logo
Smart Brain-Zapping Implants Could Revolutionize Parkinson's Treatment

Smart Brain-Zapping Implants Could Revolutionize Parkinson's Treatment

Keith Krehbiel lived with Parkinson's disease for nearly 25 years before agreeing to try a brain implant that might alleviate his symptoms. He had long been reluctant to submit to the surgery. 'It was a big move,' he says. But by 2020, his symptoms had become so severe that he grudgingly agreed to go ahead.
Deep-brain stimulation involves inserting thin wires through two small holes in the skull into a region of the brain associated with movement. The hope is that by delivering electrical pulses to the region, the implant can normalize aberrant brain activity and reduce symptoms. Since the devices were first approved almost three decades ago, some 200,000 people have had them fitted to help calm the tremors and rigidity caused by Parkinson's disease. But about 40,000 of those who received devices made after 2020 got them with a special feature that has largely not yet been turned on. The devices can read brain waves and then adapt and tailor the rhythm of their output, in much the same way as a pacemaker monitors and corrects the heart's electrical rhythms, says Helen Bronte-Stewart, a neurologist at Stanford University in California.
Bronte-Stewart received approval to start a clinical trial of this new technology, known as adaptive deep-brain stimulation (aDBS), the same week that Krehbiel was preparing for surgery. He recalls the phone call in which she asked him if he wanted to be her first participant: 'I said, 'Boy, do I!''
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
Five years on, the results of this 68-person trial, called ADAPT-PD, are under review for publication. Although the exact details are still under wraps, they were convincing enough to earn approval for the technology earlier this year from both US and European regulators.
The results of this study could be a boon for the estimated one million people in the United States and 1.2 million people in Europe who now live with Parkinson's disease — and for Medtronic, the health-care technology company based in Minneapolis, Minnesota, that manufactures the implants. The seeming success also clears a path for other companies around the world that are racing for approval on advanced devices, says Martijn Beudel, a neurologist at Amsterdam University Medical Center who worked on the trial.
The approaching wave of therapies promises to level up DBS for Parkinson's and other motor conditions. The technology might even help to treat neurological disorders such as Tourette's syndrome and psychiatric conditions, including obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) and depression. Several clinicians suggest that the new technology could have even more profound health implications — that is, if funding for US brain-implant research isn't cut.
Deep trade-offs
Since DBS was first approved in Europe and the United States in the late-1990s, the vast majority of devices have been given to people with Parkinson's disease. Parkinson's is a progressive disorder, typified by the death of neurons that produce the neurotransmitter dopamine, which is key to controlling movements.
Existing drugs that aim to increase dopamine levels can only manage the symptoms. They can't match the constant dopamine production of a healthy brain. 'No matter how clever we are with it, we have never been able to exactly mimic the way the brain supplies it,' says Bronte-Stewart. This means that symptoms vary throughout the day — from the unwanted involuntary movements induced by the morning flood of dopamine-mimicking drugs to increased rigidity later in the day as the drugs wear off. The medication also comes with other side effects that vary from person to person. For Krehbiel, it was nausea so severe he had to lie down multiple times a day.
When these become overwhelming, a neurologist might recommend DBS. Implants typically dispense pulses of electrical energy deep into the brain 24 hours a day to regulate aberrant brain signals associated with uncontrollable body movements. Before this year, this always-on approach was the only commercially available form of the therapy.
But continuous DBS can sometimes amplify the drugs' effects — or generate new symptoms. Some of these are harmless: one man with OCD developed a passion for the music of Johnny Cash when his stimulator was turned on, but was uninterested in the artist when it was off. Other symptoms are cause for more concern, including sudden-onset gambling disorders and other temporary changes in impulse control. More frequently, the addition of stimulation can induce speech impairments, such as slurring, raise the risk of falling and cause some involuntary movements.
A clinician can try to balance the system by adjusting the intensity of stimulation, but there are limits to how precisely it can be calibrated.
Krehbiel was aware of these shortcomings, and it contributed to his sense that DBS was a treatment of last resort. In the late 2010s, his neurologist hinted that big improvements were on the way. 'So I thought, wait for the new technology.'
Catching waves
Brain-wave activity is different in people with and without Parkinson's disease. In people with Parkinson's, there are noticeable differences at one range of frequencies, known as β-oscillations (between about 13 and 30 hertz), in a region deep in the brain called the basal ganglia. This region processes sensorimotor, cognitive and mood information.
β-oscillations have become an important marker of motor state. In the early 2000s, researchers at University College London found increasing evidence that people with Parkinson's have intense bursts of activity in this range. When drug treatments are working, these bursts are less exaggerated. The same is true for DBS. The more that stimulation normalizes β-oscillations, the better the relief of some symptoms, says Bronte-Stewart.
Aberrant oscillations were dubbed oscillopathies, and in the 2000s, Medtronic started focusing on developing a device that could both r ead and correct these rhythms, says Tim Denison, a biomedical engineer at the University of Oxford, UK, who was working at the company at the time. 'Just like you can build a radio to tune in to an audio channel, can we build a circuit that will tune in to these oscillopathies and help to guide how to adjust the stimulator?' he asks.
By 2006, Denison and his colleagues had built a 'brain radio', a sensing chip that could tune in to the different frequency bands in which the electrode sits. The next challenge was finding out how changes in particular bands correspond to specific movement problems. That was 'a huge part of the first eight to ten years of the research with the investigational hardware', says Bronte-Stewart. She and other researchers, including Philip Starr at the University of California, San Francisco, used a succession of new prototype devices to map these oscillopathies and adjust to them.
For example, when β-oscillation intensity begins to dip after a dose of medication, aDBS automatically reduces stimulation, keeping β-power in a healthy range. As the medication wears off, it does the opposite (see 'Fine-tuned stimulation'). In 2019, Bronte-Stewart developed one of the algorithms that would underpin aDBS. When she tested it on 13 people with Parkinson's, it improved the halting movements, called bradykinesia, that are associated with the disease. It also helped to reduce the inability to take steps, known as freezing of gait, in a study last year. In a separate study, Starr found that aDBS shortened the duration of volunteers' most bothersome motor disturbances, but without aggravating side effects.
Other studies have suggested that aDBS reduces speech problems, such as slurring, that were another possible side effect of continuous DBS. 'It only suppressed the pathological brain activity,' without suppressing normal speech, says Beudel.
Since 2013, small trials such as these have demonstrated these effects in around 400 people, estimates Robert Raike, the director of neuromodulation research and technology at Medtronic. What was missing was a way to validate these findings in real-world settings: in people's homes and workplaces over a long period of time. Researchers needed a big trial.
A personalized device
Any Medtronic DBS implant manufactured after 2020 has the ability to be switched into adaptive stimulation mode. If people were enrolled in a clinical trial after 2020, their implant's experimental capabilities could be activated by a firmware update, 'a software unlock, like your iPhone', says Raike. This approach opened up a large pool of possible trial participants. And the capability could be turned back off at the end of the trial.
After two months with continuous DBS, Bronte-Stewart unlocked Krehbiel's device. It continued to keep his tremor at bay. He needed fewer drugs.
Other trial volunteers have reported similar improvements, along with a reduction of symptoms associated with continuous stimulation. Although she is not permitted to discuss the results, which are still pending publication, Bronte-Stewart points to data presented at a 2024 conference. Of 45 volunteers in the trial who were given the choice to revert to the continuous DBS or to retain the new adaptive functionality for a further long-term follow-up, 44 chose to stay on aDBS, Krehbiel among them. 'I would not have considered for more than 30 seconds reverting back,' he says. 'I was feeling good and didn't much care why.'
Beudel saw a broadly similar trend among his participants. 'It's no secret that the results were positive,' he says. 'We now see patients from all over the country coming to our centre saying that they want the aDBS.'
Since the new system was approved earlier this year, the upgrade has been available to anyone with one of the post-2020 devices. Beyond straightforward symptom relief, these users might see beneficial effects that go beyond controlling motor symptoms.
For example, Parkinson's disease notoriously interferes with sleep, and as the medicine wears off at night, problems emerge that range from insomnia to hallucinations. Sleep deprivation, in turn, worsens the symptoms. 'It is a vicious circle,' says Beudel.
Adaptive DBS could reduce sleep disturbances by automatically adjusting to the sleep-induced changes in β-oscillations.
And better sleep might, in turn, protect the brain. If it does, says Denison, aDBS could shed light on the tantalizing but controversial hypothesis that DBS protects the brain when implanted earlier in Parkinson's disease progression.
Beyond Parkinson's
It's not just people with Parkinson's who might benefit from the new therapy. Slightly more than one-quarter of the estimated 230,000 people with a DBS implant use it to manage other diseases, including dystonia — a movement disorder that causes muscles to contract — essential tremor and OCD.
Researchers are working to identify the associated oscillopathies to allow them to extend aDBS to these populations, and to those whose conditions have not yet been approved for any form of DBS, including Tourette's syndrome. Beudel is exploring oscillopathies that precede the onset of tremor. Michael Okun, a neuroscientist at the University of Florida in Gainesville, has identified oscillations that could be quashed to dial down tics in Tourette's syndrome.
And although the evidence for psychiatric conditions is not yet as strong, says Starr, 'they might have oscillopathies that could be DBS targets.' OCD is especially promising, says Damiaan Denys, a psychiatrist at the University of Amsterdam. In a soon-to-be-published study, he and his team found clear associations between compulsions and specific brain signatures. 'We are near to finding some of these neurological imprints,' he says.
Adaptive DBS has also raised hopes for treatment-resistant depression, which would represent a much larger market than Parkinson's disease. Although DBS is not approved for this condition anywhere in the world, a few hundred people have had experimental implants.
Helen Mayberg, a neurologist at Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York City, ran two of the largest trials for depression so far. Both failed to meet their primary endpoint. Mayberg got one of Medtronic's early prototype brain radios to examine the potential role of oscillations in depression. The condition is complicated. Like Parkinson's, it has many symptoms, but unlike Parkinson's, no specific abnormal oscillations have been associated with it. 'If you round up ten people with depression,' says Alik Widge, a psychiatrist and biomedical engineer at the University of Minnesota, 'you would not see the same oscillopathy.'
But Mayberg might be zeroing in on a signal that is associated with individuals getting better: this brain-oscillation pattern emerges as symptoms recede. A month after the brain signal disappeared in one participant with depression, they relapsed.
This work is in its early days, but Mayberg thinks the sensing capabilities of modern devices might one day provide a 'check engine' warning light for possible relapse.
Overcomplicating the problem?
As Medtronic and other companies continue to enhance their DBS systems, the number of electrodes and their sophistication has risen swiftly. Some researchers, including Denison and Bronte-Stewart, say that the line is blurring between DBS and brain–computer interfaces.
The enhanced sophistication puts pressure on the clinicians in charge of managing the complex device settings. 'Who is going to program these?' asks Okun. He worries that the proliferation of smarter devices could make them, paradoxically, less accessible to people owing to the already-huge demands on clinicians' time.
Medtronic is working on more-automatic programming to save time: one new technology, approved this year, streamlines the process by which the clinician programs the device. Artificial intelligence might refine settings further; the US Food and Drug Administration is developing new standards for automation. Any further advances, however, will require more large studies, such as ADAPT-PD and the smaller studies that led up to it. These are not cheap. 'Every patient can cost a million bucks or more,' says Okun. But the future of a major funding source for DBS is in doubt. Even before the new US administration began slashing funds for medical research, last year Congress made a 40% cut to the BRAIN Initiative, the US National Institutes of Health's neurotechnology innovation accelerator that has provided instrumental support for DBS research. 'I think we're all worried about where the funding will come from to develop these types of studies,' says Bronte-Stewart, although even now, other countries are taking up the slack.
All the while, the number of people with Parkinson's is expected to nearly double globally by 2050: to 25 million.
To meet that need, the goal is to make the process as accessible as it was for Krehbiel. 'I had the opportunity to get the secret sauce,' he says, 'so why not go for it?'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NIH cuts spotlight a hidden crisis facing patients with experimental brain implants
NIH cuts spotlight a hidden crisis facing patients with experimental brain implants

Hamilton Spectator

time10 hours ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

NIH cuts spotlight a hidden crisis facing patients with experimental brain implants

Carol Seeger finally escaped her debilitating depression with an experimental treatment that placed electrodes in her brain and a pacemaker-like device in her chest. But when its batteries stopped working, insurance wouldn't pay to fix the problem and she sank back into a dangerous darkness. She worried for her life, asking herself: 'Why am I putting myself through this?' Seeger's predicament highlights a growing problem for hundreds of people with experimental neural implants, including those for depression, quadriplegia and other conditions. Although these patients take big risks to advance science, there's no guarantee that their devices will be maintained — particularly after they finish participating in clinical trials — and no mechanism requiring companies or insurers to do so. A research project led by Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz, a Harvard University scientist, aimed to change that by creating partnerships between players in the burgeoning implant field to overcome barriers to device access and follow-up care. But the cancellation of hundreds of National Institutes of Health grants by the Trump administration this year left the project in limbo, dimming hope for Seeger and others like her who wonder what will happen to their health and progress. An ethical quagmire Unlike medications, implanted devices often require parts, maintenance, batteries and surgeries when changes are needed. Insurance typically covers such expenses for federally approved devices considered medically necessary, but not experimental ones. A procedure to replace a battery alone can cost more than $15,000 without insurance, Lázaro-Muñoz said. While companies stand to profit from research, 'there's really nothing that helps ensure that device manufacturers have to provide any of these parts or cover any kind of maintenance,' said Lázaro-Muñoz. Some companies also move on to newer versions of devices or abandon the research altogether, which can leave patients in an uncertain place. Medtronic, the company that made the deep brain stimulation, or DBS, technology Seeger used, said in a statement that every study is different and that the company puts patient safety first when considering care after studies end. People consider various possibilities when they join a clinical trial. The Food and Drug Administration requires the informed consent process to include a description of 'reasonably foreseeable risks and discomforts to the participant,' a spokesperson said. However, the FDA doesn't require trial plans to include procedures for long-term device follow-up and maintenance, although the spokesperson stated that the agency has requested those in the past. While some informed consent forms say devices will be removed at a study's end, Lázaro-Muñoz said removal is ethically problematic when a device is helping a patient. Plus, he said, some trial participants told him and his colleagues that they didn't remember everything discussed during the consent process, partly because they were so focused on getting better. Brandy Ellis, a 49-year-old in Boynton Beach, Florida, said she was desperate for healing when she joined a trial testing the same treatment Seeger got, which delivers an electrical current into the brain to treat severe depression. She was willing to sign whatever forms were necessary to get help after nothing else had worked. 'I was facing death,' she said. 'So it was most definitely consent at the barrel of a gun, which is true for a lot of people who are in a terminal condition.' Patients risk losing a treatment of last resort Ellis and Seeger, 64, both turned to DBS as a last resort after trying many approved medications and treatments . 'I got in the trial fully expecting it not to work because nothing else had. So I was kind of surprised when it did,' said Ellis, whose device was implanted in 2011 at Emory University in Atlanta. 'I am celebrating every single milestone because I'm like: This is all bonus life for me.' She's now on her third battery. She needed surgery to replace two single-use ones, and the one she has now is rechargeable. She's lucky her insurance has covered the procedures, she said, but she worries it may not in the future. 'I can't count on any coverage because there's nothing that says even though I've had this and it works, that it has to be covered under my commercial or any other insurance,' said Ellis, who advocates for other former trial participants. Even if companies still make replacement parts for older devices, she added, 'availability and accessibility are entirely different things,' given most people can't afford continued care without insurance coverage. Seeger, whose device was implanted in 2012 at Emory, said she went without a working device for around four months when the insurance coverage her wife's job at Emory provided wouldn't pay for battery replacement surgery. Neither would Medicare, which generally only covers DBS for FDA-approved uses. With her research team at Emory advocating for her, Seeger ultimately got financial help from the hospital's indigent care program and paid a few thousand dollars out of pocket. She now has a rechargeable battery, and the device has been working well. But at any point, she said, that could change. Federal cuts stall solutions Lázaro-Muñoz hoped his work would protect people like Seeger and Ellis. 'We should do whatever we can as a society to be able to help them maintain their health,' he said. Lázaro-Muñoz's project received about $987,800 from the National Institute of Mental Health in the 2023 and 2024 fiscal years and was already underway when he was notified of the NIH funding cut in May. He declined to answer questions about it. Ellis said any delay in addressing the thorny issues around experimental brain devices hurts patients. Planning at the beginning of a clinical trial about how to continue treatment and maintain devices, she said, would be much better than depending on the kindness of researchers and the whims of insurers. 'If this turns off, I get sick again. Like, I'm not cured,' she said. 'This is a treatment that absolutely works, but only as long as I've got a working device.' ____ The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Department of Science Education and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.

NIH cuts spotlight a hidden crisis facing patients with experimental brain implants
NIH cuts spotlight a hidden crisis facing patients with experimental brain implants

San Francisco Chronicle​

time10 hours ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

NIH cuts spotlight a hidden crisis facing patients with experimental brain implants

Carol Seeger finally escaped her debilitating depression with an experimental treatment that placed electrodes in her brain and a pacemaker-like device in her chest. But when its batteries stopped working, insurance wouldn't pay to fix the problem and she sank back into a dangerous darkness. She worried for her life, asking herself: 'Why am I putting myself through this?' Seeger's predicament highlights a growing problem for hundreds of people with experimental neural implants, including those for depression, quadriplegia and other conditions. Although these patients take big risks to advance science, there's no guarantee that their devices will be maintained — particularly after they finish participating in clinical trials — and no mechanism requiring companies or insurers to do so. A research project led by Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz, a Harvard University scientist, aimed to change that by creating partnerships between players in the burgeoning implant field to overcome barriers to device access and follow-up care. But the cancellation of hundreds of National Institutes of Health grants by the Trump administration this year left the project in limbo, dimming hope for Seeger and others like her who wonder what will happen to their health and progress. An ethical quagmire Unlike medications, implanted devices often require parts, maintenance, batteries and surgeries when changes are needed. Insurance typically covers such expenses for federally approved devices considered medically necessary, but not experimental ones. A procedure to replace a battery alone can cost more than $15,000 without insurance, Lázaro-Muñoz said. While companies stand to profit from research, 'there's really nothing that helps ensure that device manufacturers have to provide any of these parts or cover any kind of maintenance,' said Lázaro-Muñoz. Some companies also move on to newer versions of devices or abandon the research altogether, which can leave patients in an uncertain place. Medtronic, the company that made the deep brain stimulation, or DBS, technology Seeger used, said in a statement that every study is different and that the company puts patient safety first when considering care after studies end. People consider various possibilities when they join a clinical trial. The Food and Drug Administration requires the informed consent process to include a description of 'reasonably foreseeable risks and discomforts to the participant,' a spokesperson said. However, the FDA doesn't require trial plans to include procedures for long-term device follow-up and maintenance, although the spokesperson stated that the agency has requested those in the past. While some informed consent forms say devices will be removed at a study's end, Lázaro-Muñoz said removal is ethically problematic when a device is helping a patient. Plus, he said, some trial participants told him and his colleagues that they didn't remember everything discussed during the consent process, partly because they were so focused on getting better. Brandy Ellis, a 49-year-old in Boynton Beach, Florida, said she was desperate for healing when she joined a trial testing the same treatment Seeger got, which delivers an electrical current into the brain to treat severe depression. She was willing to sign whatever forms were necessary to get help after nothing else had worked. 'I was facing death,' she said. 'So it was most definitely consent at the barrel of a gun, which is true for a lot of people who are in a terminal condition.' Patients risk losing a treatment of last resort Ellis and Seeger, 64, both turned to DBS as a last resort after trying many approved medications and treatments. 'I got in the trial fully expecting it not to work because nothing else had. So I was kind of surprised when it did,' said Ellis, whose device was implanted in 2011 at Emory University in Atlanta. 'I am celebrating every single milestone because I'm like: This is all bonus life for me.' She's now on her third battery. She needed surgery to replace two single-use ones, and the one she has now is rechargeable. She's lucky her insurance has covered the procedures, she said, but she worries it may not in the future. 'I can't count on any coverage because there's nothing that says even though I've had this and it works, that it has to be covered under my commercial or any other insurance,' said Ellis, who advocates for other former trial participants. Even if companies still make replacement parts for older devices, she added, 'availability and accessibility are entirely different things,' given most people can't afford continued care without insurance coverage. Seeger, whose device was implanted in 2012 at Emory, said she went without a working device for around four months when the insurance coverage her wife's job at Emory provided wouldn't pay for battery replacement surgery. Neither would Medicare, which generally only covers DBS for FDA-approved uses. With her research team at Emory advocating for her, Seeger ultimately got financial help from the hospital's indigent care program and paid a few thousand dollars out of pocket. She now has a rechargeable battery, and the device has been working well. But at any point, she said, that could change. Federal cuts stall solutions Lázaro-Muñoz hoped his work would protect people like Seeger and Ellis. 'We should do whatever we can as a society to be able to help them maintain their health,' he said. Lázaro-Muñoz's project received about $987,800 from the National Institute of Mental Health in the 2023 and 2024 fiscal years and was already underway when he was notified of the NIH funding cut in May. He declined to answer questions about it. Ellis said any delay in addressing the thorny issues around experimental brain devices hurts patients. Planning at the beginning of a clinical trial about how to continue treatment and maintain devices, she said, would be much better than depending on the kindness of researchers and the whims of insurers. 'If this turns off, I get sick again. Like, I'm not cured,' she said. 'This is a treatment that absolutely works, but only as long as I've got a working device.'

15 Sets Of Cooling Sheets To Make Sleeping Hot A Thing Of The Past
15 Sets Of Cooling Sheets To Make Sleeping Hot A Thing Of The Past

Buzz Feed

timea day ago

  • Buzz Feed

15 Sets Of Cooling Sheets To Make Sleeping Hot A Thing Of The Past

Hi, all my fellow hot sleepers!!! Tell your night sweats they're about to meet their match — we've found sheet sets that are actually cooling and won't make your bed feel like a sauna in the summer. So what did we look for when finding these 15 reviewer-loved sheet sets? 100% cotton and 100% linen reign supreme when it comes to cooling fabrics. Cotton is lightweight and breathable, and linen ups the ante by also being moisture-wicking. However, cotton is very durable (especially long- or extra-long staple cotton like Supima), while linen is less also included a mix of sateen- and percale-weave sheets. Sateen sheets are super smooth, drape easily, and have a subtle sheen to them. Percale sheets have more of a crisp, cool feeling with a matte finish — think of a freshly laundered shirt! We'll also point out if the set is Oeko-Tex certified. This means it has been independently tested for harmful substances to ensure that it is suitable for humans to use — that's super important for something that makes contact with your skin on a nightly basis!We decided not to include bamboo sheets, as most of them undergo less sustainable production methods. Most sheets that advertise themselves as "bamboo" are actually made of bamboo-viscose (aka bamboo-rayon) or bamboo-lyocell, which are produced in ways that involve toxic chemicals that can become pollutants. You can read more about bamboo fabrics at The Council of Fashion Designers of and microfiber is not the best choice when it comes to staying cool. It's tightly-woven, meaning your body heat won't escape as now let's find you a new sheet set!!! A wildly popular 400-thread count cotton sateen cooling sheet set so soft and cooling, you'll never throw them off you in the middle of the night when you suddenly feel like someone cranked up the thermostat to 100 degrees. Bonus — reviewers say these hold up super well after repeated washings with very few wrinkles and no shrinkage! A 100% European linen set that comes in a gingham pattern so country-chic it might just mentally transport you to a cozy cabin in the woods. Reviewers rave over them for their super lightweight feel. (Oh, and that there's an option without a flat sheet!) A set made with 100% Egyptian cotton in a percale weave — which is perfect for curling up under on a 90+ degree day while watching Uptown Girls and singing along to 🎶na na na na na na na na, sheets of Egyptian cotton. 🎶 Oh, and Egyptian cotton is known for its durability, so these should last you for years to come. A set of 100% organic cotton sheets that come packaged in a reusable fabric bag, which is so much better than the flimsy plastic other sets come in. Several reviewers say these are thin enough to feel comy for hot sleepers, yet sturdy enough to stand up to many washes — one reviewer says years worth! A splurge-worthy set of Supima cotton sheets with a super smooth sateen weave that'll tell night sweats to take a hike. One reviewer even compared these to hotel sheets, which is truly the highest compliment you can give to a sheet set. A set of 100% cotton sateen sheets that are BELOVED by Target reviewers. No, really, I think some of these reviewers are counting on these becoming a family heirloom. That's probably because of the smooth 400-thread count wrinkle-resistant fabric, and the extremely helpful "top or bottom" tags so you know which side is which. If you've ever almost given up on making your bed and just flopping on the couch because you lined the fitted sheet's corners up incorrectly, these are for you. A pure linen set so buttery smooth you'll roll around on it like a dog going carpet swimming. It's designed to absorb moisture without feeling wet to the touch, so if night sweats come to pay you a visit, they'll be quickly whisked away with barely a trace. A set made with 100% pima cotton (meaning they're luxuriously soft, silky, and long-lasting compared to regular cotton fibers) and a percale weave for a crisp, cool feel and matte finish. And can we talk about the floral prints?! Absolutely stunning for any time of the year = worth the investment. A set of brightly printed cotton bedsheets so you can add a vibrant summer vibe to your bed while you escape from the grueling summer temps. These get rave reviews for the bold prints that actually look as nice in person as they do in the product photos, and for having a ~crisp~ percale texture that'll give you that *fresh sheet* feeling every night. A super sweet rainbow set — it's made with 100% cotton, meaning it'll be light and breathable enough to keep kids (or your inner child) comfy and cool all afternoon long, when it's time for a nap, *and* all night long. A set of cotton sheets that'll combine your love for bold, vibrant patterns and breathable fabrics, thanks to the percale weave. The fitted sheet can easily fit mattresses up to 18 inches deep, so they might just make you dread sheet-changing-day a little less. Or a cotton set featuring a super vibrant red floral pattern so you can make it look like spring every single day of the year. The breathable percale weave will also make it feel like spring too — not too cold, not too hot. Or! A 100% cotton set made with a smooth sateen weave that'll drape super elegantly over your bed and basically turn it into a work of art. Reviewers say they hold up for years, and some have even picked up extra sets! A chic set made with 100% stone-washed linen — come for the lightweight softness, stay for the dramatic flair of the ruffled pillowcases. An absolutely adorable set made with 100% cotton and a percale weave — the coffee that's printed on them might be hot, but you'll stay as cool as a glass of cold brew. No judgment if they inspire you to have breakfast-in-bed and leave croissant crumbs all over them. It'll just elevate the vibe.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store