China's Temu owner sees profit plunge as trade tensions linger
The drop came as the economic superpowers are locked in another bruising trade standoff that saw US President Donald Trump last month scrap a customs exemption for goods valued under $800. In a statement with the earnings release on Tuesday, PDD Holdings' co-chief executive Lei Chen said the company made "substantial investments...to support merchants and consumers" and deal with "rapid changes in the external environment".
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Chinese ecommerce giant PDD Holdings saw net profit almost halve in the first three months of the year as the Temu owner prepared for a blistering trade war between Beijing and Washington.The Shanghai-based company said net profit came in at 14.7 billion yuan ($2 billion) in the three months ending March 31, down 47% year on year.The drop came as the economic superpowers are locked in another bruising trade standoff that saw US President Donald Trump last month scrap a customs exemption for goods valued under $800.The exemption was long a vital part of the business model supporting platforms offering low-cost goods like Temu.In a statement with the earnings release on Tuesday, PDD Holdings' co-chief executive Lei Chen said the company made "substantial investments...to support merchants and consumers" and deal with "rapid changes in the external environment"."These investments weighed on short-term profitability but gave merchants the room to adapt", he said, insisting they were focused on "strengthening the (platform's) long-term health".The firm also saw revenue growth slow for a fourth straight quarter.It said revenue in the first quarter rose 10% on-year to 95.7 billion yuan.But that was down on the 24% growth recorded in the previous three months -- and a severe drop from the 131% growth it saw at the start of 2024.The growth slowdown was "expected", said PDD Holdings' vice president of finance Jun Liu, adding that the downturn was "accelerated by the changes in the external environment".She warned that the company's financial results "may continue to reflect the impact of sustained investments... through uncertain times".PDD's New York-listed depository receipts plunged more than 13%.As part of a detente in the tariff standoff between China and the United States, Trump signed an executive order this month that set duties on "de minimis" items sent through the US Postal Service to 54% of their value, or a $100 payment.A prior tariff had been set at 120%.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Lower duty on edible oils, nuts; target growth in spice, rice in US deal: Niti Aayog
India should offer concessions on agricultural products from US such as edible oils and nuts where domestic supply gaps exist, and explore duty concessions to boost high-performing exports — including shrimp, fish, spices, rice, tea, coffee, and rubber — in the US market during the Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) negotiations, a Niti Aayog working paper has argued. The need for calibrated negotiations on agricultural trade relations between India and the US arises as India has traditionally maintained relatively high tariffs on politically sensitive agricultural sectors to protect farmers, but the US, under President Donald Trump, has been aggressively pushing for greater market access and lower tariffs, posing a challenge for developing countries such as India. The working paper dated May said India can offer some concessions to the US in the 'import of soybean oil' to meet US demands to reduce the trade imbalance, without harming domestic production, as India is the largest importer of edible oil in the world and the US has a huge export surplus of soybean. 'Import soybean seed from US 'We should also explore the option of importing soybean seed and using it for extracting oil in the coastal areas, then selling the oil in the domestic market and exporting the meal, for which there is adequate overseas demand. This will avoid genetically modified (GM) feed entering the Indian market,' the paper, authored by Senior Adviser at NITI Aayog, Raka Saxena, and Member of NITI Aayog, Ramesh Chand, said. 'Similarly, corn may be imported for ethanol blending, and its by-products — like Distiller's Dried Grains with Solubles (DDGS) — can be entirely exported to avoid GM feed in the country. US corn is cheaper and can be used to meet India's biofuel targets without disrupting local food and feed markets,' the paper said. Notably, soybeans and corn are among the US top exports to China, where a trade war may affect agricultural trade between the two countries. According to a Reuters report, US soybean exports may drop 20 per cent and prices could plunge if the United States and China fail to resolve their trade dispute, limiting US soybeans from accessing their largest market. Ease US apple imports 'Indian producers already enjoy supply advantages in commodities like rice and pepper. High tariffs on such products by India, which are regularly exported by the country, can be easily lowered or even removed in the bilateral trade accord. Such tariffs are not relevant for trade with countries like the US,' the paper said. The Niti Aayog paper said India can consider lower tariffs on agricultural commodities where either domestic production is small or imports do not compete with domestic production due to different quality grades and seasons. 'For example, US apples sell at a premium price in Indian retail markets due to different quality, long shelf life, and off-season availability.' Boost exports of fish, spices & coffee 'India should negotiate more access to the US market for high-performing exports like shrimp, fish, spices, rice, tea, coffee, and rubber. India earns approximately $5.75 billion annually from agri-exports to the US. Expanding this through duty waivers or TRQs should be part of trade talks,' the paper said. The authors said that US is expected to remain a big market for export of surplus food from India and all efforts need to be made to keep favorable environment for export to US. 'This should include strategic opening for US imports into India to achieve larger gains in exports. The ongoing negotiations between the two countries for a bilateral trade accord seem to be the best option for resetting long term trade relationships'. 'Export basket should emphasize both, traditional products like fishery and rice sold in large volume and a large number of high value products, differentiated products, ethnic products, attribute-based products, health foods, processed food etc. which are individually small but cumulatively quite large,' the paper said. In the last 10 years, India's agricultural exports to the US grew nearly fivefold, from $1.18 billion to $5.75 billion and the share of the US in India's total agricultural exports saw a slight decline, dropping from 11.5 per cent in 2004 to 9.8 per cent in 2024. Meanwhile, India's agricultural imports from the US increased even faster, rising from $291 million in 2004 to $2,217.9 million in 2024. Ravi Dutta Mishra is a Principal Correspondent with The Indian Express, covering policy issues related to trade, commerce, and banking. He has over five years of experience and has previously worked with Mint, CNBC-TV18, and other news outlets. ... Read More
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
US dismisses India's steel tariff challenge at WTO on legal, procedural grounds
The United States has rejected India's notice at the World Trade Organization (WTO), which proposed retaliatory action against the 25 per cent US tariffs on steel and aluminium, arguing that the tariffs were imposed on national security grounds. The US also pointed out procedural errors in India's case. In its note dated May 23, the US stated that India is wrongly treating the tariffs on steel and aluminium as safeguard measures. It clarified that these duties were imposed under US law (Section 232), which allows such action if imports are considered a threat to national security. This development is significant as US President Donald Trump on Friday announced a move to double import tariffs on steel to 50 per cent — a step Indian exporters have called 'unfortunate', warning that they have already lost $5 billion in exports due to earlier tariffs, and further hikes could deepen losses. 'The United States will not discuss the Section 232 tariffs under the Agreement on Safeguards as we do not view the tariffs as a safeguard measure,' the US told the WTO Council for Trade in Goods in response to India's challenge. In FY2025, India exported $4.56 billion worth of iron, steel, and aluminium products to the US, including $587.5 million in iron and steel, $3.1 billion in articles of iron or steel, and $860 million in aluminium and related goods. These exports now face sharply higher US tariffs, threatening the profitability of Indian producers and exporters. The US also claimed that India had committed procedural errors. 'India never acknowledged the United States' offer to discuss these tariffs in our response dated 16 April 2025. Accordingly, India has not complied with the obligations under the Agreement on Safeguards, the agreement that it mistakenly contends applies to the tariffs in question,' the US note said. Ajay Srivastava, former trade officer and head of the Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI), said India now has several options. One is to launch a formal WTO dispute, not under the Safeguards Agreement, but under broader GATT rules, challenging the Section 232 tariffs as disguised protectionist measures. 'India could argue that the US is abusing the national security exception, referring to earlier WTO rulings that limit how Article XXI can be invoked. However, this legal path carries risks, as the US has a track record of disregarding WTO rulings on national security,' GTRI said. A more forceful approach would be for India to impose retaliatory tariffs on its own, even without WTO authorisation, Srivastava said. He noted that other countries such as the EU, Canada, and China have already done this in response to the US Section 232 tariffs, as a political signal of resistance. 'While this sends a clear message, it also risks US countermeasures and potential legal battles. GTRI believes that although India has legal and diplomatic options, it may decide not to act immediately,' Srivastava said. GTRI suggested that a pragmatic path would be for India to use the ongoing bilateral Free Trade Agreement (FTA) negotiations with the US as the main platform to resolve the issue. Ravi Dutta Mishra is a Principal Correspondent with The Indian Express, covering policy issues related to trade, commerce, and banking. He has over five years of experience and has previously worked with Mint, CNBC-TV18, and other news outlets. ... Read More
India Today
2 hours ago
- India Today
US demands final trade offers by Wednesday as tariff deadline nears
With just five weeks until a self-imposed deadline and global markets watching closely, the Trump administration is accelerating trade negotiations with multiple countries, urging them to submit their "best offers" by to a draft letter seen by Reuters, the United States Trade Representative (USTR) is pressing countries to outline top-line proposals in key areas such as tariff cuts, quota allocations for US industrial and agricultural goods, and removal of non-tariff trade move comes as the administration attempts to wrap up complex negotiations that began on April 9, when President Donald Trump paused his sweeping "Liberation Day" tariffs for 90 days after a market backlash. That temporary pause ends on July 8. The letter outlines an aggressive timeline, reflecting a growing sense of urgency inside the White House. "Productive negotiations with many key trading partners continue at a rapid pace. It is in all parties' interest to take stock of progress and assess any next steps," a USTR official told administration officials, including White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett, have repeatedly signalled that multiple agreements are "nearing completion," only one limited deal has emerged so far — with Britain. That agreement, however, is widely viewed as a loose framework for ongoing talks, rather than a final draft letter reportedly calls for detailed responses on digital trade, economic security, and country-specific commitments. Once proposals are submitted, the US plans to evaluate them "within days" and provide what the letter refers to as "a possible landing zone," potentially including reciprocal tariff the draft doesn't specify recipient nations, it's understood to target countries currently in active negotiations, including the European Union, Japan, Vietnam, and ambitious -- and often frenetic -- tariff policy represents a major part of his "America First" economic agenda as he seeks to reshape US trade relationships, reduce trade deficits and protect American industries. Republican lawmakers are also banking on tariffs to add to federal revenue and offset the cost of the tax-cut legislation now working its way through twists and turns in Trump's tariff policies have taken investors on a rollercoaster ride. In May, US stocks held their biggest rally of any month since November 2023, but that was after global indexes had cratered under the barrage of Trump's tariff announcements throughout February, March and early inputs from ReutersTune InMust Watch
