BJP MPs Walk Out Of Parliamentary Panel Meet, Objecting To Presence Of Medha Patkar, Prakash Raj
The agenda included the consideration and adoption of two draft reports on government actions by the Department of Land Resources and the Ministry of Panchayati Raj
The Standing Committee on Rural Development and Panchayati Raj met in Parliament on Tuesday morning, chaired by Congress MP Saptagiri Sankar Ulaka. However, the meeting soon became contentious over the participation of controversial figures, particularly social activist Medha Patkar.
The agenda included the consideration and adoption of two draft reports on government actions by the Department of Land Resources and the Ministry of Panchayati Raj. It also featured scheduled oral testimonies from representatives of various ministries, NGOs, and other stakeholders on the implementation of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.
top videos
View All
A committee member later told CNN-News18, on condition of anonymity, 'The chairman is generally known to be fair and soft-spoken. But it appears he was under pressure from the top leadership of his party. Summoning known Gandhi family supporters like Medha Patkar sends the wrong message."
The tension culminated in BJP MPs staging a walkout after the chairman insisted on proceeding with testimonies from ten NGO representatives. With their exit, the meeting was adjourned due to a lack of quorum.
First Published:
July 02, 2025, 03:20 IST
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
3 days ago
- The Hindu
CPI(M) general secretary M.A. Baby slams Naidu's silence on resettlement of Polavaram-displaced
Communist Party of India (Marxist) [CPI(M)] general secretary M.A. Baby on Sunday (August 17) expressed his dismay over the silence on the part of Chief Minister N. Chandrababu Naidu and Members of Parliament from the NDA in Andhra Pradesh on the Resettlement and Rehabilitation (R&R) of the displaced families of the Polavaram project. Mr. Baby and CPI(M) MP John Brittas on Sunday concluded their two-day field visit to the Polavaram project submergence area, where they took stock of the implementation of the R&R component. The duo inspected the R&R colonies and project-affected villages along the banks of rivers Godavari and Sabari in Y. Ramavaram, Rekhapalli, Yetapaka Mandals in the Chintoor Agency of Alluri Sitarama Raju district. Addressing the affected families at Ramavaram in V.R. Puram Mandal, Mr. Baby said the party was not against Chief Minister N. Chandrababu Naidu's vision to develop the capital city of Amaravati, but disapproved of his silence about the Polavaram-displaced and R&R component. 'The Members of Parliament of the previous three terms (2014, 2019 and 2024) represented by the TDP and the YSRCP never raised their voice for the Polavaram R&R in Parliament. All of them failed to address the concerns of the Polavaram-displaced,' said Mr. Baby. He promised to return with an action plan to lead the fight for the resettlement and rehabilitation of the Polavaram-displaced, as guaranteed by the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. 'On the ground, the nexus between the bureaucracy and public representatives is reflected in the execution of the R&R component. An inquiry should be ordered into the irregularities in the R&R component, beginning from 2014-19 term,' said Mr. Baby. In his address, Mr. Brittas promised to raise his voice for the Polavaram-displaced at the national level. CPI(M) Central Committee Member K. Lokanadham, ASR district secretary Boppena Kiran and other leaders were present.
Hindustan Times
5 days ago
- Hindustan Times
Guest Column: Way forward after U-turn on land-pooling policy
The Punjab government took a quick and rational decision by withdrawing the land-pooling policy amid challenges since its announcement on May 14, 2025. The Punjab government took a quick and rational decision by withdrawing the land-pooling policy amid challenges since its announcement on May 14, 2025. The challenges included lack of consultation with stakeholders, specifically farmers; protests by farmers; bypassing of major clauses of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. (HT File) The challenges included lack of consultation with stakeholders, specifically farmers; no provision for alternative sources of livelihood to displaced farmers, landless workers and artisans; apprehension among farmers and opposition parties that the policy had been adopted at the behest of corporate realtors; protests by farmers; bypassing of major clauses of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, including a social impact assessment as observed by the Punjab and Haryana high court while passing the interim stay order on its execution for four weeks. The government should take this withdrawal as an opportunity to learn lessons for making future policies in such a manner that the need for a U-turn does not arise. Involve stakeholders at outset The first lesson is that policy-making has gone beyond the in-house exercise of the government. This is an age when the process is evidence-based and requires open consultation with stakeholders. If sufficient research-based evidence is unavailable, the government should commission research in the chosen area. Punjab has a reservoir of research inputs by universities and think tanks. The government should involve experts and representatives of stakeholders in the policy-making committee from the beginning. Senior officers and experts in consultation with stakeholders should prepare the first draft policy. In the present case, the stakeholders are farmers, landless workers, artisans and village-based shopkeepers. The government should place the draft policy before the public and stakeholders for wider consultation. Print, electronic and social media can be used to reach out to the public. The government should also invite public inputs through its website. By incorporating inputs received, the committee should prepare the second draft for the consideration and approval of the council of ministers. If the policy decision approved by the cabinet requires a new law or amendment or repeal, it is placed before the assembly for discussion. Develop non-farm sectors Second, agriculture is the backbone of the rural economy in Punjab. Land productivity of two major crops, wheat (4,216kg per hectare) and paddy (4,340kg per hectare), are the highest in the country. Before announcing a land-pooling policy on a large scale, it is essential for the state government to prepare a fertile ground for the smooth implementation of the policy. This preparation requires the development of non-agricultural sectors for absorbing surplus workforce like farmers and agricultural labour. Once this is achieved, the land acquisition for non-agricultural purposes will be smooth. So long as the agriculture sector is overpopulated and population engaged in agriculture does not find decent jobs and remunerative avenues in non-agriculture sectors, no such policy can be implemented in Punjab. Rural industrialisation Third, instead of promoting non-agricultural activities in the urban areas, the government should promote these activities in the villages in the form of rural industries and repair services related to agricultural implements and electronics, including cell phones. These activities can absorb surplus workforce from agriculture and would reduce pressure on urbanisation. Here the Punjab government can follow the Chinese model of rural industrialisation. China set up township and village enterprises (TVEs) in the 1980s for the industrialisation of rural areas. Studies suggest that these TVEs proved important vehicles for gainfully absorbing the surplus labour from agriculture. Like China, Punjab should promote rural industrialisation through its organisations, such as the Punjab State Industrial Development Corporation, Agro-industry Corporation, Small Scale Industrial and Export Corporation, Markfed, Milkfed, Sugarfed, etc. People in non-agricultural sectors like commission agents, rice mills, warehouses, petrol pumps, transport and real estate should be encouraged to set up rural industries. The state government should use start-ups as vehicles for rural industrialisation. Unfortunately, rural startups have not come up in a big way in Punjab, in spite of the state being at the forefront in agriculture. In Punjab, only 52 agricultural startups got financial and technical support under the Innovation and Agri-Entrepreneurship Development Programme of the Rashtriya Krishi Vikas Yojana between 2019-20 and 2023-24. In other states, the number of agricultural startups that got such support is much higher. For instance, Maharashtra has 226 such startups, Karnataka 211, Tamil Nadu 137, Kerala 97, Uttar Pradesh 86, Haryana 84, Chhattisgarh 79, Madhya Pradesh 68 and Andhra Pradesh 61. In a nutshell, the Punjab government should take the policy-making process beyond official proceedings. It should be evidence-based from the beginning, while experts and stakeholders should be an integral part of the process. Preparing a congenial environment is necessary for framing a successful public policy. The writer, a former vice-chancellor of Punjabi University, Patiala, is chairman, Centre for Regional Development Studies at the Institute of Development and Communication, Chandigarh, and can be reached at ghumanbs54@ Views expressed are personal.
Indian Express
13-08-2025
- Indian Express
How AI tool will bring structure, uniformity to minutes of gram sabha meetings across country
The Centre is set to unveil an artificial intelligence (AI)-powered tool to automatically generate minutes of meetings of gram sabhas, the primary body of the Panchayati Raj system, consisting of all registered voters of a gram panchayat. Named 'SabhaSaar', it will be rolled out in Tripura on Independence Day, August 15, and thereafter made available to other states, said a government official. Union Minister of Panchayati Raj Rajiv Ranjan Singh Lalan and his deputy Prof SP Singh Baghel will unveil 'SabhaSaar' in New Delhi Thursday, on the eve of Independence Day. A source said 'SabhaSaar' is built on Bhashini, an AI-powered language translation platform launched by the government to bridge literacy, language, and digital divides. The tool generates transcription from a video or audio, translates it into a chosen output language and prepares a summary. It enables transcription in all major Indian languages like Hindi, Bengali, Tamil, Telugu, Marathi and Gujarati, in addition to English, the source said. 'SabhaSaar' is ideal for panchayats, administrative bodies, and rural development projects as it streamlines documentation and empowers stakeholders with instant access to meeting insights, as per sources. As per the Ministry of Panchayati Raj, there are 2,55,397 village panchayats, 6,742 intermediate panchayats, 665 district panchayats, and 16,189 traditional local bodies across the country. A gram sabha is supposed to meet at least four days (January 26, May 1, August 15, and October 2) in a year. To ensure that gram sabhas meet regularly and function transparently, the Panchayati Raj ministry has launched a Panchayat NIRNAY portal, a real-time monitoring system that deals with their meetings. It has provisions for scheduling, notifying citizens with the meeting agenda well in advance, enhancing public participation, recording and enabling panchayat decisions for ready reference, bringing about transparency and accountability of panchayat functionaries in panchayat decision making and its implementation. According to data available with the ministry, over 10,000 gram Sabha meetings were held through the Panchayat NIRNAY platform during the financial year 2024-25. Most of these meetings were held in Punjab, Andhra Pradesh, Telangana and Bihar.
