaps the First Minister should spend less time focusing on opinion polls and more examining last Thursday's result. The numbers make for fascinating - and surprising - reading. Mr Swinney has expended considerable effort over recent months attempting to build the case that Nigel Farage's politics is anathema to Scots. His disruptive approach is cruel and unfeeling while we prefer something more compassionate, more progressive, more downright baby-boxy. Even a cursory glance at last week's result shows many take a different view. In fact, the numbers show a substantial number of Scots are more than happy to vote for Mr Farage's party. Reform won 26.1 per cent of the vote in Hamilton, Larkhall, and Stonehouse last week. Not bad for a party contesting a seat for the first time. Unsurprisingly, much of Reform's support came from people who had previously backed the Tories. But a drop of 11.5 per cent in the Conservative vote, compared with the result of the 2021 election, doesn't account for the level of support achieved by Mr Farage's party. It must, then, have been disillusioned former Labour voters who got behind Reform, mustn't it? It would certainly suit Mr Swinney for that to be so but a drop of just two per cent in Labour's support doesn't make up the shortfall. What does balance the books is the fall in support for the SNP. Last week, the nationalists' vote share plummeted by 16.8 per cent. Add that to the Tory and Labour losses and the Reform result is explained. It would appear that Nigel Farage is able to tickle the tummies of voters who previously sought to express their disillusionment with 'the establishment' by voting SNP. If this is so - and some Scottish nationalist politicians believe it to be - then the chances of another Scottish Parliamentary election victory have slimmed down. As the 2014 referendum campaign kicked off, support among Scots for the break-up of the United Kingdom sat at below 30 per cent. These voters - die hard nationalists - were of the 'independence at any cost' variety. Nothing could have shaken the belief of those voters that Scotland should stand alone. During the referendum campaign, support for independence rocketed. No, the Yes campaign didn't prevail but it took 45 per cent of the vote, a result which emboldened the SNP to believe it was just a matter of time until its separatist dream came true. But were the new converts to the independence cause true believers whose loyalty would remain unshakeable? Doesn't look like it, does it? Eleven years ago, then SNP leader Alex Salmond enthusiastically fomented great anger among a section of the electorate. He encouraged the belief that a distant political elite had abandoned ordinary voters and - to an extent - he did so very successfully, indeed. For some, a Yes vote was less about self-determination than it was about furious rejection of the status quo. And, so long as 'Indyref2' was being denied by big bad Westminster, those supporters looked like they'd stick by the SNP. These days, even John Swinney accepts there will be no second referendum any time soon. That reality makes the SNP offer less appealing to the hacked-off voter who wishes to 'shake things up'. The more self-aware among the upper echelons of the SNP know that the same dissatisfaction which boosted the independence cause in 2014 also drives support for Reform. Understandably, senior SNP figures take succour from a recent poll by Norstat which revealed that - once undecideds are removed - support for Scottish independence sits at 54 per cent, with just 46 per cent in favour of maintenance of the United Kingdom. Surely such a result shows the independence dream is very much alive? Well, up to a point, Lord Copper. One SNP source cautions colleagues against agitating for a second referendum, now, on the grounds both that the party - and wider independence movement - is unprepared and that support for breaking up the UK is not concrete. 'In the last few years,' said the party insider, 'we've seen polls which say people are in flavour of a second referendum and lots of our people get very excited. The thing is, though, that when you get down into the detail, it's usually been the case that people would be happy to see a second referendum at some vague point in the future which means we're just stuck in a time-loop where a referendum is always in sight but always out of reach.' The SNP moved from the fringes of Scottish politics to become the dominant party by persuading a substantial number of voters that it was an insurgent, anti-establishment force. After almost 20 years in government, the SNP is very much part of the establishment and that makes it vulnerable to the sort of attacks it once launched on Scottish Labour. Nigel Farage's Reform won't win next year's Holyrood election but the result in Hamilton, Larkhall, and Stonehouse suggests it could help end the SNP's reign.
