
The strange divide in how Americans experience summer temperatures
The contiguous United States has endured another searing summer. June was unusually warm, and a major heatwave afflicted nearly a third of the population late in the month, and July offered little relief.
This is hardly a surprise: Summers in the Lower 48 are now 1.6 degrees Fahrenheit warmer on average than they were in 1896, according to the Environmental Protection Agency.
Summer is the season in which the effects of climate change are arguably most apparent: It's getting hotter, longer, more humid and more dangerous. Yet averages elide a complex reality: The country's experience of hotter summers — and thus one of the most visceral aspects of climate change itself — is fractured along geographic lines.
Summer is behaving very erratically as the country warms, with large changes in some regions, especially the West, and very muted ones in the central and southeast US.
Comparing summers of the past 30 years with a broad period between 1901 and 1960, the limited warming and even slight cooling in some locations becomes strikingly apparent.
It's dubbed the summertime 'warming hole.'
Scientists have acknowledged the warming hole's existence for some time, and sought to explain what is causing it. They are not at all convinced it will continue — frankly, many suspect it won't. But for now, it stands out enough that it requires an explanation, which many research papers have attempted to do.
'There are not too many places on the planet that are showing this, honestly,' said Joseph Barsugli, a climate researcher at the University of Colorado at Boulder who contributed to a recent study on the topic. 'It's pretty unique, I think.'
The pattern is so widely recognized among scientists who study warming trends in the US that it was prominently featured in the most recent installment of the US National Climate Assessment, which came out in 2023. Under the Trump administration, that document no longer resides at what was once its main government website, but it is still available here. It states that in summer, 'seasonal temperatures in some regions east of the Rockies have decreased,' although it adds that in the Southeast, a trend of cooling temperatures had 'recently reversed.'
This is an oddity amid a warming climate, as the general pattern is that the world's land areas are warming up more quickly than the oceans. Europe, for instance, is one of the fastest warming land areas on the planet.
But where you are on Earth determines the kind of climate change you get, and there's an enormous amount of variability.
Scientists are still trying to understand the reasons behind the bifurcated pattern — which they sometimes call a 'dipole' — in US summer warming rates between the? West and East.
It has been attributed to anything from the cooling effects of reforestation in the Southeast to 'corn sweat' in the Midwest tied to more productive agriculture. The 'sweating' refers to how corn crops transpire and put more water into the air, which then can fall as cooling rain.
'I think a piece of it is the land use change, and basically, the increase in agricultural intensification, which just kind of dumps water into the atmosphere,' said Jonathan Winter, a professor at Dartmouth University who has found that the warming 'hole' has actually been good for Midwest corn yields.
There's also reason to think that in the Southeast, as people abandoned less profitable farms during the 20th century and forests regrew, that too muted warming. Especially in the summer, forests draw up water through tree roots and transpire it into the air, making it more humid. In a recent paper, Mallory Barnes of Indiana University and colleagues find that this had a significant cooling effect.
Reforestation 'cools off big areas, not just small areas,' said Barnes.
On top of all that, some of the phenomenon has to do with the extreme temperatures associated with the Dust Bowl of the 1930s. That human-induced phenomenon skews the data extra-warm in that era for some parts of the US, making it hard to find a warming temperature trend today. Very warm summer temperatures in the 1930s are noticeable, for instance, in the temperature history of Tulsa County, Oklahoma.
The summer warming hole is also sensitive to how it is defined, and in recent decades, there are signs that it may be lessening, somewhat.
In southeastern states like Alabama, Georgia, Kentucky and Tennessee, summer temperatures were very cool in the 1960s and 1970s but have warmed considerably since then. It's just that they haven't necessarily risen much beyond where they were earlier in the 20th century – yet. In some places, like Tuscaloosa County, Alabama, the overall change remains in the direction of cooling:
Finally, the dearth of warming in summer doesn't necessarily mean regions are not warming over the whole year — summer only comprises a quarter of that and gets averaged in with everything else. Still, it mutes the overall change and is an anomaly that needs explaining.
It's also significant because summer is when warm temperatures are potentially the most dangerous. It's also the season we most feel and remember the experience of heat.
One thing the different hypotheses tend to have in common is an emphasis on the cooling effects of rainfall.
For instance, in one striking 2023 paper in the Journal of Climate, a group of leading researchers sought to understand why this 'warming hole' pattern has 'not disappeared,' as might have been expected, and why many climate models don't produce it.
One of their key findings was that an increase in rainfall is the explanation. The rain comes in during summer afternoons and cools temperatures down, keeping a lid on them.
'More rain or cloudier conditions have limited daytime temperatures from rising across a large part of the region,' said Zachary Labe, a climate scientist with Climate Central who was involved with the research.
Indeed, the study shows that nights in the region have been warming as expected. It's the days that have not really done so.
Ultimately, beyond local factors, some researchers are tracking the source of the changes farther afield. They believe a rainier pattern over the eastern US may be rooted in the behavior of the Pacific Ocean.
It's complex to decipher what may be happening, but generally, scientists believe ocean patterns can affect weather and climate in very distant regions. And that includes, perhaps, why one part of the US might be getting more rain while another gets drier.
The atmospheric alignment is similar to what has been called the positive phase of the 'Pacific North America' pattern, with a cool eastern US and a warm West, said Labe.
If ocean surface temperatures are warmer than normal 'in the central equatorial Pacific near the Dateline, no matter what time period you use, it appears you'll get a warming hole somewhere in the eastern US in summer due to increased clouds and precipitation,' said Gerald Meehl, a climate scientist at the National Center for Atmospheric Research who has studied the warming hole and its connection to the Pacific.
The relative lack of warming has been highlighted by some critics of various aspects of climate science. That includes John Christy, the state climatologist of Alabama and a professor at the University of Alabama in Huntsville. Christy recently co-authored an Energy Department report that did not deny the Earth is warming in general, but criticized 'exaggerated projections of future warming.' That document has mobilized a large number of climate researchers seeking to refute it.
'One can immediately see how determining the warming effect on Alabama of the extra [greenhouse gases] is a problem as the temperatures of the recent decades (which should be responding to the warming influence of extra [greenhouse gases]) have actually been cooler than earlier decades when this influence was essentially absent,' writes Christy.
And it's true Alabama shows up in the summer warming hole.
But because the lid on temperatures is so closely tied to rainfall, Barsugli warns that there's no guarantee it'll continue. The warming can leap back without something to suppress it.
'If you do have a very dry year, it probably means you'll break records in maximum temperatures,' he said. 'It's sort of a latent threat.'
It's also hard not to notice the summer warming hole primarily affects central and southern states that tend to vote Republican.
It's unlikely that temperatures themselves are significantly affecting people's ideology, however, said James Druckman, a political scientist at the University of Rochester who has studied the factors underlying beliefs about climate change.
'I don't think they're having a substantial impact on what people think. They might at the margin,' Druckman said. 'I think the politics have become too polarized or entrenched on this issue.'
Ultimately the question is whether the hole will finally be overcome by broader trends. Experts say it might, though they're not sure when.
'It's this tug of war between the increase in rainfall and the increase in temperature,' said Winter. 'At some point, I do expect that it will dissipate. It will still be cool relative to the rest of the United States. But relative to historical temperatures, I think you will eventually see climate change.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Associated Press
23 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Sethera Therapeutics Unveils Breakthrough Enzymatic Platform for Next-Generation Peptide Drugs
Salt Lake City, Utah--(Newsfile Corp. - August 21, 2025) - Sethera Therapeutics today announced publication in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) of peer-reviewed results describing an enzymatic crosslinking platform that forges durable thioether 'staples,' locking peptides into drug-like cyclic architectures. The platform works across a broad range of substrates, including sequences built entirely from non-natural building blocks, delivering exceptional versatility, expanding accessible chemical space, and enabling the design of next-generation peptide therapeutics. To view the full announcement, including downloadable images, bios, and more, click here. Key Takeaways: [ This image cannot be displayed. Please visit the source: ] Click image above to view full announcement. About Sethera Therapeutics Sethera Therapeutics is developing internal programs and collaborations that leverage its enzymatic macrocyclization platform to create more effective, stable, and deliverable peptide medicines. By opening vast new design space and offering precise architectural control, Sethera is positioned to help lead the next wave of innovation in peptide therapeutics. Contacts: Karsten Eastman, PhD, CEO 385-461-8528 [email protected] Source: Sethera Therapeutics To view the source version of this press release, please visit


Washington Post
3 hours ago
- Washington Post
Arctic melting slowed in the past two decades. Is that a good sign?
The melting of Arctic ice has been one of the most profound ripple effects from climate change, an impact often depicted with images of a lone polar bear stranded on a dwindling piece of sea ice. Now, a new study has found that ice has been melting slower over the past two decades across all seasons — even under a record hot atmosphere. From 2005 to 2024, scientists say Arctic sea ice has been declining at its slowest rate for any 20-year period since satellite measurements began in 1979. Using two different datasets, the team found that the melt rate over the past 20 years has been at least twice as slow as the longer-term rate. The slowdown is temporary, models show. It may continue for another 5 to 10 years, and afterward, sea ice may melt faster than the long-term average — offsetting any short reprieve that we may have had. 'Even though there is increased emissions [and] increased global temperatures, you can still get periods where you have very minimal loss of Arctic sea ice for sustained periods,' said Mark England, lead author of the study published Wednesday in Geophysical Research Letters. Here's what to know about variations in how ice declines in the Arctic. Let's boil the factors influencing Earth's climate down to a simple equation: humans and the planet's natural cycles. The most common driver in Earth's natural cycles is the difference in how much energy is exchanged between the ocean and atmosphere, said Alex Crawford, an assistant professor of environment and geography at University of Manitoba in Canada who was not involved in the study. 'There's always energy going back and forth between the atmosphere and ocean,' Crawford said. 'For various reasons, the oceans can store much, much more energy than the atmosphere.' In some years, he said the world's oceans take in a little more energy than normal, which will make the global atmosphere cooler than normal. If the oceans take in a little less energy than normal, then the global atmosphere will be warmer than normal. 'The most famous example of this is El Niño and La Niña, but there's also longer-term variability that can take place over several decades and either amplify (e.g., the 2010s) or weaken (e.g., the 2000s) the global warming trend,' Crawford said. 'This is all normal.' Over the past two decades, England said the planet's natural cycles perhaps helped create cooler waters around the Arctic that favored sea ice growth. Still, added heat from human activities has counteracted this growth and led to an overall deficit. For perspective, without climate change, these natural variations may have even caused the sea ice to grow in these past two decades, England said. Even under high greenhouse gas emissions, scientists have found that periodic slowdowns do occur. In the study, the team analyzed past climate models that showed these slower ice losses over the past two decades. They found these slowdowns occurred about 20 percent of the time in simulations. 'This isn't some infrequent rare event. This is something which should be expected as a part of the way that the climate system evolves,' said England, who conducted the study as a senior research fellow at the University of Exeter and is now an assistant professor at UC Irvine. In addition, the team found the current slowdown has a 50 percent chance of lasting for five more years and a 25 percent chance of lasting another 10 years. Polar scientist Alexandra Jahn, who was not involved in the research, said her own work showed slower Arctic sea ice melt occurred commonly across 10-year periods — even in the presence of human-caused warming. After this slowdown episode ends, Jahn said 'eventually we'll see a decline again.' Multiple factors make clear that climate change is not slowing down. Carbon dioxide concentrations are still at their highest levels in human history, growing at its fastest rate in our observed records. Earth's hottest years have all occurred in just the past decade, with multiple record years in the Arctic. 'If you look at global temperatures, they are definitely not slowing down,' England said. 'The debate now is whether they are speeding up.' Additionally, climate models showed these slowdowns are possible even under a continued warming world. Similar to the past two decades, Earth's natural cycles may favor more ice growth and slow down melting. Think of the Arctic sea ice trend like a ball rolling down a hill, explained climate scientist Ed Hawkins. The ball may hit some bumps that slow it down, but it will be heading toward the bottom as greenhouse gas emissions continue. Even though the rate of Arctic ice melt has slowed, ice is still declining in large quantities. Using two different datasets, study authors found the melt rate over the past 20 years has been around 0.35 and 0.29 million square kilometers per decade (depending the dataset). Since 2010, the team found the volume of ice loss amounted to about 0.4 million cubic kilometers cubed each decade. Overall, sea ice conditions at the end of the summer are at least 33 percent lower now than they were 45 years ago. Although the Arctic is low, England said it's better than the area being completely ice free. But he expects an accelerated loss once this period subsides. On average, he said sea ice loss has amounted to around 0.8 million square kilometers per decade over the long term. The subsequent ice melt could be 0.6 million square kilometers per decade faster than the broader long-term decline, the study found. 'This temporary period can't go on forever,' England said. 'It's bit like a kind of sugar rush. It feels good … and at some point it will kind of crash.'


Medscape
5 hours ago
- Medscape
High Adherence to Dupilumab in Chronic Rhinosinusitis
TOPLINE: An analysis of a real-world US practice revealed that a substantial proportion of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) who initiated dupilumab remained adherent at 12 months. Among those who discontinued therapy, over 40% resumed treatment within a short timeframe. METHODOLOGY: Researchers used real-world administrative claims and clinical data to analyze treatment patterns of 3318 patients (mean age, 47.1 years; 54.4% men) with CRSwNP who initiated dupilumab between June 2019 and December 2021. Persistence with dupilumab was defined as the interval from treatment initiation to either the end of a 60-day gap without a refill or a switch to another CRSwNP biologic (omalizumab or mepolizumab). Patients were considered adherent to dupilumab if they had a medication possession ratio ≥ 0.8 during the 12-month follow-up period. TAKEAWAY: Persistence rates among patients on dupilumab were 84.9% and 69.5% at 6 and 12 months, respectively, with an average follow-up duration of 375.6 days. Of 913 patients who discontinued dupilumab, 366 reinitiated the treatment after a median of 1.2 months, with reinitiation probabilities of 35.5% and 43.3% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Treatment adherence was 75.2%, with a high mean medication possession ratio of 1.06. IN PRACTICE: 'Future studies examining discontinuation reasons and persistence patterns across type 2 comorbidity and AERD [aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease] subgroups would enhance our understanding of dupilumab use in CRSwNP patients,' the authors of the study wrote. SOURCE: Zhixiao Wang, PhD, with Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, New York, was the corresponding author of the study, which was published online on August 15 in The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: Global. LIMITATIONS: Reasons for dupilumab discontinuation could not be determined, dispensing for comorbid asthma or atopic dermatitis was not captured, and the 1-year continuous enrollment requirement may have introduced selection bias. In addition, the study findings may not be generalizable to other publicly insured or uninsured patients, and reliance on a subjective gap definition in claims data may have resulted in imprecise records of discontinuation timing. DISCLOSURES: The study was funded by Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Three authors reported being employees of Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and two reported being employees of Sanofi; all five may hold stock or stock options in their respective companies. Three additional authors reported being employees of Analysis Group. One author reported serving on the advisory board and speakers bureau for both Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.