Unmaking Americans: Trump aims to revoke citizenship
What has Trump said?
After months of targeting undocumented migrants and some legal immigrants for removal from the U.S., the president has recently turned his attention to American citizens. In July, Trump raised the possibility of deporting his South African–born ex-adviser Elon Musk and the Ugandan-born New York City Democratic mayoral nominee Zohran Mamdani (explaining that "we don't need a communist in this country"), and said he was "giving serious consideration" to stripping comedian and Trump nemesis Rosie O'Donnell of her citizenship. The Supreme Court has ruled that U.S.-born citizens like O'Donnell cannot have their citizenship taken away. But the government can revoke the citizenship of naturalized, foreign-born Americans—who make up more than 7% of the population, about 25 million people— through a legal process known as denaturalization, which returns them to the immigration status they held before naturalizing. At that point, deportation proceedings can begin. And in June, the Justice Department said its Civil Division had been directed by Trump to "maximally pursue denaturalization proceedings in all cases permitted by law and supported by the evidence."
Is there a precedent for this policy?
Denaturalization was remarkably common for much of the 20th century. The 1906 law that federalized the naturalization process included a provision allowing new Americans to lose their citizenship due to fraud, racial ineligibility—a clause initially aimed at Chinese people—and lack of "good moral character." Denaturalization quickly became "a tool for ridding the American citizenry of 'undesirables,'" said historian Patrick Weil. That included the Russian-born anarchist Emma Goldman, whom the government had spent years unsuccessfully trying to deport. Those efforts initially fell flat, because Goldman had legally obtained citizenship through her first marriage. But immigration officials investigated her ex-husband, found he'd put the wrong age on his citizenship application, and denaturalized him and Goldman using the 1906 law. She was deported in 1919, alongside 248 others considered foreign anarchists or communists. The 1940 Nationality Act expanded those eligible to be stripped of citizenship, including U.S.-born citizens who had joined a foreign army, voted in foreign elections, or deserted during wartime.
How many people lost citizenship?
Between 1907 and 1967, the government recorded about 22,000 denaturalizations. Weil estimates another 121,000 U.S.-born citizens lost their nationality from 1945 to 1977. The Supreme Court pared back the government's citizenship-stripping powers with a string of rulings in the 1950s and '60s, the most significant being 1967's Afroyim v. Rusk. In 1960, the State Department declared that Polish-born painter Beys Afroyim had forfeited his U.S. citizenship by voting in a 1951 Israeli election. The Supreme Court overturned that decision and much of the 1940 Nationality Act in 1967, ruling that the 14th Amendment's "citizenship clause" says simply that all American-born or naturalized Americans are U.S. citizens—a status that only the individual can renounce. "The Government is without power to rob a citizen of his citizenship," wrote Justice Hugo Black. Denaturalization numbers dropped after that ruling, with only a few cases filed each year.
What's the current legal situation?
There are two grounds for denaturalization: committing serious human rights violations before naturalization and committing fraud during the naturalization process. Officials must also demonstrate a person lacks "good moral character." The most common targets in recent decades were naturalized citizens with undisclosed Nazi pasts, such as Feodor Fedorenko, who kept secret that he'd been a guard at the Treblinka extermination camp. He was denaturalized in 1981 and deported to his native USSR, where he was executed in 1987. Denaturalization investigations began to ramp up with the 2010 launch of Operation Janus under President Obama, which used new digital tools to search for discrepancies in fingerprint data that might indicate naturalization fraud. Some 315,000 potential cases were flagged, but because such investigations require significant resources, the first Janus denaturalization occurred in 2018, under President Trump. Around that same time, Trump created a "denaturalization task force" to examine the files of some 700,000 naturalized citizens. In total, 102 denaturalization cases were filed during the first Trump administration; the Biden administration filed 24.
Who's being targeted now?
The DOJ's June memo lists 10 potential grounds for denaturalization, including having links to terrorism, gangs, or cartels; committing fraud against the government or individuals; and "any other cases" deemed "sufficiently important to pursue." Immigration experts and former officials warn that the memo is so broad that it could be used to denaturalize Americans for minor infractions, such as an underpayment of taxes. Rep. Andy Ogles (R-Tenn.) has argued that Mamdani should be denaturalized for writing rap lyrics that, he said, suggest support for Hamas. Immigration lawyers say such an argument is unlikely to succeed in court, because in civil denaturalization cases the government has to show "clear, convincing, and unequivocal evidence which does not leave the issue in doubt." Playing a "game of gotcha with naturalization applicants isn't going to work," said Jeremy McKinney, former president of the American Immigration Lawyers Association. But he notes that simply threatening denaturalization can "create a climate of panic and anxiety and fear" in which naturalized critics of the Trump administration may think twice before speaking up. "They're doing that very well," said McKinney. "So, mission accomplished in that regard."
Denaturalized for political beliefs
The idea of using denaturalization to root out supposedly un-American behavior has a long but not always successful history. In 1939, the U.S. government sought to revoke the citizenship of Russia-born William Schneiderman, then secretary of the Communist Party's California branch. Officials alleged Schneiderman's citizenship had been obtained through fraud, since he could not have pledged to support the Constitution—as naturalization law required—while simultaneously belonging to a party that advocated revolution. A federal court agreed and Schneiderman was denaturalized. The case was successfully appealed to the Supreme Court by Wendell Willkie, the 1940 Republican nominee for president, and in 1943 the justices ruled that Schneiderman had not acted fraudulently; the citizenship application didn't ask if he was a Communist, so he could not have lied. The justices also stressed that the First Amendment protects freedom of thought, including political beliefs, setting a precedent that could become relevant if Trump acts on his threats. "The constitutional fathers, fresh from a revolution, did not forge a political straitjacket for the generations to come," wrote Justice Frank Murphy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Democratic state representative and Paralympian Josh Turek running for US Senate in 2026
COUNCIL BLUFFS — Democratic state representative and Paralympian Josh Turek is running for Iowa's U.S. Senate seat in 2026. Turek, 46, of Council Bluffs, is the fifth Democrat to jump into a crowded primary field of candidates seeking to take on Republican U.S. Sen. Joni Ernst. "I love Iowa," Turek said in an interview with the Des Moines Register. "Everywhere that I go, certainly in a community like mine, I'm seeing an enormous amount of people struggling, and they're struggling just to keep food on the table or keep a roof above their head. And they've got a government that's not working for them, and certainly representatives like Joni Ernst are just not working for them." Turek was elected to the Iowa House in 2022 and is serving his second term representing parts of Council Bluffs and Carter Lake. The former Paralympian has won two gold medals in wheelchair basketball representing the United States in the Paralympic Games. Turek said he intends to model his campaign on the example set by former U.S. Sen. Tom Harkin, "my political hero," who led the passage of the Americans with Disabilities Act through Congress. "He was a genuine populist that was going out there and doing the work, fighting for social and economic justice, fighting for the most vulnerable, fighting for the average person, fighting for the middle class, fighting for working class families," Turek said of Harkin. "I intend to be the exact same way." 'Kitchen table issues' will be core to Josh Turek's campaign Turek said the issues driving his campaign will be "kitchen table issues." "The economy right now is just not working for young people," he said. "It's not working for small family farms, for small business. It's not working for the middle class and working families, for that matter. And so the issues that I'm going to focus on is driving down costs, and that can be from groceries to electric bills, to certainly housing, we've got a housing crisis. Absolutely (it) is going to be on raising the minimum wage and a livable wage." Turek also criticized Ernst for her vote for President Donald Trump's tax cut bill, which cuts taxes on tips and on overtime wages while also cutting spending on Medicaid and food assistance programs. "We need affordable, accessible health care," he said. "Folks like Joni Ernst right now with what they're doing with the big, beautiful bill, we're looking at losing, not only people losing their health care benefits, but we're going to lose rural hospitals." The law extends and deepens tax cuts signed by Trump in 2017 while cutting federal Medicaid spending by an estimated $911 billion over 10 years. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates the law will add $3.4 trillion to the nation's debt over the next decade and says 10 million people are expected to become uninsured by 2034 as a result. Ernst has said she wants to preserve Medicaid for "people that truly do need the assistance." "I care about those that are most vulnerable in our population," she said June 6. "And what I'd like to say, too, I have had family members on Medicaid. So when people think, oh, I get to sit in a big fancy office in Washington, D.C., I want Iowans to remember where I came from." Turek said he has a unique story, acknowledging that he is "not your standard Senate candidate." Turek, who uses a wheelchair, was born with spina bifida and had 21 surgeries before he was 12 years old. He now works for a nonprofit that provides adaptive sports equipment and free summer camps for kids with disabilities. His wife, Jarolin, works in health care. "I'm someone that really understands, at a deeply personal level, these social safety nets that have allowed me to get to where I am and the success I've had," he said. Josh Turek touts his ability to win in areas that Donald Trump won Turek eked out a victory in his first Iowa House race by a six-vote margin in "a really tough year for Democrats." It was a race where he dragged himself up stairs, pulling his wheelchair behind him, in order to knock on doors to talk to potential voters. In his reelection bid in 2024, Turek won by about 5 percentage points, despite being heavily targeted by Republicans, even as Trump carried the district. Those experiences show "the grit, the hard work, the determination" he'll bring to his current race, he said. "I went out and I crawled stairs and I knocked doors dragging my wheelchair up there to have a conversation with every single person in the community," he said. "That didn't matter, Democrats, independents, Republicans. Talked to them all, and talked about the issues they cared about. And I won my first election by just six votes." Turek pointed to bills he has worked on in the Iowa Legislature to provide money to study the accessibility of state parks, make it easier for Medicaid recipients to get their wheelchairs repaired, ban the cancer-linked chemical DEHP in urinary catheters and raise income and asset limits for people with disabilities who are on Medicaid. "I think politically, I am the archetype of what can win out here," he said. "I am a common sense, moderate Democrat that is willing to work across the aisle in a bipartisan way. And people can see that from what I've been able to do at the state level." Josh Turek plans to stand out in a crowded primary field 'by outworking them' Turek joins a crowded Democratic primary field that includes state Sen. Zach Wahls of Coralville, state Rep. J.D. Scholten of Sioux City, former Knoxville Chamber of Commerce Director Nathan Sage of Indianola and Des Moines School Board Chair Jackie Norris of Des Moines. Ernst has not formally announced she will seek a third term in 2026, but she has hired a campaign manager and scheduled her annual Roast and Ride fundraiser for October. Two Republicans have said they intend to challenge Ernst for the GOP nomination: former state Sen. Jim Carlin and Joshua Smith. Turek said the way he'll set himself apart from his competitors "is by outworking them." "I'm going to go out there and I'm going to go into every single nook and cranny and corner in these rural communities that Democrats have ignored in a lot of their races and talk about exactly why I am the best candidate, the most electable, and I'm going to talk about the kitchen table issues," he said. Stephen Gruber-Miller covers the Iowa Statehouse and politics for the Register. He can be reached by email at sgrubermil@ or by phone at 515-284-8169. Follow him on X at @sgrubermiller. This article originally appeared on Des Moines Register: Iowa state Rep. Josh Turek running for US Senate against Joni Ernst
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump hiked Canada's tariff rate to 35%, but just who's paying it remains a mystery
When U.S. President Donald Trump published an open letter to Prime Minister Mark Carney in late July, declaring his intention to impose a 35 per cent tariff on Canadian goods in the absence of a trade deal by Aug. 1, there was a brief moment of panic. But it quickly became clear that the 35 per cent tariff, later formalized in an executive order, wasn't a new blanket levy on all goods — it was an increase to the 25 per cent that already applied to items that were not compliant with the existing North American trade pact, the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA). That CUSMA exemption meant the increase was more a glancing than crushing blow and the muted reaction when the Aug. 1 deadline passed without a deal seemed to confirm it. While the trade war has roiled the auto, steel and aluminum sectors and others targeted by specific sectoral tariffs, the impact of the broader tariffs has been harder to pinpoint. Few companies have stepped forward to acknowledge their products fall outside of CUSMA and are being hit by the now 35 per cent tariff, leaving exactly who is affected and how big an impact the tariffs are having something of a mystery. Even Canada's big banks and the Bank of Canada have struggled to put a precise number on it. In the scenario planning that it updated after its most recent interest rate announcement, the central bank estimated that 100 per cent of energy and 95 per cent of all other goods should be covered by CUSMA, while bank estimates of actual CUSMA compliance have climbed to anywhere from 50 per cent to 90 per cent. Customs brokers and other trade specialists say those who are falling outside the shield of CUSMA fall into several buckets, including smaller firms that are unwilling or unable to pay the costs associated with compliance and firms of all sizes with complex manufacturing and production supply chains that may put their goods offside with CUSMA's 'rules of origin,' which require qualifying exports to contain a fixed amount of North American components and production. And unlike sectoral tariffs, which delivered a direct blow to many companies, in many cases the broader tariffs only hit selected products and a small percentage of a company's sales. Steve Bozicevic, chief executive of A&A Customers Brokers, gave the example of a client who stopped shipping its skincare products to the United States altogether over concerns that shea butter sourced from Ghana could raise flags at the U.S. border. 'They have paused Canada to U.S. shipping until they figure it out because they do not want to be on the hook for retroactive (duty and taxes) at 25 per cent or 35 per cent if they cannot transform their supply chain,' Bozicevic said, noting the company was scrambling to find ways to add more Canadian content to their brands. This type of situation is not unique, said Clifford Sosnow, a partner in the trade group at law firm Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP, especially for companies with complex manufacturing and production supply chains that use inputs from countries outside the Canada-U.S.-Mexico trade pact whose place of origin is not clear or difficult to document. 'At 35 per cent (tariffs), some of our clients are likely to cut loses if their contracts permit them, and try to find alternative markets, if they can,' he said. 'Some clients we are advising are struggling with managing the 25 (per cent), particularly if they can't cost share with their buyers.' In the past, these goods could be exported to the U.S. without attracting tariffs because the sellers could count on Canada's 'most favoured nation' status under other international cooperative agreements or other exemptions, such as small value shipments. Even when things are in order these days, the new and fast-changing rules can make exporting to the U.S. difficult and potentially costly. Another of Bozicevic's clients recently faced an audit of exports to the U.S. even though it uses only North American-sourced materials. He said this was a worrying event for the Quebec-based home goods company that designs and manufactures pillows and throw blankets. It was flagged, he said, simply because raw hemp textiles often come from China. 'U.S. Customs wanted proof that their hemp was North American origin,' he said, pointing out the kind of scrutiny that puts companies in a vulnerable position if they don't have the proper documentation to prove the country of origin of all their components. 'Thanks to clean documentation and verified supply chains, (the client) passed the audit, but it underscores how even compliant businesses need to keep supply chain transparency and paperwork in top shape,' he said. Aggregate trade figures for June show tariffs paid on goods that tend to use a lot of foreign components — such as aerospace parts, electrical equipment and machinery — saw increases that were in the small single digits, said Erik Johnson, a senior economist at Bank of Montreal. That was up from zero or extremely low payments in January, before the trade war began. 'The (new tariff) that applies to non-USMCA (CUSMA) compliant goods isn't having a noticeable impact on the aggregate trade data,' he said. Johnson said the most obvious reason for the lower than expected tariff numbers would be that more companies had done the work necessary to receive preference under CUSMA. Other contributors could include exporters holding off on shipping in hopes the tariffs would be short-lived and border officials not being ready to impose the new levies. Exports were down around 14 per cent, he said, but that's the same level of decline seen since April. 'Without a surge in (trade pact) compliance, the calculated tariff rate would be much higher right now,' he said. Carl Gomez, chief economist at Costar Group, estimates that Trump's latest levy on raised the overall effective tariff rate on Canadian goods and services from 5.5 per cent to slightly above six per cent. The overall blended U.S. tariff rate on Canadian goods thus remains below the low double-digit base tariff rates negotiated by some outside the Canada-U.S.-Mexico trade pact, such as the European Union, United Kingdom and Japan. More concerning for Canadian exporters is the chance that CUSMA protections may be altered or even disappear altogether. The trade pact comes up for review and possible renegotiation by the three countries next year, but some have expressed concerns it won't last even that long. After meeting with Carney on Thursday, Ontario Premier Doug Ford warned that Trump may try to reopen negotiations early, possibly as soon as this fall. Canadian steelmakers need to focus on domestic market as tariffs lock them out of U.S.: Algoma CEO Trump put a tariff on gold — or did he? What you need to know about the bullion confusion 'Losing (the trade pact's) preferential treatment for Canadian-origin goods would have severe and devastating consequences for broad segments of the Canadian economy,' said William Pellerin, a partner in the international trade practice at law firm McMillan LLP. 'That is a worst-case scenario.' • Email: bshecter@ Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Democrats Are Pouring Into This Red-State Senate Race
A surprisingly robust primary field has emerged to challenge GOP Sen. Joni Ernst in bright-red Iowa, with state Rep. Josh Turek announcing a run on Tuesday to become the fifth major Democratic candidate in the race. Turek, who represents Council Bluffs in far western Iowa in the state House, is a former Paralympian who won two gold medals in wheelchair basketball as part of Team USA. He announced his run with a two-minute video in which he casts himself as an underdog who's managed to win in Trump territory. Turek joins four already-announced candidates: State Sen. Zach Wahls; Jackie Norris, the chair of the Des Moines School Board and a former chief of staff to then-first lady Michelle Obama; former professional baseball player and State Sen. J.D. Scholten and Nathan Sage, an Iraq War veteran who chairs the Chamber of Commerce in the tiny town of Knoxville. The size of the field reflects Democrats' optimism that the backlash to President Donald Trump's second term could be large enough to give them a fighting chance in a state he won by 13 percentage points in 2024. It also highlights the party's ongoing uncertainty about the best pathways to compete in red territory. The five candidates are taking distinct approaches: Norris is emphasizing her background as a teacher and education issues; Sage and Scholten are both running as populists; Wahls, age 34, is promising to be part of a 'new generation' of Democrats; and Turek is emphasizing his past electoral successes. There are clear through lines: All five candidates are attacking Ernst for her support of the GOP budget that combined slashes to Medicaid with tax cuts tilted toward the wealthy. Multiple candidates mentioned Ernst's 'we are all going to die' response at a town hall in their launch videos. Ernst has hired a campaign manager, but some Republicans in Washington, D.C., still believe she could choose not to run for a third term after briefly clashing with Trump over the nomination of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. It's not clear who the GOP could run if Ernst decides to bow out. Republicans have a 53-47 advantage in the Senate. While the political environment in the midterms is expected to favor Democrats, their pickup opportunities beyond North Carolina and Maine are unclear. Iowa is one of several states in the next tier of opportunities, along with similarly red Texas and Ohio.
