1.7 million eggs recalled across 9 states after salmonella outbreak
As of June 6, 2025, at least 79 people across 7 states have gotten sick—and 21 were hospitalized. If you bought brown cage-free or organic eggs from Walmart, FoodMaxx, Save Mart, or other retailers, check the carton codes to see if yours are part of the recall.
Related: Check your fridge: Cucumber recall hits 15 states after salmonella outbreak
The recall affects brown cage-free and certified organic eggs distributed by August Egg Company, based in Hilmar, CA.
These eggs may be sold under the following brand names:Clover, First Street, Nulaid, O Organics, Marketside, Raleys, Simple Truth, Sun Harvest, Sunnyside.
Sold at:Walmart, Save Mart, FoodMaxx, Lucky, Smart & Final, Safeway, Raleys, Food 4 Less, Ralphs, and others.
Here's how to identify recalled eggs:
Look for a Julian date between 32 and 126.
Followed by plant codes: P-6562 or CA-5330.
These codes are printed on the side of the carton (fiber or plastic).
Sell-by dates range from March 4 to June 19, 2025.
Item Name
Plant Number
Carton UPC
Clover Large Brown Organic 12 eggs
P-6562 or CA-5330
070852010427
First Street Large Brown Cage Free Loose 1 case = 150 eggs
P-6562 or CA-5330
041512039638
Nulaid Medium Brown Cage Free 12 eggs
P-6562 or CA-5330
071230021042
Nulaid Jumbo Brown Cage Free 12 eggs
P-6562 or CA-5330
071230021011
O Organics Cage Free Large Brown 6 eggs
P-6562 or CA-5330
079893401522
O Organics Large Brown 12 eggs
P-6562 or CA-5330
079893401508
O Organics Large Brown 18 eggs
P-6562 or CA-5330
079893401546
Marketside Large Cage Free Brown Organic 12 eggs
P-6562 or CA-5330
681131122771
Marketside Large Cage Free Brown Organic 18 eggs
P-6562 or CA-5330
681131122801
Marketside Large Brown Cage Free 12 eggs
P-6562 or CA-5330
681131122764
Marketside Large Brown Cage Free 18 eggs
P-6562 or CA-5330
681131122795
Raleys Large Brown Cage Free 12 eggs
P-6562 or CA-5330
046567033310
Raleys Large Brown Cage Free 18 eggs
P-6562 or CA-5330
046567040325
Raleys Organic Large Brown Organic 12 eggs
P-6562 or CA-5330
046567028798
Raleys Organic Large Brown Organic 18 eggs
P-6562 or CA-5330
046567040295
Simple Truth Medium Brown Cage Free 18 eggs
P-6562 or CA-5330
011110099327
Simple Truth Large Brown Cage Free 18 eggs
P-6562 or CA-5330
011110873743
Sun Harvest Cage Free Large Brown Organic 12 eggs
P-6562 or CA-5330
041512131950
Sun Harvest Cage Free Large Brown Organic 18 eggs
P-6562 or CA-5330
041512145162
Sunnyside Large Brown Cage Free 12 eggs
P-6562 or CA-5330
717544211747
Sunnyside Large Brown Cage Free 18 eggs
P-6562 or CA-5330
717544211754
Sunnyside Cage Free Large Brown Organic 12 eggs
P-6562 or CA-5330
717544201441
Sunnyside Cage Free Large Brown Organic 18 eggs
P-6562 or CA-5330
717544211761
Loose Small Brown Cage Free – 1 box = 6 flats (1 flat = 30 eggs)
P-6562 or CA-5330
NA
Loose Medium Brown Cage Free – 1 box = 6 flats (1 flat = 30 eggs)
P-6562 or CA-5330
NA
Loose Medium Brown Organic – 1 box = 6 flats (1 flat = 30 eggs)
P-6562 or CA-5330
NA
Loose Large Brown Organic – 1 box = 6 flats (1 flat = 30 eggs)
P-6562 or CA-5330
NA
Loose Jumbo Brown Cage Free – 1 box = 5 flats (1 flat = 20 eggs)
P-6562 or CA-5330
NA
Loose Jumbo Brown Organic – 1 box = 5 flats (1 flat = 20 eggs)
P-6562 or CA-5330
NA
Recalled eggs were distributed in nine states:
Arizona, California, Illinois, Indiana, Nebraska, New Mexico, Nevada, Washington, and Wyoming
Confirmed salmonella cases have been reported in:Arizona, California, Kentucky, Nebraska, New Jersey, Nevada, and Washington
The FDA is still investigating, so more locations may be added.
Related: CPSC recalls Amazon faucets over lead exposure risk to babies, kids, and pregnant women
Illnesses started as early as February 24, 2025, and continued through May 17, 2025. Of those who became ill:
27 of 30 reported eating eggs or egg-containing dishes.
21 people were hospitalized.
No deaths have been reported.
FDA traceback efforts identified August Egg Company as the common supplier. Environmental testing confirmed Salmonella Enteritidis contamination at their processing facility.
Salmonella can cause serious illness—especially in:
Children under 5.
Older adults.
People with weakened immune systems.
Diarrhea (sometimes bloody).
Fever over 102°F.
headaches.
Stomach cramps.
Dehydration (dry mouth, dizziness, fewer wet diapers).
Symptoms usually appear 12 to 72 hours after exposure and last 4 to 7 days.
Call your doctor or pediatrician right away if you notice any of these signs in your child or yourself.
Do not eat the eggs.If you spot the recalled codes (P-6562 or CA-5330) or are unsure of origin, throw them out or return them for a refund.
Sanitize thoroughly.Wash any surfaces, containers, utensils, or dishes that may have come into contact with the eggs using hot, soapy water or a dishwasher.
Wash hands before and after handling eggs.Even small traces of contamination can spread in your kitchen if not cleaned properly.
Meal prep is already stressful. Discovering a recall on something as basic as eggs? It's enough to make any parent feel overwhelmed.
But this isn't about blame—it's about staying informed and acting quickly. The good news? Most people recover fully from salmonella, and awareness is your best defense.
If you've served eggs recently and your child seems fine, take a deep breath. But if you do notice symptoms—or can't confirm your eggs are safe—it's OK to toss them. Your peace of mind matters too.
Bookmark the FDA's official recall page here.Share this post with other caregivers, especially in affected states.
Sources:
Salmonella outbreak. June 2025. CDC. Salmonella Outbreak Linked to Eggs.
Salmonella outbreak. June 2025. FDA. Outbreak Investigation of Salmonella: Eggs (June 2025).
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hamilton Spectator
2 days ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Residents push back against proposed cell tower
A resident is petitioning the City of Brandon to change cellphone-tower policies after learning a 35-metre tower has been proposed next to his home in the Centennial area. Chris Bird is pushing the city to oppose the tower proposal at 1009 34th St. and to set a policy directing all future towers to be at least 100 metres away from homes. He has spent two weeks collecting signatures and said he is doing it out of concern for his children. 'I don't want to grow old in this house and find out, 'Oh, that's been messing up my sons' development,'' he told the Sun. 'That's why I feel so strongly about it.' Bird and his wife are raising two boys, ages one and six, in their home that sits about 70 metres from the site of the proposed tower. His petition comes as city staff are reviewing Brandon's cell-tower policy, a staff member told the Sun. Bird, who lost a leg in a car crash, said he is worried about losing his investment in his 'forever home.' He and his wife bought the home in 2022 and spent roughly $40,000 to make it accessible, modifying stairs so he can use them on crutches, levelling the yard to make it flatter and changing the floors of the home to be stickier. But Bird said he is primarily concerned about his sons' health. He cited a 2021 report for the European Parliament that says the technologies planned for across the street 'are probably carcinogenic for humans' and 'clearly affect male fertility and possibly female fertility.' The concerns are not recognized in Canada, however. The safety code that applies to 5G in Canada asserts that the 'vast majority of research to date does not support a link between radiofrequency EMF exposure and cancers in humans.' The code, called Safety Code 6, says the technology proposed for the 34th Street is safe, but adds additional research is warranted about ties to cancer. The page does not discuss fertility. Since receiving a letter in the mail informing him of the tower proposal, Bird has knocked on 24 doors looking to get signatures from affected residents. On crutches, he has so far gathered signatures from 14 households, with several people not at home when he called. On a separate petition, he gathered 144 signatures to change Brandon's policies. The goal is to keep towers at a safer distance from houses. If his efforts fail and the tower is approved, he said, he and his wife will consider selling their home. The tower is being proposed because a wireless carrier company will need to take its equipment down from an existing tower in Brandon, the tower applicant told the Sun. Price Leurebourg of Shared Tower Inc. said his client, the carrier, is looking for a new tower in the area for its equipment. 'This follows the termination of a co-location agreement on an existing nearby tower, creating a need for new infrastructure to maintain service levels and avoid disruptions,' he wrote in an email. Bird has written to council asking for Brandon to adopt a policy similar to cities like Winnipeg. The preferred location in Manitoba's capital city is equal to three times the height of the tower, which would be 105 metres in this case. The nearest home on 34th Street would be about 35 metres away from the base of the tower. When asked to comment, Coun. Barry Cullen, whose Ward 3 area includes Bird's residence, wouldn't say whether he supported the ongoing petition. But Cullen said generally that Brandon should try to keep its tower count low by having companies put equipment on the same tower. Residents have until July 27 to submit letters of support or opposition. The information will be forwarded to the city to review before a decision is made. To apply for the tower, Shared Tower Inc. was required to place an advertisement in the local newspaper, post notices on the site and send notification packages to residences within 100 metres of the site. The notices added up to about 31 residences. In a letter of protest to council, resident Scott Third complained that Brandon appears to be playing 'musical towers, continously trying to place this unwanted structure in residential areas.' He highlighted that a tower proposal for nearby Durum Drive had been rejected earlier this year. The protocols in Brandon are lacking, Third said, adding that Shared Tower should have to install larger signage on the property and notify residents far beyond 100 metres. 'The extremely limited amount of contact they were required to make is an embarrassment and infringement on the people in our neighbourhood,' he wrote. He said there are already five towers within two and a half kilometres of the proposed tower. 'We as residents of this city should not have to be continuously opposing the building of a massive tower in and around our established neighbourhoods.' City planner Sonikile Tembo told the Sun that after the Durum Drive tower was cancelled, the applicant searched for new locations and decided on the 34th Street site. It poses less of an impact in terms of nearby houses, because it is near a railroad and a drainage area, she said. With fewer homes in the area than the previous location, the tower proposal does not need to go before council but can go through city staff, as it is ranked as a 'medium visual impact,' she said. The city's recommendation outlining its support or objection would be used by the federal government to inform a final decision on the application. If staff find there is a need for more engagement, the process can be handed over to council, which would weigh in on the application, Coun. Shaun Cameron (Ward 4) told the Sun. When asked about Brandon's policy, Tembo said there are no guidelines for minimum distances of towers from homes. She said that policy is under review. The federal government has the final say on where towers are located. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Should You Sunscreen Your Cat?
The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here. For all of the eons that animal life has existed on Earth, the sun has been there too. And for all of those eons, animal life has had only one solution for intense exposure to the sun: evolution. Some creatures have thick, dark skin that's resistant to UV harm; others sprout fur, scales, or feathers that block the sun's rays. Many fish, reptiles, amphibians, and birds may produce a compound that protects their cells against the sun's damaging effects. Hippos, weirdly, ooze a reddish, mucus-y liquid from their pores that absorbs light before it can destroy their skin. And plenty of creatures have evolved behaviors that take advantage of their environment—rolling around in dirt or mud, simply retreating into the shade. But certain modern animals have sun problems that natural selection can't easily solve. Some reside at zoos that can't perfectly replicate their habitat; others live at latitudes that their ancestors didn't experience. Others spend too much time sunbathing in a living-room window, or sport sparse or light-colored fur or hair because their domesticators liked the way it looked. For these animals, people have come up with a shorter-term solution: sunscreen. If, that is, a creature is willing to accept the treatment. Indu, an Asian elephant who lived at the Phoenix Zoo, was game. A few years ago, Heather Wright, one of the zookeepers, noticed the tops of Indu's ears pinking, peeling, and flaking in the summer heat, much like her human keepers' did. So her caretakers picked up some zinc-oxide-based sunblock—specially formulated for sensitive (human) skin—and dabbed it on the elephant. Indu, to be fair, was used to a level of care most wild animals don't enjoy. 'We had already been applying lotion,' to manage dryness, Wright told me. The elephant knew the drill: Once in the barn, she'd lumber up to a window with an opening for her ear and stick the appendage through. As far as zoo staff members could tell, the treatment helped. 'There's nothing magical' about other animals' skin, Leslie Easterwood, a large-animal veterinarian at Texas A&M University, told me: Bake it in the sun, and it will burn. Scientists have spotted whales suffering from sunburns; cats, dogs, horses—even alpacas, turtles, and penguins—can develop all kinds of skin cancers. Pigs, in particular, 'have skin most similar to humans,' Mitchell Song, a veterinary dermatologist based in Arizona told me. At Zoo Miami, keepers have spread mud on older, arthritic wild pigs who can't wallow as well as they did in their youth; they've also applied sunscreen to a babirusa, a species of swine native to Indonesia's forests, and to a Kunekune pig, Gwen Myers, the zoo's chief of animal health, told me. In some sunny places, vets commonly recommend sunscreen for pets and other domesticated creatures, especially light-colored dogs and horses. Steve Valeika, a veterinarian in North Carolina, advises the same for 'white cats that go outside.' This particular conundrum is one of our own making. 'You don't see a lot of white-skinned animals in the wild,' Anthea Schick, a veterinary dermatologist in Arizona, told me. Only thanks to generations of selective breeding have they become a frequent presence in and around people's homes. Of course, to sunscreen your pet, you have to … sunscreen your pet. Some pet owners, vets told me, are definitely flummoxed by the suggestion: 'It's not widely discussed,' Schick told me. Vets are more unified in recommending teeth brushing for cats—and most cat owners still just decide they'd rather not. But some animals would certainly benefit from block: Schick told me she's seen her fair share of badly burned dogs, especially after long bouts of sunbathing that scorch their bellies. 'We see a lot of sun-induced skin cancers that could be avoided,' she said. Pit bulls, Dalmatians, and other short-haired breeds are especially vulnerable; even long-haired white cats are sensitive around their eyes, their nose, and the tips of their ears. And Easterwood estimates that the majority of paint horses, left unprotected, will eventually develop skin issues. Squamous-cell-carcinoma cases make up the majority of her workload: 'I see it every single day,' she said. The vets I spoke with generally agreed: Don't bother with sprays, which a lot of animals find annoying or downright terrifying; reapply often, and well; it is way, way, way harder to sunscreen a cat than a dog, though some brave souls manage it. But although some vets recommended human sunscreens, formulated for kids or sensitive skin, others told me they preferred blends marketed for animals. (The FDA has dubbed just one pet sunscreen, made by a company called Epi-Pet and marketed to dogs and horses, 'FDA compliant'—not the same as FDA approval, which requires rigorous safety testing.) Several warned against zinc oxide, which can be toxic to animals if ingested in large quantities; others felt that zinc oxide was worth the risk, unless administered to a tongue-bathing cat. Regardless of the product they're offered, most animals generally aren't as eager as Indu to subject themselves to a human-led sun-protection ritual. And even she was usually plied with a five-gallon bucket of fruits and vegetables while her keepers tended her ears. At Zoo Miami, keeper Madison Chamizo told me she and her colleagues had to spend months training an okapi—an African mammal closely related to a giraffe—to accept caretakers gently scrubbing sunscreen onto her back with a modified Scotch-Brite dishwand, after she lost some patches of hair on her back to a fungal infection. But for creatures in very sunny parts of the world, the alternatives are, essentially, being cooped up indoors, kept away from windows, or wrestled into full-body sunsuits. (Some dogs don't mind; cats, once again, are unlikely to comply.) And some sun-related problems, sunscreen can't fix. Gary West, the Phoenix Zoo's vet, told me he suspects that UV glare has caused eye inflammation in some of his animals; Myers, in Miami, worries about the sensitive skin around some species' eyes. 'They're not really going to wear sunglasses for us,' Myers told me. So she and her colleagues have started to wonder: 'Gosh, is this an animal that we could put a sun visor on?' Article originally published at The Atlantic Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
7 days ago
- Yahoo
Forgotten 'weeds' prove a culinary hit in Kenya
Once dismissed as wild weeds and a "poor man's food", indigenous leafy vegetables in Kenya are now becoming much more common - grown on farms, sold in markets and gracing the menus of restaurants. At the busy Skinners Restaurant in Gachie just outside the capital, Nairobi, one employee says demand for "kienyeji" - as all local vegetable varieties are known - is higher than for other greens. "Many people ask for kienyeji when they come here," Kimani Ng'ang'a tells the BBC, despite the fact the restaurant charges extra for them as he says they are harder to source. Vegetables like cabbage, spinach, kale and spring greens, introduced by colonial authorities before the 1960s, are more readily available and cheaper. Spring greens are known as "sukumawiki", meaning "stretch the week" in Swahili, reflecting how they have become a daily staple. But diners in Gachie are part of the growing wave of Kenyans who see the benefits of eating local, organically produced nutrient-rich varieties of greens. "It detoxifies the body and is good in weight loss," says James Wathiru, who ordered "managu" - or African nightshade. Another person told me: "It's all about its taste, which is better." According to horticulture professor Mary Abukutsa-Onyango, this trend is reflected in government data and some of the health benefits are backed by research. Over the last 10 years, production of local greens has doubled - with 300,000 tonnes produced by local farmers last year, she says. It is a remarkable change in attitudes, given people used to look down on traditional crops as inferior - not realising they were often more resistant to diseases and pests, meaning they can be grown organically. In the 1980s, when Prof Abukutsa-Onyango began her studies, she says she was perplexed to find them referred to as "weeds". "We never learnt about African indigenous vegetables. They were calling amaranth 'pigweed' [and] spider plant, they were calling it 'spider weed'," she tells the BBC. Her postgraduate research on traditional plants was also tricky as there was no literature about them, but she persevered and now works with the government to promote them for food security. She says managu and other local vegetables like "mrenda" (jute mallow) and "terere" (amaranth) have more essential minerals than sukumawiki, as well as "higher levels of vitamin A and C [and] antioxidants" that boost immunity and reduce the risk of disease. Some varieties also contain protein, making them an excellent option for vegetarians. She notes for instance that 100g (3.5 ounces) of mrenda - known for its distinctive slimy texture when cooked - contains more nutrients than a similar portion of common cabbage. The progress people like Prof Abukutsa-Onyango have made in promoting the diversity and knowledge of indigenous vegetables was acknowledged by Unesco in 2021, when the UN cultural agency commended the East African nation for the "safeguarding of intangible cultural heritage" that had been threatened by "historical factors and the pressures of modern lifestyles". It noted that Kenya had begun a project in 2007 involving scientists and local communities to record an inventory of traditional foods, which now includes 850 indigenous plants and their local names. Some of these vegetables are eaten nationwide, while others are specific to certain areas or communities. But sukumawiki, first introduced to Kenya from the Mediterranean as animal feed, is still favoured by many farmers - with more than 700,000 tonnes produced in 2023 - more than double the volume of all indigenous leafy vegetables combined. Francis Ngiri, who used to farm in Kirinyaga in central Kenya where cabbages are a mainstay crop, explains that this is because, especially during the 1970s, those growing imported leafy vegetables used fertilisers and pesticides that damaged the local biodiversity. Today, he tells the BBC, only the introduced varieties thrive as the soil has become too acidic to support many native species. Determined to do something so they would not be lost forever, Mr Ngiri moved his operation to Kenya's Rift Valley - an area he considers relatively untouched by chemical contamination - so he could practise organic farming of indigenous crops. On a four-acre (1.6 hectare) farm in Elementaita, he began with 14 native varieties in 2016. Today that has grown to 124, many of which he has sourced through seed exchanges with fellow farmers. His farm now draws visitors from across Kenya and neighbouring countries. They come to see how he collaborates with 800 other regional farmers, who also grow organic food for local markets, to preserve and regenerate "forgotten plants", ensuring their genetic diversity is safeguarded for future generations. Nonetheless by swapping seeds, Mr Ngiri and his colleagues are actually breaking the law as the government only allows the planting of certified seeds. This controversial law was introduced in 2012 with the intention of protecting farmers from purchasing poor quality seeds. Wambui Wakahiu, who trains farmers on seed conservation, says such policies do not support efforts to save indigenous crop varieties, as their seeds are not available in farm-supply shops. She works for Seed Savers Network, a non-governmental organisation with 400,000 members, which helps establish seed banks for farmers to safely store and preserve their local seeds. Her team found that more than 35 traditional plant varieties had been "completely lost" in one county alone because of the law. "If [the farmers] focus more on the exotic [foreign] seeds, then the traditional seeds continue going away. And we have seen most of them go extinct," she tells the BBC. Mr Ngiri and others who have been exchanging seeds have not been pursued by the authorities, but he says the law does prevent them from marketing them: "If I can't sell the seed, I don't own it." And getting certification is a rigorous, costly process, as seeds need to be tested in a laboratory for their purity and things like how well they germinate. Dr Peterson Wambugu, a chief research scientist with the national gene bank at the Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization (Kalro), acknowledges that under the current law, the exchanging and sale of uncertified seeds - including those saved by farmers - is criminalised. However, he points out that this is at odds with the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, of which Kenya is a signatory, as it sets out farmers' rights to save, use and exchange their seeds. The national gene bank has been working with other groups to draft regulations through the agriculture ministry to align Kenyan law with the treaty. The proposals, once passed by parliament, will allow farmers to exchange their seeds "without fearing that what they are doing is criminal", he tells the BBC. However, the selling of such seeds would still remain outlawed - something Dr Wambugu knows means the journey to full acceptance of indigenous crops continues. For Priscilla Njeri, a vegetable vendor in the bustling Wangige market in Kiambu county just outside Nairobi, there is no turning back, as she can see first-hand that indigenous greens are now the most popular with her customers - something she puts down to the media campaigns that promote them. "The most preferred are managu, terere and kanzira [African kale] - which is popular for those who have sensitive stomachs as it has no gas," she tells the BBC. "But all the kienyeji greens are good because they have a better taste." You may also be interested in: The Kenyan enthralled by the healing power of plants Kenyan vigilantes taking on avocado gangs The ancient lore of the humble Nigerian yam Jollof Wars: Who does West Africa's iconic rice dish best? Podcast: Africa's forgotten foods Go to for more news from the African continent. Follow us on Twitter @BBCAfrica, on Facebook at BBC Africa or on Instagram at bbcafrica BBC Africa podcasts Africa Daily Focus on Africa
