Ukraine receives IT equipment worth $2.3 million from Luxembourg, Iceland
The included 3,288 access points, 500 routers, 460 charging stations with solar panels, and 872 phones – with a total value of about 2 million euros ($2.3 million).
Deputy Defense Minister for Digitalization Kateryna Chernohorenko thanked the coalition for "strengthening the technological resilience" of Ukraine's military.
"With this equipment, we will increase the capacity for high-quality and reliable communication in the Armed Forces of Ukraine, which is crucial in the combat zone," Chernohorenko said.
This is the third delivery from the IT coalition in 2025. In January, Ukraine received equipment worth 3.3 million euros ($3.81 million) from Estonia, the Netherlands, and Luxembourg. In February, Ukraine receive an additional package worth 7.5 million euros ($8.65 million).
The IT Coalition – headed by Estonia and Luxembourg – is part of the . It was established to build the capacity of the Armed Forces of Ukraine and the Ministry of Defense in IT, communications, and .
The coalition currently includes Belgium, Denmark, Ireland, Iceland, Spain, Italy, Canada, Latvia, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Germany, the United Kingdom, Finland, Sweden and Japan.
Read also: Ukraine strikes Russian drone launch site in Kursk Oblast, killing up to 20 operators, General Staff says
We've been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
33 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump must approach Putin with a very big stick
It has long been evident that President Trump believed Russian President Vladimir Putin could be persuaded to settle for less than the total conquest of Ukraine — specifically, for control over the Donbas region in the east — and that this would somehow be a reasonable 'deal.' From the moment Russia invaded in 2022, many analysts warned that Putin's ambitions extended well beyond those two provinces. Trump's 2024 election victory set up a test. Now, more than three years into the war and seven months since his return to the White House, Trump seems to believe that moment has arrived. His planned Aug. 15 meeting with Putin in Alaska suggests that the Russian leader may finally be ready to sign on to such an arrangement. The outlines of a deal are familiar: Russia retains roughly one-fifth of Ukrainian territory in exchange for a ceasefire and some form of security arrangement that halts the war. It is not yet clear if Putin would actually agree, and if agreement might not be a trick. But no less an obstacle may be Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Over the weekend, a day after the Alaska meeting was announced, Zelensky reiterated that 'Ukrainians will not gift their land to the occupier.' At the same time, he left the door open to 'real decisions' for peace — but only, he emphasized, with Ukraine at the table. Trump and Putin plan to meet without Zelensky. There is a game of great powers with spheres of influences and vassal states that can be bullied. Trump does not lack bargaining chips. The most immediate is the secondary sanctions package scheduled to take effect this month, which would impose tariffs and other penalties on countries —including allies such as India — buying Russian oil, effectively forcing governments to choose between discounted energy and access to the U.S. market. The threat has been enough to rattle Russia's trading partners and, if maintained, could pressure Moscow toward compromise. Ukraine also has a fresh offer of military support from NATO countries, one that Trump himself endorsed with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte last month. It allows NATO states to supply Ukraine with American weapons and ammunition for the foreseeable future. That guarantee of ongoing Western backing makes it less likely that Kyiv can be coerced. If Zelensky is to contemplate a deal that cedes territory, he would be wise to demand compensations that go beyond words — they must be concrete, enforceable and immediate. Given the nature of things, he will need Trump to represent him at the table, beginning with the Alaska meeting. The core elements of a deal acceptable to Ukraine might include the following. EU membership: Ukraine's fast-track admission to the European Union would give it a secure economic and political anchor in the West, even without NATO membership. Brussels will inevitably invoke its process and the need for reforms — especially on corruption — but events have overtaken bureaucracy. Ukraine has earned the right to be integrated fully into Europe. Trump can strong-arm the Europeans to make this happen. Reparations for destruction: Russia should be required to pay, directly or indirectly, for the rebuilding of Ukraine's cities, roads and energy infrastructure. This is a moral and practical necessity given the estimated half-trillion dollar reconstruction cost over the next decade. Frozen Russian funds, estimated at over $300 billion, can be applied toward this. Return of abducted civilians and prisoners: The safe return of the thousands of Ukrainians, including children and political detainees, believed to have been taken into Russian custody since the war began must be non-negotiable. A binding non-aggression agreement: Russia's invasion shattered trust across the region. Any settlement must include a formal pledge, with verification mechanisms, that Moscow will not attack Ukraine again or undermine its sovereignty through covert means. Given Russia's meddling in recent decades in Moldova, Georgia and other former Soviet republics in addition to Ukraine, this guarantee must be broad and backed by enforceable consequences. These provisions would not make the loss of territory painless, but they could give Ukraine a secure future within the European sphere and the breathing room to rebuild. These concessions would be hard to extract from Putin — but that's what negotiations are all about. Trump and his team need to come armed with carrots and a very big stick. The stakes are high enough for some chances to be taken, since the war's toll is staggering. Ukraine's economy has contracted by roughly 20 percent. Daily military expenditures are estimated at $140 million, totaling about $51 billion a year. Western nations have poured more than $100 billion in aid into the fight, but the damage is overwhelming: millions displaced, tens of thousands killed and over 10,000 documented civilian deaths. Russia has paid heavily as well. By mid-2024, its war bill had reached $250 billion, with defense spending consuming 40 percent of the government budget this year. Falling oil and gas revenues have deepened the strain. Over 100,000 Russian soldiers are estimated to have been killed — a human cost that would be politically unsustainable in a more open society. That Putin has been willing to bear such losses to enlarge the world's biggest country by a marginal amount is a testament to the pathological nature of his rule. That pathology is unlikely to vanish — which is why any deal must not simply stop the shooting, but guard against the next war. If Trump can do that, he may indeed bring the Ukraine war to a close. If he can also force Netanyahu to end the Gaza war, a Nobel Peace Prize ceases to be absurd. History works in strange ways, through the strangest of agents. Dan Perry is the former Cairo-based Middle East editor and London-based Europe-Africa editor of the Associated Press, the former chairman of the Foreign Press Association in Jerusalem and the author of two books.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
India attacks US and Europe's 'double standards' in their trade relationship with Russia
India has lashed out at the United States and the European Union, criticising what it described as "double standards" over their trade relations with Russia, after US President Donald Trump threatened to impose higher tariffs on Indian goods due to New Delhi's continued import of Russian oil. "The countries criticising India are themselves engaged in trade with Russia," India's Ministry of External Affairs said in a statement on Monday evening, adding that "it is unjustified to target India alone". It noted that the European Union conducted trade with Russia worth €67.5 billion ($78.02bn) in 2024, including record LNG imports of 16.5 million metric tonnes. According to the statement, the US continued to import Russian uranium hexafluoride for use in the nuclear power sector, along with palladium, fertilisers and chemicals, without clarifying the source of this information. This escalation follows direct threats made by Trump on 31 July, announcing 25% tariffs on Indian goods exported to his country, while also threatening unspecified sanctions against India's purchases of Russian oil, in what observers described as a sudden escalation in relations between Washington and New Delhi. India, one of the largest importers of Russian oil, imported about 1.75 million barrels daily between January and June 2025, up 1% from the same period last year. The EU in July imposed sanctions on India's Nayara Energy, a major refiner in which Russia's Rosneft holds a majority stake. New Delhi has maintained that it does not recognise "unilateral sanctions" imposed by the EU. New Delhi's scathing response Both Prime Minister Narendra Modi's ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the main opposition Congress Party condemned the ongoing US criticism. "Trump's insulting remarks hurt the dignity of Indians," said Congress MP Manish Tiwari, adding: "It is time to put an end to this incessant bullying and intimidation." BJP vice-president Baijayant Jai Panda recalled a famous quote by Henry Kissinger on the X platform: "To be an enemy of America may be dangerous, but to be a friend of America is deadly." Trade experts believe that the upcoming US tariffs could cause significant damage to the Indian economy. Ajay Srivastava, of the Global Trade Research Initiative in New Delhi, said he expects India's exports to the US to fall 30% in the current fiscal year to $60.6bn from $86.5bn in fiscal 2025. The trade tension was directly reflected in the markets, with Indian stock indices plummeting after Trump's latest threats. Sign in to access your portfolio
Miami Herald
5 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Layoffs? Price increases? Companies make hard choices as Trump's tariffs set in.
Barry Barr has taken a number of cost-saving measures in recent months to keep his outdoor apparel company afloat during President Donald Trump's destabilizing trade war. He froze his spending on marketing and even prohibited his employees from traveling to see customers. But while he waited for Trump's tariffs to come into better focus, he resisted making more consequential decisions at his company, KAVU True Outdoor Wear. He didn't raise prices on its fall lineup. He continued manufacturing bags, woven shirts, polar fleeces and other items at factories in China, India and Vietnam, even though Trump had signaled that those countries would face stiff duties. 'It's a sit and wait, honestly,' he said last month. 'We just don't know.' More recently, Barr was trying to wrap his head around the punishing new tariffs that were set to click on shortly after midnight Thursday. It was hard for him to know whether the slate of duties on about 90 countries would ultimately hold, given the ever-evolving nature of Trump's trade policy. On Wednesday, Trump signed an executive order that would double tariffs on India, to 50%, beginning this month in an effort to stop the country from buying Russian oil. He also threatened to impose a 100% tariff on foreign semiconductors. The latest tariff orders confirmed for Barr that he would have to raise prices and lay off employees in the months ahead. 'There will be some tough decisions to be made for sure,' he said. 'You have to put your big-kid pants on and do it.' Barr's thinking is emblematic of the shift in strategy occurring at companies across the country. For manufacturers, retailers and other businesses that rely on imported goods, Trump's tariff policy has become an exercise in forbearance. Since the spring, companies have had to contend with a series of delays, fresh threats and haphazard deals that have scrambled their ability to make long-term decisions. 'We kind of saw this summer as a holding period for a lot of firms,' said Courtney Shupert, an economist at MacroPolicy Perspectives. 'Firms were saying, 'Let's wait and see if demand is going to be stronger or weaker.'' But now that many of Trump's tariffs have officially set in and his trade policy seems to be solidifying, many companies are concluding that they can no longer afford to hold back. On recent earnings calls with investors, public companies including shopping conglomerate QVC Group, footwear brand Allbirds and eyewear vendor Warby Parker openly talked about their tactics to handle the escalating tariff costs, including increasing prices. 'I think we can, over the medium term, mitigate the impact of tariffs,' Andrew Rees, CEO of the footwear brand Crocs, said Thursday. He outlined plans to raise prices, reduce business expenses and wring savings out of the company's supply chain, including by negotiating with factories. How quickly businesses act could have wide-ranging implications for the economy. Should more companies decide to pass on price increases to consumers, that could push up inflation and chill consumer spending. Many companies in recent months also hesitated to fire, or hire, workers amid the tariff unpredictability, reminiscent of the labor hoarding after the worst of the pandemic. If companies begin to have more confidence in the tariff rates, that moratorium could break. Indeed, the latest jobs report from the Labor Department, which was released Aug. 1, suggested that businesses might be closer to that tipping point than previously thought. 'As policy is resolved, if tariffs are biting more than firms were expecting, that could be impactful for their hiring decisions,' Shupert said. Officials at the Federal Reserve are closely watching inflation and the labor market for signs that the tariffs are affecting the broader economy, even as many forecasters acknowledge that it could be some time before the full effects are known. 'These tariff shocks are unlike anything that we've seen in 100 years, virtually,' Neel Kashkari, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, said in an interview on CNBC on Wednesday. 'And it's taken a while for businesses to try to process it.' In several interviews by phone and text message in recent days, Barr, who started KAVU in 1993, recounted how his business had contended with mounting pressure because of Trump's tariff policy. Barr has long paid some levies on products. But the extra tariffs that Trump revealed in April, which included since-modified duties of 46% on Vietnam and 26% on India, were much more onerous. At first, Barr chose to swallow Trump's baseline 10% tariff, as well as tariffs against China that had already kicked in. But as the trade war dragged on, he started to consider other solutions. 'There's absolutely no way I can make a profit this year absorbing all these tariffs,' Barr said. 'It's bigger than any tax bill I've had to pay.' His foreign suppliers lowered their prices slightly to account for the cost of the tariffs, which helped somewhat. Barr weighed manufacturing some items in a factory his company works with in Seattle but decided against it, in part because it would be too expensive and impractical to import the sewing machines he would need. He was also concerned that the tariffs would make buying fabric and other raw materials from abroad too costly. He is looking into whether he could move some production to factories in Central America but is not yet sure it will be possible. As the tariff landscape began to take firmer shape, however, Barr started to enact deeper changes. He chose not to raise prices on items in KAVU's fall lineup, even though the items were subject to some tariffs when they arrived in the United States this summer. But the persistently high tariff rates compelled him to increase prices for next year. KAVU products are sold in about 2,000 U.S. retail locations. The company also exports its goods to 26 countries. Working off the assumption that tariffs for Vietnam and India would settle around 10%, and China around 37.5%, Barr increased retail prices for his company's summer 2026 line by about 15% to 30% -- the most he believed customers would pay. Under the new pricing, the retail cost of a pullover made in China would rise to $120 from $90. A button-down shirt produced in India that used to retail for $80 would be $105. But with the tariff rates settling higher, Barr is now worried he will have to raise prices even more. The U.S.' trade deal with Vietnam, for instance, stipulates a 20% tariff on goods from the country, and India is facing 50% tariffs. At the same time, KAVU's preseason sales for next summer came in 15% lower compared with sales for this summer season. With his profit margin shrinking and business expenses already shaved to the bone, Barr said he would probably have to lay off some of his 28 employees in the next three to four months. 'You've got to save money somewhere so the company can move ahead,' he said. Frustrated, Barr has been speaking to members of Congress about the effect of Trump's trade policy on small businesses like his. 'What we need to thrive is stability and not chaos,' Barr said during a virtual news conference with Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash. And while he still fears that the tariffs will severely hurt KAVU, he hopes his company can pull through with the right adjustments. 'We can fight hard to survive,' Barr said. 'That's all we can do.' This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Copyright 2025
