logo
JPMorgan Chase is heading upmarket to woo America's millionaires

JPMorgan Chase is heading upmarket to woo America's millionaires

CNBC27-05-2025

JPMorgan Chase thinks it has cracked the code on managing more money for America's millionaires.
It's not a new financial product, a novel software program or an enticing sign-up bonus. Instead, it's a refurbished take on an old concept — the brick-and-mortar bank branch — along with new standards for service that are at the heart of its aspirations.
The bank is unveiling 14 of these new format branches — each acquired when JPMorgan took over First Republic in 2023 — in tony zip codes in New York, California, Florida and Massachusetts, including Napa, Palm Beach and Wellesley Hills.
It's part of JPMorgan's push to convince affluent Americans, many who already use Chase checking accounts or credit cards, that the bank is ready to manage their millions.
JPMorgan is the country's biggest bank by deposits and assets and has a top share in areas as disparate as Wall Street trading and retail credit cards. But one of the only major categories where it isn't a clear leader is in wealth management; peers like Morgan Stanley and Bank of America exceed it there.
While half of the 19 million affluent households in the U.S. bank with JPMorgan, it has just a 10% share of their investing dollars, according to Jennifer Roberts, CEO of Chase Consumer Banking.
"We have this giant opportunity to convince customers to have their wealth management business with us in addition to their deposit relationship," Roberts said in a recent interview.
Helped by its acquisition of First Republic, which was known for catering to rich families living on either coast, JPMorgan decided to launch a new tier of service. Called J.P. Morgan Private Client, it is anchored by the new physical locations, of which there will be 31 by the end of next year.
The service comes with its own mobile banking app, but its main appeal is the in-person experience: Instead of being handed off to multiple employees like at a Chase branch, J.P. Morgan Private Client members are assigned to a single banker.
"What First Republic did really well was deliver a concierge-level of service where if you have an issue, a person owned it for you and you didn't have to worry about it," Roberts said. "So with this experience we are going to deliver a more elevated concierge type of service, like you would expect at a high-end hotel."
The price of entry: at least $750,000 in deposits and investments, though Roberts said the bank is aiming for those with around $2 million to $3 million in balances.
The new locations, dubbed J.P. Morgan Financial Centers, have a warm feel and an earth-tone color palette that intentionally sets them apart from the nearly 5,000 Chase branches operated by the bank.
During a recent visit to a Manhattan location, the vibe is family-office-meets hotel, with soaring ceilings, living room-style seating areas and art-filled meeting rooms scattered over two floors.
Gone is the traditional row of bank tellers; there is just a solitary ATM machine. Instead of lollipops, visitors are offered squares of Dylan's chocolate. The space is quiet, except for the crack of a Perrier being opened or the whir of an espresso machine.
The design elements and hushed environment are "really meant to illustrate that we're there to have a more serious, less-transactional conversation about your wealth planning over the course of time," said Stevie Baron, JPMorgan's head of affluent banking.
Those conversations involve planning for long-term goals and examining clients' portfolios to see whether they are on track to reach them, he said.
Elements of the new high-end branch format could find their way to regular Chase branches, especially the 1,000 or so that are in high-income areas, Baron said.
JPMorgan executives have said the bank's branch network has already succeeded as a feeder into the firm's wealth management offerings.
The new service tier — which sits above the bank's Chase Private Client offering, which is for those with at least $150,000 in balances and is delivered in the regular branches — is expected to help JPMorgan's retail bank double client assets from the $1.08 trillion it reached in March.
"Obviously it's a big challenge, because clients already have their established wealth managers, but it's something that we've been making really strong progress in," Roberts said.
But attempting to create a new, more luxurious brand from a mainstream one — think the difference between Toyota and its luxury brand Lexus — is not without its risks. Or at least, momentary confusion.
So far, the two flagship financial centers in New York and San Francisco opened late last year haven't seen heavy foot traffic, Roberts admitted.
"Our biggest challenge is that we don't have people walking in because they don't really understand what they are," Roberts said. "So we just need to get the awareness out there."
While JPMorgan is leaning on the first part of its name, rather than Chase, to signal exclusivity for the new branches, that may deter people from walking through the doors and starting conversations.
"I just want this to be acknowledged: We're never going to turn someone away. Any customer can come and leverage any of our branches at any time," Roberts said.
"We want people walking in, having the experience, meeting with our experts and understanding how we can help support their financial goals over time," she said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump wants to get rid of his red Tesla after feud with Musk
Trump wants to get rid of his red Tesla after feud with Musk

USA Today

time40 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Trump wants to get rid of his red Tesla after feud with Musk

Trump wants to get rid of his red Tesla after feud with Musk Show Caption Hide Caption 'Two big egos.' Americans not surprised by Trump-Musk feud Americans across the country say they're not surprised by the public feud between President Donald Trump and Tesla CEO Elon Musk. Tesla is no longer hot, the president says. After playing influencer-in-chief and hosting a car show in the South Lawn of the White House for the brand in March, Donald Trump is considering getting rid of his red Tesla, a day after his public spat with his close adviser and Tesla CEO Elon Musk. A White House official confirmed on background June 6 that Trump no longer wants the Tesla Model S he bought in March in a show of support for the company after incidents of vandalism at Tesla dealerships across the country. The electric car, worth about $80,000 new, still sits in the White House parking lot. Trump said he was 'very disappointed' with Musk, who served as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency, a position from which Trump revealed Musk was asked to leave last month. 'Elon was wearing thin,' Trump posted on Truth Social, seemingly indicating that Musk had worn out his welcome. Musk lobbed a series of online jabs at Trump's signature tax and spending bill after he left the White House, calling it a 'disgusting abomination' and asking Americans to tell their representatives in Washington to "Kill the Bill." Trump said Musk was upset about electric vehicle subsidies from the bill that would have benefited Tesla. The Congressional Budget Office has said the bill would lead to an increase of $2.4 trillion in total deficits over the next 10 years, a figure Trump has disputed. The feud reached an apparent point of no return after Musk accused Trump of being named in classified files on financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. A White House official told USA TODAY on background on June 6 that Trump had no plans to have any contact with Musk. Throughout his tenure as the cost-cutting czar, Musk has suffered ongoing losses for the car company. His deep cuts to federal staffing and programs spurred "Tesla Takedown" protests, with Tesla owners being harassed and multiple dealerships across the United States being vandalized. On March 11, Tesla's stock price plummeted 15%, the greatest one-day drop in five years. In the aftermath of the June 6 feud, Tesla's stock price fell 14% but showed signs of rebounding on Friday by 5%, trading at $300 on NASDAQ at 10:50 a.m.

‘A lesson in worst practices': Shocking audit reveals Chicago parking meters have made $2B for private company
‘A lesson in worst practices': Shocking audit reveals Chicago parking meters have made $2B for private company

Yahoo

time41 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

‘A lesson in worst practices': Shocking audit reveals Chicago parking meters have made $2B for private company

Have you ever been strapped for cash? Perhaps you took a payday loan, sold a long-term asset or even made an early withdrawal from your 401(k). And chances are, you've later regretted it. This is the situation the City of Chicago finds itself in — and the cost may have been billions. Privatizing public infrastructure is a growing trend among cash-strapped cities that need fast revenue. Back during the 2008 financial crisis, Chicago was broke and needed to raise money. Rather than make the unpopular move of raising property taxes, then-mayor Richard M. Daley chose to privatize public assets. Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 5 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) Nervous about the stock market in 2025? Find out how you can access this $1B private real estate fund (with as little as $10) 'If we didn't have money for a long-term debt, you're talking about a serious economic crisis then for Chicago,' Daley said at the time, according to NBC 5 Chicago. So, Chicago City Council struck a deal to lease the city's 36,000 parking meters to investment consortium Chicago Parking Meters LLC, a group of global investors led by Morgan Stanley. The investors paid nearly $1.157 billion to receive the revenue from the meters for 75 years — and the city must reimburse them whenever the parking meters are taken offline, such as for festivals or construction. The deal was essentially rubber-stamped 40-5 in favor by the council, which had only a few days to review it before voting — turning out to be what the Better Government Association later called 'a lesson in 'worst practices.'' Soon after, a report issued by the then-inspector general found the city was paid at least $974 million less than it could have made from operating the parking meters itself over the term of the deal. While an analysis done by 32nd Ward Alderperson Scott Waguespack — who voted against the deal — found the deal could have been worth $5 to $10 billion, reported NBC 5. Now, a 2024 audit by accounting firm KPMG has found that, with another 58 years still left in the agreement, the private investors have already recouped their initial investment. In 2023, the meters generated a record $160.9 billion in income, bringing the total income from the start of the deal to $1.97 billion. 'It's just one of those deals that I would beg people never to replicate anywhere in the United States,' Waguespack told NBC 5. Still, many Americans can relate to the situation that faced Mayor Daley. When we're desperate for funds, we can make rash decisions that negatively affect our long-term financial health. Almost 4 in 10 (37%) U.S. adults would not be able to cover a $400 emergency expense with cash savings, according to the Economic Well-Being of US Households in 2024 report from the Federal Reserve Board of Governors. And while many of these people say they could cover the expense some other way, such as using a credit card, borrowing from family or friends or selling something, 13% would not be able to pay the expense by any means. About 58% of Americans are 'living paycheck to paycheck and experienced a cash emergency in the past 12 months,' according to The 2025 Cash Poor Report from peer-to-peer lending platform SoLo Funds. Read more: Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says — and that 'anyone' can do it These 'cash-poor' Americans may not be who you think they are. Forty percent have a full-time job and one in seven cash-poor households earn more than $75,000 per year. The top unexpected expenses, according to the report, are auto repairs, medical bills and utility bills — common expenses that can happen to any of us. To cover these expenses, some may turn to short-term financing options that could end up costing them more money in the long term. For instance, buy now pay later (BNPL) services come with an average borrowing cost of 23%, according to The 2025 Cash Poor Report, which can increase substantially if the borrower incurs repeat late fees. Another option is a payday loan, which is one of the most expensive ways to borrow. The industry average cost of borrowing for payday loans is 35%, according to the report, but origination fees, late fees and processing fees can push this as high as 49% of the principal borrowed. Increased borrowing and missed payments can also affect your credit score, which in turn can limit your future ability to borrow. People might also look to sell long-term assets such as stocks, bonds or mutual funds, but this too can have long-term financial costs. If you're 30 years from retirement and sell $10,000 of an asset today that's earning 7% per year, then you'll have about $76,000 less when you retire due to the loss in compounding interest. Plus, research has shown that time out of the stock market can be costly — and missing the best days in the market can be devastating to your long-term returns. And, if you make an early withdrawal from a tax-deferred account such as a 401(k), you'll also pay a 10% tax penalty. To avoid high-cost borrowing in an emergency or cashing out long-term investments during a downturn, start by building an emergency fund that could cover unexpected expenses. A rule of thumb is to have three to six months' income in an accessible account, such as a high-yield savings account. While desperate times may call for desperate measures, it's worth consulting with a financial advisor (or a free counseling service) to discuss your options before getting saddled with debt or selling long-term assets. Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead How much cash do you plan to keep on hand after you retire? Here are 3 of the biggest reasons you'll need a substantial stash of savings in retirement Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? Like what you read? Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise straight to your inbox every week. This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Most Republicans side with Trump over Musk: Poll
Most Republicans side with Trump over Musk: Poll

Axios

time43 minutes ago

  • Axios

Most Republicans side with Trump over Musk: Poll

Republicans overwhelmingly said they'd side with President Trump over Elon Musk in the duo's explosive feud, according to Thursday polling. Why it matters: Republicans' loyalty to Trump remains strong, and the acrimony only adds to Americans' existing dissatisfaction with the former head of DOGE. By the numbers: More than half of Americans said they wouldn't side with either the president or the wealthiest man in the world, per a YouGov survey of U.S. adults. 28% said they would side with Trump, and only 8% said they would side with Musk. Zoom in: Among Republicans, 71% said they would side with Trump over Musk, while 12% said they would side with neither. 80% of Democrats said they would side with neither. Context: Trump and Musk had a public falling out on Thursday following months of collaboration. Musk left the White House in late May after months of influence over the Trump administration and federal spending. He initially said he'd continue to be an adviser to the president, but then started bashing the "One Big Beautiful Bill." Trump on Thursday said he didn't know if they'd have a "great relationship," prompting bitter backlash from Musk on X. What we are watching: Musk and Trump have scheduled a phone call on Friday to defuse the tension, according to Politico.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store