Just 8% of Italian enterprises using AI, many people lack digital know-how
ROME, May 21 (Reuters) - In Italy, long burdened by slow economic growth, the number of companies using artificial intelligence is limited compared to other European Union countries, according to figures released on Wednesday by national statistics bureau ISTAT.
In its wide-ranging annual report, ISTAT said that only eight out of 100 Italian enterprises were using AI last year, a lower percentage than the figure for France and Spain, and well below the level of almost 20% in Germany.
In general, digital know-how in Italy falls short of European targets, ISTAT said.
Only 45.8% of Italians aged 16-74 had at least basic digital skills in 2023, according to the latest available data, compared to an EU27 average of 55.5% and European targets aiming for 80% by 2030.
The percentage declines to a low of 36.1% in the economically underdeveloped Mezzogiorno - Italy's six southern regions plus the islands of Sicily and Sardinia.
Against a challenging economic backdrop, compounded by a deep demographic crisis, a growing number of young educated Italians have decided to try their luck abroad.
In 2023, 21,000 graduates aged 25-34 left Italy, a 21.2% year-on-year rise, ISTAT said, adding that the net loss of qualified young workers was 97,000 over 10 years.
Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni's government halved its full-year 2025 growth forecast last month to 0.6% from a 1.2% target set in September, amid mounting uncertainty due to U.S. trade tariff policy.
In the first quarter the Italian economy grew by 0.3% from the previous three months, based on preliminary data.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
19 minutes ago
- Reuters
Putin tells Trump talks with Ukraine useful despite what he called attempts to disrupt them
MOSCOW, June 4 (Reuters) - Kremlin leader Vladimir Putin told U.S. President Donald Trump on Wednesday that a second round of peace talks between Russia and Ukraine was useful despite Kyiv's attempt to disrupt them by staging attacks Putin considered terrorism, a Kremlin foreign policy aide said. Yuri Ushakov also said that the two presidents discussed other international issues, particularly the Middle East conflict and how Russia could help deal with Iran and its nuclear programme. Ushakov told reporters after Putin and Trump spoke by telephone for more than an hour that Ukrainian attacks on bridges and other civilian infrastructure were an attempt to torpedo the negotiations. "It was stressed that Ukraine tried to disrupt these talks by carrying out, on the direct orders of the Kyiv regime, deliberate attacks on civilian targets, on peaceful civilians," Ushakov told reporters. "The Kyiv regime has in essence degenerated into a terrorist organisation. The Russian side did not give in to provocations ... Let me stress that our president described in detail the content of the talks and that these talks on the whole were useful." Memorandums outlining peace plans were exchanged and will be analysed, Ushakov said, "and we hope that afterwards the two sides will be able to continue their talks." He said the issue of a possible meeting between Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy had not been raised at this stage. But talks with Ukraine were possible despite what Moscow denounced as terrorist acts as "on the whole they are vital to achieve some sort of settlement." Ushakov said Trump "listened intently" to Putin's description of events in Ukraine. "I think it was very useful for Trump to hear our assessment of what has been happening." Both presidents, he said, described their exchanges as "positive and very productive. Both President Trump and our president confirmed their readiness to remain in contact." On Iran, Ushakov said the United States believed Russia could play an important role in helping with the difficulties over Tehran's nuclear programme. "Donald Trump believes that Russian assistance is possible and vital and he would be grateful if Russia could help in an appropriate fashion by working with the Iranian side," he said. The two presidents, he said, also discussed the Middle East and tensions between India and Pakistan.
Reuters
19 minutes ago
- Reuters
Apple loses bid to pause app store reform order in Epic Games case
June 4 (Reuters) - Apple (AAPL.O), opens new tab has failed to persuade a U.S. appeals court to pause key parts of a federal judge's order requiring the iPhone maker to immediately open its lucrative App Store to more competition. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Wednesday rejected Apple's request to put the provisions on hold as the tech giant appeals the judge's order, which came in a long-running antitrust lawsuit brought by 'Fortnite' maker Epic Games. U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in April found Apple (AAPL.O), opens new tab in contempt of an earlier injunction order she issued in the Epic Games case. The judge on April 30 ordered Apple to end several practices that she said were designed to circumvent the injunction, including a new 27% fee Apple imposed on app developers when its customers complete an app purchase outside the App Store. The court also prohibited Apple from restricting where developers place links to make purchases outside of an app. In its emergency appeal, Apple said the ruling blocked the company from "exercising control over core aspects of its business operations" and forced it to give away free access to its services. Epic Games countered that Apple was trying to continue evading competition and collecting fees that the judge had barred. Apple has faced a "surge of genuine competition" since Gonzalez Rogers issued her April injunction, as developers updated apps with "better payment methods, better deals, and better consumer choice," Epic said. Epic Games sued Apple in 2020 to loosen its control over transactions in applications that use its iOS operating system and how apps are distributed to consumers. Apple mostly won the case, but Gonzalez Rogers in 2021 said Apple must allow developers to more easily steer consumers to potentially cheaper non-Apple payment options. Apple defied that court order to maintain a revenue stream worth billions of dollars, Gonzalez Rogers wrote in April. She also said Apple had misled the court about its efforts to comply with her injunction and referred the company and one of its executives to federal prosecutors for a possible criminal contempt investigation.
Reuters
22 minutes ago
- Reuters
Trading Day: Teflon stocks glide higher
ORLANDO, Florida, June 4 (Reuters) - Markets again lacked a unifying theme on Wednesday, as world stocks hit record highs, Wall Street ended mixed and Treasury yields tumbled, all against a backdrop of patchy U.S. economic data and a lack of clarity on global trade talks. In my column today I look at how, despite justifiable fears of tariff-fueled price rises later this year and beyond, the global forces of disinflation are stronger right now than the forces of inflation. More on that below, but first, a roundup of the main market moves. If you have more time to read, here are a few articles I recommend to help you make sense of what happened in markets today. Today's Key Market Moves Teflon stocks glide higher Financial market moves can usually be traced to, or at least reasonably explained by, a narrative or new development that changes investors' view of the value of the asset in question. But some days, they are difficult to rationalize. Wednesday was one of those days, at least in equities. Wall Street rose for a third session, the Nasdaq climbed back into the green for the year, and global stocks rose to their highest level on record. Yet the newsflow was hardly bullish, although the nonpartisan U.S. Congressional Budget Office did lower its estimate of how much President Donald Trump's tax-cut and spending bill will add to the national debt by $1.4 trillion. On the trade front, the Trump administration doubled steel and aluminum tariffs, and it became clear that trade talks with Europe and China are proving difficult. The deadline for countries to show their "best offers" to avoid other punitive import levies taking effect next month passed on Wednesday too. China's decision in April to suspend exports of a wide range of rare earths continues to wreak havoc across crucial supply chains around the world, especially in the auto industry. Some European auto parts plants have suspended production. On the economic data front, the U.S. 'stagflation' alarm bells could not have rung louder on Wednesday. Figures showed U.S. private sector employment growth in May was the slowest in more than two years, perhaps an ominous signal for Friday's non-farm payroll report. Meanwhile, the services sector contracted in May for the first time in nearly a year and input prices paid by businesses leaped to their highest in two and a half years. If gold prices took their cue from the 'flation' side of those numbers, the bond market took its cue from the 'stag' side of the equation. Treasuries prices rallied strongly, and the 10-year yield posted its biggest fall since mid-April. Trump used the weak economic data to take to social media and repeat his call for Fed Chair Jerome 'Too Late' Powell to lower interest rates, complaining that "Europe" has already cut rates nine times. If he's referring to the European Central Bank, that's not quite accurate. The ECB has cut rates seven times since June last year, but is widely expected to make that eight on Thursday. The Bank of Canada took a leaf out of the Fed's book on Wednesday, deciding against cutting interest rates and choosing to wait and see what the effects of U.S. trade policy are. It said another rate cut might be needed, however, if the economy slows sufficiently. Aside from the ECB, the biggest market-moving event on Thursday could be China's 'unofficial' services sector PMI report for May. Signs of renewed weakness might be the cue for a 'risk-off' tone to world markets on Thursday, although the evidence of Wednesday shows that's no guarantee. Disinflation is a greater force right now than inflation Investors, consumers and policymakers may justifiably fear the specter of tariff-fueled inflation later this year and beyond, but it's powerful global disinflationary forces that are weighing most heavily right now. The OECD said on Tuesday it expects collective annual headline inflation in G20 economies to moderate to 3.6% this year from 6.2% last year, cooling further in 2026 to 3.2%. But the United States is an "important exception," the OECD argues, and it sees inflation there rising to just under 4% later this year and remaining above target in 2026. While annual PCE consumer inflation in the U.S. cooled to 2.1% in April, the slowest rate in four years and virtually at the Fed's 2% target, consumer inflation expectations are the loftiest in decades. The Fed has paused its easing cycle as a result, and U.S. bond yields are higher than most of their G10 peers. Economists at Goldman Sachs share the OECD's view that U.S. inflation will pick up to near 4% this year, with tariffs accounting for around half of that. Many others also agree that the U.S. appears to be the exception, not the rule. The world's next two largest economies, China and the euro zone, find themselves trying to stave off disinflation. Deepening trade and financial ties between the two may only intensify these forces, keeping a lid on price increases. Annual inflation in the euro zone cooled to 1.9% in May, below the European Central Bank's 2% target, essentially setting the seal on another quarter-point rate cut later this week. More easing appears to be in the cards. As economists at Nomura point out, inflation swaps are priced for inflation undershooting the ECB's target for at least the next two years. This, combined with weakening growth due to U.S. tariffs and disinflationary pressure from China, could force the ECB to cut rates another 50 basis points to 1.5% by September. China's war on deflation is, of course, well-known to investors, but it has appeared to slip off their collective radar given how protracted it has become. The last time annual inflation in China eclipsed 1% was more than two years ago, and it has remained near zero, on average, ever since. China's 10-year bond yield remains anchored near January's record low below 1.60%, reflecting investors' skepticism that price pressures will accelerate any time soon. They have reason to be doubtful. Deflation and record-low bond yields continue to stalk the economy despite Beijing's fiscal and monetary stimulus efforts since September. And punitive tariffs on exports to the U.S., one of its largest export markets, are generating massive uncertainty about the country's economic outlook moving forward. This is where the exchange rate becomes important. On the face of it, Beijing appears to have resisted mounting pressure on the yuan thus far, with the onshore and offshore yuan last week trading near their strongest levels against the dollar since November. But when considering the yuan's broad real effective exchange rate (REER), an inflation-adjusted measure of its value against a basket of currencies, the Chinese currency is the weakest since 2012. Robin Brooks at The Brookings Institution reckons it may be undervalued by more than 10%. With China's goods so cheap in the global marketplace, China is essentially exporting deflation. And the yuan's relative weakness could put pressure on other Asian countries to weaken their currencies to keep them competitive, even as the Trump administration potentially encourages these governments to do the exact opposite. Countries in Asia and around the world, especially in the euro zone, may also be nervous that China could dump goods previously bound for the U.S. on their markets. If anyone wants confirmation that the "tariffs equal inflation" view is too simplistic, they got it this week from Switzerland, where deflation is back and potential negative interest rates may not be far behind. True, Trump's threatened tariffs could throw everything up in the air. But the Swiss example is a warning to markets and policymakers that global disinflationary forces may be spreading. What could move markets tomorrow? Opinions expressed are those of the author. They do not reflect the views of Reuters News, which, under the Trust Principles, opens new tab, is committed to integrity, independence, and freedom from bias.
