
Trump targets India-Russia friendship with penalty move, biggest reason for US President Trump's frustration was...,Bankrupt Pakistan...
'…Also, they have always bought a vast majority of their military equipment from Russia, and are Russia's largest buyer of ENERGY, along with China, at a time when everyone wants Russia to STOP THE KILLING IN UKRAINE – ALL THINGS NOT GOOD! INDIA WILL THEREFORE BE PAYING A TARIFF OF 25%, PLUS A PENALTY FOR THE ABOVE, STARTING ON AUGUST 1st. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER. MAGA!', the US President in a post on Truth Social said. What prompted Trump to impose penalties on India's Russia ties?
He stated that India has relied on Russia, in part, for nearly all of its military supplies and is one of Russia's largest buyers of Russian energy, alongside China. Meanwhile, India has consistently maintained that Russia is a trusted, all-weather ally that has supported it for decades.
In a recent confrontation with Pakistan, India had engaged its S-400 air defense system, purchased from Russia. The U.S., which in the past had refused to supply weapons to India, now expresses frustration over India's continued defense ties with Russia. Why is the US frustrated with India's continued purchase of Russian oil?
The announcement is being seen as a pressure tactic to get New Delhi to agree to demands made by the US, which has, in recent days, got favourable trade deals with major partners like Japan, the UK and the European Union.
The penalty was announced as India has made large purchases of oil and military equipment from Russia. India is the first country to face a penalty for Russian imports. Previously, Trump slapped high tariffs on China but refrained from levying any penalty despite Beijing being Russia's largest oil importer.
India's import of crude oil from Russia has risen from 0.2 per cent of total purchases before the Russia-Ukraine war to 35-40 per cent. New Delhi is the largest buyer of Russian oil after China.
Brahma Chellaney, India's leading strategist, noted on social media platform X that using trade measures as instruments in economic warfare – such as former President Trump's decision to impose a 25% duty on Indian goods and impose sanctions on India for its continued purchasing of Russian oil and thus the first use of U.S. 'secondary tariffs' – was further worsening already strained bilateral relations.
In a post on X(previously Twitter), Brahma Chellaney, India's leading strategist wrote,'Use of trade measures as economic warfare: Trump's decision to impose a 25% tariff on Indian goods — along with a punitive levy for India's continued purchase of Russian oil, in the first U.S. use of 'secondary tariffs' — threatens to further strain an already fraying bilateral relationship.'
'India refrained from retaliating against Trump's earlier tariffs on its auto parts, steel and aluminum exports, opting instead for negotiation (despite formally notifying the WTO of planned countermeasures). But with Washington pressing maximalist demands for unfettered access to India's vast and expanding market, progress on a bilateral trade deal has stalled,' he added.
According to the media reports, experts believe that the issue of buying Russian oil will not be something that India would be willing to compromise on simply because the United States asked. Earlier, External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar has said India will act in the interests of its citizens and will buy oil from whichever country sells it for the best price.
India has stood up for its choice to purchase Russian oil since the beginning of the war in Ukraine. In December 2022, Jaishankar commented that he recognized that there was a war in Ukraine and that Europe has its view of the conflict but the decisions Europe makes for its energy needs is its own business. However, he emphasized that Europe should not expect India to act differently while doing the same for itself. How does Pakistan's economic situation relate to Trump's anger towards India?
Hours after announcing 25 per cent tariffs with additional penalties on India, US President Donald Trump on Wednesday (local time) announced a trade deal with Pakistan, touting a joint initiative to develop oil reserves in India's terror-harbouring neighbour and even floated the idea that 'some day' Islamabad might sell oil to New Delhi. In a post on Truth Social, Trump stated that the United States and Pakistan are currently in the process of selecting the oil company for the partnership.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Deccan Herald
a few seconds ago
- Deccan Herald
Congress minister, MLAs meet Rajanna; BJP leader invites him to join party
Rajanna, who was Cooperative Minister was removed from the cabinet on Monday, following directions from the Congress high command, according to party sources. His recent comments on Congress leader Rahul Gandhi's 'votes theft' allegations during 2024 Lok Sabha polls, seems to have proved costly for him.


New Indian Express
a few seconds ago
- New Indian Express
588 defunct excise licences to be auctioned
BENGALURU: The state government is shortly going to auction around 588 defunct excise licences to scale up revenue collection and mobilise resources, informed sources told TNIE. Of the 588 odd licences that will go under the hammer 'soon', 288 are 11-C (government-owned Mysore Sales International Limited retail outlet) licences followed by 204 CL-2 (retail liquor shops) and 96 CL-9 (bars & restaurants), said sources on condition of anonymity. 'These licences have not been renewed for whatever reason, and have been lying defunct. The reason behind the auction is to bring them back into the market and generate revenue for the government. The auction is likely to fetch between Rs 500 crore and Rs 600 crore,' said sources. The Excise department is presently working out the modalities; from prospective allocation of these licences to the 40 excise districts in Karnataka to suggesting reserve or base price (minimum price of the bids) etc. The draft will soon be shared with the government to finetune it; address legal hurdles and set the base price of the bids. 'The base price may be pegged at 10 to 15 times higher than the Excise licence fee. No decision has been taken so far on this. The government will take the final decision. Majority of licences, especially CL-9, are likely to be allocated to Bengaluru,' added the sources. 'Out of the 288 MSIL licences under consideration for auction, 64 have not been renewed, rest were not utilised and are being considered to be brought back to the main pool,' said sources. Meanwhile, the liquor industry has responded to the proposed auction with caution. 'Our concern is that multinational companies may end up having an upper hand in these auctions with higher bids. They have the money power to incentivise sales of their brands, which no Indian company or brand will be able to match.


New Indian Express
a few seconds ago
- New Indian Express
Harvard and Trump administration are nearing settlement including a $500 million payment
WASHINGTON: Harvard University and the Trump administration are getting close to an agreement that would require the Ivy League university to pay $500 million to regain access to federal funding and to end investigations, according to a person familiar with the matter. The framework is still being sorted out with significant gaps to close, but both sides have agreed on the financial figure and a settlement could be finalized in coming weeks, according to the person who spoke to The Associated Press on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations. Harvard declined to comment. The agreement would end a monthslong battle that has tested the boundaries of the government's authority over America's universities. What began as an investigation into campus antisemitism escalated into an all-out feud as the Trump administration slashed more than $2.6 billion in research funding, ended federal contracts and attempted to block Harvard from hosting international students. The university responded with a pair of lawsuits alleging illegal retaliation by the administration after Harvard rejected a set of demands that campus leaders viewed as a threat to academic freedom. Details of the proposed framework were first reported by The New York Times. A $500 million payment would be the largest sum yet as the administration pushes for financial penalties in its settlements with elite universities. Columbia University agreed to pay the government $200 million as part of an agreement restoring access to federal funding, while Brown University separately agreed to pay $50 million to Rhode Island workforce development organizations. Details have not been finalized on where Harvard's potential payment would go, the person said. The Republican president has been pushing to reform prestigious universities that he decries as bastions of liberal ideology. His administration has cut funding to several Ivy League schools while pressing demands in line with his political campaign. None has been targeted as frequently or as heavily as Harvard, the richest US university with an endowment valued at $53 billion. More than a dozen Democrats in Congress who attended Harvard cautioned against a settlement on Aug. 1, warning the university it may warrant 'rigorous Congressional oversight and inquiry.' Capitulating to political demands, they said, would set a dangerous precedent across all of higher education.