Uttarakhand: Man sentenced to 20 years rigorous imprisonment for raping minor
Chamoli District and Special Sessions Judge Vindhyachal Singh also imposed a fine of Rs 20,000 on Ashok Mahato.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
11 minutes ago
- Hans India
Conman in judicial custody
Mangaluru: RoshanSaldanha, a Mangaluru-based man accused of defrauding businessmen across several states of several crore rupees, has been remanded to judicial custody. The accused, who was arrested earlier this week, is facing multiple FIRs related to financial frauds, police said. Police produced Saldanha before a court on Saturday night, which ordered a judicial custody for him. Mangaluru South (CEN) police, who are already investigating two earlier cases involving Rs 11 crore and Rs 2 crore, have now received fresh complaints. A Maharashtra-based businessman alleged that Rs 5 crore was transferred to Saldanha's account on July 16. Similarly, a businessman from Assam claimed a loss of Rs 20 lakh on July 17. Police have since directed banks to freeze the accused's accounts. Chitradurga police may also seek his custody in connection with a separate case involving a Rs 40 crore fraud filed by an Andhra Pradesh businessman. Mangaluru Police Commissioner Sudheer Kumar Reddy said the accused will likely be taken into police custody again for further interrogation. Authorities have urged other victims to file complaints either locally or with the South CEN police station. Meanwhile, a Malaysian woman found at Saldanha's residence at the time of arrest is being processed for repatriation. Police said she has no role in the fraud. Her documents are being verified in coordination with the Ministry of External Affairs.
News18
18 minutes ago
- News18
Chronology of events in 2006 Mumbai train blasts case
Agency: PTI Mumbai, Jul 21 (PTI) Following is the chronology of events in the 2006 Mumbai train blasts case, in which the Bombay High Court on Monday acquitted all the 12 accused. *July 11, 2006: Seven bomb blasts in first class compartments of seven local trains on western suburban railway line between 6.23 pm and 6.29 pm. 187 persons killed and 824 injured. *July 11, 2006: Seven separate FIRs lodged in different police stations. Later clubbed and investigated by the Maharashtra Anti- Terrorism Squad (ATS). *July-August 2006: Thirteen persons arrested in the case by the ATS for their involvement in the case. *November 30, 2006: Chargesheet filed against 30 accused, including 13 Pakistani nationals, several of whom are wanted. *2007: Trial begins. *August 19, 2014: Trial ends. Special court reserves its order against 13 arrested accused. *September 11, 2015: Special court convicts 12 out of the 13 accused. One accused acquitted due to lack of evidence against him. *September 30, 2015: Special court imposes death penalty on five of the convicted accused. Life sentence imposed on remaining seven. *2015-2024: Appeals placed before different benches of HC. *June 2024: Ehtesham Siddiqui, one of the convicts on death row, files application in HC seeking intervention for expeditious hearing and disposal of the appeals. *July 2024: HC sets up special bench of Justices Anil Kilor and Shyam Chandak to hear case. *July 15, 2024: Special bench of HC starts hearing appeals on day-to-day basis. *January 31, 2025: HC completes hearing appeals. Closes matter for orders. *July 21, 2025: 19 years after blasts, Bombay HC acquits 12 persons, noting prosecution has utterly failed to prove case and that it is hard to believe the accused committed the crime. PTI SP GK view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
News18
18 minutes ago
- News18
ED crossing all limits: SC on agency summoning lawyers for giving legal advice
New Delhi, Jul 21 (PTI) The Enforcement Directorate is 'crossing all limits", the Supreme Court said on Monday as it expressed serious concern over the agency summoning advocates for offering legal advice or representing clients during investigations. It also called for guidelines on the matter. The remarks from an apex court bench of Chief Justice B R Gavai and Justice K Vinod Chandran came during a suo motu hearing initiated by the court to address the implications of such actions on the independence of the legal profession. This comes in the wake of the ED summoning senior lawyers Arvind Datar and Pratap Venugopal. 'The communication between a lawyer and the clients is privileged communication and how can the notices be issued against them… they are crossing all limits," the CJI said. 'Guidelines should be framed," he said while responding to submissions that recent ED notices to legal professionals like senior advocate Datar could have a chilling effect on the practice of law. Attorney General R Vennkataramani and Solicitor General Tushar Mehta said the issue had been taken up at the highest level and the probe agency asked to not issue notices to the lawyers for rendering legal advice. 'Lawyers cannot be summoned for rendering legal opinions," the solicitor general said. He, however, said there have been attempts to malign institutions by creating false narratives. Advocates stressed that summoning lawyers, especially for giving legal opinions, was setting a dangerous precedent. 'If this continues, it will deter lawyers from offering honest and independent advice," a lawyer said, adding that even district court lawyers were facing undue harassment. The attorney general acknowledged the concerns and said, 'What is happening is certainly wrong." The CJI responded that the court had also been surprised by reports it came across. However, the solicitor general cautioned against forming opinions based on media narratives. 'There is a concerted effort to target institutions. Please don't go by interviews and news," the law officer said. 'We don't watch the news, haven't seen YouTube interviews. Only last week I managed to watch a few movies," said the CJI, who was indisposed last week. When the solicitor general referred to politicians, accused in scams, attempting to shape public opinion, the CJI said, 'We said it… don't politicise this." 'The moment I heard about Mr Datar, I immediately brought it to the notice of the highest executive," Mehta said. The bench directed all parties, including the Supreme Court Bar Association(SCBA), represented by its president and senior advocate Vikas Singh, to file comprehensive notes on the issue and allowed intervention applications. The matter is now listed for further hearing on July 29. 'Ultimately, we are all lawyers," the CJI remarked, adding that arguments in court should not be viewed adversarially. On June 20, the ED said it had directed its investigating officers not to issue summons to any advocate in money laundering investigations being carried out against their clients. An exception to this rule can only be made after 'approval" by the agency's director, it added. The ED, tasked with combating money laundering crimes, issued a circular for guidance of its field formations, stating that 'no summons" should be issued to any advocate in violation of Section 132 of the Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA), 2023. 'Further, if any summons needs to be issued under the exceptions carved out in proviso to Section 132 of the BSA, 2023, the same shall be issued only with the prior approval of the director, ED," the agency said. The summons issued to these advocates was condemned by the SCBA and the Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association, which called the move a 'disturbing trend" that struck at the very foundations of the legal profession. The bar bodies had urged the CJI to take suo motu cognisance of the matter. On June 25, an apex court bench of Justices K V Viswanathan and N Kotiswar Singh said allowing police or probe agencies to directly summon lawyers for advising clients would seriously undermine the autonomy of the legal profession and was a 'direct threat" to the independence of justice administration. top videos View all It observed that the legal profession was an integral component of the process of administration of justice. The order came when the top court was hearing a plea of a Gujarat-based advocate, challenging an order of the high court passed on June 12. PTI SJK SJK MIN MIN (This story has not been edited by News18 staff and is published from a syndicated news agency feed - PTI) First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
