
Could Racheal Reeves' new reforms boost growth?
Chancellor Rachel Reeves said on Wednesday that "economic growth is the number one mission of this government" as she unveiled a series of proposals to boost the UK's economy. But how quickly could the government get growth from the plans she announced?Critics have argued some of the projects - such as expanding Heathrow - would not help in the near term.BBC Verify has examined some of the key numbers and claims.
How slow is the UK's growth?
The most recent official data shows there was virtually no growth in GDP - the overall size of the UK economy - between the July 2024 election and November 2024.
And the latest medium term official growth forecast from the Office for Budget Responsiblity, the government's official forecaster, is for 1.6% GDP growth in 2029, which would be well below the pre-2008 financial crisis average growth of 2.8% a year.However, the International Monetary Fund has forecast that the UK's growth rate for 2025 and 2026 will be higher than in France and Germany.Lower rates of GDP growth would translate into slower growth in our wages and incomes and general living standards.
Heathrow expansion
The chancellor said that allowing Heathrow to build a third runway would "create 100,000 jobs", boost investment and exports and "unlock futher growth".She cited a new report by the consultancy Frontier Economics which found it could increase the UK's potential GDP by 2050 by 0.43%, around £17bn.That is broadly in line with the findings of an independent commission by Sir Howard Davies in 2015, which concluded a third runway at Heathrow would support UK trade and enhance productivity and push up GDP by 0.65-0.75% by 2050 relative to otherwise.However, most analysts believe it would likely take many years before shovels went into the ground to start building a new runway, even with new reforms to speed up the planning process.And the government will have a difficult balancing act to both expand Heathrow and meet its climate goals.BBC Verify asked the Treasury for its source for the 100,000 jobs figure and it pointed to a 2017 report by the Department for Transport estimating that a new runway at Heathrow could add between 57,000 and 114,000 additional local jobs. Though that report added that "these jobs are not additional at the national level, as some jobs may have been displaced from other airports or other sectors."
Oxford-Cambridge Growth Corridor
The chancellor in her speech claimed an Oxford and Cambridge Growth Corridor "could add up to £78bn to the UK economy by 2035".This corridor is a resurrection of the previous government's plans to join Oxford and Cambridge with new transport links and allow those two university and research hubs to expand.In support of the chancellor's figure, the Treasury has cited research by an industry group called the Oxford-Cambridge Supercluster.This research shows that this £78bn is a "cumulative figure" over 10 years, not the boost in a given year.The analysis suggests the project could add £25bn in Gross Value Added (GVA) a year to the UK economy by 2035.That would constitute roughly a permanent 1% boost to UK GDP by that date.
Estimates of the impacts of an infrastructure project on growth are inherently uncertain and very sensitive to the assumptions of researchers about what would have happened to growth if it had never been built.Yet most economists do believe infrastructure projects, especially those that allow already productive places to expand, will ultimately help the UK economy grow more rapidly than otherwise.Ben Caswell, a senior economist at The National Institute of Economic and Social Research (Niesr), said: "Big infrastructure projects typically deliver growth over the long term, approximately 10 to 20 years." "There may be a small demand side boost in the short term when shovels are in the ground, but nothing so significant that you would see it in headline GDP growth figures."However, after the project is complete, the supply capacity of the economy is permanently enhanced, and, all other things equal, that delivers higher sustained GDP growth than would have otherwise been."
Pensions reform
Another reform the chancellor says will be pro-growth is enabling UK companies to access the funds from their "defined benefit pension" pots, held on behalf of their workforces to fund their retirement.Defined benefit pension schemes guarantee an annual pension payment to retired workers, based on their salary while they were in work.Many of these defined benefit pension pots have moved into surplus in recent years due to the rise in interest rates since the pandemic, meaning their financial assets (their investments) are greater than their financial liabilities (what they have to pay out to pensioners).The Treasury has said that approximately 75% of schemes are now in surplus and that the total surplus adds up to £160bn.The chancellor wants to legislate to allow the firms to use these funds to invest, while keeping safeguards to protect and guarantee workers' pension pay-outs.Pension shake-up plan aims to boost growthWhat's the plan for a third runway at Heathrow Airport?At a glance: What was in Rachel Reeves's speech?Measuring the size of the surplus of defined benefit scheme depends on various complex assumptions about the scheme and its relationship to the employer.The official Pension Regulator estimates that on one measurement the size in September 2024 was £207bn, but £137bn on a different measurement.The Treasury's estimate is roughly midway between the two.If such sums were deployed that could, in theory, make a positive difference to overall UK business investment, which is regarded by economists as both a short term and a long term driver of GDP growth.Total business investment in 2023, according to official data, was £258bn.But the size of any boost from this pension reform would depend on companies being willing to invest their surpluses, which is subject to great uncertainty as many firms have been looking to offload their defined benefit pension schemes to insurance companies in recent years.
What do you want BBC Verify to investigate?
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Sky News
41 minutes ago
- Sky News
UK military could 'potentially' be used to defend Israel, chancellor tells Sky News
The chancellor has told Sky News that UK military assets could "potentially" be used to help defend Israel, and the government is "not ruling anything out". Rachel Reeves said that while the UK is calling for de-escalation in the region, it is also sending military assets, including fighter jets, "to protect ourselves and also potentially to support our allies". The chancellor went further than the prime minister last night, who confirmed the movement of military assets, but refused to say if they could be used to help Israel. She also warned about rising oil prices and disruption to key trade routes in the Middle East, which could see inflation in Britain. Speaking to Sky's Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips, the chancellor said sending military assets to the Middle East "does not mean that we are at war", and emphasised that "we have not been involved in these strikes or this conflict". "But we do have important assets in the region," she continued. "And it is right that we send jets to protect them. And that's what we've done. It's a precautionary move, and at the same time, we are urging de-escalation." 0:30 Asked what the UK government would do if the Israelis requested the deployment of assets to support their operations, Ms Reeves reiterated that there has been no UK involvement so far and would not get in to "operational decisions for the future". She said: "This is a fast moving situation. Israel has every right to defend itself. We also are very concerned about Iran's nuclear deterrent." She continued: "We have, in the past, supported Israel when there had been missiles coming in. I'm not going to comment on what might happen in the future. But so far we haven't been involved. We're sending in assets to protect ourselves and also potentially to support our allies." Pushed on the question of what the UK would do if Israel asked for support with its operations, the chancellor replied: "I'm not going to rule anything out at this stage. It's a fast moving situation, a very volatile situation. But we don't want to see escalation." Asked if the UK would support a change of regime in Tehran, she replied: "I've got no time for the Iranian regime for the suppression and repression of their own people, and we have serious concerns, which we've expressed on a number of occasions, about the Iranian nuclear programme. "But we want to see de-escalation at the moment. We are not trying to ramp up the rhetoric." Ms Reeves also warned of the consequences of the conflict in the UK, saying that oil and gas prices "have gone up by just over 10%" since the conflict started, and warning there is a risk that key trade routes through the Middle East could be disrupted.


Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
Israel Iran attacks: Rachel Reeves says UK could 'potentially' support Israel as more RAF jets sent
Chancellor Rachel Reeves has spoken about the decision to send more RAF jets to the Middle East. Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Rachel Reeves has indicated the UK could 'potentially' support Israel amid the conflict in the Middle East, as she described sending more RAF jets to the region as a 'precautionary move'. The Chancellor told Sky News she was 'not going to rule anything out at this stage' given the 'fast-moving situation'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Israel has unleashed air strikes across Iran for a third day and threatened even greater force as some Iranian missiles evaded Israeli air defences to strike buildings in the heart of the country. Israeli security forces inspect destroyed buildings that were hit by a missile fired from Iran, near Tel Aviv. Picture: AP Photo/Ohad Zwigenberg | AP Planned talks on Iran's nuclear programme, which could provide an off-ramp, were called off. Asked whether the UK would come to Israel's aid if asked, Ms Reeves told Sunday Morning with Trevor Phillips: 'We have, in the past, supported Israel when there have been missiles coming in. 'I'm not going to comment on what might happen in the future. But so far we haven't been involved, and we're sending in assets to both protect ourselves and also potentially to support our allies.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Pushed again on whether the UK would deploy assets in support of Israel if asked, she said: 'What we've done in the past … is help protect Israel from incoming strikes. So a defensive activity.' She added: 'I'm not going to rule anything out at this stage … it's a fast moving situation, a very volatile situation. But we don't want to see escalation, we want to see de-escalation.' Ms Reeves said the UK sending more RAF jets to the Middle East 'does not mean that we are at war'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Chancellor Rachel Reeves | PA She said: 'We have not been involved in these strikes or this conflict, but we do have important assets in the region and it is right that we send jets to protect them and that's what we've done. It's a precautionary move.' The region braced for a protracted conflict after Israel's surprise bombardment of Iran's nuclear and military sites on Friday killed several top generals and nuclear scientists, and neither side showed any sign of backing down. Israeli soldiers dig through rubble to search for survivors in a residential area hit by a missile fired from Iran, near Tel Aviv, on Sunday. Picture: AP Photo/Ariel Schalit | AP Iran said Israel struck two oil refineries, raising the prospect of a broader assault on Iran's heavily sanctioned energy industry that could affect global markets. The Israeli military, in a social media post, warned Iranians to evacuate arms factories, signalling what could be a further widening of the campaign. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad US President Donald Trump has expressed full support for Israel's actions while warning Iran it can only avoid further destruction by agreeing to a new nuclear deal. Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi said on Sunday that if the Israeli strikes on Iran stop, then 'our responses will also stop'. New explosions echoed across Tehran and were reported elsewhere in the country early on Sunday, but there was no update to a death toll put out the day before by Iran's UN ambassador, who said 78 people had been killed and more than 320 wounded. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad In Israel, at least ten people were killed in Iranian strikes overnight and into Sunday, according to Israel's Magen David Adom rescue service, bringing the country's total death toll to 13. The country's main international airport and airspace remained closed for a third day. People take shelter during sirens warning of incoming fire in Tel Aviv. Picture: AP Photo/Baz Ratner | AP Israeli strikes targeted Iran's Defence Ministry early on Sunday after hitting air defences, military bases and sites associated with its nuclear programme. The killing of several top generals and nuclear scientists in targeted strikes indicated that Israeli intelligence has penetrated Iran at the highest levels. In Israel, at least six people, including a ten-year-old and a nine-year-old, were killed when a missile hit an apartment building in Bat Yam, near Tel Aviv. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Daniel Hadad, a local police commander, said 180 people were wounded and seven are still missing. Israel's ambassador to the UK has said 'Europe owes a huge thank you' for its strikes on Iranian nuclear infrastructure. Tzipi Hotovely insisted the operation was an act of self-defence and argued Iran had rejected diplomatic efforts to ease tensions. She told the BBC's Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg: 'Europe owes a huge thank you to Israel for doing that, and the Gulf countries as well. Our region would have been a place that is not safe for anyone if Iran had accomplished their plan.' Referencing past airstrikes on suspected nuclear sites in Iraq in 1981 and Syria in 2007, Ms Hotovely added: 'The international community owes a huge thank you to Israel and it's the same case here.'


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Britain ‘not at war' despite sending more RAF jets to the Middle East, Reeves says
Rachel Reeves has insisted Britain is not at war despite sending more RAF jets to the Middle East amid devastating strikes between Iran and Israel. The chancellor said the UK could play a military role defending Israel from ongoing Iranian attacks, but said moves so far 'do not mean we are at war'. Speaking to Sky News, she said: ' We have, in the past, supported Israel when there have been missiles coming in. I'm not going to comment on what might happen in the future, but so far, we haven't been involved, and we're sending in assets to both protect ourselves and also potentially to support our allies.' Ms Reeves also warned that the conflict has pushed up oil prices by 10 per cent and could threaten to block key trade routes, including the Strait of Hormuz, hitting the finances of families in the UK. She said: 'It's very early days, and things are moving quickly, but when we urge for de-escalation in the region, that is in part because of the lives at risk… but also because what happens in the Middle East affects us here at home.' Iran and Israel continued trading heavy missile strikes overnight on Saturday, with at least seven dead in Israel and an unknown number of casualties in Iran. Israel targeted Iran's Defence Ministry headquarters in Tehran, while dramatic footage showed a huge blaze raging at the Shahran oil depot near Iran's capital, after it was targeted in an Israeli attack. Air sirens were heard in Tel Aviv and Jerusalem as casualties were reported from strikes on buildings in northern Israel and Bar Yam, a city just south of Tel Aviv. The outburst of conflict was sparked when Israel launched a series of attacks on the heart of Tehran's nuclear programme and armed forces. After Iran hit back, Sir Kir on Saturday said: 'I'm not going to get into the precise details, but we are moving assets, we've already been moving assets to the region, including jets, and that is for contingency support across the region.' 'Our constant message is de-escalate, and therefore everything we're doing, all discussions we're having, are to do with de-escalation,' he added. Donald Trump has vowed to respond 'at levels never seen before' if Tehran follows through on a threat to strike US bases. Posting on Truth Social, the US president said his forces had 'nothing to do with the attack on Iran, tonight" but warned: 'If we are attacked in any way, shape or form by Iran, the full strength and might of the US Armed Forces will come down on you at levels never seen before.' It comes after Iran warned on Saturday that it would target US, UK or French bases in the region if they shot down missiles heading for Israel.