Is 420 the magic credit score number for a home loan application?
A person's credit score reflected how well they had paid off credit in the past and how likely they were to be able to service their debts in the future.
It takes into account factors like how long you have had credit accounts - that could also include things like power and internet bills - how often you make your payments on time, how much you owe on loans and credit cards, what types of credit you have, how often you ask for credit and any defaults or insolvencies in your history.
There are three different credit bureaux in New Zealand but, for all of them, the lower your score, the poorer your credit rating.
Centrix ranged from zero to 1000.
It said anything below 496 was poor and about 10 percent of the population was in that range. Centrix noted people in this bracket were more likely to be rejected for a loan.
Missed power or phone bills could sometimes impact a person's credit score. (File photo)
Photo:
Shutterstock / Allie Schmitz
People with slightly better scores might get a loan but have extra conditions.
For example, anything below 299 is low and 300 to 499 represented "room for improvement".
David Cunningham, chief executive at mortgage advice firm Squirrel, said about 420 was the level at which banks would draw a line.
"Some people's scores are way lower than expected. The biggest thing we see is missed minimum payments on credit cards over several months.
"One-off has a negligible impact. It's when it becomes a deteriorating trend."
He said people also needed to watch out for power bills and phone bills.
Sometimes a missed payment could affect someone's credit without them realising, for example if they had moved house and not paid a final bill.
But he said banks were generally open to an explanation if people could provide information about how they got into trouble.
Another mortgage adviser, Jeremy Andrews at Key Mortgages, said it was a "blurry line" that borrowers did not want to push too far.
"A score of 400 to 500 trending upward with good recent conduct might be better than a score of 500-plus with recent bounced payments or dishonours, unarranged overdraft fees. Any recent collection steps or agencies having to step in will be much harder to mitigate."
He said other things could be easier to fix or explain.
"Historical events affecting credit scores such as not paying bills on time, or just tipping into arrears, could be a short term problem and easily fixed. But if a borrower has not been paying either financial companies or property related bills such as property rates, on time every time, that can be a much bigger problem to resolve."
Head of Link Advisory Glen McLeod said banks had internal thresholds.
"That said, it's not just about the score itself. Lenders look at the full picture: what kind of credit issues are showing up, how recent they are, and what caused them.
"Life events-like a separation, illness, or unexpected financial hardship-can reflect on your credit score, even if they were temporary. That context matters and can influence how a lender views your application.
"If the credit history is too risky for a mainstream bank, non-bank lenders may still be an option. They tend to be more flexible, though that usually comes with higher interest rates to reflect the added risk."
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
3 hours ago
- RNZ News
Dunedin cafe looks for home gardeners to supply produce
business food 4:24 pm today A Dunedin cafe is looking for keen home gardeners to supply it produce, in a trial backyard to plate project. To begin with Taste Nature hopes to contract four gardeners for 12 months, but would like to continue the scheme longer term. It is all part of the cafe's push to use seasonal produce and know exactly where the ingredients come from. Home gardeners will be paid for what they grow. Managing Director of Taste Nature, Clinton Chambers spoke to Lisa Owen.
RNZ News
4 hours ago
- RNZ News
Future of Nelson Provincial Museum's new storage facility uncertain
Nelson Provincial Museum. Photo: Supplied / Nelson Provincial Museum The future of Nelson Provincial Museum's long-awaited archive storage facility is uncertain after Nelson City Council agreed to publicly consult on whether to spend $3 million it already allocated to the project, now it's no longer in the central city. The Tasman Bays Heritage Trust requested support from the Nelson City and Tasman District councils in 2018 to develop a new archives, research and collections facility after it's existing building was deemed not fit for purpose. The museum's current research facility in Isel Park opened in 1973 and chief executive Lucinda Jimson said its $20 million collection was under threat every time it rained , with the entire building in a "pretty dire" state. The original plan for a new archive facility in the central city - adjacent to the museum - was ditched after costs rose from $12m to $15m. The trust is now proposing a new build in Richmond, Tasman, at a cost of $9.8m. "When the government announced last year that the Ministry of Culture and Heritage was no longer funding capital projects, there was no way that we could afford the $14.9 million price tag," Jimson said. Tasman Bays Heritage Trust went back to the drawing board and considered eight options, with the preferred option a new build in Richmond due to the lower construction costs, greater space efficiency from a single-storey design, along with savings on heating, ventilation and air conditioning. When the business case was first put forward for a new facility in 2018, both councils committed around $3m in funding to the project. Jimson said Tasman District Council had confirmed its commitment of $3.1m, while Nelson City Council said it needed to seek feedback from the public on the $3.04m it had allocated due to the change from the initial proposal. In the Isel Park building, plastic wrap and buckets are used to protect the collections in bad weather, with litres of water leaking through the roof during the recent storms. "It's not just the roof that is the issue, the whole building is compromised," Jimson said. "It doesn't fit our collection now, it's got asbestos, it's got wiring issues, the cinder block construction lets a lot of damp in through the walls and through the concrete floor, we have salts growing on those blocks in our collection. "We try and keep decent humidity and temperature, which is so vital to care for museum collections, by having a huge range of dehumidifiers everywhere." The museum's Nelson-Tasman regional collection has been independently valued at $20m and is thought to be one of the most significant in the country. It is made up of about 200,000 objects, 1.2m photographs and 150,000 original, rare and one-off paper documents. The collection also includes the UNESCO-inscribed Tyree Studio photographic collection, a range of Taonga Māori objects including a portrait of Atama Paparangi by Charles Goldie, fine art and personal diaries including one from a soldier in Gallipoli. A recent independent building assessment reinforced that the building could not be made fit for purpose, "in very black and white terms". "Some of the collections that we have here are of international significance, these collections are of national significance, we can't afford to lose them." Nelson City Council wants to hear feedback from the community on the $3m contribution before August 29, with a decision to be made at a council meeting on September 4. It said consultation was required because the revised project had changed and it was no longer in the central city. The trust had requested a decision on the funding by the end of September in order to purchase the land and secure a fixed price contract for the build. Nelson Mayor Nick Smith says he does not support the $9.8m archive facility in Richmond at a time when ratepayers are struggling. Photo: Max Frethey / LDR On Facebook, Nelson Mayor Nick Smith said he did not support the $9.8m archive facility in Richmond at a time when ratepayers were struggling and councils were facing millions in storm repair costs. He said the trust was putting the council under "unreasonable pressure" in seeking approval so quickly, ahead of the local body elections. "This revised project does nothing for [the] revitalisation of the city centre." Smith said re-roofing and refurbishing the existing Isel Park facility was a far more cost-effective way of safeguarding the museum's collection. Tasman Bays Heritage Trust chair Venus Guy said the trust had done its due diligence in exploring different options, once it became clear the central city facility would not be cost effective. "We really had to pivot when we didn't have enough funds from central government and we had a shortfall of $7m... we looked at our purpose, which was the safety of our collection." She said it was frustrating to be re-discussing $3m in funding already allocated by the Nelson City Council in its 2018 long term plan. "I think we're letting everyone down, we're letting our staff down, we're letting our volunteers down, it's disappointing that seven years later we're still talking about the same problem and same challenges. "We have done a lot of work with our potential commercial partners in order to save ratepayers money and save this collection." Nelson MP Rachel Boyack. Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone Nelson MP Rachel Boyack said the proposal for a new build in Richmond was sensible, less costly than the original plan and wouldn't require any additional funding from ratepayers, while ensuring local heritage could be saved. "It is critical that a new facility is built as soon as possible, as the current facility at Isel Park in Stoke is cramped, leaky and prone to flooding. "This is an essential piece of regional infrastructure." Feedback closes at midday on August 29 and will be considered by elected members, with a decision to be made at a council meeting on September 4. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
4 hours ago
- RNZ News
Café fights street flag ban
Coffee on Queen owner Matt Redwood says not displaying his flag would cost him up to $300 in lost sales each day. Photo: LDR / Max Frethey A Richmond retailer says rules banning advertising flags from the street would cut his revenue by hundreds of dollars. Coffee on Queen owner Matt Redwood said his flag was "essential" to his business. "At the moment, 90 percent of our customers that I've asked how they know we're open, they go: 'we see the flag'." The Queen Street café opens at 4.30am, and putting the flag on the edge of the footpath brings in about $200-300 a day, he estimated, and ensured the employment of up to four workers. However, Tasman District Council's new bylaw for public places, adopted in November 2024, bans their use. Last week, Redwood presented to the council about the flags' importance to local businesses and said he was supported by around 20 other retailers. He said the council should have been more deliberate in its consultation with local businesses and sent a staff member down Richmond's main street talking to them in person. "We appreciate that we do get emails sent out, but talking to a lot of businesses, a lot of them blend into each other - these emails. We haven't got enough time in a day." Retailers are now limited to just one display, which must be a sandwich board, that must be placed against the kerb to leave 1.8 metres of unobstructed footpath. However, the signs were often made "null and void" the moment a car parked beside them. "It's worrying me big time, and it worries a lot of businesses… we are losing money every day if we don't promote ourselves," Redwood said. "I believe that if we keep bringing these little laws in, with not having flags, not trying to promote businesses, [not] trying to make the place look vibrant, we will become Nelson - a dead city." New rules require sandwich boards to be placed against the kerb rather than the storefront to increase accessibility for the blind and low vision community. Photo: LDR / Max Frethey Raymond Griffith, chair of business association Richmond Unlimited, said it was "unfortunate" that the council was enforcing the flag rules when the country is seeing a "sharp rise" in the closure of retail and hospitality businesses. "When considered in the context of their locations and surrounding street furniture, it's understandable that business owners question the need for these flags' removal," he said. "Richmond Unlimited is committed to working constructively with the council to find a solution that allows our members to promote their businesses while also addressing any perceived safety concerns for vulnerable members of the public." A Tasman District council spokesperson did not confirm if it was engaging with Richmond businesses on the issue, but said that disability advocacy was a theme of its early engagement and consultation on the bylaw. "While the Blind Low Vision Community had a preference for no signs - either sandwich boards or flags - it was indicated that flags were the most disruptive form of advertising due to their movement." Richmond Unlimited chair Raymond Griffith thought it was "unfortunate" the council was enforcing its bylaw on advertising flags. Photo: LDR / Tessa Claus Indeed, Kaye Halkett, one of the three presenters to the hearing panel that was considering the bylaw while it was a draft, said flags were "the worst" form of retail display. "They flutter around in your field of vision ... navigating in this sort of environment is absolutely exhausting. It plays havoc on the brain," she told the council in September 2024. The council received 35 submissions on its draft bylaw, and 27 submitters gave their preference on the retail display rules that had been proposed. Fifteen submitters agreed with the proposed rules while 11 disagreed. One had no opinion. Council staff commentary about the written responses supplied also said that many of those who disagreed with the rules wanted all retail displays banned. Non-compliant retailers displaying a flag risked a $500 fine, though the council said it prioritised working alongside the community to support compliance before undertaking enforcement action. The bylaw will be reviewed in four years. LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
