BJP MPs Walk Out Of Parliamentary Panel Meet, Objecting To Presence Of Medha Patkar, Prakash Raj
The agenda included the consideration and adoption of two draft reports on government actions by the Department of Land Resources and the Ministry of Panchayati Raj
The Standing Committee on Rural Development and Panchayati Raj met in Parliament on Tuesday morning, chaired by Congress MP Saptagiri Sankar Ulaka. However, the meeting soon became contentious over the participation of controversial figures, particularly social activist Medha Patkar.
The agenda included the consideration and adoption of two draft reports on government actions by the Department of Land Resources and the Ministry of Panchayati Raj. It also featured scheduled oral testimonies from representatives of various ministries, NGOs, and other stakeholders on the implementation of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.
top videos
View All
A committee member later told CNN-News18, on condition of anonymity, 'The chairman is generally known to be fair and soft-spoken. But it appears he was under pressure from the top leadership of his party. Summoning known Gandhi family supporters like Medha Patkar sends the wrong message."
The tension culminated in BJP MPs staging a walkout after the chairman insisted on proceeding with testimonies from ten NGO representatives. With their exit, the meeting was adjourned due to a lack of quorum.
First Published:
July 02, 2025, 03:20 IST
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
a day ago
- Hindustan Times
Land-saving alternative model of development for Punjab
The Punjab government has announced a new land pooling policy proposing to acquire over 40,000 acres for urbanisation. Ludhiana district with 23,073 acres tops the list followed by Amritsar with 4,464 acres and Mohali with 3,535 acres. While the government is defending the policy by stating it is purely voluntary and would make farmers stakeholders and beneficiaries of urbanisation, opposition parties and farmers at few places claim it is working in collusion with corporates and big realtors. Amid the discourses on the cost-benefit analysis of the land pooling policy, it is the right time to explore an alternative model of development in Punjab that conserves fertile land. The conflict between development of agricultural sector and non-agricultural sectors becomes more pronounced when agriculture becomes commercialised like industry. This is exactly the position in Punjab. (HT file photo) Land is limited and has alternative uses for agricultural and non-agricultural development. In the initial stages of development, conflict between both the uses is minimal as sufficient land is available. As development reaches the advanced stage, a conflict arises between land used for agriculture; and for industrialisation and urbanisation. The conflict between development of agricultural sector and non-agricultural sectors becomes more pronounced when agriculture becomes commercialised like industry. This is exactly the position in Punjab. The trade-off between agricultural and non-agricultural uses has arisen due to land being an emotive issue and an integral part of life and culture of Punjabi farmers. In this backdrop, acquisition of land for industrialisation, urbanisation, roads and communication poses challenges which are likely to be different from many states of India. The awareness of farmers and their organisational strength have added to the list of challenges. The implementation of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation, and Settlement Act, 2013, has been most difficult in Punjab. Many projects relating to industry and national highways have faced rough weather due to litigation. According to the Panj Foundation, around 1,400 cases relating to land acquisition were with the Punjab and Haryana high court from 2017-24. Learning from increased cases of litigation and the existing model of extensive land use for non-agricultural purposes, Punjab can explore a model of development which has a land-saving pathway. In this backdrop, an alternative model of industrial development and urbanisation is suggested which may require lesser land but at the same time delivers robust economic outcomes. Land-friendly model of industrialisation Two types of industries require less land. These are footloose industries and advanced digital technology and knowledge-based industries. Footloose industries are industries that need limited space, use light weight material, produce light weight goods and services, involve low transport cost, and employ skilled manpower. The examples of footloose industries include electronics, computer chips, mobile phones, watch-making, petrochemical industries, light engineering and assembly, toy manufacturing, etc. These industries are non-polluting and can be located near residential areas. Thus, Punjab has locational advantages for these industries. Another set of industries which save land are advanced digital technology and knowledge-driven industries. These are leading industries globally, thanks to the Fourth Industrial Revolution. These like footloose industries use light raw material, occupy limited space, however, are intensive in terms of human knowledge. Examples of these industries include artificial intelligence, 3-D printing, robotics, cloud computing, computer and software development; optical instruments and lenses; biotechnology, R&D firms, etc. Hi-tech agriculture-based industries in rural areas Though these industries require land, but if they are located near agriculture and mainly owned by farmers' co-operatives, then the problem of land acquisition will not arise, as land will be pooled by the farmers. These need not be traditional agro-based industries but hi-tech industries having the backing of smart and digital technology. Examples of these industries are precision farming industry, agro-biotechnology industry, vertical farming and controlled environment agriculture, agro-robotics industry, agri-tech platforms and software, food processing, agricultural drones, hydroponics and aquaponics industry, and seed technology industry. Model of urbanisation In Punjab, around 40% of the population resides in the urban areas. It is projected that by 2035, Punjab's urban population will reach 50% and hence more land is likely to be acquired if the existing model of urbanisation continues. For making urbanisation less land intensive two strategies are put forth: (i) Vertical model of urbanisation At present, Punjab follows a horizontal model of urbanisation consuming fertile land on a regular basis. Given the high fertility of land, Punjab should encourage the vertical model of urbanisation that involves building upwards (i.e. multi-storyed buildings). In the vertical model, ground floors can be used as shopping complexes and recreation centres and thus would reduce use of vehicles, leading to reduction in carbon emission and noise pollution. The basement can be used for parking, thus, saving land. Major cities of the world in which vertical urbanisation has emerged as a dominating model are Hong Kong, Tokyo, Shanghai, Seoul, Mumbai, Madrid, London, Berlin, Paris, Milan, Melbourne, and New York. (ii) Creating rurban model in villages The ministry of rural development introduced a scheme, the Provision of urban amenities in rural areas (PURA) for three years (2004-05 to 2006-07) on a pilot basis and later extended it to the whole country. The purpose of PURA was to provide amenities and urban-like livelihood and job opportunities in the rural areas to reduce the urban-rural gap in development. In 2016-17, PURA was replaced by the Syama Prasad Mookherjee Urban Mission, aiming to create a cluster of urban villages by providing economic, social, and infrastructure amenities comparable with cities. Though this mission is no longer continuing but, Punjab can create its own rurban model to suit its socio-economic conditions. Finally, for preparing industrial and urban plans, the stakeholders like farmers, local communities and NGOs should be involved right from the beginning. This practice will help in reducing the court cases relating to land acquisition. BS Ghuman The writer is a former vice-chancellor, Punjabi University, Patiala; and chairperson, Centre for Regional Development Studies, IDC, Chandigarh. Views expressed are personal.
Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
Is working for Dalits, farmers 'anti-national' ?: Medha Patkar slams BJP MPs over meeting walkout
Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads A day after BJP MPs walked out of a parliamentary panel meeting she was invited to, activist Medha Patkar on Wednesday hit back, asking if standing up for Dalits, Adivasis, farmers and labourers now counts as "anti-national".A meeting of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Rural Development and Panchayati Raj to discuss the implementation of the land acquisition act ended abruptly on Tuesday as BJP MPs protested against the panel's decision to hear Patkar , who had led protests against raising the height of the Sardar Sarovar Dam in Gujarat under the banner of ' Narmada Bachao Andolan '.The panel, headed by Congress MP Saptagiri Sankar Ulaka, had called Patkar to hear her views on the implementation and effectiveness of the land acquisition law enacted by Parliament when the Congress-led UPA government was in power in Union minister and BJP MP Parshottam Rupala was joined by other lawmakers from his party as they walked out of the meeting, with some dubbing Patkar as "anti-national". A BJP MP even said he had no idea that leaders from Pakistan could also be called to such a meeting."What is the charge of being anti-national? We are working with Dalits, Adivasis, farmers, labourers... Is that something anti-national? To protect their rights under the law and the Constitution, and the human rights, which are above the constitutional rights," Patkar told PTI."And even if whatever we are saying is wrong, they can oppose it. But that doesn't mean that they can call us anti-national or 'urban naxals'. This democratic process includes the parliamentary standing committee proceedings," she said she has participated in parliamentary panel discussions earlier and has been part of consultations carried out by the government for framing the Land Acquisition Act of 2013."Even when Sumitra Mahajan was in the Chair, we were given a good hearing," she said, referring to the former Lok Sabha Speaker and BJP said they were invited to appear before the panel, made their submissions, and all due process was said she was informed that a communication was sent by the secretary general of the Lok Sabha to the chairperson -- Congress MP Ulaka -- to cancel the meeting due to a lack of quorum. The activist said she was told by officials that 17 MPs had come for the meeting, and questioned how there was a lack of quorum."The written letter that the secretary general gave to the chairman to cancel the meeting gave only one reason that there is no quorum. The fact that I was invited to appear was not mentioned as the reason," she prime minister H D Devegowda's Janata Dal (Secular), which is a part of the BJP-led NDA, also participated in the meeting but not in the walkout, Patkar said."Mr. Devegowda, he did not walk out. He was just sitting quietly near the chairman," she about the Narmada Bachao Andolan, Patkar said they only demanded what was awarded by the Narmada Narmada Water Disputes Tribunal (NWDT) was established in 1969 to resolve the water-sharing disputes among Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, and Rajasthan concerning the Narmada River."They are mentioning the position taken by the Narmada Bachao Andolan. Our position has been that the award by the Narmada tribunal should be implemented," she said."Even the World Bank stopped funding this project (Sardar Sarovar Dam), saying that it was an ill-planned project. The statistics on which the decision is based the data is flawed. The World Bank took a position that they had not followed the law," she World Bank had agreed to fund the project to increase the height of the dam in 1985. However, following protests by the NBA led by Patkar, they formed the Morse Commission to look into factors like environmental cost and human the World Bank decided to pull out of the project, the government cancelled the loan sanctioned by the World Bank on 31 March stressed that the rehabilitation of the families that were to be dislocated was important."There were thousands of families living in this area. How could they be denied fair and full rehabilitation? That was the question. Now, about 50,000 families have received rehabilitation. Whatever is remaining, a few thousand in Madhya Pradesh, hundreds in Maharashtra, hundreds in Gujarat, the dialogue is still going on," she said."We want the government to take immediate action and decision, but they are not doing it on war footing," she added.
Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
Andhra Pradesh notifies capital region land pooling scheme rules, 2025
AMARAVATI : The Andhra Pradesh government on Tuesday notified the Andhra Pradesh Capital Region Land Pooling Scheme (Formulation and Implementation) Rules, 2025, which will govern the unique method of pooling land for building the greenfield capital city of Amaravati. S Suresh Kumar, principal secretary to the government, Municipal Administration and Urban Development, said these rules shall apply to the 'capital region' except the 'capital city area' which will continue to be governed by the Andhra Pradesh Capital City Land Pooling Scheme (Formulation and Implementation) Rules, 2015. "In keeping with the will of the Government to build 'People's Capital' and for building the necessary concomitant infrastructural projects like airports, ports and all other necessary projects, the procurement mechanism of the land has been designed to be a voluntary scheme," said Kumar in a government order (GO). It is based on mutual consensus between the landowners and the state/authority, said Kumar, adding that this is a unique method of procurement of land, which is named and styled as 'Land Pooling Scheme'. The 'Land Pooling Scheme' rules come at a time when the government is planning to turn greenfield capital city Amaravati into a 'mega city' by combining adjacent Mangalagiri, Tadepalli, Guntur, and Vijayawada with Amaravati. This endeavour aims to pool an additional 40,000 acres of land, besides the 54,000 acres of land on which the government is already sitting for Amaravati. The government is planning to build an international airport in Amaravati. The 'Land Pooling Scheme' has been designed for developing the Capital Region wherein the land parcels owned by individual farmers and owners or group of owners are consolidated by the authority under a development scheme, he said. According to Kumar, the 'Land Pooling Scheme' is a better scheme formulated by the Andhra Pradesh State Legislature owing to the mandate enabled under Sections 107 and 108 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. "The broad objective of the scheme is to do justice to the families affected by the construction of a Livable and Sustainable Capital Region for the State of Andhra Pradesh and also to the farmers and land owners in the Capital Region and also to make them avail a better compensation and also with a view to make them Partners in the State Development Process," said the principal secretary. It is designed in such a manner that the participant land owners are fairly compensated with the allotment of the reconstituted plot along with the developed infrastructure, among other benefits, said Kumar.
