logo
Major Update For 6 Million Borrowers About Potential Loss Of Student Loan Forgiveness Eligibility

Major Update For 6 Million Borrowers About Potential Loss Of Student Loan Forgiveness Eligibility

Forbes15-05-2025

13 million nonprofit workers, including teachers, nurses, and university staff, could lose access to ... More student loan forgiveness under a GOP tax proposal.
A low-profile provision buried in the GOP's 2025 tax proposal could spark one of U.S. history's most significant rollbacks in student loan forgiveness and repayment eligibility, specifically targeting the Public Service Loan Forgiveness program. The bill would allow the Treasury Secretary to unilaterally revoke the nonprofit status of any organization it designates as a terrorist supporting organization. While its language appears aimed at bad actors, the downstream effect could destabilize the PSLF for the more than 12.8 million Americans who work at nonprofits.
The PSLF program requires borrowers to work full-time for a qualifying employer, most often government agencies or 501(c)(3) nonprofits, for 10 years while making income-driven repayments. In exchange, the remainder of their federal student loan balance is forgiven. However, if an employer loses its 501(c)(3) designation, its employees become ineligible for student loan forgiveness, even years into the program.
Under this proposed bill, the Secretary of the Treasury could strip that status without the checks and balances usually afforded to the IRS or federal courts. That could open the door to politically motivated or ideologically driven revocations, placing millions of borrowers at risk of losing forgiveness they've been working toward for years.
According to 2022 data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, approximately 12.8 million people work for nonprofit organizations in the United States. That's more than 10% of the private workforce. The majority of those workers are clustered in two PSLF-relevant sectors: healthcare and education.
That means nearly 12.8 million nonprofit workers are in fields where student loan debt is typical and PSLF eligibility is crucial; think of nurses at nonprofit hospitals, adjunct professors, K–12 teachers at religious schools, social workers, community health staff, and early childhood educators. If the bill passes, none of their PSLF eligibility would be guaranteed.
We can triangulate the addressable borrower population that would potentially be impacted in other ways too. On the lower end, we know that approximately 3.6 million people are eligible for Public Service Loan Forgiveness based on their employment in qualifying public service roles such as education, healthcare, social work, the military, and government positions.
Secondly, according to sector data, 501(c)(3) organizations make up about 75% of all nonprofits (1.48 million out of 2 million). If 75% of nonprofits are 501(c)(3), and we assume a similar share of nonprofit employment is in these organizations, then about 75% of the 12.8 million nonprofit employees work for PSLF-eligible employers. This would equal approximately 9.6 million nonprofit employees potentially eligible for PSLF, provided they meet other criteria (full-time, correct loan type, etc.). The actual number will likely be a bit lower after accounting for individual employment and loan circumstances.
We also know from TIAA's 2020 Nonprofit Student Debt Survey that among nonprofit employees with at least a bachelor's degree, about 47% reported currently having student loan debt. This is based on a nationally representative survey of nonprofit and public sector workers. If we apply the 47% figure from TIAA's study to the total nonprofit workforce, then we get approximately 6 million nonprofit employees who likely have student loan debt.
President Donald Trump has already called out nonprofit organizations and even specific institutions in the education space and signaled he intends to act against them. In April 2025, Trump publicly threatened to revoke the nonprofit status of Harvard University, accusing it of harboring terrorist-inspired ideology. That wasn't idle rhetoric. His administration also announced funding freezes for Harvard, Columbia, and the University of Pennsylvania over their handling of campus protests following Hamas's attack on Israel on October 7, 2023.
These institutions are 501(c)(3) nonprofits and major PSLF-eligible employers. Harvard, for instance, employs more than 18,000 people in Massachusetts. Penn and Columbia are also large employers, with thousands of staff in public-facing academic, healthcare, and administrative roles.
Under current law, revoking tax-exempt status is a lengthy process requiring IRS review and justification. But the GOP's new bill would give that authority solely to the Treasury Secretary, who could make such designations based on a claim of "material support" for terrorism, even if no charges or investigations have occurred.
That shift could instantly disqualify every employee at those institutions from PSLF. Those months would no longer count, no matter how far along they are toward loan forgiveness. The government wouldn't need a trial, audit, or congressional vote, just a designation.
This legislative provision builds on President Trump's executive order earlier this year directing the Department of Education to tighten PSLF eligibility requirements. That order called for new rules excluding nonprofits involved in illegal or anti-American activity including support for immigration violations, campus protests, or what the administration labeled hate-based movements.
While that executive order didn't change tax status, it foreshadowed this legislative strategy. With the Treasury granted sole power to label and suspend nonprofits, the executive branch could rapidly cut off PSLF access for entire categories of organizations. The White House has not clarified how it defines terrorist supporting, but observers fear it could be used to target immigration nonprofits, racial justice groups, climate organizations, or university systems.
Beyond individual borrowers, this bill introduces potential structural risk to the nonprofit sector. Nonprofits may begin self-censoring to avoid political retribution if the Treasury can strip tax-exempt status without judicial review. That could stifle advocacy, research, and direct services in reproductive health, refugee resettlement, environmental justice, or racial equity.
It could also disincentivize professionals from pursuing nonprofit careers if PSLF eligibility is seen as unstable. That would worsen already strained education and healthcare staffing pipelines, where burnout and turnover are high.
The GOP's tax bill is still in the early stages of the legislative process; however, student loan forgiveness and repayment, and specifically PSLF eligibility, could be fundamentally altered overnight for up to 6 million borrowers.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What will the Spending Review mean for NI public services?
What will the Spending Review mean for NI public services?

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

What will the Spending Review mean for NI public services?

Next week the Chancellor Rachel Reeves will reveal the outcome of her Spending Review. It will allocate money to day-to-day public services for the next three years. It will also set infrastructure budgets for the next four years. The review will directly impact on what Stormont Ministers have to spend on public services in Northern Ireland. Last year Reeves set what is known as the "spending envelope" – the amount by which total government spending will change in a given period. Day-to-day spending is planned to grow by an average of 1.2% above the rate of inflation each year for the next three years. Infrastructure spending is planned to grow by 1.3% above inflation a year over the next four years. These are much lower growth rates than this year and last year, reflecting the new government's "emergency" injection of cash into the health service and public sector pay deals. On Wednesday the Chancellor will break it down further, making allocations to each central government department. The precise allocation of this money matters for Stormont's spending plans. More than 90% of what Stormont ministers have to spend comes from the Treasury through what is known as "the block grant." The increase in the block grant is worked out using a calculation known as the Barnett formula, which is based on the annual changes in UK central government departmental budgets. It gives Stormont an equivalent spending increase for the size of the NI population, adjusted for the extent to which each service is devolved. Some services, like health, are almost entirely devolved but defence is not devolved. If the government decides it is going to spend more on defence at the expense of other services that will have an impact on the amount of extra money in the Stormont pot. In simple terms: If the UK Department of Health sees its budget increase by £100m, then Northern Ireland would get approximately £3m extra. If the Ministry of Defence budget increases by £100m Stormont does not get anything extra. When devolution was restored in 2024 the government agreed a financial package which included an automatic top-up of any money awarded by the Barnett formula. The government was persuaded that the level of need in Northern Ireland means it requires spending of £124 per head for every £100 per head spent in England. As Northern Ireland was funded below that level, the government said that in future every £1 that comes through the Barnett formula will now come with an extra 24p. That will apply until the overall level of funding need is reached. The independent Fiscal Council has estimated that will be worth £815m over five years. The government said the size of the top up could be reviewed if "independent and credible sources" provide evidence. To that end the Executive commissioned a study from the economist Prof Gerry Holtham, an expert in the devolution of public finances. The BBC understands that his work has come back with a range of possible funding need. The central estimates are £123 per head, for every £100 spent in England, if agricultural spending is excluded and £128 per head if agriculture forms part of the calculation. If the Treasury is persuaded to accept the higher end of the range it will be worth tens of millions of pounds extra over the next five years. The devolution financial package also brought a large dollop of one-off UK government funding, largely to pay for public sector pay deals. However that creates a cliff-edge drop in Stormont funding of about £500m in 2026/27 when that short term money runs out. The government committed to review "concerns about 2026-27 funding" at the Spending Review. The Fiscal Council has suggested options to tackle the cliff edge could include more one-off funding or setting a new, higher baseline for Stormont's budget. However, it is also possible that the normal operation of Spending Review will allocate enough money to largely remove the cliff edge. The Chancellor will be allocating trillions of pounds in the Spending Review but it is a tiny fraction of that which may have most political impact in Northern Ireland. There is a growing expectation that the UK government will come up with additional money for the construction of a new GAA stadium at Casement Park in Belfast. That project has been bogged down in labyrinthine planning and funding issues. The GAA official leading the project has told the BBC he is cautiously optimistic that the Spending Review will include a new financial contribution for the redevelopment project. Spending Review: When is it and what might Rachel Reeves announce? Reeves admits some will lose out in spending review

Jobs at the Port of Los Angeles are down by half, executive director says
Jobs at the Port of Los Angeles are down by half, executive director says

Miami Herald

timean hour ago

  • Miami Herald

Jobs at the Port of Los Angeles are down by half, executive director says

LOS ANGELES — Job opportunities at the Port of Los Angeles are dwindling as President Donald Trump's steep tariffs take a hit on global trade and a major economic engine for the regional economy. Nearly half of the longshoremen who support operations at the port went without work over the last two weeks, Gene Seroka, executive director of the Port of Los Angeles, said in an interview. The port processed 25% less cargo than forecast for the month of May, he said. Trump's tariffs have drastically stemmed the flow of goods into the U.S., driving down activity at the neighboring ports of L.A. and Long Beach, which collectively processed more than 20 million 20-foot-long cargo units last year. The two ports are the largest in the country and provide jobs for thousands of dockworkers, heavy equipment operators and truck drivers. But work has fallen off sharply in recent weeks. Over the last 25 work shifts, only 733 jobs were available for 1,575 longshoremen looking for work. 'They haven't been laid off, but they're not working nearly as much as they did previously,' Seroka told the Los Angeles Times. 'Since the tariffs went into place, and in May specifically, we've really seen the work go off on the downside.' Marine terminal operators post available work opportunities, known as job orders, on a digital board at the port three times a day. Longshoremen can review the job orders at each shift and bid on the jobs they want to take. If there are more longshoremen than job orders, a portion of workers will go without pay. The average of 733 job orders posted over the past 25 shifts, which is equal to roughly two weeks, is unusually low. Ordinarily, between 1,700 and 2,000 job orders are posted during a typical day shift, and between 1,100 and 1,400 are posted during a standard night shift. Seroka attributed the decrease in job opportunities to lower cargo volume moving through the port. In May, 17 cargo ships canceled their planned trips to Los Angeles amid uncertainty over duties the Trump administration imposed worldwide. Although May is typically a busier month than April, this past May saw 18% less cargo processed than the month before, according to port data. The falloff comes during a critical time in advance of the Christmas shopping season, orders for which are usually placed before July 1. Conditions are not expected to significantly improve anytime soon. 'The June numbers that we're projecting right now are nowhere near where they traditionally should be,' Seroka said. An average of five ships have entered the port each day over the last week. This time of year, there would typically be between 10 and 12 ships in the port each day. 'The drop in cargo volume caused by Trump's tariffs will mean empty shelves when products don't reach our stores, rising prices on everything from groceries to clothes to cars, and undoubtedly, more Americans out of work,' U.S. Sen. Alex Padilla of California said in a news conference last month. The decline in shipping has broader ripple effects on L.A.'s logistics economy. A 2023 report found that the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach contributed $21.8 billion in direct revenue to local service providers, generating $2.7 billion in state and local taxes and creating 165,462 jobs, directly and indirectly. A decline of just 1% in cargo to the ports would wipe away 2,769 jobs and endanger as many as 4,000 others, the study found. Union officials could not be reached for comment on Friday but had previously predicted job losses for their members. 'Some of the workforce will not be getting their full 40 hours a week based on the loss of cargo,' Gary Herrera, president of the longshoremen union ILWU Local 13, warned last month. 'That is going to have an effect on the work opportunities for not just us, but for truck drivers, warehouse workers and logistics teams,' he said. The slowdown in activity at the ports of L.A. and Long Beach has also spread into surrounding communities. Businesses in the area rely on a robust community of port workers to frequent their establishments. 'We're starting to hear from small businesses and restaurants in the harbor area that their customer patronage is trending downward,' Seroka said. 'Outside of COVID, this is the biggest drop I've seen in my career.' Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store