
He worked 70 hours a week building a startup until his child asked a simple question that changed his life and leadership style
When Cache Merrill founded his software development startup Zibtek in 2009, he was already juggling more than most—three young kids aged 1, 4, and 7, and the relentless ambition to scale his business. Like many in the startup world, Merrill quickly got swept into the vortex of 60 to 70-hour work weeks, late-night client emergencies, and a schedule that barely left room for dinner at the table. But it wasn't the pressure from investors or clients that forced him to reassess his routine—it was a simple question from his child: 'Daddy, why don't you eat with us anymore?'
In a candid Business Insider article, Merrill opened up about the emotional toll of missing school performances, bedtime routines, and even casual conversations with his children. He admitted that while his spouse was understanding, the disappointment in his kids' eyes cut deeper than any business loss. 'The guilt,' Merrill noted, 'is a constant companion.'
This reflection echoes a growing conversation around the personal cost of startup culture, particularly in the wake of controversial viral statements like US-based Indian founder Neha Suresh's claim that '80-hour weeks aren't extreme. It's baseline.' While such statements fuel the 'grind till you make it' narrative, founders like Merrill are beginning to question if that hustle is truly worth it—especially when it risks the very relationships that ground them.
— Neha_Suresh_M (@Neha_Suresh_M)
For Merrill, the turning point wasn't just about being a better dad—it became about being a better leader. "Prioritising family taught me patience, empathy, and clarity,' he reflected, noting that these are now core values he brings into boardrooms and brainstorms alike. He gradually began drawing firmer boundaries: turning off his phone during family time, opting for check-ins with his now grown-up children, and striving to delegate more responsibilities within his team. His aim wasn't just a better work-life balance—it was sustainability, both at home and in business. Merrill's story arrives at a time when the glorification of overwork is facing increasing pushback. From Infosys co-founder Narayana Murthy's 70-hour work week call to Neha Suresh's now-infamous 14-hour day tweet, the tech industry continues to wrestle with where ambition ends and burnout begins.
Yet, as neurologist Dr. Sid Warrier recently pointed out on the For a Change podcast, the stress of long hours depends less on the clock and more on the emotional load. 'It's not about work or not work—it's about stress and no stress,' he said, emphasizing that purpose and connection play a vital role in mental resilience.
Now in his late 40s, Merrill still logs long hours, but with greater intention. His kids, now aged 16 to 23, no longer need bedtime stories—but they do appreciate nightly conversations and the presence of a father who has learned to show up in full. 'As they've grown, so have I,' Merrill shared. 'Being fully present—even if just for a few moments—can mean more than being physically around all day.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India.com
17 minutes ago
- India.com
Pakistan Suffers Rs 1,240 Crore Loss After Airspace Ban On Indian Flights: Report
After India suspended the Indus Water Treaty on April 23 in response to the gruesome Pahalgam terror attack, Pakistan closed its airspace to Indian-registered aircraft. However, according to a local media report, Islamabad has suffered massive financial losses after the shutdown as the Pakistan Airports Authority (PAA) lost over Rs. 1,240 crore (PKR 4.1 billion) in over two months. According to ANI, Dawn reported the figure of losses, citing a statement by the Pakistan Ministry of Defence in the National Assembly on Friday. Furthermore, as per the report, the closure came into effect from April 24, when Islamabad withdrew overflight permission for all Indian-registered aircraft and those operated, owned, or leased by Indian carriers. The closure of airspace has backfired on the Pakistani economy. According to the Dawn, the revenue of PAA from overflying charges plunged between April 24 and June 30, nearly affecting 100-150 Indian aircraft daily and slashing Pakistan's transit air traffic by almost 20 percent. Also Read: '6 Pak Aircraft Were Downed During Operation Sindoor': Air Force Chief Pakistani Ministry Admits Financial Losses The Pakistani Defence Ministry has admitted the financial losses but attempted to justify the decision to close airspace for all Indian aircraft and said, "Sovereignty and national defence take precedence over economic considerations." Meanwhile, the officials also claimed that the measures issued by Notices to Airmen (NOTAMs) were for "strategic and diplomatic" reasons. According to the ministry's data, PAA's average daily overflight revenue in 2019 was 508,000 dollars, compared to 760,000 dollars in 2025, meaning the ban is costing Pakistan far more now than during the previous standoff, Dawn reported. Pakistan Airspace Closure Pakistan's airspace is open to all except Indian airlines and aircraft, and the ban has been extended twice and is now set to last until the last week of August. Furthermore, Indian carriers continue unaffected on other international routes, while Pakistani airlines are still barred from entering Indian airspace. India-Pakistan Tensions On April 22, terrorists gunned down 25 Indian citizens and one Nepali citizen in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam. The incident sent shockwaves through the nation. The responsibility for the attack was claimed The Resistance Front (TRF), an offshoot of Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), however, later it distanced itself from the incident. After this, New Delhi took several diplomatic measures against Islamabad, and the airspace closure was a part of the same. India banned all Pakistani-operated, owned, or leased aircraft, including military flights, from entering Indian skies from April 30.


Mint
17 minutes ago
- Mint
Man resigns soon after first pay; HR calls it ‘unethical', netizens says ‘nothing wrong'
An Instagram post by an Indian HR professional has sparked debate online after they claimed an employee resigned just minutes after receiving their first salary. 'Salary credited at 10:00 AM, resignation emailed at 10:05 AM,' the post read. The HR professional said the company's HR team had spent hours on the employee's onboarding, while their team had invested weeks in training them. 'Let's talk about professional ethics. The company welcomed you, trusted you, and gave you a platform to grow. And then—five minutes after your first salary hit your account—you walked away. Was that fair? Was it ethical?' she wrote. Criticising the sudden resignation, the HR professional said such behaviour reflected 'a lack of intent, maturity, and accountability,' and urged workers to be honest if they feel a role or company is not the right fit. 'If something didn't feel right: You could've spoken up. You could've asked for clarity or help. You could've made a conscious exit, not a convenient one. No job is 'easy'. Every role takes commitment, patience, and effort. Growth doesn't come with your first paycheck — it comes with perseverance,' the post read. 'So before pointing fingers at 'culture' or 'role mismatch,' Pause. Reflect. Communicate. Because in the end, your professionalism is defined not by your post — but by your actions.' The post drew mixed responses. Some supported the employee, arguing that salaries are payment for work already completed. 'Could not disagree more. When corporations start putting their employees first, the employees will start putting their companies first,' one LinkedIn user wrote. Another commented: 'Ethics? Let's be clear: salaries are paid for work already done — not for charity, not in advance. If someone resigns after getting paid, it means they fulfilled their obligation for that month.' Others compared the case to sudden layoffs. 'How is it justified to terminate employees in the middle of the month without proper notice or explanation?' one user asked. Another wrote: 'Nothing wrong'


Economic Times
17 minutes ago
- Economic Times
FII flows, US-India tariff developments among 7 factors likely to steer D-Street this week
Factors that are likely to impact movement when markets reopen this week: 1) Q1 earnings Live Events 2) Domestic data 3) India–US trade talks 4) Technical factors 5) FII/DII activity 6) Crude prices 7) INR movement (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel Markets extended their losing streak for the sixth consecutive week, weighed down primarily by escalating trade tensions between the US and India. The tone remained muted in the early part of the week, but selling pressure intensified as the days progressed. Ultimately, both the Nifty and the Sensex lost nearly a percent each, closing at 24,363.30 and 79,857.79, dominant driver of the week's decline was the sudden escalation in US tariffs, with the US President announcing a 50% levy on Indian goods. The RBI's decision to maintain the policy rate at 5.50% with a neutral stance, signaling near-term uncertainty, failed to lift Nifty breached Thursday's low of 24,344, giving up all the recovery seen from the previous day's low. Moreover, the index has now closed decisively below its 100-day DEMA, currently placed at 24, is significant as the Nifty had already slipped below its 20- and 50-day DEMAs earlier. A close below the 100-day DEMA signals a positional downtrend, indicating a more pronounced shift in market sentiment beyond short-term earnings season is nearing its end, with key results due from Ashok Leyland BPCL , and others, which could drive stock-specific action In the coming week, attention will turn to domestic CPI and WPI inflation in US–India trade relations will remain in focus amid ongoing discussions over a trade Nifty's close below 24,450 has increased the risk of further correction, with immediate support near 24,200—the 200-day EMA—followed by 23,950. On the upside, resistance is expected around 24,600–24,800, with a stronger hurdle at 25,200.'Broader market indices remain vulnerable given their higher beta to FII outflows, while the advance–decline ratio continues to signal weak breadth. Any rebound is likely to be short-lived unless accompanied by easing trade tensions and a reversal in FII flows ,' said Ajit Mishra, SVP – Research at Religare turned buyers in Indian equities. On Friday, foreign institutional investors recorded net purchases worth Rs 1,850.55 crore, while domestic institutional investors bought a net Rs 7,437.36 oil remains under pressure due to rising inventories, which could also influence market sentiment this rupee traded weak as ongoing US tariff concerns weighed on sentiment. With an existing 25% tariff in place and an additional 25% proposed, pressure on the currency remains elevated.