logo
UAE likely to play key role in global rare earths supply chain

UAE likely to play key role in global rare earths supply chain

Khaleej Times3 days ago
One of the key elements in the global trade wars has been the rare earths sector, which play a critical role in fostering industrial development linked to renewable energy systems, electric vehicles and defence applications.
As the UAE progresses towards its ambitious economic diversification agenda, the country is exploring ways to localize elements of the rare earths supply chain. Given local deposits in the UAE are limited, the country is focusing on the midstream processing and logistics, assisted by trade partnerships. This move is part of a larger strategy to establish a strong presence in the midstream supply chain, benefitting from the UAE's geopolitical neutrality and sovereign wealth fund power, which could help reduce global rare earth reliance on China, experts say.
In this regard, there is interest in establishing trade and processing hubs in the country, and freezones such as Khalifa Economic Zones Abu Dhabi (Kezad) are prime locations for such activities in the emirate. With a business friendly environment, excellent logistics, infrastructure and global connectivity, establishing a rare earths hub in the country would help mitigate some of the geopolitical tensions between China and the West. 'Rare earth refining is mostly concentrated in China today, with parallel supply chains being developed elsewhere (e.g. Australia) as a means to reduce that market concentration. The UAE, could position itself as a natural bridge between miners in Africa and Asia and Western technology and manufacturing firms, supported by sovereign wealth funds that invest in mining assets abroad. Furthermore, establishing industrial activity in Kezad tied to rare earths (e.g. processing) would boost local advanced manufacturing (e.g. electric vehicles) which heavily rely on rare earths such as neodymium for magnets,' Alexios Zachariadis, Partner at Deloitte Middle East, told Khaleej Times.
The UAE's 'Make it in the Emirates' and Operation 300bn initiatives promote local manufacturing of elements reliant on rare earths, such as electric vehicle components (e.g. magnets, batteries), renewable energy systems (e.g. wind turbines) and high-tech industries (e.g. drones, defense technologies). 'Investing in rare earths processing alone could enable the country to add value to imported raw materials and export technology products which are in high demand, but also further scale up the UAE's domestic renewable energy projects,' Zachariadis said.
COP28 emphasized the role of critical minerals for the energy transition. 'Post-COP28, the UAE is leveraging its Brics membership to secure upstream rare earth supplies, whilst at the same time positioning itself as an alternative trading hub, vying to attract Western and Asian companies seeking to de-risk global supply chains which have been affected by geopolitical tensions and trade barriers. It is however important to balance environmental concerns with industrial growth,' Zachariadis said.
Nations across the GCC are pursing aggressive strategies to reduce reliance on hydrocarbons, with a growing emphasis on mining as a potential sector to generate new revenue streams. 'The GCC could become a key supplier of critical minerals required for the global energy transition, competing with Latin America, Africa and Australia. New trade alliances are also likely to emerge, focusing on raw material import/export activities,' Zachariadis said.
Further down the line, enhanced regional collaboration is possible whereby individual nations focus on their key added value. For instance, a plausible scenario is one where Saudi Arabia and the UAE continue leading in mining investments (e.g. Ma'aden, EGA and international assets through sovereign wealth funds), Oman would develop metal processing hubs given its ports and smelting capacities, and Qatar and Bahrain would continue focusing on downstream industries, Zachariadis said.
'This stronger regional collaboration would in turn incentivise new infrastructure and logistics investments (e.g. railways) and create cross-border value chains in the GCC as a means to establish a regional industrial eco-system in critical minerals and rare earths to manufacture products in demand locally/regionally and by other export markets,' he added.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Dubai Chamber of Commerce reports 4% rise in new members, trade value up 18% in H1
Dubai Chamber of Commerce reports 4% rise in new members, trade value up 18% in H1

Gulf Business

time26 minutes ago

  • Gulf Business

Dubai Chamber of Commerce reports 4% rise in new members, trade value up 18% in H1

Image: Dubai Media Office Dubai Chamber of Commerce said it registered 35,532 new member companies in H1 2025, up 4 per cent from a year earlier, while the value of members' exports and re-exports rose 18 per cent to Dhs171.9bn ($46.8bn). The chamber, one of three operating under Dubai Chambers, issued 409,083 certificates of origin in the period, an increase of 10 per cent from H1 2024. It also processed 2,961 ATA carnets for goods valued at Dhs1.94bn. Chairman Sultan bin Saeed Al Mansoori said the results reflected Dubai's position as 'a leading global centre for trade and investment' and the emirate's 'integrated business ecosystem,' which he said reinforced investor confidence in the national economy. The chamber supported the expansion of 60 local companies into new overseas markets during H1 2025, a 76 per cent increase from the 34 firms assisted in the same period last year. Dubai Chamber of Commerce organised trade missions As part of its 'New Horizons' initiative, it organised trade missions to Thailand, the Philippines, Angola and Mozambique, resulting in 1,076 business-to-business meetings. During the first six months of the year, the It held 98 meetings with Business Groups and Councils, more than double the number last year, and set up five new Business Councils representing Brazil, Slovakia, Peru, Indonesia and Hungary. The chamber handled 94 mediation cases worth Dhs213.5m, up 19 per cent year-on-year, and organised 19 legal events attended by 1,414 participants. The Dubai Centre for Family Businesses, part of Dubai Chambers, published a guide in partnership with the Department of Economy and Tourism on best practices for preserving family wealth and ensuring business continuity. Read:

Latest: Netanyahu repeats alarming call for Palestinians to leave Gaza
Latest: Netanyahu repeats alarming call for Palestinians to leave Gaza

The National

timean hour ago

  • The National

Latest: Netanyahu repeats alarming call for Palestinians to leave Gaza

Israel 'will allow Palestinians to leave Gaza', Netanyahu says Hamas delegation in Cairo in effort to salvage ceasefire talks Gaza suffering has reached 'unimaginable' levels, say UK, France and international partners UN accuses Israel of smearing journalist Al Sharif before killing him WHO wants more aid in Gaza before Israeli occupation At least 61,599 Palestinians killed and 154,088 wounded in Gaza since war began

The damage Israel can inflict if Hezbollah doesn't disarm
The damage Israel can inflict if Hezbollah doesn't disarm

The National

timean hour ago

  • The National

The damage Israel can inflict if Hezbollah doesn't disarm

The Lebanese government's decision last Thursday to endorse the objectives of a US-drafted plan provoked a negative response from Hezbollah and, to an extent, its ally within the Shiite community, the Amal Movement. However, the two parties, realising the risk of isolating themselves further, did not withdraw their ministers from the government of Prime Minister Nawaf Salam. The document presented to the Lebanese cabinet by the interim US envoy to Lebanon, Tom Barrack, outlined, among other things, a process for Hezbollah's disarmament. Prior to its Thursday session, the Salam government had ordered the Lebanese army to prepare a plan by the end of August. This plan would implement the decision taken by the state to secure a monopoly over weapons by the end of this year. The legal basis for this process is UN Security Council Resolution 1559, which calls for the disbanding of all militias in Lebanon, Lebanese and non-Lebanese; as well as Resolution 1701, which ended the 2006 Lebanon war. Resolution 1701 had imposed a Hezbollah pullback to behind the Litani River, but also reaffirmed the provisions of Resolution 1559. It still remains unclear how the Lebanese government and army will be able to implement such decisions if Hezbollah continues to refuse to surrender its weapons. Both Lebanese President Joseph Aoun and Mr Salam want to avoid violence at all cost, and seek to avert a rupture with the Shiite community, a majority of which supports Hezbollah and Amal. Since last November, when the ceasefire was reached, Israel has continued to hit Hezbollah sites and target party officials, or alleged officials, almost daily One aspect that has been left largely unmentioned in this context is what Israel might do if Hezbollah and Amal manage to derail the government's plan to disarm the party. Both parties, in their recklessness, have to grasp the real dangers if the Israelis resume their military campaign in Lebanon, especially given that they enjoy unconditional US support. Hezbollah finds itself very lonely in Lebanon today. Many people blame it for having carried the country into a war over Gaza that was unnecessary, highly destructive, and allowed Israel to reoccupy parts of Lebanon, after it had pulled its forces out of the country in 2000. Since last November, when the ceasefire was reached, Israel has continued to hit Hezbollah sites and target party officials, or alleged officials, almost on a daily basis. The Israelis also violated the ceasefire agreement by refusing to withdraw completely from Lebanon in January, as the agreement stipulated, a position supported by the Trump administration. A proposal by Mr Barrack subsequently tied an Israeli pull-out from the Lebanese areas that it still occupies to the demilitarisation of Hezbollah. By drawing this link, the US envoy effectively placed the burden of the continued Israeli presence on the party. The Israelis will certainly take this into consideration as they plan their strategy in Lebanon. If the Trump administration is willing to blame Hezbollah for the Israeli occupation, then this provides Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government several options for what to do next if the party continues to refuse to disarm. Israeli forces can occupy more Lebanese territory up to the Litani River, and proceed to destroy all Hezbollah infrastructure south of that – though this process has already begun under the Lebanese army. Israel's leaders can then make a condition for withdrawal that the Lebanese government disarm Hezbollah, or even sign a peace treaty with Israel. Barring Lebanese acceptance, an expansionist Israel could even permanently annex Lebanese land. A more ambitious plan would be for Israeli forces to occupy territory up to the Awwali River, at the level of the southern Lebanese city of Sidon, and make similar demands, or even contemplate annexation. This would empty the south of its Shiite population, while the ensuing humanitarian crisis would increase pressure on Hezbollah and the Lebanese state to comply with the Israeli government's demands. If the Lebanese fail to do so, Israel could use its new installations in southern Lebanon to mount a long campaign to destroy Hezbollah positions and arms depots around Lebanon, using aircraft, drones, or commandos flown in by helicopter, as they did against a Hezbollah missile factory in Masyaf, Syria, last September. Some observers feel that if the Israeli forces redeployed to southern Lebanon, this would provide a lifeline for Hezbollah, which could revive its resistance dimension by fighting the occupation. Perhaps, but the challenges are many. First, the party would be on its own in doing so, with many Lebanese wanting an end to the conflict with Israel. Second, without a regular arms supply line through Syria, the party's capacities to sustain such a military effort would suffer. And third, if Hezbollah tries to form a front against the Israeli presence, particularly along the Awwali, this would mean anchoring itself in non-Shiite areas, where local communities are deeply hostile to the group. Under such circumstances, Hezbollah would probably find it exceptionally difficult to mount an effective resistance struggle. The Shiite parties, above all Hezbollah, are certainly conscious of their vulnerabilities. Moreover, Hezbollah does not appear to have a credible plan B. It is now under direct Iranian control, since its leadership cadre was decimated last year, and has been reduced to trying to defend an untenable status quo. The possibilities open to Israel make such a strategy even less likely to succeed, while the potential outcomes are deeply alarming.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store