logo
PKE Stock Rises 23% as Q1 Earnings Up Y/Y on Defense Demand Surge

PKE Stock Rises 23% as Q1 Earnings Up Y/Y on Defense Demand Surge

Yahoo5 days ago
Shares of Park Aerospace Corp. PKE have surged 23.3% since the company released its earnings report for the quarter ended June 1, 2025. This far outpaces the modest 0.5% gain in the S&P 500 index over the same period. Over the past month, PKE stock has rallied 41%, compared to a 4.8% rise in the S&P 500, signaling strong investor optimism surrounding the company's recent financial results and outlook.
Park Aerospace reported earnings per share (EPS) of 10 cents in the fiscal first quarter of 2026, up from 5 cents in the prior-year quarter.
Net sales of $15.4 million represented a 10.2% increase from $14 million in the year-ago period. Net earnings more than doubled to $2.1 million from $1 million in the same quarter last year.
Gross profit rose 15% to $4.7 million, with gross margin improving slightly to 30.6% from 29.3%. Adjusted EBITDA also improved, reaching $3 million compared to $2.6 million a year ago, marking a 13.5% year-over-year increase.
Park Aerospace Corp. Price, Consensus and EPS Surprise
Park Aerospace Corp. price-consensus-eps-surprise-chart | Park Aerospace Corp. Quote
Other Key Business Metrics
Park's operating performance showed solid execution, as evidenced by an increase in earnings from operations to $2.4 million, up 16.2% from $2.1 million a year ago. SG&A expenses increased marginally to $2.3 million from $2 million.
The balance sheet remained robust, with $65.6 million in cash and marketable securities as of June 1, 2025. The company's equity per share stood at $5.29, only slightly lower than $5.36 at the end of the previous quarter. Despite a sequential decline in inventories and total assets, Park Aerospace continued to maintain a strong liquidity position.
Management Commentary
During the earnings call, Chairman and CEO Brian Shore expressed satisfaction with the gross margin exceeding 30%, calling it 'nice to be over 30%' and attributing performance to consistent cost management and favorable sales mix. Shore emphasized transparency by breaking down margin estimates and cautioning investors not to overinterpret short-term variations.
President and COO Mark Esquivel added color to the supply chain and production environment, indicating that while production volumes were relatively flat, key customers are expected to ramp up significantly later in the fiscal year. The team also addressed ongoing pressure from tariff-related costs and international shipments, citing a modest $0.3 million impact from missed shipments in the quarter.
Factors Influencing Performance
Key drivers behind the strong performance included increased sales of fabric-based composite materials, particularly to defense and aerospace customers. Management noted that $1.1 million of the $15.4 million in quarterly revenue came from fabric sales, while $0.5 million came from materials made with the fabric, both areas with stronger margins.
On the downside, international logistics and tariff-related costs slightly weighed on the quarter, although they were not significant enough to impact broader earnings momentum. The decline in cash was attributed to discretionary expenditures including a $2.2 million share repurchase and a $1.5 million investment in Ariane to expand C2B fabric production capabilities.
Guidance and Outlook
Park Aerospace provided a forecast for the fiscal second quarter of 2026, anticipating net sales between $15 million and $16 million, and EBITDA between $3.1 million and $3.4 million. This implies sequential growth in both sales and profitability, driven by strong customer demand and production scheduling improvements.
Furthermore, management reiterated its confidence in a solid full-year outlook, underpinned by a $40 million proposed blanket purchase order and expanding defense-related opportunities, particularly in missile systems and engine components.
Other Developments
During the quarter, Park Aerospace continued construction of a new facility in Newton, Kansas, part of a long-term strategic plan to increase manufacturing flexibility and capacity. The company indicated that it aims to have the expansion plan finalized by the end of the calendar year, with implementation starting shortly thereafter.
Additionally, Park reported significant progress on a new long-term agreement (LTA) with GE Aerospace, spanning fiscal years 2025 through 2030, covering engine-related composite components. While management refrained from disclosing specific financial details, the LTA is expected to support long-term revenue stability and diversification.
Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report
Park Aerospace Corp. (PKE) : Free Stock Analysis Report
This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research (zacks.com).
Zacks Investment Research
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bull market enters the 'anything goes' phase. Should you follow?
Bull market enters the 'anything goes' phase. Should you follow?

CNBC

time8 minutes ago

  • CNBC

Bull market enters the 'anything goes' phase. Should you follow?

"Hey, you never know" was the catchphrase of New York State Lottery ads through much of the 1990s. An old friend in advertising who worked on another state's lottery account once told me his creative team couldn't get that line out of their minds, failing to improve upon the way it so perfectly captured the awareness of long odds that make the notion of winning that much more enticing. "I'll probably lose – but what if I don't?" Without belaboring a clumsy and reductionist analogy between negative-sum lottery games and positive-sum investing, the recent re-embrace of meme-stock trading, proliferating short-squeeze stampedes and the alt-coin crypto revival has that "Hey, you never know" flavor. And, frankly, the thing about markets is you truly never do know what stocks will work, or why, or how much good or bad news is priced in at a given moment. The best professional investors of all time get it right maybe 55% of the time, so why wouldn't amateurs shoot for low-probability/high-payout bets? We've already been citing the rushing torrent of speculative adrenaline in racier, gamier stocks for weeks, and now we appear firmly in the "Anything goes" phase of this bull market. The question is whether to view this outbreak of frothy fun as a warning that the broader market has grown euphorically risky, or as a sort of "rationally reckless" impulse that can help energize an otherwise sturdy and poised bull market. An enormous proportion of last week's trading volume was in zombie 2021-era busted momentum plays such as OpenDoor and GoPro , along with heavily shorted household names Kohl's and Krispy Kreme . Last week JPMorgan calculated that the investor crowding into the most volatile and often lower-quality "high-beta" stocks has essentially never been more extreme over the past 35 years. The firm is also tracking retail-trader buying in high-short-interest stocks, now showing its sixth frenzied outburst since 2020. Such excitement has quickly drawn the tut-tutting of the spoilsports and voices of moderation, though I tend not to scold those playing these games. For one thing, this is a lot closer to how Wall Street started – a game of telephone among pods of speculators before the invention of the telephone – than is represented in any academic version of sober capital formation. For another, how would one expect profit-motivated, low-information traders to behave after the S & P 500 has been compounding at a 115% annual pace since April 7 and the Goldman Sachs basket of retail-favorite stocks is up 50% over that time? It's possible for this activity to be both foolhardy for those participating and not particularly dangerous to the broader $60 trillion in U.S. market capitalization. It's likely, for one thing, that many of those involved are in on the joke, to a large degree. They perhaps see a surge in social attention toward certain tickers or identify asymmetric advantage in stocks burdened by many complacent short sellers. Most will lose money and many will lose interest, and that's ultimately how many buy-and-hold index investors are born. Measuring the speculation surge One thing for sure, this overheated activity is motivating market researchers to devise new, better-tuned analytical thermometers to measure it. Goldman last week introduced a Speculative Trading Indicator based that's now in its sharpest three-month upswing ever outside the late-1990s tech mania and the original meme-stock/SPAC fever of 2020-2021. The indicator captures trading volumes in penny stocks, unprofitable companies and those with the most extreme valuations. Volume in penny stocks is now running in the 98 th percentile of all periods since 1990, and turnover in stocks with enterprise-value-to-sales ratios above 10 is in the 96 th , the firm says. (This harkens to a known lottery phenomenon called "jackpot fatigue" – a given level of payout fails to excite players after a while, requiring more juice to activate their interest.) Fascinatingly, similar rushes for the risky fringe of the markets have in the past had positive implications for S & P 500 returns over the ensuing 3-, 6- and 12-month periods, Goldman says, but beyond a year they have tended to lead to significantly worse performance. "The trend is your friend until the end when it bends," indeed. 3Fourteen Research co-founder and CIO Warren Pies unveiled a new Daily Sentiment Composite last week as well, comprising ETF flows, options activity, systematic-hedge-fund behavior, surveys and more. It's now above 70 on its zero-to-100 scale, with 60 being the threshold for "excessive optimism." This dampens the outlook for market returns while the composite stays in the upper range. Pies, who is holding to a 6,800 year-end S & P target, nonetheless expects a tougher couple of months from here due to less demand from "automatic buyers" (corporate buybacks and volatility-targeting hedge funds); weaker seasonal patterns; potential cracks in the economic-growth narrative; and the aforementioned sentiment setup. Pies also goes deep on the broad-scale, society-wide "fear of losing ground" to the acceleration in assets that have run higher on what he calls "debasement" forces – persistent fiscal deficits and political pressure to lower interest rates that are benefiting stocks, real estate, crypto and gold, while undercutting housing affordability and lifting longer-term market-based inflation expectations. "In this new world, an increasingly large number of (particularly young) citizens believe that leveraged speculation is the only way to break out of the American caste system. It is no surprise that online gambling has boomed in this new era," he says. "It is hard to blame the young speculators who have embraced financial nihilism." It's common for financial-wellness types to lament the way consumers of modest means spend on lottery tickets (more than $300 a year per capita in states that have lotteries), when they could build a cushion more safely by saving that money. But research shows that saving such sums is rarely enough to materially change a person's financial reality, whereas the longshot windfall could. Similarly, we can talk to young people who trade short-dated stock options or leveraged ETFs or penny stocks about the power of long-term compounding and clockwork retirement contributions, but good luck having it penetrate when homes are out of reach for most and we've just seen trillions in crypto wealth pile up in a few years, as bitcoin was all the while derided (with good reason) as economically unnecessary. Financial guardrails being removed These are tidal shifts in societal behavior lapping around the edges of the capital markets. There's a broader story to tell these days about the urgent removal of financial guardrails and the gradual buildup of structural excesses now underway: Congress is greenlighting stablecoins and blessing crypto-ownership expansions. Banks are being urged to lend to consumers against their crypto assets. Robinhood is tokenizing high-value private startups to let smaller investors own them. Regulators are reportedly close to lowering minimum-balance levels for so-called "pattern day traders" while opening 401(k) plans to alternative assets. The AI buildout boom is taking on financial leverage, with Meta Platforms and xAI tapping private credit to build data centers. Advocates for such measures can surely argue that the removal of frictional barriers is beneficial to enabling capital flows among risk takers, perhaps raising the economy's metabolism. Still, it's tough to make the case that U.S. capital markets – featuring the deepest credit markets and the world's most stoutly valued equity indexes – have been stymied all that much by bureaucratic overreach. The peddlers of prudence will no doubt eventually find something in all this to say "I told you so" about, but who knows when. The implications will likely emerge sporadically over a span of years and are not particularly useful for handicapping the market's immediate prospects from here. It remains notable that for all the wild action in the spicier parts of the market, the core of the equity complex has scarcely made a misstep in months. The furious springtime rebound rally has given way to a calm, low-drama grind – a "boring is bullish" mode. The S & P 500 was nearly static on multiple days last week, reflecting some groups cooling off and others playing some catch-up, a so-far orderly rotation that nonetheless bears monitoring. The benefit of the doubt remains with the bullish overall trend, even while the case for a tactical pause or retrenchment builds. Stock reactions to earnings have been slightly net negative for the companies reporting even as the aggregate "beat rate" has been expectedly high. The Nasdaq 100 is getting pretty stretched relative to its longer-term trend and has put in a significant multi-month peak in the second half of July the past two years. Arguably, the consensus is now a bit complacent regarding the potential impact of tariff outcomes, lulled by a slow-and-steady economy helped by a torrid tech capex binge. Valuation is not much of a tactical help, but I'll note that Microsoft – an excellent measuring tool given it's been near the top of the index and at the front lines of tech trends for more than a generation – is again trading above 33-times forward 12-month earnings. Its P/E has been no higher than 34 since the early 2000s, all in the past few years. Elevated, sure, and reflective of a market pricing in plenty of positives. But not exactly bubbly – the stock traded above 50x in the two years before the March 2000 peak of the tech mania, a time when the public intoxication with risk reached genuine historic extremes that the current speculative wave has not yet even closely approached.

These overbought stocks could take a dip after the market's record gains
These overbought stocks could take a dip after the market's record gains

CNBC

time9 minutes ago

  • CNBC

These overbought stocks could take a dip after the market's record gains

Stocks including Northrop Grumman and Advanced Micro Devices appear overbought after this week's rally, according to one widely used technical metric. The three major U.S. indexes notched strong gains this week, powered by a slew of positive earnings reports and developments on trade deals. The S & P 500 rose 1.5% in the period after recording five record closes this week alone and notching 14 total record closes this year. The 30-stock Dow gained roughly 1.3% this week, and the Nasdaq Composite rose 1%. Stocks that popped during this winning run could be on risky ground moving forward, though. Using the CNBC Pro stock screener tool , we identified the most oversold and overbought stocks this week by their 14-day relative strength index. An RSI above 70 suggests that a stock is overbought and could see a decline, while a result below 30 indicates a stock could be oversold and may be due for a boost. Take a look at the overbought names below, which were each up at least 5% this week. Chipmaker Advanced Micro Devices made the list this week with an RSI of nearly 77. Shares rallied 6% this week. Earlier this month, the company said it will soon resume shipments of its MI308 artificial intelligence chips to China, once license applications are approved by the U.S. Commerce Department. Defense and aerospace company Northrop Grumman jumped 9.8% this week, putting the stock in the overbought group with an RSI of about 73. Northrop on Tuesday posted a second-quarter revenue beat along with a guidance raise for the full year. CEO Kathy Warden said on a conference call with analysts that the company believes revenue from its B-21 stealth bomber could potentially exceed 10% of total revenue "in the future." Other stocks that have high RSIs and could see their shares dip include Block , Newmont and GE Vernova . GE Vernova shares rallied about 12% this week on strong second-quarter results, which led analysts from firms including Citi and Bank of America to raise their price targets on the stock. International Business Machines , Texas Instruments and Philip Morris International are considered some of the broader market's most oversold companies, per their high RSIs. IBM shares slid more than 9% this week after the tech company's second-quarter software revenue came in below expectations, even though its overall revenue and earnings topped analysts' forecasts, per LSEG. The stock has an RSI of around 26. Tobacco giant Philip Morris fell on the back of lackluster results, which missed second-quarter revenue expectations. Wall Street was also disappointed by the company's Zyn nicotine shipments. Shares dropped almost 10% this week, and the stock had an RSI reading of about 29.

Should You Really Buy Stocks as the S&P 500 Roars by Record Highs? History Gives a Shocking Answer.
Should You Really Buy Stocks as the S&P 500 Roars by Record Highs? History Gives a Shocking Answer.

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Should You Really Buy Stocks as the S&P 500 Roars by Record Highs? History Gives a Shocking Answer.

Key Points The S&P 500 is seeing a surprising turnaround from the pervasive bearish sentiment that plagued the stock market earlier this year. Record highs are more common than investors might think. Buying an S&P 500 index fund only on days when the index hit a record high has historically yielded better returns than buying on any random day. 10 stocks we like better than S&P 500 Index › The S&P 500 (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC) has rocketed through five record highs in five days as of Friday, July 25. That strong upward momentum stands out in stark contrast to the pervasive bearish sentiment that plagued the stock market earlier this year. Is it smart to buy stocks with the S&P 500 roaring by record highs? Historical data gives a shocking answer. Record highs in the stock market are relatively common The S&P 500 is one of several major stock market indexes in the United States, but it is generally considered the best benchmark for the overall U.S. market due to its breadth. The index includes 500 large-cap companies that cover more than 80% of domestic equities by market capitalization. The S&P 500 hits all-time highs more frequently than investors may realize. The index has historically closed at a record high on one in 15 trading days, which is approximately 7% of the time, according to JPMorgan Chase. Moreover, the index often keeps climbing (or at least holding its level) with little to no backtracking. If we define "market floor" as incidents when the S&P 500 never declines more than 5% following a high, then nearly one in three record highs since 1988 have been market floors. In other words, about 30% of the time, the S&P 500 never fell more than 5% after hitting a high. The stock market tends to perform better following record highs Many investors get nervous when the stock market reaches an all-time high. The little voice in the back of your head may tell you to stop buying stocks, or even to sell existing positions. However, history says that this instinct is more likely to backfire than to prevent losses. Goldman Sachs analysts recently explained: "Contrary to conventional wisdom, investing in the S&P 500 exclusively on days when the market hit an all-time high has historically outperformed investing on any given day, producing stronger returns over the next 1, 3, and 5 years." The chart below expands on that information. It compares the average forward return in the S&P 500 when money is invested (1) unconditionally on any given day, and (2) exclusively on days when the index reached a record high. Time Period S&P Forward Return (From Any Given Day) S&P 500 Forward Return (From Record Highs) 6 Months 6% 6% 1 Year 12% 13% 2 Years 25% 29% 3 Years 40% 46% 5 Years 75% 81% Data source: JPMorgan Chase. Forward returns include dividend payments. Data collected between January 1988 and December 2024. The data shown above comes from JPMorgan Chase. It verifies Goldman's conjecture that an S&P 500 index fund would have generated better returns had money only been invested at all-time highs, rather than on any random day. In short, investors have no reason to fear record highs in the S&P 500. Quite the opposite, in fact. History says those days are good opportunities to add money to the stock market, no matter how counterintuitive it may seem. However, I would be remiss not to add this disclaimer: Historical data is never a guarantee of future returns, because every situation is different. In this case, the S&P 500 currently trades at 22.2 times forward earnings, a meaningful premium to the 10-year average of 18.4 times forward earnings, according to FactSet Research. The economy also has yet to feel the full effect of President Donald Trump's tariffs, which introduces downside risk. Indeed, the S&P 500 has a median year-end target price of 6,300 among 17 Wall Street analysts, which implies about 1% downside from its current level of 6,378. That does not mean investors should avoid the market. Rather, they should err on the side of caution by focusing solely on high-conviction ideas. Should you invest $1,000 in S&P 500 Index right now? Before you buy stock in S&P 500 Index, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and S&P 500 Index wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $636,774!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,064,942!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,040% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 182% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025 JPMorgan Chase is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. Trevor Jennewine has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends FactSet Research Systems, Goldman Sachs Group, and JPMorgan Chase. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Should You Really Buy Stocks as the S&P 500 Roars by Record Highs? History Gives a Shocking Answer. was originally published by The Motley Fool 擷取數據時發生錯誤 登入存取你的投資組合 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store