logo
The Trump-Crypto Honeymoon Is Over

The Trump-Crypto Honeymoon Is Over

WIRED5 days ago
Jul 30, 2025 11:00 AM The flood of crypto money in the 2024 election was one of the biggest breaks for the Trump campaign. Six months into the term, the relationship might be cooling. Photo-illustration: WIRED Staff; Getty Images
As with any fledgling romance, Trumpworld and big money cryptocurrency interests were bound to have their first fight at some point.
It was late June heading into July, and two highly anticipated bills were in the pipeline to help fulfill President Donald Trump's promises to make the US the 'crypto capital of the planet' and usher in what his supporters believed would be a 'golden age' of digital assets. Congress had one shot at passing something before the August recess.
Coinbase, the cryptocurrency exchange, and Andreessen Horowitz, the venture capital firm known as a16z, were, according to two Republicans involved in the negotiations, calling around to members to see if they could combine components of the two bills, known as the GENIUS Act and the CLARITY Act. The former more narrowly covered the realm of stablecoins; the latter was a more ambitious overhaul of how crypto products are regulated more broadly. Joining them together would give the industry what it failed to get during President Joe Biden's term—a comprehensive framework that would give the industry regulatory certainty and a clear path to profit, legally, off of these digital assets for the foreseeable future.
But the White House was not happy, and made sure to let the two power players know it. To the Trump administration, this attempt at political maneuvering was slowing down a much awaited win for crypto.
'We said, you're just fuckin' wrong,' a senior administration source involved in negotiations over crypto legislation tells me, requesting anonymity to describe private deliberations over the two most significant pieces of legislation for the industry.
'They were being hissy pissy about the way to do things,' the senior administration official says. 'But you know, it's not just their call.' The White House promised the firms they'd get their more prized regulatory overhaul—but it would be separate, and they'd have to wait.
Coinbase, Andreessen Horowitz, and the White House did not return requests for comment.
It's been pretty clear for quite some time: Trumpworld loves crypto. Almost everywhere you look in the second Trump administration, there's a crypto connection. The president, most notably, has his own memecoin, and his two eldest sons, Eric and Don Jr., are involved in a variety of crypto ventures, including World Liberty Financial and its stablecoin.
Despite cryptocurrency being immensely profitable for the Trump family and vice versa, though, cracks are beginning to emerge in a key alliance that helped bring the president back to power. The dustup around stablecoin and market structure legislation could be the first preview of more fissures to come.
It doesn't have the flair, the trappings, the egos, or the household name personalities of the Musk-Trump breakup, and the gripes involved aren't necessarily even about ideology or policy.
But this brewing lovers' quarrel does say something about how power works in Trump 2.0, and it very well could have far-reaching implications for the global economy. You Can't Always Get What You Want
At this time last year, Trump was successfully digging his campaign out of a fundraising cash crunch as former vice president Kamala Harris took over as the Democratic nominee. While Harris would revive sagging donor sentiment in her party, millions had been pouring into what was then known as the Save America PAC, which until then had covered many of Trump's legal expenses.
Much of what shifted crypto's attitude towards the GOP was vibes based. Sources of mine in Trumpworld and in the crypto community said they felt the Biden administration and Democratic Party more broadly were overly hostile to blockchain-based businesses.
'The crypto community was almost libertarian and apolitical for a while,' my source tied into the donor space tells me. But as the business grew under the Biden administration, more regulation by enforcement occurred—the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, brought at least 83 crypto-related enforcement actions, initiating lawsuits against companies like Coinbase and Kraken, according to Reuters, arguing that their products should be regulated like securities—and donors felt 'an animosity' from the White House that pushed them into Trump's coffers, they explained. (Months into the second Trump administration, those lawsuits were dismissed.)
However, sources in both Trumpworld and on the blockchain side of the equation tell me crypto donors have become impatient with the return on their investment from the campaign, which came in at just under $250 million raised by crypto-aligned and related PACs and super PACs when all was said and done. Getting their favorite parts of both the GENIUS Act and the CLARITY Act over the line—including what they viewed as more favorable regulation under the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, rather than the SEC—was an opportunity to cash in.
This is where Coinbase and a16z got involved. Both firms have key connections in Trump's orbit—most notably, respectively, Chris LaCivita, the former 2024 Trump co-campaign manager, works on the global advisory council for Coinbase, while a16z is cofounded by Marc Andreessen, the Silicon Valley billionaire and cocreator of the modern web browser, who wields influence primarily through Vice President JD Vance. These power players wanted to effectively merge the stablecoin bill with the more ambitious and wide-reaching CLARITY Act, according to two sources familiar with the proceedings.
Coinbase specifically ruffled feathers in the House GOP conference, another Republican operative in Trumpworld tells me. 'It was one of those things with, if you're gonna throw your weight around … at the end of the day they wasted two weeks of the legislative calendar by slowing everything down.'
Another sticking point, the senior administration official and GOP operative tells me, is around Coinbase appearing too chummy with Democrats after bringing on David Plouffe, the former Obama and Harris strategist, to join the organization's global advisory council in addition to LaCivita and others.
Even though plenty of industries depend on maintaining relationships with lawmakers in both parties, Trumpworld has grown increasingly wary of any perception of camaraderie between the crypto crowd and Democrats, with Plouffe being the most prominent example.
'If [Democrats] take power again, you're not getting shit,' says the senior administration source, 'and all of your bets are wasted.'
The message from Trumpworld to the crypto community heading into the next phase of legislation is simple: Play by our rules, or good luck getting anything from a possible future Democratic-controlled Congress and White House.
'These guys just need to understand that if they stick with us they have a good chance of success—rowing against us will almost guarantee failure,' the administration source tells me.
'And they shouldn't play both sides beyond getting the bare minimum of Democrat votes on legislation … They should wake up.'
Underneath all the wrangling is the substance of the legislation—even if the legislative gambit had been successful, it may have ultimately backfired. 'It's a case of be careful what you wish for,' says James Angel, a finance professor at Georgetown University. 'The problem with the CLARITY Act is this tremendous lack of clarity that it really gives us.' It's still unclear where the CFTC authority ends and the SEC's begins under the proposed law, according to Angel.
And either way, he says, the evangelists shouldn't be surprised if the CFTC ultimately cracks down on crypto as well.
As for the rough-and-tumble of getting legislation through Congress, the senior administration source says this is a welcome-to-the-club moment for the crypto community.
'Welcome to Congress,' the official says. 'You're just one of many who's been chewed up and spit out.'
This is an edition of Jake Lahut's Inner Loop newsletter. Read previous newsletters here.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tyson Foods hasn't seen 'material' impact from Trump tariffs as consumer protein push lifts results
Tyson Foods hasn't seen 'material' impact from Trump tariffs as consumer protein push lifts results

Yahoo

time5 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Tyson Foods hasn't seen 'material' impact from Trump tariffs as consumer protein push lifts results

Tyson Foods (TSN) reported results Monday that were better than expected for its fiscal third quarter. A consumer focus on protein and a lack of immediate impact from President Trump's tariff policies boosted results. "Consumers are prioritizing protein ... over other foods, but they're also prioritizing food as essential versus the non-essential things like apparel, ... bigger ticket items," Tyson Foods CEO Donnie King said. As far as the impact of President Trump's tariffs, King said, "I would not call anything we've seen from tariffs today, not only beef, but in pork, chicken. I don't see a material impact from that at this point." In the quarter, Tyson reported sales grew 4% to $13.88 billion, topping forecasts for revenue to tally $13.55 billion, according to Bloomberg data. Adjusted earnings per share were $0.91 in the quarter, ahead of forecasts for $0.78. The company also said its sales for its fiscal year 2025, which wraps up during the current quarter, will rise 2% to 3% from last year, better than its previous outlook for sales to be flat to up 1%. Tyson Foods stock rose about 3% following the results on Monday. Year to date, the stock remains down over 5%, trailing the S&P 500's roughly 7.5% gain. Read more: Live coverage of corporate earnings Chicken was the company's strongest category during the quarter, with volumes rising 2.4% alongside an average price increase of 1.1%. Consumers leaned into frozen items like Tyson Simple Ingredient nuggets, which have higher protein. Tyson's fresh chicken business grew volume by 2.3%. Tyson now expects its chicken segment to post operating income of $1.3 billion to $1.4 billion for the year, up from the previously expected range of $1 billion to $1.3 billion. "Our chicken business is obviously running a lot better than it has," King said. "This has been a multiyear journey, but it's running more efficiently." King said the company is also seeing the benefit from the closure of four chicken plants two years ago. Its pork business is having a moment too. Volume for that segment grew 1.5% against forecasts for a 2.3% decline. Pork delivered its strongest third quarter adjusted operating income for the company in four years. All the momentum offset a more challenging quarter for its beef business. The average price for beef increased 10%, higher than the 7.3% jump expected. Volumes declined 3.1%, more than the 2% expected, as the tightened cattle supply made fewer available for Tyson to buy and drove costs higher. Still, King said its beef consumer "has been very resilient" in the face of higher prices. For ranchers, higher beef prices have been good news, according to Texas A&M professor David Anderson, as these prices reverse the situation "for ranchers who have dealt with low prices, high costs, and drought in recent years." Fewer imports from Mexico have hit the US cattle supply, however, creating another challenge for Tyson. "I expect the tariff and retaliatory tariffs from China have introduced more struggles in [the ranchers'] business," Anderson said. "I should say it's not just high prices but fewer cattle that make it hard to get enough cattle to operate." Brooke DiPalma is a senior reporter for Yahoo Finance. Follow her on X at @BrookeDiPalma or email her at bdipalma@ Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Analyst downgrades top S&P 500 stock after disappointing earnings
Analyst downgrades top S&P 500 stock after disappointing earnings

Yahoo

time5 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Analyst downgrades top S&P 500 stock after disappointing earnings

Analyst downgrades top S&P 500 stock after disappointing earnings originally appeared on TheStreet. Compass Point has lowered Coinbase's (Nasdaq: COIN) price target from $330 to $248 and downgraded the rating from "Neutral" to "Sell" after the crypto exchange reported disappointing financial results for the second quarter of 2025. The investment firm indicated receding retail interest, poor Q2 records, weak prospects for recurring revenue lines like subscriptions and custody services the next quarter, and more competition from stablecoin and decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms as the reasons it downgraded the COIN stock's rating. Compass Point also warned of Coinbase's retail trading under pressure despite a bullish crypto market. Notably, retail trading is Coinbase's main profit are two other factors that the firm highlighted as possible risks for Coinbase. One is a potential delay in the CLARITY Act, which deals with classifying the financial status of crypto assets. Another is Coinbase trailing Robinhood (Nasdaq: HOOD) and Kraken in launching stock trading. 'We see limited support for COIN's valuation if crypto markets sell off further,' said Compass Point. Founded in 2012, Coinbase is the largest crypto exchange in the U.S. The company, which went public in April 2021, joined the S&P 500 list in May 2025 — the only crypto stock to be included in the hotly contested list so far. During Q2 2025, the exchange generated $1.5 billion in total revenue, $1.4 billion in net income, and earnings per share (EPS) of $5.14 in Q2. The exchange held 11,776 Bitcoin worth $1.3 billion by the end of the quarter. The COIN stock is trading at $319.55 at the time of writing, up 1.54% a day. Analyst downgrades top S&P 500 stock after disappointing earnings first appeared on TheStreet on Aug 4, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Aug 4, 2025, where it first appeared. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Former Obama adviser quips that Trump is ‘combing Fox News' for new Labor Stats chief after firing
Former Obama adviser quips that Trump is ‘combing Fox News' for new Labor Stats chief after firing

Yahoo

time5 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Former Obama adviser quips that Trump is ‘combing Fox News' for new Labor Stats chief after firing

After Donald Trump's pledge to nominate a new Bureau of Labor Statistics commissioner in the next few days, former Obama adviser David Axelrod joked that the president is 'probably combing Fox News' for a replacement. Following a weak jobs report Friday that found not only did the U.S. economy add only 73,000 jobs in July but that the 258,000 fewer jobs were created in the previous two months, the president announced that he had axed the chief labor statistician Erika McEntarfer. 'I believe the numbers were phony, just like they were before the election, and there were other times,' the president told reporters over the weekend when pressed on his decision. Since then, Trump has repeatedly and baselessly claimed that the jobs report 'was RIGGED' and that McEntarfer – who was appointed by his predecessor Joe Biden – had manipulated the numbers to make him 'look bad.' While the president has faced some criticism from Republican lawmakers for firing McEntarfer, who was overwhelmingly confirmed by the Senate last year, White House officials were tasked over the weekend with justifying and defending Trump's rash move. Their efforts were met with mockery and ridicule from cable news outlets and editorial boards. The Wall Street Journal labeled the president's economic adviser the 'bureau of labor denial' while Morning Joe host Joe Scarborough claimed that Trump's aides had to 'put on their Baghdad Bob hat this weekend because there was no justification for' the firing. Axelrod, who now works as a CNN senior political commentator, took a decidedly snarky tone over the news that Trump would soon offer up a replacement for McEntarfer. Sharing a New York Times article that noted the president had told reporters he'd announce a new BLS commissioner 'over the next three or four days,' Axelrod tweeted Sunday: 'He's probably combing Fox News right now for a qualified replacement.' Of course, Axelrod – who served as a senior advisor to former President Barack Obama and helped run his two presidential campaigns – was referencing Trump's penchant for using the conservative cable giant to staff up his administration. Trump created a revolving door between Fox News and the White House during his first term in office, and his second term has seen roughly two dozen former Fox News employees take on roles in the administration – with several of them filling Cabinet-level jobs. Axelrod wasn't the only one who jokingly suggested that the president would look for a loyalist to lead the Bureau. George Conway, the former GOP lawyer who has become a leading anti-Trump critic in recent years, created a fake White House press release announcing that the president had named former Trump Organization CFO Allen Weisselberg to be the next Labor Stats chief. Weisselberg pleaded guilty to charges of grand larceny, criminal tax fraud and falsifying business records in 2022. He also later pleaded guilty to perjury charges for lying under oath in a New York civil trial. In his newsletter, The Atlantic contributing writer Derek Thompson argued that Trump was waging a war against reality, adding that weak job growth wasn't 'the only inconvenient statistic that the Trump administration has tried to suppress in its first seven months.' As Thompson pointed out, the administration has also dismissed scientists in charge of vaccine evaluations at the CDC and gotten rid of experts who put together national climate assessments so insurance companies can gauge risk, not to mention the firing of McEntarfer. In a wild post on Truth Social Monday morning, Trump claimed that he was the victim of 'FAKE' numbers that were meant to hide the economic success of his tariff policies. 'Last weeks Job's Report was RIGGED, just like the numbers prior to the Presidential Election were Rigged. That's why, in both cases, there was massive, record setting revisions, in favor of the Radical Left Democrats,' he wrote. 'Those big adjustments were made to cover up, and level out, the FAKE political numbers that were CONCOCTED in order to make a great Republican Success look less stellar!!! I will pick an exceptional replacement. Thank you for your attention to this matter. MAGA!'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store