
Female champagne exec ‘told she needed 'anti-seduction training for flirting with bosses' and is ‘gagging for it''
Maria Gasparovic is accusing French drinks powerhouse Moët Hennessy of sexual harassment, gender discrimination and unfair dismissal in a £1.1million lawsuit.
5
5
Gasparovic was former chief of staff to the firm's global head of distribution Jean-Marc Lacave, and was fired in June last year.
According to a Financial Times bombshell article, Gasparovic claims the comments were made by Lacave himself.
These include allegations that she missed out on a promotion because a client had described her as 'gagging for it', and that she should undergo 'anti-seduction coaching' to move up the corporate ladder.
She is seeking €1.3 million (around £1.1m) in damages and compensation through France's employment tribunal system.
Moët Hennessy — the elite drinks arm of luxury conglomerate LVMH — has strenuously denied the allegations and hit back with its own lawsuit, accusing Gasparovic of defamation after she aired the accusations on social media.
Those posts have since been taken down, and a defamation trial is reportedly set for autumn.
An LVMH spokesperson has shared with The Sun the full letter from Moët Hennessy's CEO Jean-Jacques Guiony to all members of staff.
In it, Mr Guiony addressed the recent allegations regarding the company's treatment of women and its culture.
He claims Gasparovic's contract was terminated due to her "destructive behavior", and she subsequently launched a press campaign, leading Moët Hennessy to file a libel suit.
The letter claims that Gasparovic's actions were a manipulative attempt to gain financial compensation and invoke whistleblower status after her initial strategy failed.
Mr Guiony went on to emphasise his commitment to continuing this positive cultural shift and upholding a supportive environment at Moët Hennessy.
The Sun has also asked LVMH for a comment on the matter.
In her termination letter, cited by the FT, the company claimed she impersonated a colleague on a call while on sick leave and made threats to other staff — charges she flatly denies.
Before her dismissal, Gasparovic had submitted a whistleblower report, alleging harassment and discrimination at the Paris HQ.
But according to her legal complaint, the company failed to launch a formal investigation into her claims.
The New York Post reports that Gasparovic further alleges Moët's then-CEO Philippe Schaus ordered HR to dig into her personal life, believing she was having an affair with a colleague — a claim she says was part of a broader 'boys club' atmosphere.
'Private life is protected by law in France,' she told the FT.
'Dignity matters, especially for women at work.'
The lawsuit has dragged Moët Hennessy into a bubbling scandal just as it's grappling with broader turbulence.
5
5
A dozen insiders reportedly told the FT the workplace culture had become toxic — with bullying, burnout and staff 'disappearing overnight' on sick leave.
At least 20 employees were signed off long-term in 2024 alone, according to the Daily Mail.
One anonymous source reportedly said bosses would 'scream at people like it was a fashion house in the 1990s — except we are in 2025. That behaviour is no longer acceptable.'
Several other women have reportedly left the company after facing similar treatment. At least four former female staffers accused Moët of harassment and bullying before exiting, three of whom later settled employment tribunal claims, according to the FT.
In one case, after a female employee told HR that false rumours were circulating about her sleeping with a male exec to advance her career, she was allegedly told simply to 'get used to it'.
Even Moët's former COO Mark Stead — who is reportedly in a relationship with Gasparovic — was fired shortly after accompanying her to HR meetings.
He was accused of misusing company expenses, though his supporters suspect retaliation, according to Daily Mail.
The case is expected to go before a French employment tribunal later this year.
Full message from Moët Hennessy CEO to all staff
Dear Moët Hennessy teams,
You may have seen or heard about an article published by the Financial Times regarding Moët Hennessy.
I am deeply disappointed by this not only because it harms our reputation, but above all because the allegations made are unacceptable.
I would like to share some context.
Maria Gasparovic appears to hold considerable resentment toward Moët Hennessy, driven by personal ambition that led her to believe she could claim a position that did not exist at the time and was eventually not opened due to budgetary constraints. Her behavior, following that decision, changed drastically: she claimed to have been subject to sexist discrimination, she began making comments and sharing posts that can be construed as bullying and these were directed to employees and clients.
As a member of the Distribution Executive team she was privy to confidential information and in addition had access to personal information pertaining to colleagues, to which she did not apply the required confidentiality measures. Holding such a position she should have disclosed information regarding her personal situation and personal relations as a conflict of interest, but did not do so.
She created an environment that was destructive and Moët Hennessy had no choice but to terminate her contract even if some of the above-mentioned elements and others, like threats of blackmail, were only brought to light subsequently.
Instead of challenging her termination in court, she started a press campaign and MH had no choice but to file a libel suit based on these false allegations. In 2025, she finally challenged her termination in court and MH will strongly defend the case. Ultimately, Maria Gasparovic chose to exploit a situation that she herself created - one rooted in her personal agenda and which is now being used in an attempt to justify financial compensation. After her strategy failed, she attempted to invoke whistleblower status, again manipulating the systems that are intended to protect.
This behavior, both toward our company and certain colleagues, was clearly at adds with our values. These actions took place outside of any formal oversight and were facilitated by the complacency of a few individuals, and even to the point of intentional support from others.
Such conduct cannot be tolerated. This is the reason of her departure.
With regard to the place of women in our company, I cannot accept the attacks directed at my predecessor, Philippe Schous, whose behavior was beyond reproach in all interactions. Philippe spent considerable time embedding a vision and values that were in keeping with equity. Philippe was instrumental in appointing women to some key critical roles, that today sit at the COMEX of MH, such as the EVP of Human Resources, the President for Maison Moët, the CFO, and a new Regional President for Asia.
Since 2020, we have successfully achieved gender parity at Executive and Manager level rising from 45 to 50% in less than 5 years. He initiated a genuine cultural shift at Moët Hennessy one that has brought greater equity and diversity to our organization.
This is a commitment I fully intend to carry forward as President of Moët Hennessy.
I will never tolerate such behavior.
Like you, I believe in our core values, and I will not accept them being called into question.
Seeing these values misrepresented in the press is not only disappointing to me but I know it is also deeply unsettling for all of you who work so hard to uphold them. I share your frustration and concern that the press has failed to accurately and fairly represent events.
I understand that these accusations, along with commentary about our culture, may raise concerns.
I want to underscore that Moët Hennessy is committed to continuously upholding a positive and supportive environment for all.
Jean-Jacques Guiony,
President and CEO, Moët Hennessy.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Finextra
26 minutes ago
- Finextra
Payabl. selects Silverflow to upgrade payments infrastructure
Silverflow, the new standard in payment processing, has partnered with payabl., a leading European financial technology provider, to upgrade its payments infrastructure and accelerate growth. 0 The collaboration marks a significant shift to more agile, API-first technology, unlocking faster time-to-market, operational reliability and a shared vision for innovation. Seeking greater agility and responsiveness, payabl. turned to Silverflow for a modern solution that matched its engineering-led mindset. With Silverflow's single API platform and scalable cloud infrastructure, payabl. saw immediate improvements across performance, flexibility and resilience. 'Their API-first approach was very important for us,' said Breno Oliviera, Head of Product at payabl. 'With a modular setup and the ability to scale fast, Silverflow enables us to meet surging demand during peak times like Black Friday or the holidays and launch new features much faster than before.' Integration timelines for new card schemes were reduced from years to just months. This agility not only improved operational efficiency but also gave payabl. the ability to deliver new services to their clients at pace. Silverflow's team worked hand-in-hand with payabl.'s product and engineering teams, helping shape ideas and troubleshoot in real-time - a cultural alignment that proved just as critical as the technology itself. 'It's not just about replacing old systems,' Oliviera added. 'We needed a partner who could evolve with us. Silverflow's modern architecture and collaborative mindset matched ours perfectly.' Looking ahead, payabl. is planning to expand its partnership with Silverflow. The companies now operate as strategic allies, holding regular cross-functional workshops to co-develop innovative features and build resilient infrastructure together. 'This partnership is a blueprint for the future of payments,' said Anne Willem de Vries, Co-Founder and CEO at Silverflow. 'It shows what's possible when cutting-edge technology meets a shared commitment to innovation. Together with payabl., we're raising the bar for what modern payment processing can be.'


Daily Mail
26 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Crystal Palace LOSE European appeal and will play in the Conference League - with Nottingham Forest taking Eagles spot in the Europa League
Crystal Palace have lost their European battle with UEFA - and will play in the Conference League this season. The Eagles were demoted from the Europa League earlier this summer, when UEFA ruled that they had breached their rules on multi-club ownership. Outraged Palace officials appealed the decision in a gruelling, 10-hour session at the Court of Arbitration for Sport in Lausanne on Friday. CAS lawyers had promised to hand down a verdict by close of play on Monday. And they have subsequently sided with the governing body, in what will be a devastating blow to the FA Cup winners and their fans and a decision that could cost Palace up to £20m in lost revenue. It is also likely to be welcomed at the City Ground, with the verdict confirmation that Nottingham Forest will take Palace's place. The Eagles had attempted to have their demotion overturned at the expense of either Forest or Lyon. They were dropped into the third tier competition after a UEFA panel found that US businessman John Textor, whose Eagles Holdings company held a 43 per cent stake in the club, was in a position of influence at Selhurst Park. His firm also owned French outfit Lyon, which qualified for the same competition. Lyon took priority, with only one MCO club allowed in, because they finished higher in their domestic league than FA Cup winners Palace. Textor, who subsequently sold his stake in Palace, was not present at the hearing. Both Forest and Lyon also had legal representatives at CAS. Palace argued that while Textor's firm held a 43 per cent stake in the club, it only afforded him 25 per cent of the voting rights and that chairman Steve Parish, along with silent partners Josh Harris and David Blitzer, called the shots with their 75 per cent. As such, they said, Textor had no influence at Selhurst Park. They also claimed that double standards were in play, stating that sides in the European Club Association (ECA) were told that those with potential MCO issues could go beyond UEFA's March 1 deadline to submit their paperwork. A swipe was also taken at Forest, with Palace claiming they did not act to navigate the rules when it looked like they may qualify for the Champions League along with Olympiakos, who are also owned by Evangelos Marinakis, until April 29. Palace said the only communication they had from UEFA was in an email to the club's generic address. However, they faced an uphill battle. In June, CAS upheld UEFA's decision to remove Irish side Drogheda United from the Conference League due to non-compliance with MCO rules. Drogheda, owned by the same group that controls fellow qualifiers Silkeborg IF, argued that the March 1 deadline had not been communicated properly by UEFA. However, in what appeared to be a precedent, CAS rejected the claim, along with a further allegation of unequal treatment.


Daily Mail
27 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Reform UK's DOGE efforts 'save more than £100m in council spending in 100 days' since local elections as Nigel Farage's party 'rolls back Net Zero'
Reform UK claims to have saved taxpayers more than £100million in council spending in 100 days since this year's local elections. Nigel Farage 's party won more than 650 council seats and took control of 10 local authorities in contests across England in May. It established a 'DOGE' unit - based on the Department of Government Efficiency set up by Tesla boss Elon Musk in the US - to try and cut spending by councils. Reform said, since the local elections on 1 May, it has now made about £110million in savings. This has included scrapping Net Zero initiatives within local councils, 'streamlining and modernising' services, and focusing on pay and allowances, the party added. Mr Farage said: 'On May 1, we showed that if you vote Reform, you get Reform. 'In the 100 days since, Reform UK councils across Britain are actioning the change we promised and already delivering on their manifesto commitments. 'From rolling back the devastating Net Zero agenda on a local level to cutting wasteful spending, Reform councils are standing up for the priorities of local people, not the whims of bureaucrats or the entrenched elite.' In Durham, the Reform-led council last month rescinded a formal declaration of a 'climate emergency' and claims to have saved £25million. This included not upgrading to a fleet of electric vehicles, scrapping the installation of a heat pump in the new county hall, and scaling back investment in solar panels. In Kent, Reform said it had saved £32million in spending over four years, which had been earmarked to make buildings more energy efficient. In Staffordshire, the party claimed to have saved £4.5million by halting the roll out of electric vehicle charging in areas where there is little to no customer demand. But this was said to be central government funding and not from the council's budget. The Liberal Democrat opposition in Durham claimed Reform's actions would cost the council money in the long run. They argued that investments made in solar panels and heat pumps had so far saved the council more than £9million and attracted central government grants. Reform's claims of success 'should be nominated for a fiction prize', added Lib Dem councillor Amanda Hopgood. A Labour spokesman said Reform's first 100 days in local government had been 'beset with chaos' and full of 'vanity spending of taxpayers' cash'.