
Trump's shocking deal with Putin: A dangerous blow to U.S. security and global standing
By: Ya Libnan Editoria Board
In a move that will undoubtedly send shockwaves through Washington and beyond, President Donald Trump has reportedly signed a deal with Russian President Vladimir Putin for rare minerals from both Russia and occupied Ukrainian territories. This reckless decision represents a direct threat to U.S. national security, weakens America's global standing, and marks a historic betrayal of Ukraine and U.S. allies in Europe.
Rare minerals are the backbone of modern industries, from technology and defense to energy and manufacturing. By making Russia America's primary supplier, Trump has granted Putin enormous leverage over critical U.S. industries. This deal strengthens Russia's economy at a time when global sanctions are designed to cripple its war machine. Instead of isolating Russia for its aggression in Ukraine, Trump is empowering it economically, allowing Putin to fund his military ambitions.
Even more concerning is the fact that Putin is China's number one ally. If Russia and China consolidate their control over rare minerals, they could dominate global supply chains and undermine American industrial and technological capabilities. Such a scenario would give them the ability to blackmail the U.S. and its allies, much like Russia attempted to do with Europe's gas supply.
The BRICS alliance—comprising Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa—has been actively working to undermine the dominance of the U.S. dollar in global trade. China and Russia, in particular, have pushed for an alternative financial system that reduces reliance on American financial institutions and currency. By securing control over rare minerals, they could accelerate their efforts to shift global economic power away from the U.S.
This deal plays directly into the BRICS strategy, allowing Russia and China to use their mineral dominance as economic leverage. If BRICS nations successfully weaken the U.S. dollar's standing as the world's reserve currency, it could have devastating consequences for the American economy, including higher inflation, reduced global influence, and financial instability. Additionally, with BRICS recently expanding its membership to include new economic powerhouses, its collective influence is growing. This means any shift away from the dollar could happen faster than expected, further isolating the U.S. financially.
Even more alarming is the inclusion of rare minerals from Ukrainian territories occupied by Russia. This deal legitimizes Russia's illegal annexation of Ukrainian land, further eroding Ukraine's sovereignty. The U.S. has spent billions in military aid and resources to support Ukraine's defense against Russian aggression. By now turning to Putin for resources extracted from that same land, Trump is directly undermining America's own investment and signaling to the world that the U.S. no longer stands by its allies.
Europe has been steadfast in its support for Ukraine, leading the charge on sanctions and providing military and economic aid. Trump's deal with Putin will fracture this unity, sending a clear message that the U.S. is willing to prioritize its own economic interests over the collective security of NATO. This move not only weakens America's alliances but also emboldens Putin, who has long sought to divide Western nations.
If the U.S. begins sourcing essential minerals from Russia, European allies will be forced to reconsider their economic and military reliance on America. Such a shift could push European nations to seek stronger partnerships elsewhere, including with China, creating a new global order where U.S. influence is drastically reduced.
America's reliance on an adversarial nation for critical minerals poses an unprecedented security risk. Should tensions escalate, Putin would have the power to cut off supply chains, holding the U.S. economy hostage. This would be akin to Europe's past dependence on Russian oil and gas—a vulnerability that Putin ruthlessly exploited before the war in Ukraine.
Trump should have learned from Europe's experience with Russian gas. Russia attempted to blackmail Europe by threatening to cut the gas pipelines, forcing European nations to scramble for alternative energy sources. If Russia could manipulate energy markets, it can certainly do the same with rare minerals.
Additionally, by securing mineral resources through Russia, the U.S. risks exposing its supply chains to Russian and Chinese espionage, cyber threats, and economic coercion. This is not just a matter of economics; it is a fundamental issue of national defense. The BRICS alliance, already working to reduce dependence on the U.S. dollar, could use this newfound leverage to further weaken the American economy, shifting global financial power to authoritarian regimes.
Trump's economic strategy, including his heavy reliance on tariffs, falls into the same category of economic missteps that have historically harmed the U.S. economy. Protectionist policies have backfired in the past, causing higher costs for American consumers and industries.
File: Combined portrait of President Donald Trump and William McKinley , who was the 25th President of the United States, serving from March 4, 1897, until his assassination on September 14, 1901, after leading the nation to victory in the Spanish-American War and raising protective tariffs to promote American industry. McKinley was known as the 'Napoleon of Protection' . it's worth revisiting McKinley's parting words. He realized that success in a globalized world required cooperation, not just protectionism.
A key example is President William McKinley's tariff policies over 125 years ago, which proved disastrous. High tariffs often lead to trade wars, damaging American exports and reducing economic growth. Rather than making the U.S. economy stronger, Trump's tariffs on key goods have already strained trade relations with allies and increased costs for American businesses. By making the U.S. dependent on Russian rare minerals while simultaneously imposing tariffs on allies, Trump risks isolating America economically and diplomatically.
Trump's decision to sign this deal is not just bad policy—it is a direct affront to American interests and values. It rewards an adversary who has consistently worked to undermine the U.S., while abandoning a democratic ally that has fought bravely for its sovereignty and independence.
At a time when strong leadership is needed to counter authoritarian threats, Trump has instead handed Putin and China a massive geopolitical victory. The long-term consequences of this deal will be severe, not only for America's security but also for its global credibility.
This dangerous development must be met with immediate and decisive action. Congress must investigate the full details of this deal and consider legislative measures to prevent the U.S. from becoming dependent on Russian resources. NATO allies must unite in condemning this reckless move and work together to secure alternative sources of rare minerals. The American people must demand accountability from their leaders and reject policies that strengthen America's adversaries at the expense of its security.
If this deal is allowed to stand, history will remember it as the moment America willingly surrendered its strategic advantage to hostile powers. The question now is whether U.S. lawmakers and citizens will act in time to prevent further damage before it is too late.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Al Manar
9 hours ago
- Al Manar
Russia Says Ukraine Stalls POW Exchange and Return of Fallen Soldiers
Russia's Defense Ministry said on Saturday that Ukraine is indefinitely delaying a planned exchange of prisoners of war and the repatriation of thousands of Ukrainian soldiers' bodies, despite Moscow's readiness and prior arrangements. According to Alexander Zorin, head of the General Staff's main directorate, Russia had initiated the return of over 6,000 bodies of Ukrainian soldiers on June 6. A convoy carrying 1,212 remains had already arrived at the exchange site, with four more trains—each transporting approximately 1,200 bodies—preparing for transfer. Zorin affirmed Russia's full commitment to the Istanbul agreements, offering to exchange all prisoners on an 'all-for-all' basis, including the wounded, critically ill, and those under 25. He added that a list of 640 names was submitted to Ukrainian authorities, who have yet to respond with a date for either receiving the bodies or reciprocating the prisoner exchange. Presidential aide Vladimir Medinsky echoed these claims, stating that Kyiv's sudden refusal to proceed came despite Russia's formal invitation to retrieve the bodies—an act aimed at giving families the right to a dignified burial. He further invited international media to witness Russia's preparedness on the ground, confirming that the initial batch of bodies had already reached the designated exchange zone, while additional shipments were en route. Vladimir Medinsky spoke to us about Kiev's sudden refusal to take back 6,000 bodies of their dead. 'Families will have opportunity to bury their close ones in a Christian manner. We are here, we are ready to fulfil our agreements. Accept the bodies, the POWs, and the sick. Let… — Margarita Simonyan (@M_Simonyan) June 7, 2025 Medinsky accused Ukraine of obstructing the agreements, alleging that Kyiv may be stalling to avoid financial obligations—namely, compensation payments announced in 2023 of $257,000 per fallen soldier. According to him, no Ukrainian families have received these funds to date, and concealing the return of such a large number of bodies is becoming increasingly difficult. Moscow Pushes for Lasting Peace Amid Diplomatic Gridlock The second round of Russia-Ukraine negotiations took place earlier this week at Istanbul's Çırağan Palace, lasting more than an hour and involving the exchange of memoranda on conflict resolution mechanisms. Russia – Ukraine negotiations, Istanbul, Türkiye. 'We aim to discuss ceasefire requirements of both sides in Russia-Ukraine talks'. Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan 'We expect a real result from today's meeting in Istanbul: a ceasefire, exchange of prisoners, return of… — Intel Edge (@Intel_edge1) June 2, 2025 Russian President Vladimir Putin, during a government video conference, instructed Medinsky to present a full report on the outcomes of the talks. Medinsky noted that Kyiv expressed interest in a 30-day ceasefire to prepare for a potential summit, while Moscow insisted on negotiating a comprehensive peace agreement rather than settling for a temporary truce. Despite ongoing dialogue, Ukraine has yet to act on its commitments, while Russia continues to push for implementation of the agreed exchanges—against the backdrop of mounting Ukrainian challenges related to prisoner numbers and unpaid death compensations.


Ya Libnan
11 hours ago
- Ya Libnan
Musk floats ‘The American Party' after Trump tiff
Elon Musk floated a new political party on Friday after falling out with President Trump over the big, beautiful bill. He launched a Thursday poll on the social platform X, which he owns, asking about whether or not the country needed a new faction for political nominees. 'The people have spoken. A new political party is needed in America to represent the 80% in the middle! And exactly 80% of people agree. This is fate,' Musk wrote, citing numbers from his survey . He followed up with a potential name for the group, ' The America Party .' In recent days, Musk has railed against Trump for suggesting the United States increase its national debt by $4 trillion as proposed in the bill. The tech giant said it 'undermines' all the work he did at the Department of Government Efficiency, geared towards reducing government spending. However, Trump said the Tesla CEO was mad over slashes to electric vehicle incentives instead of other clauses in the legislation. 'Elon knew the inner workings of this bill better than almost anybody sitting here. … He had no problem with it,' Trump told reporters in the Oval Office. 'All of a sudden he had a problem, and he only developed the problem when he found out that we're going to have to cut the EV mandate, because that's billions and billions of dollars,' he added. Still, Musk, who served as a White House adviser for over 100 days in the Trump administration, backed a call for Trump to be impeached and replaced by his own vice president. The president has publicly questioned Musk's motives for slamming his leadership right after leaving his role in the administration. 'I don't mind Elon turning against me, but he should have done so months ago. This is one of the Greatest Bills ever presented to Congress. It's a Record Cut in Expenses, $1.6 Trillion Dollars, and the Biggest Tax Cut ever given. If this Bill doesn't pass, there will be a 68% Tax Increase, and things far worse than that. I didn't create this mess, I'm just here to FIX IT. This puts our Country on a Path of Greatness. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!' Musk also credited himself for Republicans' successful trifecta in November capturing the White House, in addition to majorities in the House and Senate. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate,' Musk said in a post on his social platform X . 'Such ingratitude,' he added. Florida Republican Rep. Jimmy Patronis cast doubt on Musk's claim of creating 'The America Party' in Friday comments, suggesting the two will be 'hanging around again' shortly. 'Elon Musk is not gonna create a new political party,' Patronis told NewsNation's Blake Burman during an appearance on 'The Hill.' 'Trump knows that sometimes you're going to have falling out with those that you trust, you like, that you're friends with. It happens with us in DC all the time. So again. Mark my words. About a month from now, these guys will be hanging around again. The Hill


Al Manar
17 hours ago
- Al Manar
Iran: Trump Travel Ban Shows ‘Deep Hostility' for Iranians, Muslims
Iran on Saturday blasted US President Donald Trump's travel ban on countries including the Islamic Republic, saying it showed 'deep hostility' toward Iranians and Muslims. 'The decision to ban the entry of Iranian nationals – merely due to their religion and nationality – not only indicates the deep hostility of American decision-makers towards the Iranian people and Muslims but also violates… international law,' a senior foreign ministry official said in a statement posted on the X social media platform. The US travel ban on hundreds of millions of people because of their nationality or faith 'amounts to racial prejudice and systematic racism prevailing in the US government,' said the director general of the Iranian Expatriates' Affairs Department at the ministry Alireza Hashemi Raja. Iran slams Washington's racist move to ban entry of citizens from several countries into US The director general for the Department of Iranian Affairs Abroad at Iran's Foreign Ministry, Alireza Hashemi Raja, strongly condemned the recent decision by the US government to bar… — Foreign Ministry, Islamic Republic of Iran 🇮🇷 (@IRIMFA_EN) June 7, 2025 He called on the United Nations and the human rights organizations to overtly oppose the US' unilateral policies that have violated the human rights norms. Trump's proclamation on Wednesday will bar citizens from 12 countries starting on Monday, alleging that the move was needed to protect against 'foreign terrorists' and other security threats. The countries are Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Congo Republic, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. Trump travel ban live: US issues full entry ban on 12 countries, with dual citizens among exemptions — Reuters (@Reuters) June 5, 2025 The entry of people from seven other countries – Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela – will be partially restricted. The ban was reminiscent of a similar move Trump implemented during his first term in office from 2017 to 2021, when he barred travelers from seven Muslim-majority nations.