
5 Actions to Enhance Shareholder Value in M&A Deals
Despite the high cost of capital and a slew of macroeconomic uncertainties, more than 70% of the most confident global chief executive officers (CEOs) are betting on a mergers and acquisitions (M&A) comeback in 2025. But to escalate value creation and total shareholder return (TSR), businesses may need to fundamentally change the trajectory of their enterprise strategy.
Enterprise strategy shapes a company's M&A approach
Business school teaches the fundamentals of strategy. The CEO and the board lead enterprise strategy to achieve significant change, using various pillars, programs, and initiatives to drive TSR. Yet we still hear about frequent disconnects from the enterprise strategy up, down, and across organizations.
Our work on thousands of M&A deals reveals five actions that deal teams can take to improve their outcomes:
1. Create a strong, strategic gameplan.
2. Allocate capital based on the enterprise strategy, backed up by data.
3. Use artificial intelligence (AI) for competitive advantage.
4. Tap the deal team's knowledge.
5. Communicate the deal thesis early.
Action 1: Get your strategic gameplan on.
Best-in-class strategy and business teams constantly have their fingers on the pulse of their growth drivers. They prepare for each year with a plan to capture growth through organic means, such as new products and new and existing customers, and inorganic means, including M&A, joint ventures, and strategic alliances. This strategic plan informs most M&A decisions and should help break any deadlocked decisions when opportune deals land on the corporate development team's desks.
Capital allocation
Many companies are capable of developing their strategy, and numerous business units are competent at creating investment cases for their programs and initiatives. However, these companies may still experience challenges when linking strategies and opportunities together. An effective capital allocation strategy incorporates the enterprise strategy and helps decision-makers plan, select, manage, and evaluate investment opportunities.
Action 2: Allocate capital based on the enterprise strategy, backed up by data.
Within the context of M&A, this means having a fact-based and data-driven approach to the volume, type, and focus areas (market, product, geography) for your planned deals within a given timeframe. Opportunistic transactions will pop up, and when they do, decision-makers should prioritize deals with a balanced scorecard of financial metrics, such as capital requested, return on invested capital (ROIC), internal rate of return (IRR) and revenue, as well as non-financial factors, such as strategic importance, customer satisfaction, and business continuity risk.
Deal sourcing
Effective acquirers constantly develop and refresh a strong pipeline of targets through various means.
Yes, it helps to have strong relationships with investment banks who know your sector and know which assets are on the market. But your organization's business leaders know the business best. The business unit presidents of effective serial acquirers identify early potential targets and use their relationships to bring the opportunities to corporate development.
Action 3: Use AI to get a leg up.
To stay competitive and maximize acquisition potential, leading deal teams are increasingly turning to AI as a strategic tool to enhance their deal sourcing and improve efficiency and effectiveness. Specifically, AI can:
• Analyze market trends
• Identify promising targets
• Forecast outcomes
• Map relationships
• Assess sentiment
• Provide automated alerts
• Streamline due diligence
• Facilitate collaboration
Companies can use AI tools, such as EY Competitive Edge, to accomplish these tasks.
Action 4: Tap into deal team expertise.
Deals can commence in various contexts, such as market expansion, technology acquisition, or strategic partnerships. To develop transaction strategy, use the brain trust of the deal team and advisors to navigate the complex journey, from initial target communication through valuation, negotiation, and final bid. No detail is too miniscule with sequencing, planning offers and counteroffers, and aligning roles and responsibilities. These tactics help streamline the process and limit resistance, contributing significantly to the success of the deal.
Preliminary analysis
While valuation, business modeling, and benchmarking are fundamental, business leaders should not overlook their importance. The preliminary analysis is critical in verifying the contemplated deal will lead to the value creation and TSR that the enterprise strategy is designed to achieve. In addition to effective analysis rooted in data—and not in the emotions of any executives who might want the deal to happen—this early stage is when integration leaders should be brought into the fold.
Action 5: Communicate the deal thesis early.
Clearly documenting the investment thesis, value drivers, integration strategy, and resourcing is a leading practice that can help expedite the subsequent phases of the deal journey after a letter of intent is signed, diligence commences, transaction documents are signed, and the deal is closed.
By taking these strategic actions early in the deal lifecycle, companies can confidently execute their M&A strategies and their enterprise strategy, enabling value creation and increased TSR. The companies that wait on these areas risk missing out on valuable time to quickly realize value and eroding the deal value post-close.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Jack Dorsey Advocates for Bitcoin Use as Everyday Currency 'As It Was Designed to Be'
Block CEO Jack Dorsey has once again emphasized his stance on Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC), advocating for its use as everyday money, a vision originally proposed by Bitcoin's creator, Satoshi Nakamoto. What Happened: Dorsey stressed that Bitcoin's ultimate purpose should be for daily transactions, not merely speculative trading. 'We want Bitcoin to become p2p electronic cash and everyday money, as it was designed to be,' Dorsey stated in a post on comments were in response to a post by Entropy Capital regarding how Block has developed a comprehensive Bitcoin ecosystem. This system comprises Square, a platform that allows merchants to accept Bitcoin payments, and Cash App, a wallet designed for quick and inexpensive transactions. Other elements include Bitkey, a self-custody hardware wallet for offline Bitcoin storage, and Proto, a Bitcoin mining infrastructure. Also Read: Jack Dorsey Says Bluesky's Rapid Expansion Fueled by X Exodus: 'Not a Great Way To Build a Product' Dorsey's message is unequivocal: Bitcoin is destined to become a part of everyday transactions, and Block is strategically positioning itself to facilitate this transition. Simultaneously, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has indicated that the U.S. is dedicated to exploring ways to accumulate more Bitcoin. At the time of writing, Bitcoin was trading at $118,473.47, a slight dip from its intraday peak of $119,399.29. Why It Matters: Dorsey's renewed emphasis on Bitcoin's intended use as everyday money underscores the growing acceptance of cryptocurrencies in the mainstream financial landscape. With Block's comprehensive Bitcoin ecosystem, the company is well-positioned to lead the charge in this transition, potentially influencing other companies to follow suit. Furthermore, the U.S. Treasury's interest in accumulating Bitcoin signals a shift in governmental attitudes towards cryptocurrencies, potentially paving the way for more widespread adoption and regulatory clarity. Read Next Here Is How Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey Plans To Expand Bitcoin Trading Image: Shutterstock Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? This article Jack Dorsey Advocates for Bitcoin Use as Everyday Currency 'As It Was Designed to Be' originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Prediction: 2 Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stocks That Will Be Worth More Than Nvidia by 2030
Key Points Nvidia has been the biggest beneficiary of AI spending among big tech companies. But Amazon and Meta Platforms are two tech giants seeing very strong results from investments in AI, and their future could be even brighter. Both trade at compelling valuations, especially compared to how expensive Nvidia has become. 10 stocks we like better than Amazon › Since October 2022, Nvidia has seen its value increase by more than $4 trillion. To put that into perspective, no other company is even worth $4 trillion today. The huge surge in value for the maker of graphics processing units (GPUs) stems from a few big tech companies spending hundreds of billions on its chips every year. The four biggest hyperscalers are set to spend around $380 billion on AI infrastructure this year, and they have guided for significant steps up in spending next year. Nvidia is set to be the prime beneficiary of that increased spending for some time, but that doesn't mean the stock will continue to climb. Market prices are based on what investors expect in the future, and the expectations for Nvidia remain high. But two other AI stocks look like they could surpass investor expectations, pushing both companies to exceed Nvidia's value by 2030. Can Nvidia keep climbing from here? Continued growth in AI spending is giving investors more and more confidence that Nvidia can keep up its torrid sales growth. The three main public cloud providers all reiterated that demand exceeds computing capacity, which means they will continue to spend growing amounts to meet their customers' needs. Meanwhile, Nvidia is selling chips as fast as it can make them. That led to a 69% rise in revenue in the company's first quarter, and a 59% increase in adjusted income. But it's unlikely to see growth continue at this pace. All four hyperscalers are working on custom silicon solutions for their own AI training. Microsoft is reportedly planning to shift a significant portion of its spending to its Maia300 chip in late 2026. Meta Platforms (NASDAQ: META) is working on expanding the AI workloads that its custom Meta Training and Inference Accelerating (MTIA) chips can handle. And on top of all of that, AMD is starting to show progress in catching up to Nvidia, while continuing to offer excellent price performance. Investors should expect a significant slowdown in sales as Nvidia faces fierce competition for its share of data center servers and it battles with the law of large numbers. As supply-demand forces reach equilibrium, the chipmaker might not be able to command such high gross margins, either. That could weigh on earnings growth. But with the stock currently trading at more than 42 times forward earnings, investors seem to think those risks aren't going to materialize. I think it's more likely they will keep Nvidia from continuing to outperform the market at such a torrid pace, limiting how much more upside there is from here. If investors want to buy shares of a big tech company capitalizing on the growth of AI, the following two industry giants present better value with more upside. In fact, I expect they will both be worth more than Nvidia by 2030. 1. Amazon Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN) is the largest provider of public cloud computing in the world with Amazon Web Services (AWS), making it one of Nvidia's biggest customers. While the company was caught flat-footed as generative AI took off in 2022, management quickly caught up with the competition thanks in part to its investment in Anthropic. Management continues to see strong demand for its AI services, with revenue more than doubling year over year. However, AWS's scale has masked that strong growth. The cloud services segment generated $116 billion in revenue over the last 12 months. That's roughly 55% larger than its next closest competitor, Microsoft. But AWS's 17% year-over-year growth looks disappointing compared to Microsoft's 39% growth in cloud services last quarter. Nonetheless, Amazon has mostly kept its market share despite strong growth by its competitors. What's more important is that the margin profile on AWS is extremely strong. The operating margin of 36.8% over the last 12 months is up from 33.4% a year ago. And while it took a dip in the second quarter, that's due to the timing of share-based compensation. The long-term trend shows continued improvement in margins. Meanwhile, Amazon's retail business is becoming very profitable in its own right. The North American segment saw its operating margin climb to 7% last quarter while the international segment's margin came in at 3.4%. Strong top-line growth of 11% for both helped, which was bolstered by high-margin ad revenue growth of 22%. The long-term trends favor steady revenue growth across Amazon's businesses with particular strength in its high-margin operations (namely AWS and advertising). That should result in earnings growth well above average. And as its spending growth on AWS slows down, free cash flow should rise to new records by the end of the decade. That gives the company more opportunities to invest for growth, just as it has managed to do throughout its history. The stock currently looks attractive amid a small pullback in price. 2. Meta Platforms Meta is another major Nvidia customer, but unlike Amazon, it only uses Nvidia chips for its own AI needs. In fact, it might be spending more on its own AI needs than any other company in the world. And Meta's second-quarter results are a clear example of why it's willing to spend so much. Sales grew 22% last quarter, and its operating margin expanded 5 percentage points. For some perspective, that's faster revenue growth than both Snap and Pinterest despite being a much bigger force in social media advertising. Meta's AI capabilities are a clear reason for the outperformance. Artificial intelligence has led to better recommendations for both advertisements and organic content. As a result, the company served up more ads and was able to command higher pricing per ad impression. Meanwhile, it's seeing strong uptake of its generative AI tools for ad creation, which makes it easier for marketers to create and test new ideas. There are a number of other opportunities that AI could unlock. Those include AI chatbots for businesses in WhatsApp and Messenger, which could drive increased click-to-message ads in Facebook and Instagram. And management has said its Meta AI chatbot built into its apps now has 1 billion monthly active users, giving it yet another surface to monetize with ads. It only recently started showing ads in WhatsApp and Threads. That should give it room to grow supply as demand increases due to its generative AI tools making advertising easier. Lastly, Meta is at the forefront of development in augmented and virtual reality. AI can unlock a lot of value in an environment that's also aware of your surroundings. The company has already seen strong early adoption of its Meta Glasses with AI built in. Shares look very attractive with an enterprise value around 16 times forward estimates on earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA). While depreciation of its data centers will weigh on its margins, the company is proving the investments are paying off with very strong revenue growth and by unlocking a lot of potential profits in the long run. Do the experts think Amazon is a buy right now? The Motley Fool's expert analyst team, drawing on years of investing experience and deep analysis of thousands of stocks, leverages our proprietary Moneyball AI investing database to uncover top opportunities. They've just revealed their to buy now — did Amazon make the list? When our Stock Advisor analyst team has a stock recommendation, it can pay to listen. After all, Stock Advisor's total average return is up 1,070% vs. just 184% for the S&P — that is beating the market by 885.55%!* Imagine if you were a Stock Advisor member when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $668,155!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,106,071!* The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 13, 2025 Adam Levy has positions in Amazon, Meta Platforms, and Microsoft. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Advanced Micro Devices, Amazon, Meta Platforms, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Pinterest. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Prediction: 2 Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stocks That Will Be Worth More Than Nvidia by 2030 was originally published by The Motley Fool Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
This CEO laid off nearly 80% of his staff because they refused to adopt AI fast enough. 2 years later, he says he'd do it again
Eric Vaughan, CEO of enterprise-software powerhouse IgniteTech, is unwavering as he reflects on the most radical decision of his decades-long career. In early 2023, convinced that generative AI was an 'existential' transformation, Vaughan looked at his team and saw a workforce not fully on board. His ultimate response: He ripped the company down to the studs, replacing nearly 80% of staff within a year, according to headcount figures reviewed by Fortune. Over the course of 2023 and into the first quarter of 2024, Vaughan said IgniteTech replaced hundreds of employees, declining to disclose a specific number. 'That was not our goal,' he told Fortune. 'It was extremely difficult … But changing minds was harder than adding skills.' It was, by any measure, a brutal reckoning—but Vaughan insists it was necessary, and says he'd do it again. For Vaughan, the writing on the wall was clear and dramatic. 'In early 2023, we saw the light,' he told Fortune in an interview, adding that he believed every tech company was facing a crucial inflection point around adoption of artificial intelligence. 'Now I've certainly morphed to believe that this is every company, and I mean that literally every company, is facing an existential threat by this transformation.' Where others saw promise, Vaughan saw urgency—believing that failing to get ahead on AI could doom even the most robust business. He called an all-hands meeting with his global, remote team. Gone were the comfortable routines and quarterly goals. Instead, his message was direct: Everything would now revolve around AI. 'We're going to give a gift to each of you. And that gift is tremendous investment of time, tools, education, projects … to give you a new skill,' he explained. The company began reimbursing for AI tools and prompt engineering classes, and even brought in outside experts to evangelize. 'Every single Monday was called 'AI Monday,'' Vaughan said, with his mandate for staff that they could only work on AI. 'You couldn't have customer calls, you couldn't work on budgets, you had to only work on AI projects.' He said this happened across the board, not just for tech workers, but also for sales, marketing, and everybody at IgniteTech. 'That culture needed to be built. That was… that was the key.' This was a major investment, he added: 20% of payroll was dedicated to a mass-learning initiative, and it failed because of mass resistance, even sabotage. Belief, Vaughan discovered, is a hard thing to manufacture. 'In those early days, we did get resistance, we got flat-out, 'Yeah, I'm not going to do this' resistance. And so we said goodbye to those people.' The pushback: Why didn't they get on board? Vaughan was surprised to find it was often the technical staff, not marketing or sales, who dug in their heels. They were the 'most resistant,' he said, voicing various concerns about what the AI couldn't do, rather than focusing on what it could. The marketing and salespeople were enthused by the possibilities of working with these new tools, he added. This friction is borne out by broader research. According to the 2025 enterprise AI adoption report by WRITER, an AI platform that specifically helps enterprise clients with AI integration, one in three workers say they've 'actively sabotaged' their company's AI rollout—a number that jumps to 41% of millennial and Gen Z employees. This can take the form of refusing to use AI tools, intentionally generating low-quality outputs, or avoiding training altogether. Many act out due to fears that AI will replace their jobs, while others are frustrated by lackluster AI tools or unclear strategy from leadership. WRITER's Chief Strategy Officer Kevin Chung told Fortune the 'big eye-opening thing' from this survey was the human element of AI resistance. 'This sabotage isn't because they're afraid of the technology … It's more like there's so much pressure to get it right, and then when you're handed something that doesn't work, you get frustrated.' He added that WRITER's research shows that workers often don't trust where their organizations are headed. 'When you're handed something that isn't quite what you want, it's very frustrating, so the sabotage kicks in, because then people are like, 'Okay, I'm going to run my own thing. I'm going to go figure it out myself.'' You definitely don't want this kind of 'shadow IT' in an organization, he added. Vaughan says he didn't want to force anyone. 'You can't compel people to change, especially if they don't believe.' He added that belief was really the thing he needed to recruit for. Company leadership ultimately realized they'd have to launch a massive recruiting effort for what became known as 'AI Innovation Specialists.' This applied across the board, to sales, finance. marketing, everywhere. Vaughan said this time was 'really difficult' as things inside the company were 'upside down … We didn't really quite know where we were or who we were yet.' A couple key hires helped, starting with the person who became IgniteTech's chief AI officer, Thibault Bridel-Bertomeu. That led to a full reorganization of the company that Vaughan called 'somewhat unusual.' Essentially, every division now reports into the AI organization, regardless of domain. This centralization, Vaughan says, prevented duplication of efforts and maximized knowledge sharing—a common struggle in AI adoption, where WRITER's survey shows 71% of the C-suite at other companies say AI applications are being created in silos and nearly half report their employees left to 'figure generative AI out on their own.' No pain, no gain? In exchange for this difficult transformation, IgniteTech reaped extraordinary results. By the end of 2024, the company had launched two patent-pending AI solutions, including a platform for AI-based email automation (Eloquens AI), with a radically rebuilt team. Financially, IgniteTech remained strong. Vaughan disclosed that the company, which he said is in the nine-figure revenue range, finished 2024 at 'near 75% EBITDA'—all while completing a major acquisition, Khoros. 'You multiply people … give people the ability to multiply themselves and do things at a pace,' he said, touting the company's ability to build new customer-ready products in as little as four days—an unthinkable timeline in the old regime. What does Vaughan's story say for others? On one level, it's a case study in the pain and payoff of radical change management. But his ruthless approach arguably addresses many challenges identified in the WRITER survey: lack of strategy and investment, misalignment between IT and business, and the failure to engage champions who can unlock AI's benefits. The 'boy who cried wolf' problem To be sure, IgniteTech is far from alone in wrestling with these challenges. Joshua Wöhle is the CEO of Mindstone, a firm similar to WRITER that provides AI upskilling services to workforces, training hundreds of employees monthly at companies including Lufthansa, Hyatt, and NBA teams. He recently discussed the two approaches described by Vaughan—upskilling and mass replacement—in an appearance on BBC Business Today. Wöhle contrasted the recent examples of Ikea and Klarna, arguing the former's example shows why it's better to 'reskill' existing employees. Klarna, a Swedish buy-now pay-later firm, drew considerable publicity for a decision to reduce members of its customer support staff in a pivot to AI, only to rehire for the same roles. 'We're near the point where [AI is] more intelligent than most people doing knowledge work. But that's precisely why augmentation beats automation,' Wöhle wrote on LinkedIn. A representative for Klarna told Fortune the company did not lay off employees, but has instead adopted several approaches to its customer service, which is managed by outsourced customer-service providers who are paid according to the volume of work required. The launch of an AI customer-service assistant reduced the workload by the equivalent of 700 full-time agents—from roughly 3,000 to 2,300—and the third-party providers redeployed those 700 workers to other clients, according to Klarna. Now that the AI customer service agent is 'handling more complex queries than when we launched,' Klarna says, that number has fallen to 2,200. Klarna says its contractor has rehired just two people in a pilot program designed to combine highly trained human support staff with AI to deliver outstanding customer service. In an interview with Fortune, Wöhle said one client of his has been very blunt with his workers, ordering them to dedicate all Fridays to AI retraining, and if they didn't report back on any of their work, they were invited to leave the company. He said it can be 'kinder' to dismiss workers who are resistant to AI: 'The pace of change is so fast that it's the kinder thing to force people through it.' He added that he used to think that if he got all workers to really love learning, then that could help Mindstone make a real difference, but he discovered after training literally thousands of people that 'most people hate learning. They'd avoid it if they can.' Wöhle attributed much of the AI resistance in the workforce to a 'boy who cried wolf' problem from the tech sector, citing NFTs and blockchain as technologies that were billed as revolutionary but 'didn't have the real effect' that tech leaders promised. 'You can't really blame them' for resisting, he said. Most people 'get stuck because they think from their work flow first,' he added, and they conclude AI is overhyped because they want AI to fit into their old way of working. 'It takes a lot more thinking and a lot more kind of prodding for you to change the way that you work,' but once you do, you see dramatic increases. A human can't possibly keep five call transcripts in their head while you're trying to write a proposal to a client, he offers, but AI can. Ikea echoed Wöhle when reached for comment, saying that its 'people-first AI approach focuses on augmentation, not automation.' A spokesperson said Ikea is using AI to automate tasks, not jobs, freeing up time for value-added, human-centric work. The WRITER report notes that companies with formal AI strategies are far more likely to succeed, and those who heavily invest in AI outperform their peers by a large margin. But, as Vaughan's experience shows, investment without belief and buy-in can be wasted energy. 'The culture needed to be built. Ultimately, we ended up having to go out and recruit and hire people that were already of the same mind. Changing minds was harder than adding skills.' For Vaughan, there's no ambiguity. Would he do it again? He doesn't hesitate: He'd rather endure months of pain and build a new, AI-driven foundation from scratch than let an organization drift into irrelevance. 'This is not a tech change. It is a cultural change, and it is a business change.' He said he doesn't recommend that others follow his lead and swap out 80% of their staff. 'I do not recommend that at all. That was not our goal. It was extremely difficult.' But at the end of the day, he added, everybody's got to be in the same boat, rowing in the same direction. Otherwise, 'we don't get where we're going.' This story was originally featured on Sign in to access your portfolio