We must count the real costs of nuclear power
The first is that the world needs more energy. Poor countries certainly do. But the clean-energy transition involves shifting to much more efficient technologies, such as electric vehicles and heat pumps. Many studies, including by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, show that these can enable rich countries to halve their energy use while improving living standards. The whole world could have western European lifestyles and still use less energy.
The second error is to argue that wind and solar energy cannot power a reliable electricity grid. A major study by the Royal Society showed that a system based on these resources with some long-duration storage is not only feasible, but will be cheaper than a system with any level of nuclear power. Nuclear power is a costly distraction from building an efficient and renewable system.Nick EyreEmeritus professor of energy and climate policy, University of Oxford
Your author, in his enthusiasm to highlight the cheaper costs to build new nuclear plants, failed to include the ever-increasing costs of decommissioning nuclear plants at the end of their working life. This must be included in any comparison of costs.
He also failed to mention the problems of vast amounts of highly dangerous radioactive nuclear waste and accidents, freak weather – such as the tsunamis causing radioactive leaks in Japan – and potential terrorist attacks.
Nuclear may not cause atmospheric carbon waste but it does create hugely toxic radioactive waste that remains dangerous for hundreds of thousands of years. A problem that threatens the health of all life.
He mentions that Finland has made a deep burial site for nuclear waste, and the probability of geological activity and disturbance has obviously been factored in. However this does not mean it is guaranteed to stand the tests of time – and stable rock formations found at the site in Finland may not be so readily found elsewhere.Kathleen AskewHayling Island, Hampshire
Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
11 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trial date set for alleged Palestine Action members accused of damaging planes at RAF base
Four people accused of damaging two Voyager aircraft at RAF Brize Norton in a demonstration allegedly carried out by members of Palestine Action will face trial in January 2027. Amy Gardiner-Gibson, 29, Jony Cink, 24, Daniel Jeronymides-Norie, 36, and Lewis Chiaramello, 22, appeared at the Old Bailey on Friday, and spoke only to confirm their names. Police previously said the incident in Oxfordshire on 20 June had caused about £7 million worth of damage to the aircraft. It has previously been alleged the defendants had been heavily involved in Palestine Action at the time. On the same day they were charged, MPs backed the Government's move to ban the direct action group Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation. Legislation passed in the Commons as MPs voted 385 to 26, majority 359, in favour of proscribing the group under the Terrorism Act 2000. Counter Terrorism Policing South East (CTPSE) charged the defendants with conspiracy to enter a prohibited place knowingly for a purpose prejudicial to the safety or interests of the United Kingdom, and conspiracy to commit criminal damage, under the Criminal Law Act 1977. On Friday, the defendants appeared at the Old Bailey amid heightened security, with a timetable set for the course of the case. Watched by members of the public in a packed public gallery, the defendants spoke only to confirm their identities, with one mouthing 'I love you' to his supporters. As the prosecution have claimed the case has a 'terrorist connection', it was heard in the terrorism list before Mrs Justice Cheema-Grubb, with the court told a provision trial date had been identified for 18 January 2027. Prosecutor Jonathan Polnay KC accepted that was 'obviously a considerable distance away' and there was uncertainty at this stage how long any trial would take. Mrs Justice Cheema-Grubb said the 2027 trial date meant an 'inordinately long time' for the four young people to wait in custody. She said: 'The sooner the real issues in this case are identified the better for everyone, particularly in fixing the trial date.' The senior judge confirmed the 2027 trial date at the Old Bailey but said she would review it at a plea hearing on January 16 next year.
Telegraph
12 minutes ago
- Telegraph
China's ‘tank boats' and a Royal Navy carrier in the Pacific: Keys to UK security
There is a perpetual battle being fought across Whitehall between those for whom foreign policy stops at Dover and those who understand the global nature of trade and alliances and the requirement to secure them. Not surprisingly, most naval officers are in the latter group. We tend to think that the UK should be able to project power far away for many reasons. To begin with, foreign trade in goods and services represents more than 60 per cent of our GDP. Nearly all those goods move by ship or seabed connections, and nearly all those services are nowadays dependent on undersea connections too. Without maritime power, most of our economy is hostage to fortune – it can only function with the consent of others. Then there is the matter of alliances. It's best, of course, to deter enemies and not have wars. Strong alliances make for strong deterrence: but this means that allies must be able to defend each other, not just themselves. The ability to take action away from home is necessary here. And we belong to other alliances than just Nato: we have just signed a new defence treaty with Australia, for example. There are others in the Indo-Pacific who should be able to rely on our assistance, as we have been able to rely on theirs. We should not forget Michael Joseph Savage, New Zealand's prime minister in 1939, who made this statement when Britain declared war on Germany: 'Both with gratitude for the past and confidence in the future, we range ourselves without fear beside Britain. Where she goes, we go. Where she stands, we stand.' Friends like that are worth defending when it's their turn to be in trouble. Australia and New Zealand are also both part of the 'Five Eyes' intelligence alliance along with us, the US and Canada. If you don't think the Five Eyes alliance is important to the UK's security, I can only put it like this: you are wrong. But still, even today's world of daily cyber-attacks on the UK and weekly attacks on undersea infrastructure in UK waters and in the Baltic has yet to convince many people of our need to be able to take action at a distance. Even the war in Europe and the movements of dark fleet shipping through seas near and far to fund it does not seem to have registered: most of the party in government think that welfare payments are more important. Showing that interest is inversely proportional to distance, contested sea lanes in the Black and Red Seas, the High North and most recently, the Strait of Hormuz attract even less interest. By the time you get to the Indo-Pacific, studied indifference has often been replaced by a more vocal 'nothing to do with us'. But there's a lot going on out there. Chinese People's Liberation Army 'tank boats' have just been conducting high-speed amphibious beach landings and live-fire drills across the strait from Taiwan. These appear to be ZTD-05 amphibious light tanks which can be launched from a variety of vessels out at sea and then drive up the beach. As watercraft their low freeboard and top weight would both give me sleepless nights, and as tanks they are probably not that great either. You would only have them if they were essential to some mission you wanted to carry out: and there is really only one mission for China's ZTD-05s. There are those who say that China will never invade Taiwan, but it's hard to believe this given the sheer amount of military equipment they are making which can have no other purpose. And Taiwan does matter to us, in fact. We still (just) remain among the top ten manufacturing nations in the world. One reason for this is companies like Arm of Cambridge, which expects its chips to account for more than 50 per cent of the entire world's data centre CPU market this year. Almost all mobile phones include at least one Arm chip. But Arm is a 'fabless' chip designer: its chips are actually made by other companies, an awful lot of them in Taiwan. At roughly the same time as the tank boat exercises, Taiwan was conducting the 41 st annual Han Kuang wargames designed specifically to strengthen defences against invasion from the mainland. In the longest and largest version yet, 22,000 reservists were mobilised. Initially the drills were focused on how to counter the actions of the Chinese Coast Guard and maritime militia whose harassment of ships across the region continues to get worse: this past week has just seen a People's Liberation Army Navy Type 815G electronic surveillance ship, escorted by a China Coast Guard cutter Zhaojun-class 4203, intercepted in Philippine waters. The Taiwanese exercise then simulated escalation, finishing with a full scale anti-landing operation. The PLA practising this exact operation at the same time just across the way presumably acted as a useful motivational training aid. Meanwhile the 2025 version of the biennial Exercise Talisman Sabre is underway. Some 35,000 soldiers, sailors and airmen from 19 countries, among them our very own Carrier Strike Group, are involved. Our carrier capability has its flaws and failings, but HMS Prince of Wales is still home right now to the largest carrier-borne group of fifth generation jets in the world. The exercise will include the usual array of anti-submarine, surface and air drills, live firings, amphibious landings and air combat operations. Lieutenant General Joel B Vowell, Deputy Commanding General, US Army Pacific, summarised it thus: 'It's effectively a deterrent mechanism, because our ultimate goal, part two here, is no war.' This is alliance in action. So in fact Operation Highmast – our deployment of our Carrier Strike Group to the far side of the world – is very important to our economy and our security here in Britain. Sending up to 4,500 of our service people and all their kit across the world comes with a bill, of course. Much of that cost will only appear after the deployment ends as hard worked ships, aircraft and personnel all need recuperation. If you don't get the importance of the Indo-Pacific, of Taiwan and Australia and New Zealand and so on to the UK, despite the things above I've outlined – and the thousands that I haven't – then that cost is all you will see. The point of this article is to show how interwoven the world's oceans and nations are. A Royal Navy which can (or does) only operate in the North Atlantic or the Channel is not doing the job this nation needs it to. The Houthis have successfully forced much of the world's trade out of the Red Sea onto the much longer route around Africa: that includes a lot of our trade. Even just talk of the Strait of Hormuz closing affects world oil and liquefied gas prices – and that includes a lot of gas that we (and our friends) need to replace Russian pipeline supplies. The ability of Western navies to project power not just into the Taiwan Strait but the Malacca Strait figures large in strategic thinking in Beijing: more than half of China's imports, including the great bulk of its seaborne oil, come through Malacca. This is why China is building a powerful blue-water navy: they know that such a navy is a vital part of their national security. We need to re-learn the same lesson.
Telegraph
12 minutes ago
- Telegraph
London's crime epidemic is far worse than people realise
I want to defend London; I really do. But it's not an easy task – which is strange for a city that has been voted the best in the world for a tenth consecutive year. I can only imagine that the team behind 'World's Best Cities' hasn't been to the capital. Or perhaps they don't have eyes or ears. Whatever it is, it doesn't matter. What matters is that London is a mess, and it seems to be getting worse. Each new week presents a fresh horror to sully our capital city's once-great reputation. This week it's crime – that old chestnut. We now know it's far worse than people realise. A recent study by Claire Waxman, London's first independent victims' commissioner, found that a mere 40 per cent of crimes in London are reported. Of that number, a further 40 per cent of victims withdraw from the justice process before a charging decision is made. Why? Because they don't believe they can get a conviction. They've lost faith in the criminal justice system. We all have. The figures are even worse for domestic abuse victims: six out of ten withdraw from the justice process altogether. That figure rises to 74 per cent in cases of rape related to domestic abuse. According to Waxman's report, police are actively dissuading victims from pursuing charges. But the Met aren't entirely to blame. The courts are also a stinking mess. Right now, there are 77,000 cases waiting to be heard. One hundred cases won't go to trial until 2029. That's four years until a victim – a person courageous enough to step forward – can experience any semblance of justice. For want of a better phrase, you're taking the proverbial. I worry about what this means for London's future. The current situation is unsustainable. The public is tired. In Waxman's report, one domestic abuse victim was quoted as saying: 'There have been cases of people being stabbed to death and we have their faces on CCTV but they still don't get a conviction, so this won't go anywhere.' Quite literally, criminals are getting away with murder. But whilst bemoaning the state of the criminal justice system is understandable, it doesn't get the victims any closer to justice. And I fear that people will start to take justice into their own hands. This isn't a good thing. A vigilante group is only one false accusation away from becoming a lynch mob. Besides, we shouldn't be forced to protect ourselves. We pay into the police precept for a reason: so that the police can handle the law for us. London is already hard enough: rising rents, shoddy transport, polluted skies. The last thing we need is to start spending our evenings wandering around the streets with baseball bats in our hands and thoughts of a brighter tomorrow. This isn't The Purge. But London certainly isn't Kansas anymore, Toto. A pint is £8. The Tube network is like the arteries of a very ill man. A room the size of an airing cupboard that smells of urine and the Gruffalo's armpit will set you back £1000 a month. Having your phone nicked is a rite of passage. And now it seems like stabbing someone to death will get you nothing more than a slap on the wrist and a tousle of the hair. But complaining about the declining state of London will only get us so far. Instead, we should be asking the only question that matters: what are our bodies of power going to do to fix it? And when?
