India on track to make Chabahar preferred port of call in Iran for trade with Central Asian nations, says shipping secy
India is pushing ahead to make Chabahar, located in the strategic southeastern corner of Iran, its main port of call in a bid to pivot away from Bandar Abbas near the Strait of Hormuz chokepoint, said ports, shipping and waterways secretary T.K. Ramachandran.
The recent tension in West Asia, marked by the Iran-Israel conflict and US bombings has prompted India to fast-track its plan to develop rail and road infrastructure at Chabahar port. This would turn it into the preferred port of call for the movement of all Indian goods destined for Central Asian countries and Afghanistan and reduce dependence on Bandar Abbas.
Chabahar not only provides India with an alternative access point to Central Asia and Afghanistan, it also bypasses both Pakistan and the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). This offers India greater regional connectivity and trade options, reducing its reliance on Pakistan and potentially strengthening its geopolitical influence in the region.
'Work on improving and expanding facilities at Chabahar Port is ongoing and the port has also been consistently getting increased container and cargo at its terminal. Very soon, the port will get connected to main rail and road networks in Iran allowing it to become the prime port for movement of shipments from India to Iran, Afghanistan and other Central Asian Republics," Ramachandran told Mint.
He said the port did not face any threat during Israel-Iran conflict and functioned normally with all construction work, including expansion and connectivity projects, continuing uninterrupted.
'The objective for Chabahar Port is to make it the main port of call for Indian shipments bound for Central Asian republics and we are moving in that direction," Ramachandran said.
Bandar Abbas key port now
At present, Indian shipments to Iran and Central Asian countries mainly use Bandar Abbas, Iran's largest port. But rising tensions in West Asia and the Persian Gulf region pose threat to this port that is close to Strait of Hormuz, a famous chokepoint. In recent days the threat of Iran closing off the Strait of Hormuz has loomed large. A closure would have made shipments in and out of Persian Gulf difficult and spiked oil prices.
Chabahar, is away from the Strait of Hormuz and has a vast opening towards the Arabian Sea. This makes the port not only strategically important for India but also one that supports uninterrupted shipments even during times of tension in West Asia.
India's focus on projects in Iran also assumes importance in wake of worsening India-Pakistan ties following the April terrorist attack on tourists in Pahalgam.
'Indian and Iranian authorities are working to provide rail connectivity to the port and the infrastructure should be available soon," Ramachandran said.
As per the plan, India along with Iran would fast-track the development of a new rail route between the Chabahar port and Zahedan city. This could turn the port into the gateway to the International North–South Transport Corridor (INSTC), providing the main trade channel for Central Asian and Eurasian countries located on the eastern side of the Caspian sea and Afghanistan. The rail line is expected to be ready by 2026-end or early 2027.
Also read | India to fast-track Chabahar port works
The rush for rail connectivity is because port operations have now become viable with a pick-up in movement of both container and dry bulk cargo as Chabahar becomes the main trading channel for India.
Chabahar, as per the ministry of ports, shipping and waterways (MoPSW), handled a substantial volume of cargo in FY25, reaching up to 80,000 TEUs and 3 million tonnes of bulk cargo. In comparison, it had managed just over 64,000 TEUs in FY24 and only around 9,000 TEUs the year before that. The port handled 2.12mt of bulk cargo in FY24 and 2.08 mt in FY23.
A TEU is a measure of volume in units of twenty-foot long containers.
The port has a current capacity of 100,000 TEUs which will rise to 500,000 TEUs over the next few years The bulk cargo capacity of 8mt will be more than doubled soon.
Work on the 700-km long Chabahar-Zahedan railway line has moved very slowly even though an MoU was signed between Indian Railways' IRCON and Iranian Railways' Construction and Development of Transportation Infrastructures Company (CDTIC) back in 2016. Now, it is getting implemented as Chabahar is emerging as next big commercial port in Iran after Bandar Abbas.
Taking shape
Things began to take shape when India and Iran in May last year signed a long-term contract for the development of Chabahar port after years of protracted negotiations. IPGL (India Ports Global Ltd) has taken over operations of Shahid Beheshti terminals at Chabahar.
The facility. which comprises a container terminal and a multi-cargo berth, is operational and providing services for bulk and container cargo. A number of schemes are being offered by IPGL to promote the use of Chabahar port including, discounts, longer free storage times for cargo etc.
The port has a deep draft that can handle larger vessels. Besides, ships calling at Chabahar avoid traffic congestion and waiting time at anchorage, being outside the Strait of Hormuz. The road to Zahedan (Iran) and onwards to Zaranj (Afghanistan) also provides seamless connectivity for movement of humanitarian aid from India to Afghanistan through Chabahar port.
The Port handles a diverse range of products such as automobile spare parts, agricultural products, iron ore, clinkers etc. and efforts are on to increase the product basket handled at the port.
Also read | After Chabahar, India looks to build port facilities in Bangladesh and Sri Lanka
The port's integration with a special free zone is another positive, while Indian incentives, such as concessions on vessel and cargo charges, bolster trade flows through Chabahar.
In 2003, India agreed to help Iran develop the port as well as accompanying infrastructure links during then President Mohammad Khatami's visit to India. However, matters progressed slowly thereafter amid western sanctions.
In 2013, India committed to providing $100 million for the development of Chabahar. An MoU) was signed in May 2015. Thereafter things appeared to be moving forward during the visit of Prime Minister Narendra Modi to Iran in 2016. But Indian plans to help develop an international trade corridor, which included Chabahar as a central transit point, stalled again due to the reimposition of western sanctions against Iran for its nuclear programme.
Enhancing regional connectivity
This present agreement aims to enhance regional connectivity and facilitate trade, particularly between India, Iran and Afghanistan. The India Ports Global Chabahar Free Zone (IPGCFZ), a subsidiary of IPGL, facilitated the first consignment of exports from Afghanistan to India in 2019.
The operations continued through short-term contracts while negotiations on a long-term agreement picked pace with the visit of MoPSW minister Sarbananda Sonowal to Chabahar in August, 2022.
Also read | India, Iran may restart rail connectivity project between Chabahar and Zahedan
Negotiations on the long-term contract were held up over disagreements on arbitration clauses. Mint had earlier reported that the two sides have reached an accommodation which will allow arbitration under rules framed by the UN Commission on International Trade Law.
India is looking to strengthen its presence in key infrastructure along the route passing through the Persian Gulf region. The Adani Group is already operating the Haifa port in Israel and more port deals are expected in the region by Indian entities that will strengthen the country's presence on this strategic route that is the main gateway for shipments moving from the India to Europe.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
23 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Daily Briefing: This day, 1975
Good morning, The game wasn't decided until the last session on Day 5. It started with great possibilities. England needed 350 to win, a daunting but not impossible target. But first, they had to reckon with Jasprit Bumrah, the world's premier fast bowler. Neither Bumrah nor his all-rounder teammate Ravindra Jadeja managed to shake the English batsmen. And soon, the suspense was over. England recorded a five-wicket win, leading the series 1-0 against India. National sports editor Sandeep Dwivedi brings alive the drama of the day, the home team's steep chase and India's missed chances, in his brilliant report from Leeds. We have more on the Test series, but first, let's turn to the rest of the day's headlines. The Emergency was imposed exactly 50 years ago on June 25, 1975. The 21-month period that followed was marked by the suspension of civil liberties, curtailment of press freedom, mass arrests, cancellation of elections, and rule by decree. In today's edition, veterans and reporters recall the darkest chapter of Indian history. 🔴 When Coomi Kapoor recollects the Emergency, it begins with a 4 am phone call informing her of the arrest of Opposition leaders. In the following months, The Indian Express became a battleground of truth, defiance, and sheer grit. Power cuts silenced the presses, censorship muzzled the newsroom, and reporters were jailed and threatened. The paper ran a blank editorial in protest, and Ramnath Goenka, the paper's fiery owner, refused to bow, fighting back with lawsuits, court orders, and iron resolve. Read Kapoor's gripping first-hand account about a newspaper that fought back. 🔴 Contributing editor Neerja Chowdhury offers a sharp and compelling portrait of Indira Gandhi, how she went from Durga, dictator to democrat, all within 5-6 years. She was once hailed by the Opposition after she helped liberate Bangladesh. That changed when she imposed the Emergency to protect her kursi. Ultimately, in a show of the tiny streak of democracy still alive in her, she puzzled her critics, calling for elections, which led to her stunning defeat. 🔴 Faced with an oppressive regime, some revolutionaries stood tall. Vikas Pathak profiles Justice H R Khanna, the sole dissenter in a Supreme Court order that upheld the suspension of rights under the Emergency. 🔴 Santosh Singh recalls the Jayaprakash Narayan movement, which shook the Indira Gandhi government, birthed an alternative to Congress and created a star line-up of future leaders like Lalu Prasad and Nitish Kumar. 🔴 And finally, we have Raj Narain, the unlikely hero who brought down Indira Gandhi with a petition in the Allahabad High Court. It was this ruling that led to her declaring the Emergency. But Narain's machinations in the Janata government would eventually bring her back to power. Also read: Commemorating the dark period should go beyond criticism of past to introspection about present, writes Suhas Palshikar Truce: A fragile ceasefire appeared to hold between Iran and Israel, days after the US attacked the former's nuclear sites. The truce is crucial in stabilising the volatile region, which puts crucial trade and flight routes at risk for the rest of the world. Roll call: Starting from Bihar, which goes to the polls later this year, the Election Commission has directed a special intensive revision of electoral rolls, preparing them afresh. This would require voters who were not on the rolls in 2003 to provide documentation proving their eligibility. Launch ready: After considerable delay, the Axiom-4 mission is slated for launch today. The spacecraft, which would carry India's Shubhanshu Shukla to the International Space Station, in a historic step, is expected to take off around noon IST. It will dock at the ISS at around 4.30 pm on Thursday. Many wrong turns: Rs 18 crore, two years and several memes later, the newly constructed rail overbridge in Bhopal has come under fresh scrutiny. The bridge became a subject of jokes, and then a serious investigation, after images appeared of its peculiar construction. The bridge appears to have an almost 90-degree turn. Whose fault is it? Officials from the Madhya Pradesh Public Works Department (PWD) and the Indian Railways appear to be shifting blame. On the docket: Much of the credit for England's win on Tuesday goes to opener Ben Duckett. It was Duckett's three reverse-sweep boundaries off Jadeja that helped him jump from 86 to 102. Duckett's 149, only the second ton on the English side in the opening game, sealed the deal for the home team. Read Dwivedi's meticulous analysis of England's Bazball hero. Everything we see in the universe, from the stars and planets to the dust, makes up just about 5 per cent of it. Another 27 per cent is made up of dark matter, which neither emits nor absorbs light, but exerts gravity. Without it, galaxies would not hold together. What is the dark matter made of? The answer has long eluded the best of our scientists. Could it be that we have failed to understand gravity altogether? Read Shravan Hanasoge's column on this cosmic mystery. That's all for today, folks! Until tomorrow, Sonal Gupta Sonal Gupta is a senior sub-editor on the news desk. She writes feature stories and explainers on a wide range of topics from art and culture to international affairs. She also curates the Morning Expresso, a daily briefing of top stories of the day, which won gold in the 'best newsletter' category at the WAN-IFRA South Asian Digital Media Awards 2023. She also edits our newly-launched pop culture section, Fresh Take. ... Read More
Scroll.in
23 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
US: Zohran Mamdani poised to win New York Democratic mayoral primary polls
Zohran Mamdani was on Wednesday poised to win the Democratic Party's primary election for the New York mayoral polls in the United States, CNN reported. His main opponent, former New York state Governor Andrew Cuomo, conceded the contest even as the counting of votes was underway. Mamdani's votes in the primary were below the 50% mark, CNN projected. This would mean that the contest will be decided by ranked-choice votes that will be announced beginning July 1. Mamdani, who is of Indian origin, campaigned for a rent freeze, making New York's buses free, energy reforms and increasing taxes on the city's wealthiest persons. The 33-year-old has been a supporter of the Palestinian cause and has called for Israel to be held to account over its war on Gaza. Since 2021, he has served as a member of the New York State Assembly for the 36th district in Queens. He is also a member of the Democratic Socialists of America. If elected in the election scheduled for November 4, Mamdani will become the first Muslim and the first person of South Asian origin to become the mayor of New York. He is the son of Indian-American filmmaker Mira Nair and Mahmood Mamdani, a Ugandan academic and professor of African, colonialism and post‐colonialism studies. Mamdani's opponent Cuomo was attempting a political comeback. In 2021, he had resigned amid allegations of sexual harassment and New York state's mishandling of the Covid-19 pandemic. He had denied the allegations. 'Tonight was not our night; tonight was Assemblyman Mamdani's night,' CNN quoted Cuomo as having told his supporters on Tuesday as the votes were being counted. However, his Spokesperson Rich Azzopardi was quoted as saying that Cuomo may consider the mayoral polls in November on another party's ticket. Mamdani will face the city's current Mayor Eric Adams, who is contesting as an Independent. The Republican Party has nominated Curtis Sliwa.
The Print
25 minutes ago
- The Print
Emergency showed extent of executive power. 50 years on, it's still embedded in Constitution
The Constitution itself was designed at a time of immense political, social, and economic upheaval. There were a multitude of challenges around secession, religious integration and communalism because of Partition, the integration of 550 princely states, which made up two-fifths of India, and widespread poverty. The resulting constitutional setup gave the Union government sweeping powers to convert the country into a unitary state. The State, consequently, while giving fundamental rights and freedoms to citizens, could also revoke these through emergency provisions, the office of the governor, money bills, ordinances and in some cases, just ordinary legislation. However, it may not be an aberration, but a logical conclusion of executive power, given the structure and setup of the Indian state itself. The declaration, which was accorded through vague wording within the Constitution in Article 352, was compounded by a flurry of legislation to support the implementation of a dictatorial state. It underscores the ease with which the Union could legally override the separation of powers and curb fundamental rights with limited judicial, legal or citizen oversight. Fifty years on, the broader legacy of the Emergency is the fragility of rights, and checks and balances. If anything, India's democratic successes may be viewed as a miracle, stemming from well-meaning actors, rather than legislation and policy action itself. About 50 years ago, on 28 June 1975, a small, 22-word obituary in The Times of India read, 'O'Casey, D.E.M., beloved husband of T. Ruth, loving father of L.I. Bertie, brother of Faith, Hope and Justicia, expired on June 26,' highlighting a fundamental shift in India's fledgling experiment with democracy. The Emergency was indeed a watershed moment in India's history, and viewed by many as a blot on India's largely democratic traditions. When the Constitution was controversially amended for the first time in 1951, impositions were placed on fundamental rights and free speech. It also enshrined a mechanism, the 9th Schedule. Laws placed in this schedule are not subject to judicial review, a feature used to override unfavourable judicial decisions and to shield the executive from scrutiny. Indira Gandhi used this schedule to overturn her suspension as a member of parliament. Also read: West read Emergency wrong. India's democracy mattered little to US, UK, Russia Existing provisions Throughout India's early years, wars with Pakistan and China allowed the government to declare states of 'external emergency,' which worked to suspend fundamental rights. They were backed by laws that expanded state power, from the Defence of India Act to the Preventive Detention Act. Christoffe Jaffrelot and Pratinav Anil in India's First Dictatorship: The Emergency, 1975-1977, and Srinath Raghavan in Indira Gandhi and the Years that Transformed India, highlight the emphasis Indira Gandhi put on making sure all emergency provisions and actions had a veneer of legality attached to them to reiterate the legitimacy of her actions. She did not need to introduce new laws to give the Emergency teeth; such provisions already existed. The Sedition provision (Section 124A of the Indian Penal Code), the Defence of India Act 1962 (DIA), and the Maintenance of Internal Security Act 1971 (MISA) all expanded the government's ability to suspend fundamental rights or harass dissidents. The DIA and MISA conferred on the government a wide range of powers to detain and arrest individuals, and limit their ability to challenge their detention in the courts. These also allowed warrantless searches and wiretapping to occur. The government could determine 'protected areas' and 'prohibited places,' limiting the movement of people, and violating the right to free movement and protest. These laws notwithstanding, the executive made the process the punishment, a feature that has dominated the Indian state since. Coomi Kapoor, in The Emergency: A Personal History, noted, 'an ugly feature of arrests and detentions under DIA [and MISA] was the immediate rearrest of persons released on bail.' Once the Emergency was lifted in 1977, Indira Gandhi lost power, and a motley coalition under the Janata Party introduced the 43rd and 44th amendments to raise the threshold to declare an emergency, and repealed some of the other controversial legislation enabling Indira Gandhi's hold on power. However, other features still remained in force, allowing the executive to expand its power. In times of crisis, emergency powers may be helpful to respond quickly, but the Constitution does not always provide clear opportunities for oversight from other branches of government that are critical to ensure accountability. During Covid-19, the Union was able to bypass the federal structure by unilaterally imposing a lockdown through ordinary legislation, rather than declaring an emergency (which would have required parliamentary oversight). This was partly because India lacks a dedicated framework to regulate public health emergencies. Containment measures became convenient tools of control and an excuse to suspend civil liberties, as seen with dwindling protests and arrests. The right to privacy was surrendered in the name of containment and contact tracing. This is not to say that such measures were unnecessary, but their legal basis matters. By using laws like the Disaster Management Act 2005, which was not designed for pandemics and is not subject to prior parliamentary review, the Union was able to suspend the freedom of movement and derive secondary powers to amend other laws like the Essential Commodities Act without any legislative or judicial oversight. Also read: Modi govt's assault on democracy is more sinister than the Emergency. Look at the differences Legacy of Emergency Another key feature of the Indian Constitution is its quasi-federal nature, according power to states over certain issues, while allowing the Union to take control if needed. Under Article 356, the Union government can override state rights by dismissing a state government and imposing President's Rule. Since 1947, it has been invoked more than 130 times, with the greatest number of instances being when Indira Gandhi was in power (50 times between 1966-1977 and 1980-1984), followed by the Janata Party (20 times between 1977-1980). It finally took a 1994 Supreme Court judgment to curtail the scope of President's rule. Nonetheless, the Union has been able to exert power over states through fiscal centralisation and the governor's office. Over the past decade, fiscal centralisation via delays in GST compensation, non-shared cesses, and discretionary transfers has undermined state capacity and made states more dependent on the Union, as seen in Kerala, Tamil Nadu, and Punjab. Though fully legal, such measures do undermine state rights. Fiscal centralisation has been accompanied by political standoffs. Governors have, of late, withheld assent on key bills passed by state legislatures, or blocked state appointments using powers accorded in the Constitution itself. Ongoing issues between non-NDA ruled states and the Union stem from the fact that governors, who are appointed by the Union, could employ a pocket veto on legislation by not assenting to it or forwarding it to the President for a decision. It took a Supreme Court judgment earlier this year to build timelines and processes into how long a governor or the President can block legislation passed by a state government. There are other areas where state control undermines the democratic ethos of the Constitution, especially when weaponised. Anti-terror and preventive detention laws—a hallmark of India's history since Independence—have had their powers expanded with the UAPA, PMLA, and earlier with TADA. This is not to say every government has unjustly used these laws, but to highlight the ease with which civil rights can be taken away if desired. Executive power has ebbed and flowed since the Emergency. During the coalition era from 1989–2014, a weaker Union allowed for cooperative federalism to emerge. States had a stronger say, and key initiatives to decentralise power away from the Union were introduced, from the 73rd and 74th constitutional amendments, to the Right to Information Act. Even as the Union yielded some of its power, anti-terror laws and financial regulation shifted power away from the citizen back to the state, and fiscal centralisation has become a weapon to use against non-NDA-ruled states. If the Emergency showed the extent of executive power, it is clear that the source of such power is embedded in India's constitutional setup; this is the legacy that India must contend with, 50 years on. Vibhav Mariwala writes about political economy, history, and the institutions that shape our world. He works on public policy and global macro between London and Mumbai and tweets @ are personal. (Edited by Theres Sudeep)
