My close friend did the unthinkable while I was going through the worst time of my life - we haven't spoken since
Emily Skye, a fitness trainer from Queensland, said her mum was given just weeks to live after being diagnosed with leukaemia, unless she began intense chemotherapy, which she's done.
'It's been the most awful thing to watch someone go through,' Emily said.
But the experience has made her realise who her true friends really are.
'People who actually genuinely care about me and the people who don't, they fully retract and they avoid you,' she said.
Emily described how one of her friends reached out after noticing she had been quiet. When Emily opened up and shared the devastating news about her mum, her friend stopped responding.
'I heard from a friend of mine. She said, "You've been really quiet lately, is everything OK?" I really appreciate her noticing and reaching out. So I replied and I told her about my mum's situation,' Emily said.
'Now, I'm very cautious of how much I dump on someone. I never want to do too much that it overloads and that I don't know how to deal with it. I'm very respectful and aware of other people.
'I asked her how she is. And then I didn't hear anything back.'
Emily said she could see her message has been 'read' but she decided to give her friend the 'benefit of the doubt'.
'Weeks went by, if not months... Then I bumped into her at the shopping centre,' she explained.
'I went to say, "Hey" and she ducked and pretended she didn't see me, and just walked off. I know she saw me.
'I felt heartbroken.'
Emily was convinced her friend might have been avoiding her because she didn't know how to handle her mum's situation.
'I thought, OK well, maybe it's too much for her. Again, benefit of the doubt,' she said.
However, she knew something wasn't right when she ran into her friend again.
'I walked straight up to her because I thought, let's put it all aside and just be kind. Who knows what's going on in her life?' Emily said.
'I gave her a hug and said, "How are you?" You could tell she was really uncomfortable. But I just acted normal. I didn't want her to feel bad or anything.
'She said, "I was meant to reply to you, but it's been a really bad year." I was like, "what's been going on?"'
Her friend went on to explain that her husband was having a hard time at work because one of his colleagues 'wasn't being nice to him'.
'I said, "Oh no, that's terrible. I'm sorry to hear that. Is everything OK now?" she said, "Yeah, it's all sorted now",' Emily recalled.
'Then I saw someone else and she just walked away. I felt like she just saw an opportunity to get out of there and escaped.
'I can't help but feel hurt and abandoned.'
Emily said she's always made an effort to show up for everyone so she feels hurt by her friend distancing herself.
'I just feel like, what's wrong with me?' she said.
'Am I just too sensitive... or was I actually hurt by someone who ignored me when I really needed support? I guess I just want to feel cared for. Maybe I expect too much.'
She wondered whether she should ask her friend directly why she's been acting this way - or simply move on with her life.
'Do I just let it go and just not have any hard feelings?' Emily said.
Her video has been viewed more than 8,500 times - with many sharing their own experiences of losing friends in similar situations.
'People just don't know how to handle others going through grief, some are naturally able to handle your news and others just freeze. I learnt this when I got cancer at 23, but I got rid of those who hid and ignored me because it upset me and took energy away from me that I didn't have to lose anyway,' one shared.
'When my mum died it was sudden and shocking and I didn't cope at all. Long story short, almost everyone disappeared. Never to be seen or heard from again. It'' their loss. I'm the loving, supportive friend who would have been there in their hard times. Now they don't have that,' another revealed.
Some suggested Emily should talk to her friend about the situation.
'Honestly call her on it… Also she's not a true friend. My true friends are all there for me regardless of how much I dump on them and I'm the same with them. I'm sorry you're going through all that with your mum... Sending love,' one said.
While others said Emily should simply walk away from the friendship.
'I completely don't understand this! How hard is it to be caring and supportive of a friend? I'm like you,' one shared.
'I'm so supportive of my friends and it hurts when it's not reciprocated. I would let this friendship go. She has let you down. Trying to talk to her will hurt more. Walk away and invest in the friendships that give as much as they get.'
Another added: 'People pleaser here. People that you thought would be there for you are not and it hurts - I've learnt this getting older. I've wasted so much time and effort trying but it's not worth it. Put your time and effort in people that do it for you.'
'When people show you who they are - believe them. It hurts, but I have found cutting the cord to those relationships is best. I'd rather wait for the right people in my life,' one explained.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
22 minutes ago
- BBC News
Reckoning for Australia's childcare sector after onslaught of abuse cases
Twice a week, Ben Bradshaw drops his young son off at a Sydney childcare centre before heading off to thousands of parents and carers across Australia, the 40-year-old had always been confident that the staff have his child's best interests at in recent months, that trust in the childcare system has been "eroded", the father-of-two says, after several high-profile cases of alleged sexual and physical abuse at centres across Australia."It's that old adage of cockroaches - if you see one in your house, there's 10 that you don't see. These are the ones that get caught. It's more scary the ones that you can't see," he tells the the past few weeks, 2,000 children in Victoria have been urged to undergo infectious disease testing after a childcare worker was charged with the mass sexual abuse of babies; police have named a Sydney man who worked for 60 after-school-care providers and is accused of taking "explicit" images of children under his supervision; a Queensland woman has faced court over allegations she tortured a one-year-old boy; and another two workers in Sydney have been charged after a toddler was left covered in comes as the nation is still reeling from the crimes of childcare worker Ashley Paul Griffith - dubbed "one of Australia's worst paedophiles" - who was late last year sentenced to life in prison for raping and sexually abusing almost 70 series of allegations have sparked panic and fear among parents, child safety advocates have demanded action to fix what they call a dangerously incompetent system, and politicians have promised reform to keep Australia's most vulnerable safe."Some childcare centres are still safe, but the current childcare system is definitely not working to protect children or prioritise their safety," says Hetty Johnston, a leading child protection advocate. "It fails at every step." Rapid growth, greater risks In recent years, there has been a nationwide push to give more children access to early childhood education and care, which research indicates has many positive long-term of dollars have been poured into the sector from federal and state governments, including funding to guarantee three days of childcare for low and middle-income families. Such measures have prompted rapid growth in the sector, with a rush of new centres opening which has deepened a shortage of qualified growth has led to "significant vulnerabilities", says Prof Leah Bromfield, director of the Australian Centre for Child Protection."Whenever you grow something really quickly, that comes with risks," she says, listing off a lack of regulation and monitoring, limited training for managers, and the disparate and casual nature of the workforce."You put all that together and you've created a weak system from the perspective of a predatory perpetrator… a system where it's easier to infiltrate."In the wake of the Melbourne child sexual abuse case where Joshua Dale Brown was charged with 70 counts of abuse against eight babies, the federal government gave itself greater powers to strip funding from providers that breach quality and safety Education Minister Jason Clare said the measure was not designed to "shut down centres" but rather increase pressure for them to "raise standards".But Mr Bradshaw wants more. He says taking away funding from a centre "doesn't stop the crime, it just punishes it"."You have to do things that are proactive in nature." Knee-jerk reactions The spate of alleged crimes have sparked a heated national conversation about how to better protect kids. Limiting the role of men in childcare is one of the most controversial was a public call to ban men from certain tasks such as changing nappies and taking children to the toilet – though some warned this could place extra pressure on female staff."It's not about banning male educators, but about providing families with agency and informed choice," says Louise Edmonds, an advocate for child sex abuse case prompted G8 Education – who owned the centre where he worked - to introduce so-called "intimate care waivers", giving parents and carers the opportunity to choose who carried out private and sensitive duties. It also pledged to install CCTV at all of its centres. Ms Johnston - who founded child protection group Bravehearts - says these are natural responses, but cautioned that, though "men are definitely a higher risk", women do abuse children too and offenders can do so in all kinds of settings."They are opportunistic… when others don't pay attention, when they are distracted, complacent, disinterested or too trusting, they create 'opportunities' for offenders."Other practical measures centres could adopt to improve child safety include having two educators with direct line of sight of children at all times and getting rid of blind spots in centres - replacing solid doors with glass panes, eliminating windowless walls, and putting more mirrors up to create "incidental supervision"."It's all about reducing opportunities for predators to isolate or conceal in nooks and crannies," Ms Johnston says. Hiding in plain sight But massive system reform is also long overdue, experts 2017, more than 400 recommendations emerged from a years-long royal commission into child sex abuse in institutional settings – like churches, schools and childcare - but critics say progress has stalled on some of the most significant of those outstanding recommendations, to be discussed by the country's attorneys-general at a meeting this month, is to overhaul Australia's checks on those who work with each state and territory complete what is essentially a police check required for those who work alongside children, but they don't share the information with each other. Advocates have called for a nationalised system, but some say the checks themselves don't go far enough."It's inconsistent, relies too heavily on prior convictions," Ms Edmonds instance, many say, the system should capture red flags such as formal complaints, workplace warnings, police intelligence, and people identified as alleged abusers in confidential applications to the national redress scheme set up after the royal a broader net is important, experts argue, as child abuse allegations can be difficult to stand up in court. Often the witnesses are young children, who are either non-verbal or have limited vocabulary, may struggle with memory, and often have a lack of situational understanding."Catching someone red-handed and being able to prove it beyond reasonable doubt is almost impossible," Ms Johnston says. That's why Prof Bromfield is among those calling for a national registration scheme for the childcare sector – like those that exist for doctors or teachers. It would require workers to prove their qualifications, could provide a detailed work history, and would bind them all by a code of argue the system could also capture many of the things the working- with-children checks currently do not."Often in child sexual abuse cases, when you look back, you see lots and lots of red flags," Prof Bromfield says."There might be a pattern, but [at the moment] we just don't see that because they are moving between states or between sectors or between providers."Mr Bradshaw says having access to more information about staff would help parents like him make informed is a necessity for his family, he explains, as he works full-time and his wife, a high school teacher, works four days a often, there's little detail about the childcare centre's staff "beyond the pictures on the wall" of the teachers and educators, so parents often have to assess a provider "based on vibes"."It's a bit of a blackbox and you're bound because you need to have your kids in childcare so you can pay for living in a big city."That's where greater education for parents is needed too, Prof Bromfield says, so they know what questions to ask and, in the worst-case scenarios, how to spot signs of grooming include enquiring about a provider's child safety policies, asking about its staff turnover, and assessing the physical spaces for any visibility issues. There also needs to be better, more regular training for managers in the sector on how to prevent and identify problematic behaviour or patterns, experts Prof Bromfield - who was part of the team which conducted the royal commission into child sex abuse – these are conversations she has been having for over a she is hopeful the current crisis will shock Australia into taking greater action."Perhaps one of the things that will happen is there will be greater political will to prioritise safety for children," Prof Bromfield says."The big lesson is that we can never rest on our laurels when it comes to children's safety."Perpetrators just keep getting smarter, working around the systems we've got. We can't forget the lessons of the past… and we can't assume that this is a problem that's gone away."
Daily Mail
6 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Scientists reveal the surprising secret to UNSHRINKING clothes after a laundry mishap
No matter how hard you try, some clothes inevitably shrink in the wash. And it can be devastating to see your favourite shirt or dress shrivel before your eyes. While many might simply just throw them away at this point, experts have now revealed there might be a way of saving them. And all your need is a common bathroom product. Dr Nisa Salim, from the Swinburne University of Technology in Australia, said understanding more about the science of textile fibres can not only help you prevent the shrinkage of clothing, but might also help you 'rescue' the occasional garment after a laundry accident. 'If a favourite garment has shrunk in the wash, you can try to rescue it with this simple method,' she wrote on The Conversation. 'This process can't completely reverse extreme shrinkage but it can help recover some of the lost size, making the clothes wearable again.' So, here's what to do next time your best jumper emerges from the wash 10 sizes smaller. Dr Salim suggests soaking the shrunken item in lukewarm water mixed with hair conditioner or baby shampoo, at a measurement of around one tablespoon per litre. Then, you can carefully stretch the fabric back into shape and dry it flat under gentle tension – for example, by hanging it on a drying rack. This solution all comes down to the fibres that clothes are made of, she explained. Common textile fibres, such as cotton and linen, are made from plants and are irregular and crinkled in their natural form. During textile manufacturing, these fibres are mechanically pulled, stretched and twisted to make them straighten and align, creating long, smooth threads. However, when these fibres are exposed to heat, moisture or mechanical action – for example, when in a washing machine – they have a tendency to relax and return to their natural state. 'This fibre memory is why some fabrics wrinkle so easily and why some of them may even shrink after washing,' Dr Salim said. Her unshrinking method works because hair conditioners and baby shampoos contain chemicals called cationic surfactants. 'These will temporarily lubricate the fibres, making them more flexible and allowing you to gently pull everything back into place,' she said. To minimise shrinkage, people could try using cold water, the lowest spin speed or the gentlest cycle available, she explained. And when in doubt, choose a 'delicate' setting. Textile scientists are now working on fabrics that resist shrinkage. Promising innovations include blended yarns that combine natural and synthetic fibres. How do you get rid of stains? Even if you have the dining etiquette of a duchess, your clothes will at some point fall victim to a splash of sauce or a dribble of gravy. But most stains do disappear. The clue is to work out what kind of stain you've got . . . Pigment-based stains Coloured products and food e.g. wine, coffee, tea, fruit juice, perfume, grass, ink Treatment: Blot stain with kitchen paper, flush with cold water and blot again. Pre-soak using a biological pre-wash powder or apply a gel. Leave for five to ten minutes then wash. Remember: For tannin-based stains, never use salt or soap. Both will set it permanently. Protein-based stains Most food stains eg. egg. Sweat, blood. Treatment: Lift excess solids with a blunt knife. Blot with paper towel. Soak in cold water and add a biological pre-soaking agent. Machine wash at 40c with biological detergent. Remember: Never use hot water; the protein can set into the fibres of the textiles. Grease-based stains Butter, oil, mayonnaise, sun tan lotion Treatment: Scrape off solid parts. Soak up excess moisture with kitchen paper. Sprinkle with baking powder or baby powder to absorb the oil. Shake off and apply liquid detergent, then leave for a few minutes. Machine wash.
The Guardian
6 hours ago
- The Guardian
My petty gripe: why do fitness instructors lie about rep counts? Who hurt them?
I do a lot of exercise. Consider this less a brag and more a heralding of middle age. If I don't do yoga, my back hurts. If I don't do weights, my back hurts. If I don't do reggaeton, well, that kind of makes my back hurt. I prefer class-based workouts because I'm naturally lazy and respond well to authority. No matter the modality, offensively attractive fitness instructors wield numbers as weapons to torment and torture me. Numbers have always been a source of struggle for me. I can barely add up, frequently forget my own phone number, and yesterday I messed up an interview time with someone in Tennessee, despite using a time conversion app. Why can't they just be letters? Unfortunately, there is no escaping the shapely little bastards, and in few corners do numbers taunt me more than the fitness industry. 'What's your BMI?' 'How far can you run?' 'How much do you bench?' Whoa, sir, I'm just trying to order a smoothie. In every exercise class, from boxing to ballet, step to spin, Lycra-clad young people with AI-worthy abs personally victimise me with numbers. 'Eight reps to go!' sings a painfully perky barre teacher, repeating several numbers twice, even thrice, in the countdown. 'Holding for 3, 2 …' breathes a tattooed yogi, stopping to adjust someone's twisted triangle, while I wait for '1' and wish for death. 'Only 30 more seconds,' promises a rare male Reformer instructor, keeping us in forearm plank for seven more hours. Why are they like this? Who hurt them? Was it Les Mills? I know hurt people hurt people, but why do they have to hurt me, specifically? All I offer them is love. And a strong core. The fitness industry has a lot to answer for: untenable beauty standards, intolerable influencers, toxic gym culture, Zumba. Misinformation is rampant, scam products abound, and don't get me started on the cult of wellness. Must its henchmen also torture us with numbers and lies? If they say eight reps to go, there should be one rep per count, not two, nor four. If they count down from three, it should be illegal to have a chat between two and one. And 30 seconds means 30 actual seconds, measured by a clock, not a vibe. I'm not requesting much; I don't think I'm being unreasonable. I'm just a girl, deadlifting in front of a boy, asking him to count correctly. (Also, it turns out Tennessee has two different time zones, so that's on them.)
