Air Force Unveils New Policies on Shaving, Nail Polish, Hair Length in Leaked Memos
The Air Force Surgeon General's new memo calls for a reset and reevaluation of all airmen's shaving profiles starting March 1 after a service member's most recent health assessment. Medical shaving waivers are often due to pseudofolliculitis barbae, a skin condition known as PFB that causes frequent and painful razor burn that disproportionately affects Black men.
Lt. Col. Karl Wiest, a spokesperson for Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. David Allvin, confirmed to Military.com that the shaving waiver guidance was "connected" to the top uniformed leader's new push earlier this month for unified standards throughout the service.
Read Next: Trump's Pick for Army Secretary, Dan Driscoll, Heads into Senate Hearing Mostly an Unknown
"Extended duration shaving profiles are generally reserved for severe cases of PFB, while mild-to-moderate cases may benefit from more frequent management, follow-ups and temporary shaving profiles," according to the memo, which was leaked online and confirmed as authentic by the Air Force.
Military.com reported last year that shaving waivers had exploded in popularity among the Air Force and Space Force in recent years. Between 2021 and 2023, the number of active-duty airmen with medical shaving waivers grew from 10,965 to 18,991.
Another Jan. 24 memo signed by Allvin, which was leaked online and confirmed by Military.com as authentic on Tuesday, also called for various changes starting Feb. 1.
It says that "Duty Identifier Tabs" are "no longer authorized for wear," nail polish must be "clear or French or American manicure," and hair must "not touch the ears." The memo also calls for a "gig line" when in dress uniform -- or neatly lining up the front button edge of the shirt, belt buckle and fly of the pants.
Like the Air Force Surgeon General's memo, Allvin's also stated that, "unless male airmen have a current medical waiver or religious accommodation ... airmen must be clean shaven."
Allvin, in a video to the entire Air Force earlier this month, called for the service to "come together in uniform" and in formation for inspections on their appearance and to make sure everyone is in compliance with regulations.
In recent years, there have been a large number of updates to dress and appearance standards for the service, ranging from changes to hair and mustache length, approved nail polish colors and certain wardrobe changes.
The Air Force did not respond to follow-up questions asking if the policy change, since it widely impacts Black airmen, was connected to President Donald Trump's recent executive orders calling for the removal of programs, initiatives and efforts tied to diversity within the ranks.
Black service members have advocated for changes to shaving waivers for years. Studies by the American Osteopathic College of Dermatology identified that pseudofolliculitis barbae occurs in about 60% of Black men.
In recent years, the Air Force's Barrier Analysis Working Groups advocated for and studied the idea of a beard pilot program for Black airmen, given the research. Last week, the service dismantled all of those groups, which were hoping to improve quality-of-life issues for minority, LGBTQ+ and female airmen, in response to Trump's executive orders, Military.com reported.
The memo detailed that the new rule "does not apply to religious accommodation shaving waivers," which have been offered for Sikhs, Muslims and Norse Pagans in the past.
Related: Air Force to Put Renewed Emphasis on Safety and Uniform Standards
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
What to know about mRNA vaccines as Trump admin pulls funding
The Trump administration is decreasing funding for the development of mRNA (messenger RNA) vaccines, which were crucial in the response to COVID-19. Why it matters: mRNA vaccines are a public health tool to mitigating future pandemic-like situations, as researchers can move fast at a lower cost than other vaccine systems. "mRNA vaccines use a genetic code to tell the body's cells to produce proteins that train the immune system," a Penn Medicine report said. "The result: 'plug-and-play' vaccines with rapid development times and lower costs." Driving the news: Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said Tuesday that the government would pull $500 million in mRNA vaccine development funding in order to focus on "safer, broader vaccine platforms." No new mRNA based projects will be initiated, HHS said. Some final-stage contracts for targets like pandemic bird flu will run their course. What they're saying: " I've tried to be objective & non-alarmist in response to current HHS actions — but quite frankly this move is going to cost lives," Jerome Adams, who served as surgeon general during President Trump's first administration, said on X. "It's rhetoric of wellness ideologues who deny the benefits of mRNA vaccine technology in saving 3.2 million American lives in the pandemic," Peter Hotez, Baylor College of Medicine vaccine researcher, said on X. "Also in my view it's [a] slap in the face for President Trump, given this is one of his best achievements." What are mRNA vaccines? How do they work? The big picture: mRNA vaccines use a molecule necessary for protein production, called messenger RNA, rather than part of an actual bacteria or virus, according to the National Library of Medicine. mRNA vaccines introduce a piece of mRNA that corresponds to a viral protein, prompting cells to produce the viral protein. People who get an mRNA vaccine are not exposed to the virus, nor can they become infected with a virus by the vaccine. Flashback: mRNA was discovered in the early 1960s, and research into how it could be delivered into cells was developed in the 1970s, per Johns Hopkins ' Bloomberg School of Public Health. The intrigue: The biggest challenge with mRNA was that it was taken up by the body and quickly degraded before it could "deliver" the RNA transcript and be read into proteins in the cells. Advances in nanotechnology allowed for fatty droplets, or lipid nanoparticles, to wrap the mRNA like a bubble and allowed entry into the cells. Didn't the COVID vaccine use mRNA? State of play: The Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna COVID vaccines use mRNA. "Thanks to decades of research and innovation, mRNA vaccine technology was ready," the Johns Hopkins report said. "With COVID, this technology got its moment and has proven to be extremely safe and effective." Context: The COVID-19 mRNA vaccine gives cells instructions for how to make the S protein found on the surface of the virus, according to Mayo Clinic. The body creates antibodies that help clear the virus, if caught. What else could mRNA vaccines help protect against? Zoom out: Researchers at Penn Medicine are developing mRNA vaccines for infections including avian bird flu, all coronaviruses such as SARS and MERS, C. difficile, genital herpes, hepatitis C, HIV, influenza, leptospirosis, malaria, norovirus and tuberculosis. Moderna has mRNA vaccines in various levels of development to fend against RSV, HIV, Lyme disease, Mpox, several cancers and cystic fibrosis. What we're watching: As of January, more than 120 clinical trials were testing the potential for mRNA vaccines in cancer treatment across various malignancies, according to research published in the National Library of Medicine.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
"It's Basically Scientific Racism": Medical Experts Seriously Hate RFK Jr.'s Shocking Claim About Black People And Vaccines
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the Health and Human Services secretary, is making changes that threaten the public health system, from telling lies about the childhood vaccine schedule to replacing credible members of a vaccine advisory panel with people known to spread misinformation. Groups like the American Medical Association and the American Academy of Pediatrics have spoken out against these changes, and some major medical associations are even suing Kennedy in response to his changes to the COVID-19 vaccine schedule. Kennedy's attack on vaccines isn't exactly a surprise — he has a history of anti-vaccine remarks, which was a major talking point throughout his Senate confirmation hearings earlier this year. Specifically, his beliefs were front and center during a heated exchange in which Sen. Angela Alsobrooks (D-Md.) brought up a comment that Kennedy once made about vaccinations and the Black community. In 2021, Kennedy had said, 'We should not be giving Black people the same vaccine schedule that's given to whites, because their immune system is better than ours.' Related: Alsobrooks asked Kennedy to explain what he meant by that remark, and he went on to reference a 'series of studies' while saying research shows that 'Blacks need fewer antigens.' (For the record, experts say that this is not true.) 'Right now, how vaccine schedules are tailored is based on things like your age, your exposure risk, if you have other chronic underlying health conditions ― but race isn't one of them, and there isn't research that suggests that it should be,' Joel Bervell, a recent medical graduate and medical myth-buster on social media, told HuffPost. What especially bothered Bervell about Kennedy's exchange with Alsobrooks was the fact that he doubled down on his comment from 2021. Kennedy could have used this as an opportunity to admit that he needs to do more research and understand the vaccine schedule, 'but instead, he defended what he said, which I think, for me, that's where the problem lies in,' Bervell told HuffPost. 'Not necessarily the fact of the misinformation is out there, but the fact that he wasn't willing to at least confront it or admit that onstage.' Below, experts like Bervell share their concerns about Kennedy's statement and how it reflects a larger problematic picture: Kennedy's comment can be considered 'scientific racism,' experts say. Related: 'In medicine, in science, we know that race is a social construct, meaning that you can't look at someone's genes and identify what race they are,' Bervell said. That means differences in vaccine timelines just don't make scientific sense. 'The comment that [Kennedy] made about the vaccine schedule, it's basically scientific racism, which has been debunked,' Dr. Oni Blackstock, a primary care and HIV physician who is the founder and executive director of Health Justice, a racial and health equity consulting company, told HuffPost. 'He's really perpetuating this false belief that Black people are somehow biologically different from white people and, in that way, justifying differential and ultimately unequal treatment for Black people versus white people,' Blackstock added. 'By saying that, he was putting on one of the larger stages in health care this notion that race-based medicine should still exist, when that's actually what many scientists recently have been trying to root out,' Bervell said. Race-based medicine and scientific racism has led to undertreatment of Black patients, dismissal of pain and even death, Blackstock stressed. Both experts pointed to real-life examples of this, like the false belief that Black people have better-functioning kidneys than white people. This made it harder for Black people to get the treatment they needed, like kidney transplants, according to Bervell. And this thought pattern isn't from some faraway time ― a medical equation that reinforced this bias wasn't changed until 2021, Bervell said. What's more, during the 1793 yellow fever epidemic in Philadelphia, Black people were believed to be resistant to yellow fever, which was not true and led to high mortality rates among Black people, Blackstock explained. 'The importance of understanding the problem with the myths is that they can literally lead to regulations being written into medicine that treat populations differently just based on race,' Bervell said. 'It can actually change the care that people receive.' While it's easy to look at a particular viewpoint as a one-off, medical racism has real-world consequences that irresponsible comments can make worse. Promoting debunked beliefs 'distracts us from really doing the work that we need to do, which is dismantling systemic racism in health care and ensuring that everyone has equitable access to preventive care and treatments that they need,' Blackstock added. Related: Such stances may lead to more mistrust in the health care system. 'One thing that is also kind of strange about him [Kennedy] is he's someone who for a long time has said that he doesn't support vaccines,' Bervell said. 'Apparently, now he's changed his mind, but for a long time he said he hasn't supported vaccines, and then he's also saying that Black people should get a different vaccine schedule. So you have to wonder, what is your goal in saying that if you don't even believe in vaccines?' Bervell said comments like those from Kennedy can sow vaccine hesitancy in the Black population, which is dangerous and can erode trust in evidence-based medicine. It's not the first time that this has happened, either, Blackstock added. In 2021, Kennedy produced a documentary called 'Medical Racism: The New Apartheid,' which Blackstock said promoted misinformation about health and vaccines to the Black community, along with other marginalized groups. 'It's interesting how some of his efforts have been focused on taking advantage of [and] exploiting the mistrust that some in the Black community have around vaccines and the health care system because of structural racism and medical racism,' Blackstock said. With misinformation and scare tactics rampant on social media, misinformation from government leaders will only make it harder to tell what's real and what's fake in medicine. Trust needs to be paramount for health care as an institution, Bervell said. 'The trust is already eroded in health care,' Bervell explained. 'We need to have someone that is going to work with scientists, researchers, doctors that are on the ground seeing these problems every day, not someone that's in an ivory tower watching from above without understanding of what's actually happening on the ground.' Related: Experts say this rhetoric aligns with messaging from Donald Trump. Blackstock stressed that while such false beliefs are very problematic, they track with much of the messaging from Donald Trump and his presidential administration. 'It echoes some of the rhetoric that [Trump] has shared around eugenics and immigrants,' Blackstock said. 'He's talked about immigrants having 'bad genes' or 'poisoning the blood of our country.' It just speaks to this idea of racial purity or genetic purity, and this false idea that certain groups of people are inherently inferior or predisposed to certain behaviors because of their genetics.' And, again, race is a social construct and does not equal genetic differences. 'It's just really shocking that in the year 2025 we are still dealing with these beliefs being propagated that have been around for several centuries that have been used to justify slavery, used to justify inequitable treatment, used to justify forced sterilization,' Blackstock said. Blackstock added that she thinks individuals get away with this kind of rhetoric because people become accustomed to outlandish comments and bad behavior. 'But we need to really flag this and say this is really dangerous and really concerning rhetoric that can have real health implications,' Blackstock said. This article originally appeared on HuffPost. Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Solve the daily Crossword
USA Today
2 hours ago
- USA Today
RFK Jr. is canceling mRNA vaccine development. Can I still get a COVID vaccine?
Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. revealed his agency will be cutting funding to mRNA development, calling the vaccine technology "ineffective" and claiming it poses more risks than benefits. In a video posted on X Aug. 5, Kennedy said the decision will impact 22 projects worth nearly $500 million at the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, which helps companies develop medical supplies to address public health threats. Messenger RNA, or mRNA, is used in the two most common COVID-19 vaccines licensed in the U.S. Kennedy's announcement has raised questions about these vaccines, how mRNA works and what this decision means for future research. "This technology played a vital role in our pandemic response and continues to show promise for treating serious diseases," said Jeff Coller, Bloomberg Distinguished Professor of RNA biology and therapeutics at Johns Hopkins University. "As other countries advance these proven, safe and effective therapies, American patients may increasingly depend on foreign innovation for breakthrough treatments." How do mRNA vaccines work? The COVID-19 vaccine works by instructing the body's immune system to recognize the virus and creating fighting antibodies to attack it. Messenger RNA, or mRNA, is a code that tells the body's cells to produce just a piece of the virus, the protein on the surface. The code is protected by a lipid coating, like a fat bubble. mRNA vaccines: RFK Jr. to wind down $500M vaccine development Once injected into the body, the vaccine releases the mRNA to program the cell to produce the spike proteins like those on the surface of SARS-CoV-2, the COVID-19 virus. Our immune system recognizes those vaccine-created spike proteins as invaders and creates antibodies to block future attacks from the virus. Messenger RNA vaccines contain only a fraction of the virus, so unlike some vaccines, they can't give people the disease they're trying to prevent or trigger allergies to eggs or other traditional vaccine ingredients. Should I expect a COVID vaccine this fall? It's unclear whether patients should be expecting COVID-19 vaccines this fall, said Dr. Beth Oller, a family physician in Stockton, Kansas, and clinical instructor at the University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita. In June, Kennedy fired all members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, a key vaccine panel that makes recommendations for COVID-19 and other vaccines, and appointed eight new members. During its first meeting, the committee did not make any recommendations for the fall and isn't expected to reconvene until "September/October," according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. Kennedy said on May 27 that the COVID-19 vaccine would no longer be included in the CDC's recommended immunization schedule for healthy children and pregnant women, a move that broke with previous expert guidance and bypassed the normal scientific review process. Under the changes, the only people who will be recommended for COVID-19 vaccines are those over 65 and people with existing health problems. This could make it harder for others who want the COVID-19 vaccine to get it, including health care workers and healthy people under 65 with a vulnerable family member or those who want to reduce their short-term risk of infection. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) and American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), among other organizations, issued statements condemning the change, with the ACOG saying it was "...concerned about and extremely disappointed by the announcement that HHS will no longer recommend COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy." Will insurance cover my COVID shot? Many consumers are worried about possible cuts to health insurers' coverage of vaccines, a recent poll said. A KFF poll published Aug. 1 found 40% of adults said they will "definitely" or "probably" get a COVID-19 vaccine shot. Of those who intend to get vaccinated, 62% said they are worried insurance won't cover the cost of the vaccine. Groups representing commercial health insurance companies said they still plan to cover vaccines recommended by the CDC and ACIP, the vaccine advisory panel. "Health plans continue to follow federal requirements related to coverage of ACIP-recommended vaccines and will continue to support broad access to critical preventive services, including immunizations," said Tina Stow, spokesperson for AHIP, which represents health insurance companies. COVID: As new variant spreads, what's the latest vaccine guidance? The CDC currently recommends shared decision-making between parents and doctors for immunizing children with the COVID-19 vaccine. It also recommends vaccines for people who are moderately or severely immune compromised. Large employers that provide health insurance benefits for workers and their families will likely continue to cover Food and Drug Administration-approved vaccines, said James Gelfand, president and CEO of the ERISA Industry Committee. In some cases, employer vaccine coverage might follow FDA approvals rather than narrower ACIP Mary Walrath-Holdridge Adrianna Rodriguez can be reached at adrodriguez@
