Layoffs? Price increases? Companies make hard choices as Trump's tariffs set in.
He froze his spending on marketing and even prohibited his employees from traveling to see customers.
But while he waited for Trump's tariffs to come into better focus, he resisted making more consequential decisions at his company, KAVU True Outdoor Wear. He didn't raise prices on its fall lineup. He continued manufacturing bags, woven shirts, polar fleeces and other items at factories in China, India and Vietnam, even though Trump had signaled that those countries would face stiff duties.
'It's a sit and wait, honestly,' he said last month. 'We just don't know.'
More recently, Barr was trying to wrap his head around the punishing new tariffs that were set to click on shortly after midnight Thursday. It was hard for him to know whether the slate of duties on about 90 countries would ultimately hold, given the ever-evolving nature of Trump's trade policy.
On Wednesday, Trump signed an executive order that would double tariffs on India, to 50%, beginning this month in an effort to stop the country from buying Russian oil. He also threatened to impose a 100% tariff on foreign semiconductors.
The latest tariff orders confirmed for Barr that he would have to raise prices and lay off employees in the months ahead.
'There will be some tough decisions to be made for sure,' he said. 'You have to put your big-kid pants on and do it.'
Barr's thinking is emblematic of the shift in strategy occurring at companies across the country.
For manufacturers, retailers and other businesses that rely on imported goods, Trump's tariff policy has become an exercise in forbearance. Since the spring, companies have had to contend with a series of delays, fresh threats and haphazard deals that have scrambled their ability to make long-term decisions.
'We kind of saw this summer as a holding period for a lot of firms,' said Courtney Shupert, an economist at MacroPolicy Perspectives. 'Firms were saying, 'Let's wait and see if demand is going to be stronger or weaker.''
But now that many of Trump's tariffs have officially set in and his trade policy seems to be solidifying, many companies are concluding that they can no longer afford to hold back.
On recent earnings calls with investors, public companies including shopping conglomerate QVC Group, footwear brand Allbirds and eyewear vendor Warby Parker openly talked about their tactics to handle the escalating tariff costs, including increasing prices.
'I think we can, over the medium term, mitigate the impact of tariffs,' Andrew Rees, CEO of the footwear brand Crocs, said Thursday. He outlined plans to raise prices, reduce business expenses and wring savings out of the company's supply chain, including by negotiating with factories.
How quickly businesses act could have wide-ranging implications for the economy. Should more companies decide to pass on price increases to consumers, that could push up inflation and chill consumer spending.
Many companies in recent months also hesitated to fire, or hire, workers amid the tariff unpredictability, reminiscent of the labor hoarding after the worst of the pandemic. If companies begin to have more confidence in the tariff rates, that moratorium could break. Indeed, the latest jobs report from the Labor Department, which was released Aug. 1, suggested that businesses might be closer to that tipping point than previously thought.
'As policy is resolved, if tariffs are biting more than firms were expecting, that could be impactful for their hiring decisions,' Shupert said.
Officials at the Federal Reserve are closely watching inflation and the labor market for signs that the tariffs are affecting the broader economy, even as many forecasters acknowledge that it could be some time before the full effects are known.
'These tariff shocks are unlike anything that we've seen in 100 years, virtually,' Neel Kashkari, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, said in an interview on CNBC on Wednesday. 'And it's taken a while for businesses to try to process it.'
In several interviews by phone and text message in recent days, Barr, who started KAVU in 1993, recounted how his business had contended with mounting pressure because of Trump's tariff policy.
Barr has long paid some levies on products. But the extra tariffs that Trump revealed in April, which included since-modified duties of 46% on Vietnam and 26% on India, were much more onerous.
At first, Barr chose to swallow Trump's baseline 10% tariff, as well as tariffs against China that had already kicked in.
But as the trade war dragged on, he started to consider other solutions.
'There's absolutely no way I can make a profit this year absorbing all these tariffs,' Barr said. 'It's bigger than any tax bill I've had to pay.'
His foreign suppliers lowered their prices slightly to account for the cost of the tariffs, which helped somewhat.
Barr weighed manufacturing some items in a factory his company works with in Seattle but decided against it, in part because it would be too expensive and impractical to import the sewing machines he would need. He was also concerned that the tariffs would make buying fabric and other raw materials from abroad too costly. He is looking into whether he could move some production to factories in Central America but is not yet sure it will be possible.
As the tariff landscape began to take firmer shape, however, Barr started to enact deeper changes.
He chose not to raise prices on items in KAVU's fall lineup, even though the items were subject to some tariffs when they arrived in the United States this summer. But the persistently high tariff rates compelled him to increase prices for next year. KAVU products are sold in about 2,000 U.S. retail locations. The company also exports its goods to 26 countries.
Working off the assumption that tariffs for Vietnam and India would settle around 10%, and China around 37.5%, Barr increased retail prices for his company's summer 2026 line by about 15% to 30% -- the most he believed customers would pay. Under the new pricing, the retail cost of a pullover made in China would rise to $120 from $90. A button-down shirt produced in India that used to retail for $80 would be $105.
But with the tariff rates settling higher, Barr is now worried he will have to raise prices even more. The U.S.' trade deal with Vietnam, for instance, stipulates a 20% tariff on goods from the country, and India is facing 50% tariffs.
At the same time, KAVU's preseason sales for next summer came in 15% lower compared with sales for this summer season.
With his profit margin shrinking and business expenses already shaved to the bone, Barr said he would probably have to lay off some of his 28 employees in the next three to four months.
'You've got to save money somewhere so the company can move ahead,' he said.
Frustrated, Barr has been speaking to members of Congress about the effect of Trump's trade policy on small businesses like his.
'What we need to thrive is stability and not chaos,' Barr said during a virtual news conference with Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash.
And while he still fears that the tariffs will severely hurt KAVU, he hopes his company can pull through with the right adjustments.
'We can fight hard to survive,' Barr said. 'That's all we can do.'
This article originally appeared in The New York Times.
Copyright 2025
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
27 minutes ago
- The Hill
School choice may be the fix to DC's crime crisis
Washington, D.C., faces a serious crime crisis, with violence and homicide rates dangerously high. Even government officials have been targeted. While the Trump administration's plan to increase federal involvement may help temporarily, relying on permanent federal intervention is unsustainable. The long-term solution requires tackling root causes — especially chronic disengagement from education, which is widespread in D.C.'s traditional public schools and contributes significantly to youth crime. In the 2023–2024 school year, more than half of all high school students in Washington, D.C., were chronically absent, meaning they missed 10 percent or more of the school year. This absenteeism represents a failure to keep students connected to constructive environments and opportunities for success. When young people are not in school, evidence overwhelmingly shows they are at much higher risk of engaging in criminal behavior. The academic outcomes for D.C. public school students further illustrate the crisis. On recent standardized tests, only about 32 percent of students in grades 3–5 met or exceeded expectations in English Language Arts, a slight improvement from the previous year but still alarmingly low. Just 11 percent of high school students met or exceeded math standards. These outcomes are a direct reflection of an education system unable to provide the foundation students need for success, making disengagement and subsequent criminal activity more likely. Charter schools offer a proven, evidence-based alternative that can disrupt this cycle. Unlike traditional public schools in D.C., charter schools provide students with 30 to 50 percent more instructional time, effectively giving students up to four additional months of schooling each year. This extra time in the classroom correlates with improved academic performance and stronger student engagement. A landmark study conducted by Harvard and Princeton researchers demonstrated that winning a lottery to attend a New York City charter school almost completely eliminated the chance of incarceration for male students in the study sample. The same study also found a 59 percent reduction in teen pregnancy rates for female students who attended charter schools through the lottery. Another study, published in the Quarterly Journal of Economics, found that winning a lottery to attend a school of choice in Charlotte, N.C., halved the rate of criminal activity among high-risk male students. And research on Milwaukee's voucher program found that students attending charter schools were significantly less likely to commit crimes by their mid-twenties compared to matched peers in public schools. Despite delivering compelling results, D.C.'s charter schools face significant funding disparities compared to traditional public schools. Though only a few studies have examined the precise funding differences between charter schools and public schools, one found that charter schools in D.C. receive approximately 41 percent less funding per pupil than public schools, averaging $17,525 per student compared to $29,808 per student — a gap of $12,283. This significant disparity limits charter schools' ability to expand facilities, attract qualified staff and improve programs. Meanwhile, demand for charter school seats far exceeds supply, with 17,047 students on waiting lists during the 2021–2022 school year, reflecting strong parental preference for alternatives to the struggling traditional system. Despite this funding disparity, evidence shows that public charter schools in Washington, D.C., specifically, continue to outperform traditional public schools. The success of charter schools in other cities demonstrates what could be achieved if D.C. removed these barriers and increased support. New York City's Success Academy, whose student population is 98 percent non-white and predominantly low-income, achieved remarkable academic results: 96 percent of students passed state math exams and 83 percent passed English Language Arts exams. This starkly contrasts with New York City's overall public school proficiency rate of around 49 percent, illustrating that well-supported charter schools can deliver superior outcomes even among disadvantaged populations. Washington, D.C. must view charter school expansion and equitable funding as integral parts of its strategy to reduce crime. Increasing access to quality education through charter schools addresses the root causes of criminal behavior by keeping youth engaged in structured, rigorous environments that foster academic achievement and discourage delinquency. Ultimately, no city can arrest or incarcerate its way out of a crime crisis. Long-term, sustainable solutions demand investments in education and opportunity. The District of Columbia has a proven tool in charter schools to disrupt the cycle of violence and provide at-risk youth with a pathway out of crime and into success. It is time for policymakers to remove funding disparities, lift arbitrary caps, and prioritize school choice as a core component of public safety reform in the nation's capital.

Los Angeles Times
27 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Trump's nod to Europe on a future peace force for Ukraine vastly improves its chances of success
BRUSSELS — The greenlight given by President Trump on U.S. backup for a European-led force to police any future peace agreement in Ukraine vastly improves the likelihood it might succeed. European leaders said Trump offered his backing during a call they held ahead of his summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Friday. The effectiveness of the operation, drawn up by the so-called coalition of the willing of around 30 countries supporting Ukraine, hinges on U.S. backup with airpower or other military equipment that European armed forces do not have, or only in short supply. EU leaders regularly have underlined how the United States is 'crucial' to the success of the security operation dubbed Multinational Force Ukraine. But the Trump administration has long refused to commit, perhaps keeping its participation on hold as leverage in talks with Russia. After a meeting Wednesday between Trump and European leaders, European Council President Antonio Costa welcomed 'the readiness of the United States to share with Europe the efforts to reinforce security conditions once we obtain a durable and just peace for Ukraine.' French President Emmanuel Macron said Trump had insisted NATO must not be part of these security guarantees, but the U.S. leader agreed 'the United States and all the (other) parties involved should take part.' 'It's a very important clarification,' Macron said. Trump did not publicly confirm he would allow U.S. backup, and no details of possible U.S. support were made public, but U.S. Vice President JD Vance sat in on the coalition meeting for the first time. More than 200 military planners have worked for months on ways to ensure a future peace should the war, now in its fourth year, finally halt. Ukraine's armed forces also have been involved, and British personnel have led reconnaissance work inside Ukraine. The exact size of the force has not been made public, although Britain has said it could number 10,000 to 30,000 troops. It must be enough to deter Russian forces, but also of a realistic size for nations that shrank their militaries after the Cold War and are now rearming. The 'reassurance' force's mission 'will be to strengthen Ukraine's defenses on the land, at sea, and in the air because the Ukrainian Armed Forces are the best deterrent against future Russian aggression,' U.K. Defence Secretary John Healey told lawmakers last month. 'It will secure Ukraine's skies by using aircraft,' Healey said, 'and it will support safer seas by bolstering the Black Sea Task Force with additional specialist teams.' Bulgaria, Romania and Turkey launched that naval force a year ago to deal with mines in Black Sea waters. The force initially will have its headquarters in Paris before moving to London next year. A coordination headquarters in Kyiv will be involved once hostilities cease and it deploys. European efforts to set up the force have been seen as a first test of the continent's willingness to defend itself and its interests, given Trump administration warnings that Europe must take care of its own security and that of Ukraine in future. Still, U.S. forces clearly provide a deterrent that the Europeans cannot muster. Details of what the U.S. might contribute were unknown, and Trump has changed his mind in the past, so it remains to be seen whether this signal will be enough to persuade more countries within the coalition to provide troops. Greece has publicly rejected doing so. Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis said last month that those discussions were 'somewhat divisive' and distracted from the goal of ending the war as soon as possible. Italy's Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni has said Rome won't contribute troops, but she previously has underlined the importance of working with the U.S. on ending the conflict and called for the participation of an American delegation in force coordination meetings. Cook writes for the Associated Press. AP writer Emma Burrows in London contributed to this report.


Politico
28 minutes ago
- Politico
AI launches across the government
The initiative comes at a time when AI threatens to displace federal workers whose jobs are already under siege by the Trump administration's Department of Government Efficiency. The emerging technology is also developing at a clip that the government — known for its slow bureaucratic processes and uneven tech adoption rates — has historically struggled to keep pace with. FAS Commissioner Josh Gruenbaum said the goal is to let employees experiment responsibly and 'make day-to-day workflows more efficient.' To address security concerns about government data, the platform is built on cloud infrastructure managed by the GSA, ensuring that agency data does not feed back in to train the companies' models—a key distinction from commercially available AI tools. The initiative comes on the heels of GSA announcing last week that it had added Anthropic's Claude, Google's Gemini and OpenAI's ChatGPT to its Multiple Award Schedule, which establishes a pre-negotiated price baseline for the AI models and acts as a seal of approval for federal buyers looking to adopt the technology. Both OpenAI and Anthropic quickly announced they would sell their AI to the government for $1 over the next year. Though a good deal for Washington, it also gives the two multi-billion dollar companies a first-mover advantage that could entrench their models within the government, possibly at the cost of smaller competitors and new entrants. The administration says its new AI program is voluntary, not mandatory, and that more AI models are likely to be added later. Agencies opt in by signing a simple agreement, after which employees can immediately access chat, search and coding features.