Sperm donor's genetic mutation linked to cancer in 10 conceived children
Sperm from a single donor in Europe has reportedly been used to conceive at least 67 pregnancies, although the donor carried a rare cancer-causing mutation.
The donor's mutation has been linked to cancer diagnoses in 10 of these children, according to a report by The Guardian.
The case was brought to light after two families separately contacted their fertility clinics after their children's cancer diagnoses were linked to a rare genetic variant called TP53.
A mutation in the TP53 gene causes Li-Fraumeni syndrome, which increases the risk of developing cancer. Cleveland Clinic states that this disorder comes with a 90% chance of developing some type of cancer by age 60, and a 50% chance by the age of 40.
The European Sperm Bank, the sperm supplier, confirmed that this variant was present in some of the donor's sperm.
The Guardian reported that the rare variant was "not known to be linked to cancer at the time of donation in 2008."
The genetic variant reportedly would not have been detectable through standard screening, and the donor is said to currently be in good health.
"The identified mutation is one that could not have been detected by the screening methods we use in accordance with regulations."
Dr Edwige Kasper, a biologist at Rouen University Hospital in France, presented this case at the European Society of Human Genetics' annual conference in Milan last week, commenting on the need for a European limit on the number of births or families for a single donor.
"We can't do whole-genome sequencing for all sperm donors – I'm not arguing for that," she told The Guardian. "But this is the abnormal dissemination of genetic disease. Not every man has 75 children across Europe."
Kasper analyzed the mutation in her lab, concluding that it was most likely cancer-causing and that children born from this donor should "receive genetic counseling."
The research-turned-investigation tracked down 67 children from 46 families in eight European countries. The children were tested, with the variant detected in 23 of them.
The 10 who had been diagnosed with cancer reportedly included cases of leukemia and non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
In a statement sent to Fox News Digital, the European Sperm Bank stated that donor-assisted reproduction "generally remains a significantly safer alternative" than reproduction without genetic screening.
The bank added that sperm donors undergo a "comprehensive health screening," which includes an in-depth medical examination, a review of the donor's family medical history and "extensive" testing for genetic and infectious diseases.
"However, it's not possible to rule out all risks — and, in this particular case, the identified mutation is one that could not have been detected by the screening methods we use in accordance with regulations and would require specialized genetic testing," the group noted.
Julie Paulli Budtz, VP. of corporate communications at the European Sperm Bank, expressed to Fox News Digital that they are "deeply affected by this case."
"The donor has been thoroughly tested even beyond the required standards, but preventative genetic screening is reaching its limits here," she said.
"Every human being has about 20,000 genes, and it is scientifically simply not possible to detect disease-causing mutations in a person's gene pool if you don't know what you are looking for."
Budtz noted that the European Sperm Bank welcomes "continued dialogue" regarding setting an "internationally binding family limit," which they have advocated for "on several occasions, also at EU level."
"This is also why, in addition to complying with national pregnancy limits, we have proactively implemented our own international limit of 75 families per donor," she added.
In the U.S., there is no official legal limit on how many sperm donations one man can make.
However, the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) recommends that donors are limited to 25 live births within each population area of 800,000 people.
"Institutions, clinics and sperm banks should maintain sufficient records to allow a limit to be set for the number of pregnancies for which a given donor is responsible," the ASRM states on its website.
"Limiting donor vials is an important part of the process."
California Cryobank, which has claimed to have the largest selection of sperm and egg donations in the country, states on its website that it closely monitors donors to limit the total number of family units to 20 to 30 worldwide.
"Limiting donor vials is an important part of the process," the bank noted.
The U.S. Federal Drug Administration (FDA) requires that all sperm donors undergo a physical exam, complete a questionnaire, provide their medical history, and undergo screenings for infectious diseases at an FDA-approved lab.
In addition, the ASRM suggests that donors undergo psychological and genetic screening, and also recommends infectious-disease testing of the recipient and the recipient's sexually intimate partners, per its website.
For more Health articles, visit www.foxnews.com/health
"Legal consultation and laws may vary by state," the organization notes.
At California Cryobank, donors must be tested for infectious diseases, undergo genetic screening, get a psychological assessment and criminal background check, and receive screening for the Zika virus, according to the bank's website.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wall Street Journal
an hour ago
- Wall Street Journal
U.S. Hiring Slowed in May Amid Tariff Uncertainty - Minute Briefing
Full Transcript This transcript was prepared by a transcription service. This version may not be in its final form and may be updated. Zoe Kuhlkin: Here's your Midday Brief for Friday, June 6th. I'm Zoe Kuhlkin for The Wall Street Journal. The US added 139,000 jobs in May, the Labor Department reported today. The figure was above economists' expectations, but the slower growth serves as a sign employers remained cautious amid all of the tariff uncertainty. The employment rate, which is based on a separate survey from the jobs figures, remained at 4.2%. Federal government employment shrank by 22,000 jobs, the fourth consecutive month of such declines. Industrial production in the Eurozone's two largest economies has declined in the first month of President Trump's global tariff blitz. German and French industrial output both contracted 1.4% in April. A sign that an economic slowdown is underway after a start to the year that was even stronger than first estimated. Trade data published today showed goods exports to the US from Germany sank 10.5% as companies adapted to the new trade reality. And Switzerland has proposed some of the strictest capital rules in the world on banking giant UBS in an attempt to prevent another Credit Suisse style meltdown, protect taxpayers, and restore the country's reputation as a haven for rich people. The proposal would require UBS to hold around $26 billion in additional equity capital and reduce its reliance on hybrid bonds that can convert to equity. UBS has openly opposed this proposal and today's reforms are a blow to their arguments. The government said the main measures could take six to eight years to fully take effect. We'll have more coverage of the day's news on the WSJ's What's News Podcast. You can add it to your playlist on your smart speaker or listen and subscribe wherever you get your podcasts.
Medscape
an hour ago
- Medscape
Sobering Figures: Alcohol's Link to GI Cancer
This transcript has been edited for clarity. In January 2025, the US Surgeon General released an important advisory that 'highlights alcohol use as a leading preventable cause of cancer in the United States, contributing to nearly 100,000 cancer cases and about 20,000 cancer deaths each year.' This is in line with epidemiologic evidence for the carcinogenicity of alcohol. However, the advisory also noted that approximately 72% of American adults drink alcohol at least once a week, and fewer than half realize that alcohol use contributes to an increase in cancer risk. In this video, we will explore the research linking alcohol to gastrointestinal (GI) cancers and suggest ways that physicians and public health experts can help individuals dramatically reduce their alcohol consumption. Through careful discussions in the clinic and public health initiatives, we can hopefully prevent many cancer deaths related to alcohol use. The Toll of Alcohol-Associated GI Cancer The association between alcohol consumption and cancer risk was first appreciated during the late 1980s. Over time, a growing body of research has demonstrated 'a causal relationship between alcohol use and increased risk for at least seven different types of cancer, including breast (in women), colorectum, esophagus, liver, mouth (oral cavity), throat (pharynx), and voice box (larynx).' The advisory publication noted that in 2020, approximately 741,300 patients developed cancer in part due to alcohol. In the United States, there are approximately 20,000 cancer deaths annually related to alcohol consumption, more than the number of alcohol-related motor vehicle collisions each year, which totals 13,500. Breast cancer makes up 60% of cancer-related deaths for women, while liver cancer (approximately 33%) and colorectal cancer (approximately 21%) make up the most cancer-related deaths for men. These figures should be sobering. Although the risk of developing cancer in people who consume fewer than two drinks per day is lower compared with higher levels of alcohol ingestion, there are a greater number of people who consume one to two drinks per day. Therefore, the total number of cancer cases is similar. In 2020, 185,100 patients who drank one to two drinks daily developed cancer attributed to alcohol usage, compared with 153,400 patients who consumed four to six drinks per day and 192,900 patients who consumed more than six drinks per day. A standard drink of alcohol amounts to 5 fluid ounces of wine, 12 fluid ounces of beer, or 1.5 fluid ounces of hard liquor. Knowledge Gap The International Agency for Research on Cancer — a specialty arm of the World Health Organization — now classifies alcohol as a Group 1 carcinogen along with tobacco, asbestos, and formaldehyde. In fact, 25 years ago, the US National Toxicology Program announced that alcoholic beverage consumption is carcinogenic. Yet, there remains a knowledge gap among the American public about the fact that alcohol is a strong cancer risk factor. A 2019 survey indicated that only 45% of Americans realized alcohol is a cancer risk factor, while those surveyed had higher awareness of the cancer risks posed by other factors, such as radiation exposure (91%), tobacco (89%), and asbestos (81%). Scientists have been studying alcohol as a potential risk factor for cancer over 20 years, using the same template of observational studies that researchers previously applied to studying smoking as a cancer risk factor. A large global meta-analysis comprising 572 research studies and 486,538 cancer deaths concluded that alcohol is indeed a cancer risk factor. A pooled analysis of 26 studies found the odds of developing oral cancer increased by 40% for those who drank one alcoholic beverage daily compared with those who did not. Furthermore, another meta-analysis showed the relative risk of cancer development compared with people who don't drink was 1.0 for light drinkers, 1.21 for moderate drinkers, and 1.52 for heavy drinkers (ie, more than four drinks per day). How Alcohol Causes Cancer Acetaldehyde is a breakdown byproduct of alcohol that can cause cancer by binding to DNA and damaging it. As a result, a cell can begin to grow uncontrollably and produce a cancerous tumor. In addition, alcohol can produce reactive oxygen species, which has the potential to create inflammation through oxidation, also damaging DNA, proteins, and lipids. Studies have shown that providing ethanol or acetaldehyde, which is the metabolic breakdown product of ethanol, led rats to develop more tumors in the body compared with controls. Alcohol can even increase estrogen levels, which can potentially predispose to breast cancer development. Smoking while drinking poses additional risks. Carcinogens from tobacco smoke can dissolve in alcohol liquid and more easily enter the body, which is especially concerning for the potential contribution to throat and oral cancers. Acetaldehyde can sometimes be used as a food additive and aroma agent, and is a significant carcinogenic component found in cigarette smoke. The acetaldehyde concentration in cigarette smoke is 1000 times greater than that in other significant carcinogens such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons or nitrosamines from tobacco. Drinking alcohol in combination with smoking cigarettes can have a synergistic negative effect on the risk for colorectal cancer, and the combination can have a sevenfold effect on the upper digestive tract's exposure to carcinogenic acetaldehyde. Additional research has focused on whether folate deficiency, sometimes caused by heavy alcohol use, might also place patients at risk through an alternative pathway. Esophageal and Liver Cancer According to the National Cancer Institute (NCI), heavy alcohol consumption can increase esophageal cancer risk fivefold. Even light drinking can increase the risk by 1.3-fold, highlighting the importance of limiting alcohol consumption. The NCI also reports that heavy alcohol ingestion can multiply the risk of developing hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma by two times compared with the regular population. Although additional research needs to be conducted, it has been hypothesized that alcohol can cause liver cancer by altering the immune response, causing reactive oxygen species production, and producing changes in the immune response. Unfortunately, alcohol can act synergistically with hepatitis B and C to cause liver cancer. Also, consistently drinking two or more alcoholic beverages per day is associated with an increased risk for liver cancer. Gastric Cancer Recent studies have shown that alcohol consumption could increase gastric cancer risk. Acetaldehydes may act as a possible mechanism by creating a local toxic effect, and ethanol may also disturb gastric mucosal protection. A meta-analysis that reviewed 10 case-control studies investigating alcohol and gastric cancer risks validated it as a risk factor even at low levels of alcohol consumption. A Korean population-based retrospective cohort study found that 'the risk of GI cancer increased linearly with the frequency of drinking in a dose-dependent manner.' Pancreatic Cancer The same Korean study found that the risk for pancreatic cancer increased with weekly alcohol drinking. A meta-analysis published in the British Journal of Cancer also showed a 20% increase in pancreatic cancer risk with alcohol consumption. In a study of over 450,000 Americans living in California, Florida, Louisiana, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey, the risk of developing pancreatic cancer in heavy alcohol users (at least three drinks per day) was 1.35 compared with light users (less than one drink per day) in never smokers. Another study, of over 33,000 patients in Sweden, found the relative risk of pancreatic cancer for intermediate and heavy alcohol use was 2.13 in former smokers. Colorectal Cancer In 2025, the NCI published a guide indicating that moderate to heavy alcohol consumption is associated with a 1.2- to 1.5-fold increased risk for colorectal cancer compared with patients who were abstinent. In an earlier review, from 2015, researchers showed that alcohol consumption of more than 30 grams per day was associated with an increased risk of developing colorectal cancer. Estimates from the World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research indicate that there was a 9% risk of developing colorectal cancer for every 10 grams of alcohol consumed daily. In addition, folate deficiency has been shown to worsen the effects of drinking alcohol on colorectal cancer risks. A 2022 meta-analysis published in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology found that consuming alcohol was associated with a 1.71 relative risk of developing early-onset colorectal cancer. Interestingly, cigarette smoking was not statistically significant for establishing such an association. Consumption of processed meat and fried foods, as well as lack of exercise, also contributed to the development of early-onset colorectal cancer. As physicians, we should encourage patients to make lifestyle modifications to avoid those other risk factors. While additional research needs to be conducted, a cohort study in California and Hawaii, led by Dr Song-Yi Park, indicated that the relationship between alcohol and colorectal cancer might vary by ethnicity. In addition, it found that colorectal cancer risk was increased by wine and beer, but not liquor. The association with alcohol was greatest for rectal and left colon cancers. Public Health Approaches Alcohol is the most consumed drug in the United States, a statistic that requires validated approaches for addressing. In the future, Congress can vote to include alcohol warning labels on bottles and cans. There's evidence that health warning labels are effective in teaching the public about alcohol-induced health consequences. Interestingly, multiple studies have illustrated a decrease in alcohol consumption following viewership of alcohol warning labels. In addition, alcohol warning labels depicting liver cancer or negative alcohol consequences have been shown to reduce drinking and drunk driver situations. A 2024 meta-analysis showed with 'moderate certainty' that alcohol warning labels might decrease selection of alcoholic drinks and drinking before driving. However, there was 'low evidence' demonstrating that warning labels might reduce alcohol drinking per occasion, or alcohol drinking speeds, which would be important considerations at parties and social gatherings. A 2020 study showed that alcohol selection was lower for all kinds of alcohol warning labels compared with no warning labels. Specifically, alcoholic drink selection was 56% with warning labels that consisted of an image and text, 49% for image only, and 61% for text only. During the 1990s and 2000s, physicians and public health experts learned a lot about how to motivate patients to quit smoking. One successful public health approach was the use of the transtheoretical model, where patients go through various stages, such as precontemplation, contemplation, preparation, action, and maintenance, when trying to decide when to quit smoking. This behavioral modification model could be used for alcohol prevention too. Key public policy interventions also helped, including a tobacco taxation, advertising bans, and tobacco marketing restrictions in smoke-free zones. Similar interventions could work well for alcohol. Alcohol taxation can be used to deter heavy drinkers and young drinkers who don't have as much money to spend, given that tobacco taxation was successful for smoking reductions. Furthermore, policies could be set to maintain minimum unit pricing to prevent the sale of ultracheap liquor. States could also limit the hours of alcohol purchasing or even the days, such as banning alcohol sales on Sunday. These public health strategies could work in tandem to help decrease alcohol drinking rates in the United States. Alcohol and smoking are very similar social activities that for years were depicted as stylish and cool in movies and on TV. Then smoking ads were banned on TV through the Public Health Cigarette Smoking Act of 1970. During the 1970s, cigarette companies shifted their advertising from TV to print. So, it would be important in the future to ban alcohol ads from all media and printed marketing. As highlighted by the World Health Organization, advertising bans and restrictions were helpful in Nordic countries with decreasing the per-capita drinking amount. Finally, physicians should screen patients for heavy alcohol consumption using the validated AUDIT- C questionnaire and biomarkers such as phosphatidyl ethanol. When needed, Alcoholics Anonymous or a similar 12-step program can be offered to patients who drink heavily to reduce alcohol consumption. Tips to Reduce Alcohol Consumption Here are some helpful tips to encourage patients and friends to reduce alcohol consumption. Set a quit date and avoid triggers such as meeting friends at bars. Drink mocktails at social gatherings and parties. Patients can also choose from a plethora of innovative and tasty alcohol-free beers when drinking with friends. Several beer companies, such as Heineken, Budweiser, Guinness, and Samuel Adams, have developed great alcohol-free beer alternatives, which are extremely helpful for patients trying to remain abstinent and also for those trying to prevent cancer. Mass media initiatives such as the Ad Council and celebrity public service announcement television spots could be used to shift social norms around alcohol consumption. Public service announcements could also be shared at sporting events and concerts where alcohol consumption is common. Public health campaigns could place posters in bars and liquor stores informing consumers about the link between alcohol and cancer. Social media could teach target populations about alcohol reduction in fun and engaging ways. By talking with patients in clinic and working on public health campaigns, gastroenterologists have a unique opportunity to inspire behavioral lifestyle changes in patients and to prevent many cancers.
Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Police arrest ‘Billboard Chris,' Christian activist in EU capital for denouncing child transgender treatments
Belgian police arrested a prominent conservative activist and an Alliance Defending Freedom International employee in the European Union capital of Brussels on Thursday while they were displaying signs opposing transgender medical treatment for kids. Chris Elston, also known as "Billboard Chris," and ADF International official Lois McLatchie Miller were detained by Brussels police while protesting gender-affirming care for children. They were released after several hours and not charged but were instructed to destroy their signs. "Chris and I were arrested for stating a simple truth in public: no child is born in the wrong body. I called the police because we were being surrounded and felt threatened. But instead of addressing the aggression of the mob, the police arrested us—two people standing peacefully with signs, open to conversation," McLatchie Miller told Fox News Digital. "That this happened in the heart of Europe is deeply troubling. If speaking up for children is now grounds for arrest, then our freedom to speak the truth on any important issue is truly in danger," the ADF International employee added. Elston, well known for wearing billboards decrying transgender medical treatment for children out in public, stood out in the streets of the Belgian capital alongside McLatchie Miller. Both wore billboards, with the ADF employee's sign reading, "Children are never born in the wrong body" and Elston's reading, "Children cannot consent to puberty blockers." According to ADF International's press release, the signs drew a crowd of onlookers, some of whom got aggressive. In a video recorded before their arrest, Elston showed Brussels police forming a ring around him and his colleague to keep onlookers from getting too close. "And we have quite a scene unfolding in Brussels, Belgium," Elston said in the recording. "We have been getting incredibly harassed for about the last hour. We've remained perfectly calm as always, having conversations about what is the greatest child abuse scandal in modern medicine history." Elston continued, saying they were the ones who called the police to protect them from harassment; however, he noted that the officers then ordered them to put away their signs. "We called the police because a man was harassing and following Lois everywhere she went, trying to stop us from filming. The police have now arrived, and they've told me I have to put – and Lois – they've told us we have to put our signs away. I have refused. He said I was violating the law. I said, 'What law?' He can't name it," he said. Elston added that he was told he was going to be arrested, stating, "So I said, 'That's fine. Go ahead.'" ADF International's press release stated the two were eventually arrested and taken to two separate police stations, where they were "ordered to remove their clothes and searched." They were released several hours later. In a statement, ADF International executive director Paul Coleman ripped Brussels' government for the action. "The Belgian authorities not only failed to uphold the fundamental right to speak freely, they turned the power of the state against those who were peacefully exercising their rights at the behest of a mob," he said. "This is the type of authoritarianism we challenge in other parts of the world, and it's deeply disturbing to see it here in the very heart of Europe. While we are grateful our colleague has been safely released, we are deeply concerned by her treatment at the hands of the police in Brussels," Coleman added. Fox News Digital reached out to the Belgian police for comment but did not immediately receive a response.
