logo
Exclusive: Biden's race-based loan program hurt white farmers, whistleblower says

Exclusive: Biden's race-based loan program hurt white farmers, whistleblower says

Yahoo28-05-2025

(NewsNation) — While President Donald Trump has spoken out against most of the Biden administration's policies, he's been particularly enraged by what he sees as Biden's endorsement of diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives in all aspects of government. However, Trump didn't even know the Biden administration had managed to implement DEI policies involving American farmers. It has remained a secret until now.
NewsNation exclusively spoke with a whistleblower from the United States Department of Agriculture about loan forgiveness policies under the Biden administration.
The whistleblower discussed the passage of the American Rescue Act and how Section 1005 of that act provided loan relief specifically for socially disadvantaged farmers.
Analyst: iPhone exports from China to US drop 75%
The section provided race-based loan forgiveness, granted only to those who qualified as socially disadvantaged farmers or ranchers.
Buried in the American Plan Rescue Act passed by a Democratic majority in Congress, the United States secretary of agriculture shall 'provide payment in an amount up to 120 percent of the outstanding indebtedness of each socially disadvantaged farmer.' The 'socially disadvantaged farmer' was defined by the act as American Indian, Alaskan Native, Asian, Black, African American, Native Hawaiian, Pacific Islander, Hispanic or Latino in order to qualify for their loan to be paid off, plus 20% to cover taxes.
When word got out that the American Rescue Plan Act was paying off the loans of only a specific class of minority farmers, white farmers from all over the country sued in federal court, alleging that the American Rescue Plan Act was race-based and violated the equal protection clause under the Constitution.
James Dunlap owns a small family farm in Baker City, Oregon. He works two other jobs to keep his farm afloat, but he did not qualify for loan forgiveness because he's white. James Dunlap told NewsNation that he found out about the new loan forgiveness policy from a friend.
Trump admin orders halt to student visa interviews
'As far as I understand, not at all. It wasn't about hardship. It wasn't about financial situations. It was about that box you checked under ethnicity line under your application,' he said.
If a borrower checked the 'non-white' box, they received loan forgiveness. It didn't matter if they actually needed assistance in making their loan payments.
Dunlap, along with other white farmers, successfully sued the Biden administration in federal court with the assistance of their attorney, Glenn Roper, from the Pacific Legal Foundation.
The federal court judge found the loan forgiveness program for socially disadvantaged farmers was 'an actual constitutional harm that cannot be undone.' He added that the fact James and other white farmers 'will suffer the harm of being excluded from eligibility for that debt relief program solely on the basis of race … is irreparable.'
But despite the federal judge's ruling, the Biden administration wasn't ready to give up on providing loan forgiveness for socially disadvantaged farmers.
Trump plans to pardon Todd and Julie Chrisley
They pushed for passage of the Inflation Reduction Act, which provided $3.1 billion for distressed direct and guaranteed loan borrowers (all farmers) who were over 60 days delinquent on qualified loans as of September 30, 2022. It was intended to provide financial assistance to all distressed borrowers as of January 2023, but as NewsNation discovered, not all farmers were actually informed about the provision.
NewsNation obtained a copy of an email that was sent out on January 10, 2023, 'to share information about new payments and/or loan modifications that may assist you.'
But the USDA whistleblower told NewsNation that not everyone received this letter. It was only sent out to minority farmers — those who qualified as socially disadvantaged farmers or ranchers under the definition set forth in the American Rescue Plan Act, which was subsequently deemed unconstitutional and repealed by Congress.
The letter was addressed to borrowers and clearly stated the reason for their notification: 'You are receiving this letter because you were previously informed of your potential eligibility as a Farm Loan Programs borrower for a payment under Section 1005 of the American Rescue Plan Act.'
Tommy Tuberville running for governor of Alabama
The letter went on to inform these socially disadvantaged farmers that, although the American Rescue Plan Act no longer grants the USDA statutory authority to fund payments to them, a new payment and loan modification program is available under the IRA.
The whistleblower told NewsNation none of the white farmers he works with received this email. He also noted that USDA workers were even instructed to tell that specific group of socially disadvantaged farmers to stop paying their loans because they would be forgiven.
'It's not right,' the whistleblower told NewsNation. 'It was discriminatory. Unethical. And the people who pushed it are still in charge of the agency … (those) at the national office. Trump hasn't gotten rid of them.'
The USDA spokesperson provided NewsNation with the following statement:
'Over the last four years, the Biden administration left USDA in complete disarray and dysfunction and that's why farmers were being left behind. The entire farm economy has been hurt by Biden's inaction. It is absurd that while the Biden Administration was driving up inflation, American taxpayers were forced to fund billions in woke DEI initiatives. No one should be shocked that Biden weaponized bipartisan farm programs to discriminate and provide taxpayer dollars to one group based on race and not on merit.
On day one, Secretary Rollins issued a memorandum to rescind all DEI programs.
Instead, USDA is reprioritizing unity, equality, meritocracy, and color-blind policies. Secretary Rollins directed USDA to review Inflation Reduction Act funding to ensure that it honors the sacred obligation to American taxpayers—and to ensure that programs are focused on supporting farmers and ranchers, not DEI programs or far-left climate programs.
As part of returning the department to normal business operations, Secretary Rollins has ended the four-year-long COVID-19 pause on debt collections. This includes terminating the 'Distressed Borrowers' program and servicing those loans.
Unlike the Biden Administration, under Trump, USDA does not discriminate and single out individual farmers based on race, sex, or political orientation. Secretary Rollins is working to reorient the department to be more effective at serving the American people and put farmers first. Fortunately, President Trump is taking strong action to support farmers by quickly rolling out programs like the Emergency Commodity Assistance Program that provides $10 Billion in direct assistance to producers. All farmers are encouraged to apply.'
USDA spokesperson
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The legal issues raised by Trump sending the National Guard to L.A.
The legal issues raised by Trump sending the National Guard to L.A.

Los Angeles Times

time29 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

The legal issues raised by Trump sending the National Guard to L.A.

The Trump administration announced Saturday that National Guard troops were being sent to Los Angeles — an action Gov. Gavin Newsom said he opposed. President Trump is activating the Guard by using powers that have been invoked only rarely. Trump said in a memo to the Defense and Homeland Security departments that he was calling the National Guard into federal service under a provision called Title 10 to 'temporarily protect ICE and other United States Government personnel who are performing Federal functions.' Title 10 provides for activating National Guard troops for federal service. Such Title 10 orders can be used for deploying National Guard members in the United States or abroad. Erwin Chemerinsky, one of the nation's leading constitutional law scholars, said 'for the federal government to take over the California National Guard, without the request of the governor, to put down protests is truly chilling.' 'It is using the military domestically to stop dissent,' said Chemerinsky, dean of the UC Berkeley School of Law. 'It certainly sends a message as to how this administration is going to respond to protests. It is very frightening to see this done.' Tom Homan, the Trump administration's 'border czar,' announced the plan to send the National Guard in an interview on Fox News on Saturday as protesters continued confronting immigration agents during raids. 'This is about enforcing the law,' Homan said. 'We're not going to apologize for doing it. We're stepping up.' 'We're already ahead of the game. We were already mobilizing,' he added. 'We're gonna bring the National Guard in tonight. We're gonna continue doing our job. We're gonna push back on these people.' Newsom criticized the federal action, saying that local law enforcement was already mobilized and that sending in troops was a move that was 'purposefully inflammatory' and would 'only escalate tensions.' The governor called the president and they spoke for about 40 minutes, according to the governor's office. Critics have raised concerns that Trump also might try to invoke the Insurrection Act of 1807 to activate troops as part of his campaign to deport large numbers of undocumented immigrants. The president has the authority under the Insurrection Act to federalize the National Guard units of states to suppress 'any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy' that 'so hinders the execution of the laws' that any portion of the state's inhabitants are deprived of a constitutional right and state authorities are unable or unwilling to protect that right. The American Civil Liberties Union has warned that Trump's use of the military domestically would be misguided and dangerous. According to the ACLU, Title 10 activation of National Guard troops has historically been rare and Congress has prohibited troops deployed under the law from providing 'direct assistance' to civilian law enforcement — under both a separate provision of Title 10 as well as the Posse Comitatus Act. The Insurrection Act, however, is viewed as an exception to the prohibitions under the Posse Comitatus Act. In 1958, President Eisenhower invoked the Insurrection Act to deploy troops to Arkansas to enforce the Supreme Court's decision ending racial segregation in schools, and to defend Black students against a violent mob. Hina Shamsi, director of the ACLU's National Security Project, wrote in a recent article that if Trump were to invoke the Insurrection Act 'to activate federalized troops for mass deportation — whether at the border or somewhere else in the country — it would be unprecedented, unnecessary, and wrong.' Chemerinsky said invoking the Insurrection Act and nationalizing a state's National Guard has been reserved for extreme circumstances where there are no other alternatives to maintain the peace. Chemerinsky said he feared that in this case the Trump administration was seeking 'to send a message to protesters of the willingness of the federal government to use federal troops to quell protests.' In 1992, California Gov. Pete Wilson requested that President George H.W. Bush use the National Guard to quell the unrest in Los Angeles after police officers were acquitted in the beating of Rodney King. That was under a different provision of federal law that allows the president to use military force in the United States. That provision applies if a state governor or legislature requests it. California politics editor Phil Willon contributed to this report.

Trump attends UFC championship fight in NJ, taking a break from politics, Musk feud

time33 minutes ago

Trump attends UFC championship fight in NJ, taking a break from politics, Musk feud

NEWARK, N.J. -- President Donald Trump walked out to a thunderous standing ovation just ahead of the start of the UFC pay-per-view card at the Prudential Center on Saturday night, putting his public feud with tech billionaire Elon Musk on hold to instead watch the fierce battles inside the cage. Trump was accompanied by UFC President Dana White and the pair headed to their cageside seats to Kid Rock's 'American Bad Ass.' Trump and White did the same for UFC's card last November at Madison Square Garden, only then they were joined by Musk. Trump shook hands with fans and supporters — a heavyweight lineup that included retired boxing champion Mike Tyson — on his way to the cage. Trump was joined by his daughter Ivanka Trump and her husband, Jared Kushner, along with son Eric Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio. Trump shook hands with the UFC broadcast team that included Joe Rogan. Rogan hosted Trump on his podcast for hours in the final stages of the campaign last year. UFC fans went wild for Trump and held mobile devices in their outstretched arms to snap pictures of him. Trump arrived in time for the start of a card set to include two championship fights. Julianna Peña and Merab Dvalishvili were scheduled to each defend their 135-pound championships. UFC fighter Kevin Holland won the first fight with Trump in the building, scaled the cage and briefly chatted with the President before his post-fight interview.

LA immigration protests live updates: Trump deploys 2,000 National Guard members

time38 minutes ago

LA immigration protests live updates: Trump deploys 2,000 National Guard members

California Gov. Gavin Newsom called the move "purposefully inflammatory." 1:20 The Trump administration is deploying the California National Guard in response to protests in Los Angeles that begin Friday evening over immigration enforcement operations that have resulted in some clashes between demonstrators and authorities, the White House said in a statement. President Donald Trump signed a memorandum "deploying 2,000 National Guardsmen to address the lawlessness" in California as demonstrations opposing Immigration and Customs Enforcement operations continue in the state, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement Saturday evening. Earlier Saturday, California Gov. Gavin Newsom said the federal government was moving to "take over the California National Guard," calling the move "purposefully inflammatory" and saying it will "only escalate tensions." 6 minutes ago Hegseth says National Guard being mobilized immediately, active-duty Marines on 'high alert' Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said the Defense Department is "mobilizing the National Guard IMMEDIATELY to support federal law enforcement in Los Angeles." Hegseth said if violence continues, "active duty Marines at Camp Pendleton will also be mobilized — they are on high alert." The memo that President Donald Trump signed Saturday night directing the National Guard to California said that the current protests "constitute a form of rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States." Trump utilized his authority under "10 U.S.C. 12406 to temporarily protect ICE and other United States Government personnel," according to the memo. The presidential memorandum also said that the 2,000 service members could be deployed for 60 days or "at the discretion" of the defense secretary. The memo adds that the secretary of defense "may employ any other members of the regular Armed Forces as necessary to augment and support the protection of Federal functions and property in any number determined appropriate in his discretion."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store