Canadian province leader threatens to cut off energy to 3 US states, imposes 25% surcharge
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Mexico, Canada tariffs most likely to impact Americans
After a brief pause, President Donald Trump announced Mexico and Canada tariffs back on for early March, which could ultimately impact Americans.
The head of the Canadian province of Ontario has repeatedly promised strong retaliation against the U.S. tariffs going into effect against Canadian goods, ensuring "America feels the pain."
President Donald Trump announced Monday the delay on tariffs against Mexico and Canada was over, and thus a 25% tax on most imports from the trade partners went into effect after midnight.
Ontario Premier Doug Ford, leader of the Progressive Conservative Party of Ontario, said at a press conference Tuesday he would apply a 25% surcharge on energy exports to New York, Michigan and Minnesota and would consider restricting the electricity exports down the line if the tariffs persist. He repeatedly placed the blame solely at Trump's feet.
"A tariff on Canada is a tax on Americans," Ford said at the Prospectors and Developers Association of Canada convention Monday. "I will do everything, including cut off their energy with a smile on my face. And I encourage every other province to do the same."
Ontario is Canada's second-largest energy producer, with most of its power coming from uranium. The province has interconnections with the provinces Manitoba and Quebec as well as three U.S. states: Michigan, Minnesota, and New York. Most of its imports come from Quebec and most of its exports go to New York and Michigan, according to the Canada Energy Regulator website.
The tax would not begin immediately on Tuesday, a Ford representative told Bloomberg.
What the Trump administration means for your wallet: Sign up for USA TODAY's Daily Money newsletter.
What are tariffs? Here's why they could make beer, books and coffee more expensive
Canada enacted retaliatory tariffs: Alcohol, internet imports impacted in Ontario
Canada and the U.S. have enjoyed a mostly tariff-free relationship for decades. While most imports from Canada are now taxed at 25%, energy is taxed at 10%.
Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced Tuesday Canada would respond with 25% tariffs on $20.7 billion worth of U.S. imports, effective immediately. That will escalate to another $86.2 billion worth of imports if Trump's tariffs are still in effect in three weeks.
Ford said he supported Trudeau's tariffs Tuesday. He also announced he was removing American alcohol products from distribution and had canceled Ontario's contract with Elon Musk's satellite internet service Starlink.
"There's going to be unemployment, inflation is going to hit and it's going to hurt the American people," Ford said Tuesday. "You need to speak up against Donald Trump and speak up for your people. That's what we do here in Canada."
Contributing: Kim Hjelmgaard
Kinsey Crowley is a trending news reporter at USA TODAY. Reach her at kcrowley@gannett.com, and follow her on X and TikTok @kinseycrowley.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Report slams Trump's DC homeless policy. Should it be a crime to be homeless?
As President Donald Trump tries to forcibly remove homeless people from Washington, D.C., one think tank is warning that policies that criminalize or punish people for sleeping outside are not just cruel, they're ineffective. Trump plans to seize control of Washington's Metropolitan Police Department and sweep homeless people off the city's streets, he said at an Aug. 11 press conference. Those steps would go against evidence that anti-homeless laws and actions can exacerbate the problem, according to an Aug. 6 report by Mari Castaldi, director of state housing policy at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP), a nonpartisan Washington-based think tank often described as left-leaning. When people are removed from public spaces where they've been living, the report noted, they may lose personal property, have traumatic encounters with law enforcement and incur criminal records and fines that make it harder to get a job or rental housing. "Communities implementing these practices actively hinder people from exiting homelessness, thus worsening, not solving, the nation's homelessness crisis," Castaldi wrote. Homelessness can lead to jail in many states, cities "Since 2022, at least eight states have passed — and dozens more have considered — legislation to ticket, fine, or jail people simply for having no safe place to sleep," Castaldi wrote. What's more, the report said, more than 320 local ordinances to fine or arrest people for sleeping outside have been introduced since the Supreme Court's Grants Pass v. Johnson decision determined that it may be considered a crime. On July 24, Trump signed an executive order making it easier for cities and states to remove homeless people from the streets. When rental assistance and similar services are well-funded, homelessness declines, the report says, citing such policy experiments in Chattanooga, Tennessee, Los Angeles and among veterans nationally. The CBPP report is among several that critique policies championed by the Cicero Institute, a think tank that describes itself as nonpartisan. Cicero was founded by Joe Lonsdale, a Silicon Valley entrepreneur who backed Trump's campaign for president in 2024. More: America's housing is pulling further out of reach, report finds The policies endorsed by CBPP are "untenable," Cicero argues. "Instead, states should pursue minimally viable shelter options and sanctioned encampments with services. Permanent supportive housing doesn't address homelessness – it creates demand for more homelessness and supports cronyism." The group also believes that such policies trap the homeless where they are, rather than providing a path to self-sufficiency. "That's why, despite increased spending, homelessness has continued to rise over the past two decades," Cicero says. Read next: Why do over 1 million Americans live in 'plumbing poverty,' lacking running water? CBPP and other groups see the increase in homelessness as stemming from a failure to respond to the affordable housing crisis. "Homelessness is solvable," Castaldi says. "The way forward is not through punishing people for struggling under a flawed system, but through prioritizing supports that can end their homelessness or prevent it from occurring in the first place." This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Should it be a crime to be homeless?
UPI
16 minutes ago
- UPI
Will new South Korean administration attract more foreign investment?
South Korean President Lee Jae Myung delivers a speech during a press conference to mark his first 30 days in office at the Yeongbingwan, the state guest house of the Blue House, in Seoul in early July. File photo by Kim Min-Hee/EPA/Pool Aug. 14 (UPI) -- The South Korean government will hold a special event Friday to commemorate President Lee Jae Myung's recent election, coinciding with the 80th anniversary of Liberation Day from Japan's 1910-1945 colonial rule. The ceremony will be held because Lee did not have a formal inauguration. He assumed office immediately after winning the June 3 election, which was triggered by the impeachment of former President Yoon Suk-yeol over his declaration of martial law last December. In his first two months in office, Lee has introduced a range of economic and legal policies, which could influence the decisions of foreign investors. So far, reactions have been mixed. One of the most contentious issues is the so-called Yellow Envelope Act, intended to safeguard subcontracted workers, curb corporate lawsuits seeking damages from strikes and expand legal responsibility for executives who avoid collective bargaining. Business associations have asked the National Assembly to reconsider its legislation, which would amend the Trade Union Act, warning that it could negatively affect the economy by emboldening already militant trade unions. However, the ruling Democratic Party has vowed to pass the bill this month, which alarmed foreign companies here, as demonstrated by the response from the American Chamber of Commerce in Korea. "A flexible labor environment is essential to strengthening Korea's competitiveness as a business hub in the Asia-Pacific region," its chairman, James Kim, said in a statement. "If enacted in its current form, this legislation could influence future investment decisions by American companies considering Korea." The European Chamber of Commerce in Korea also voiced concern, particularly over the broadened definition of "employer" to include those from subcontracted firms. It even warned that it could prompt foreign firms to exit the market. "Given the numerous criminal sanctions imposed on employers under the Trade Union Act, this vague and expanded definition may treat business operators as potential criminals and significantly discourage business activity," the chamber said. "The impact is particularly severe for foreign-invested companies, which are highly sensitive to legal risks stemming from labor regulations. For example, if a company faces the risk of criminal penalties for refusing to engage in collective bargaining -- especially in situations where it is unclear which union to negotiate with -- it may ultimately choose to withdraw from the Korean market," it said. On July 31, the new administration announced plans to roll back recently imposed tax cuts on corporate income and capital gains, which were made in 2022 during the Yoon administration in 2022. Global financial think tanks, including Citigroup, Goldman Sachs and CLSA, expressed concern. Citigroup noted that the proposed tax hikes would be "unfavorable for business and equity market investors' confidence." The market reaction was swift. On Aug. 1, the next trading day, offshore investors sold $470 million worth of benchmark KOSPI shares, ending a seven-day streak of net purchases. They have since returned as buyers, though. "President Lee has pledged to double the nation's stock market value during his five-year stint, and one of his main strategies was to draw foreign investment by improving the investment environment," Lee Phil-sang, an adviser at Aju Research Institute of Corporate Management and former Seoul National University economics professor, told UPI. "Yet, his administration has come up with various anti-corporate policies. They would not encourage foreigners to invest in Korea," he said. Still, not all of Lee's initiatives have disappointed markets. Early last month, the country's unicameral parliament approved an amendment to the Commercial Act, expanding board members' fiduciary obligations to better protect minority shareholders' interests. President Lee has endorsed the legislation to help eliminate the so-called "Korea discount," which refers to the tendency for Korean companies to trade at lower valuations than comparable firms in other major economies. "After President Lee made an oath, stock prices have remained bullish and foreign investors have gobbled up Korean shares. That is clear evidence that his foreign investor policy is working," Seoul-based consultancy Leaders Index CEO Park Ju-gun said in a phone interview. Since Lee's inauguration, the KOSPI has jumped nearly 20%. During the span, foreign investors have been buyers, pouring in more than $6.7 billion, according to the Korea Exchange. By contrast, Sogang University professor Kim Young-ick downplayed the appreciation of stock values. "Our share prices have risen mainly due to the removal of political uncertainty following the ouster of erstwhile President Yoon. That is simply the normalization of temporarily undervalued stock prices," he said. "To continue the upward momentum, the country's economy should perform better. President Lee's goal of increasing the potential economic growth rate to 3% through AI investment sounds good. But it will be very difficult to achieve," he added.
The Hill
17 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump's nod to Europe on a future peace force for Ukraine vastly improves its chances of success
BRUSSELS (AP) — The greenlight given by President Donald Trump on U.S. backup for a European-led force to police any future peace agreement in Ukraine vastly improves the likelihood it might succeed. European leaders said Trump offered his backing during a call they held ahead of his summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Friday. The effectiveness of the operation, drawn up by the so-called coalition of the willing of around 30 countries supporting Ukraine, hinges on U.S. backup with airpower or other military equipment that European armed forces do not have, or only in short supply. EU leaders regularly have underlined how the United States is 'crucial' to the success of the security operation dubbed Multinational Force Ukraine. But the Trump administration has long refused to commit, perhaps keeping its participation on hold as leverage in talks with Russia. After a meeting Wednesday between Trump and European leaders, European Council President Antonio Costa welcomed 'the readiness of the United States to share with Europe the efforts to reinforce security conditions once we obtain a durable and just peace for Ukraine.' French President Emmanuel Macron said Trump had insisted NATO must not be part of these security guarantees, but the U.S. leader agreed 'the United States and all the (other) parties involved should take part.' 'It's a very important clarification,' Macron said. Trump did not publicly confirm he would allow U.S. backup, and no details of possible U.S. support were made public, but U.S. Vice President JD Vance sat in on the coalition meeting for the first time. The Multinational Force Ukraine More than 200 military planners have worked for months on ways to ensure a future peace should the war, now in its fourth year, finally halt. Ukraine's armed forces also have been involved, and British personnel have led reconnaissance work inside Ukraine. The exact size of the force has not been made public, although Britain has said it could number 10,000 to 30,000 troops. It must be enough to deter Russian forces, but also of a realistic size for nations that shrank their militaries after the Cold War and are now rearming. The 'reassurance' force's mission 'will be to strengthen Ukraine's defenses on the land, at sea, and in the air because the Ukrainian Armed Forces are the best deterrent against future Russian aggression,' U.K. Defence Secretary John Healey told lawmakers last month. 'It will secure Ukraine's skies by using aircraft,' Healey said, 'and it will support safer seas by bolstering the Black Sea Task Force with additional specialist teams.' Bulgaria, Romania and Turkey launched that naval force a year ago to deal with mines in Black Sea waters. The force initially will have its headquarters in Paris before moving to London next year. A coordination headquarters in Kyiv will be involved once hostilities cease and it deploys. The impact of US participation European efforts to set up the force have been seen as a first test of the continent's willingness to defend itself and its interests, given Trump administration warnings that Europe must take care of its own security and that of Ukraine in future. Still, U.S. forces clearly provide a deterrent that the Europeans cannot muster. Details of what the U.S. might contribute were unknown, and Trump has changed his mind in the past, so it remains to be seen whether this signal will be enough to persuade more countries within the coalition to provide troops. Greece has publicly rejected doing so. Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis said last month that those discussions were 'somewhat divisive' and distracted from the goal of ending the war as soon as possible. Italy's Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni has said Rome won't contribute troops, but she previously has underlined the importance of working with the U.S. on ending the conflict and called for the participation of an American delegation in force coordination meetings.
