Miranda July, the problem with purity culture, and why a professor of fascism left the US
The US 'true love waits' movement was a phenomenon in the 1990s, inspiring Bill Clinton to spend tens of millions funding abstinence-only sex education. George W Bush doubled down, despite mounting evidence it didn't reduce teen sexual activity.
Matt (not his real name), who grew up in a fundamentalist Christian household of that time and was 'terrified' by the idea of sexual sin, had not had a relationship nor a sexual partner by his 40th birthday. He vented his frustration online. And of course, he was offered a solution: the Purity Culture Dropout Program.
Policy failure? Seventeen US states still offer abstinence-only sex ed – and they have higher-than-average teen pregnancy rates.
How long will it take to read: Ten minutes.
Meanwhile, Tinder is trialling a height filter in some markets and the dating app's shorter in stature men are feeling aggrieved (though the app said profiles that don't match the selected height criteria will not be blocked outright).
Discrimination, or a vital tool to help women satisfy an 'evolutionary drive' to find a taller partner? Leah Harper investigates.
Keywords: According to the dating app Badoo, the top word in profiles for men to get matches is '6ft' – for women, it is 'love'.
How long will it take to read: Five minutes.
The US history professor Marci Shore, her husband and a colleague made headlines last month with what in ordinary times would be an innocuous move from Yale to the University of Toronto. Part of her reasoning – a fear the US is 'headed to civil war'.
Shore argues Donald Trump has an approach to politics 'in which all of the ugliness is right on the surface'. But, in conversation with Jonathan Freedland, she offers the world the possibility of optimism.
'Without a distinction between truth and lies, there is no grounding for a distinction between good and evil.'
How long will it take to read: Five minutes.
Further reading: How Trump is propelling the US towards authoritarianism at an 'alarming speed'.
Sign up to Five Great Reads
Each week our editors select five of the most interesting, entertaining and thoughtful reads published by Guardian Australia and our international colleagues. Sign up to receive it in your inbox every Saturday morning
after newsletter promotion
Studies suggest cats and dogs are capable of reading human emotions. From not recognising what different cat miaows mean to assuming a dog who has just torn up a cushion feels guilt (rather than fear at their human's reaction), turns out we're not as advanced as our furry friends.
Sam Pyrah – owner of Morris, her nomination for best dog in the world – asks the experts how we can be better.
How long will it take to read: Ten minutes.
Further reading: The raccoons that conquered a German city.
In her hit novel All Fours, Miranda July's heroine blows up her life after an encounter with a young dancer on a road trip. July herself separated from her husband two years before the book's publication and has a child roughly the same age as the narrator's.
So is All Fours real life, or just fantasy? As Zoe Williams discovers, even July's closest friends are fuzzy on the detail. Says the author of its creation: 'The joy of it, for me, was writing a thing I hadn't seen written about sex.'
Sample reaction: One woman who nearly divorced her husband after reading it said: 'I think what I felt, which I think is what a lot of us feel, is permission to be undone.'
How long will it take to read: Seven minutes.
Enjoying the Five Great Reads email? Then you'll love our weekly culture and lifestyle newsletter, Saved for Later. Sign up here to catch up on the fun stuff with our rundown of must-reads, pop culture, trends and tips for the weekend.
And check out the full list of our local and international newsletters.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
33 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Air Canada flight attendants to defy back-to-work order and remain on strike
Air Canada's flight attendants plan to remain on strike, their union has said, defying government efforts to force them back to work and into binding arbitration over a dispute that has left more than 100,000 travellers stranded around the world during the peak summer travel season. About 10,000 flight attendants who work for Canada's largest airline walked out on the job early on Saturday amid an increasingly bitter dispute over what the union has described as 'poverty wages' and unpaid labour. Around the same time, Air Canada, which operates about 700 flights a day, said it would begin locking flight attendants out of airports. Less than 12 hours later, the Canadian government said it had ordered an end to the work stoppage, leading Air Canada to announce plans to resume flying by Sunday evening. However, that timeline was thrown into question after the union told Reuters it would challenge the return-to-work order, which it described as unconstitutional. It was the latest twist in talks that have dragged on since March as the flight attendants seek to address the fact that they are not compensated for work carried out when planes are not in the air, whether it is time spent on the ground between flights and or helping passengers to board. On Saturday, Canada's federal jobs minister, Patty Hajdu, said it was clear the talks had reached an impasse and that the impact was being felt by Canadians and visitors across the country. 'The talks broke down,' said Hajdu as she told reporters that she had asked the Canada Industrial Relations Board to order an immediate end to the strike and to impose binding arbitration. 'It is clear that the parties are not any closer to resolving some of the key issues that remain and they will need help with the arbitrator.' She appeared to link her actions to the toll that US tariff increases had taken on the Canadian economy. 'In a year in which Canadian families and businesses have already experienced too much disruption and uncertainty, this is not the time to add additional challenges and disruptions to their lives and our economy,' she said in a statement. Hajdu's power to halt the strike stems from a section of the Canada Labour Code, which gives the minister unilateral authority to end work stoppages in order to 'maintain or secure industrial peace'. While the section was rarely used by previous governments, the Liberal government has invoked it several times in the past year, quelling strikes by workers at Canadian ports, the post office and railway companies, prompting analysts to voice concerns that the use of the clause may be undermining workers' rights. The union representing the flight attendants decried the Liberal government for stepping in within hours, accusing it of violating their right to take job action. Air Canada had reportedly previously requested that the government intervene to impose binding arbitration. Wesley Lesosky, of the Canadian Union of Public Employees, said the government was giving 'Air Canada exactly what they want – hours and hours of unpaid labour from underpaid flight attendants, while the company pulls in sky-high profits and extraordinary executive compensation'. According to the aviation analytics firm Cirium, the airline had cancelled 671 flights by Saturday afternoon, leaving some travellers stranded overseas and others scrambling to find alternatives during the busy summer travel season. About 130,000 customers a day could be affected by a disruption, according to the airline. The airline said earlier it had offered its flight attendants 'an increase of more than 38% on global compensation', but the union said the figure failed to fully account for inflation. Air Canada also said it was willing to pay flight attendants 50% of their wage for work done before planes take off, leading the union to reply that its members should be fully compensated for their labour. About 70% of the airline's flight attendants are women, said Natasha Stea, a local union president and flight attendant. She questioned whether they were being treated fairly, given that Air Canada pilots, the vast majority of whom are men, received a significant raise last year. 'We are heartbroken for our passengers,' she told the Associated Press late last week. 'Nobody wants to see Canadians stranded or anxious about their travel plans, but we cannot work for free.'
The Guardian
33 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Rubio says both Russia and Ukraine ‘have to make concessions' for peace deal
In a combative series of interviews on Sunday, the US secretary of state, Marco Rubio, said that 'both sides are going to have to make concessions' for there to be a peaceful resolution to the war that erupted when Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022. 'You can't have a peace agreement unless both sides make concessions – that's a fact,' the Trump administration's top diplomat said Sunday on ABC's This Week. 'That's true in virtually any negotiation. If not, it's just called surrender. And neither side is going to surrender. So both sides are going to have to make concessions.' Rubio said the recent talks in Alaska between Russian president Vladimir Putin and his US counterpart Donald Trump toward ending the war had 'made progress in the sense that we identified potential areas of agreement – but there remains some big areas of disagreement'. 'We're still a long ways off,' Rubio added. 'We're not at the precipice of a peace agreement. We're not at the edge of one. But I do think progress was made and towards one.' He declined to go into specific areas of agreement or disagreement, or outline what Trump has described as 'severe consequences' for Russia if its aggression toward Ukraine continued. 'Ultimately, if there isn't a peace agreement, if there isn't an end of this war, the president's been clear – there are going to be consequences,' Rubio remarked. 'But we're trying to avoid that. And the way we're trying to avoid those consequences is with an even better consequence, which is peace, the end of hostilities.' Rubio agreed that no agreement was possible without both sides – including that of Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy – being at the table. 'You're not going to reach a ceasefire or a peace agreement in a meeting in which only one side is represented,' Rubio told ABC News. 'That's why it's important to bring both leaders together – and that's the goal here.' Rubio confirmed that a ceasefire – or, as Trump now reportedly prefers, a straight-to-peace deal – 'is going to be difficult', despite the White House's openly demanding one. The war, he said, has been 'going on for three and a half years'. 'You have two very entrenched sides, and we're going to have to continue to work and chip away at it,' Rubio said. Separately, on NBC's Meet the Press, Rubio said a ceasefire was 'not off the table', though he added: 'It was agreed by all that the best way to end this conflict is through a full peace deal.' He said the US had advocated for a ceasefire, but 'unfortunately, the Russians as of now have not agreed to that. 'But the ideal here, what we're aiming for here is not a ceasefire,' he said. 'What we ultimately are aiming for is an end to this.' Nonetheless, Rubio said he doubted that a new set of western sanctions on Russia would force Moscow to agree to any deal. He also denied that Trump, as critics claim, had merely given the aggressor in the conflict, Putin, an unwarranted place on the world stage. 'Putin is already on the world stage,' Rubio said on ABC News. 'The guy's conducting a full scale war in Ukraine. 'That doesn't mean he's right about the war. That doesn't mean he's justified about the war. You're not going to end a war between Russia and Ukraine without dealing with Putin. That's just common sense. So people can say whatever they want.' On NBC's Meet the Press, the Democratic US senator Chris Murphy of Connecticut countered on Sunday that the Trump-Putin 'meeting was a disaster'. 'It was an embarrassment for the United States,' Murphy said. 'It was a failure. Putin got everything he wanted.' Murphy said that Trump had given Putin 'that photo-op' he wanted and to 'be absolved of his war crimes in front of the world. 'War criminals are not normally invited to the United States of America,' Murphy remarked. Secondly, he said, Putin had not been forced to give up anything. 'President Trump said he wanted a ceasefire – it appears the ceasefire wasn't even seriously discussed,' Murphy added. 'And then, third, there's no consequences. 'Trump said, 'If I don't get a cease fire, Putin is going to pay a price.' And then he walked out of that meeting saying, 'I didn't get a ceasefire. I didn't get a peace deal, and I'm not even considering sanctions.''
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Ghislaine Maxwell files will not be released despite Trump order
Ghislaine Maxwell 's grand jury transcripts will not be released, a federal judge has ruled, saying the Trump administration 's request to do so is a 'diversion'. Paul Engelmayer, a Manhattan District Court judge, suggested the Department of Justice (DOJ) had requested the transcripts be released to create the 'illusion' of transparency. The judge said the files would not reveal any new information, adding that they 'do not discuss or identify any client of Epstein's or Maxwell's'. The decision will come as a blow to Donald Trump, who continues to grapple with the fallout after his administration closed the Jeffrey Epstein case. The administration's refusal to release information surrounding Epstein, the late financier and convicted paedophile, prompted a backlash from some of Mr Trump's most loyal supporters. In an effort to placate his base Mr Trump ordered Pam Bondi, the US attorney general, to seek the release of grand jury testimony related to the case in July. However, in a ruling filed on Monday, Mr Engelmayer said none of the arguments made by the DoJ for unsealing the transcripts met the requirements to authorise the disclosure of grand jury materials. 'The Court's review confirmed that unsealing the grand jury materials would not reveal new information of any consequence,' Mr Engelmayer wrote. He added: 'A member of the public, appreciating that the Maxwell grand jury materials do not contribute anything to public knowledge, might conclude that the Government's motion for their unsealing was aimed not at 'transparency' but at diversion — aimed not at full disclosure but at the illusion of such.' In the 31-page order, Mr Engelmayer said the DoJ's argument that the unsealing of the documents was necessary because of public interest 'fails at the threshold'. He said the suggestion that the transcripts would bring 'meaningful new information' about Epstein and Maxwell's crimes was 'demonstrably false'and the public 'would thus learn nothing new' from their disclosure. The judge said the files 'do not discuss or identify any client of Epstein's or Maxwell's' and 'do not reveal any heretofore unknown means or methods of Epstein's or Maxwell's crimes'. He added: 'They do not reveal new venues at which their crimes occurred. They do not reveal new sources of their wealth. They do not explore the circumstances of Epstein's death. They do not reveal the path of the government's investigation.' Weeks before the Trump administration announced it would not release the so-called Epstein files, Mr Trump was reportedly told his name came up several times in the documents, according to Wall Street Journal. Being mentioned in the files is not a sign of wrongdoing, and the Trump administration said the story was 'fake news'.
