
British Steel on a razor's edge: inside Starmer's Scunthorpe rescue mission
By next weekend, a cargo ship carrying more than 50,000 tonnes of coking coal from Australia will dock at Immingham. In other circumstances, its arrival would be unremarkable. But the moment Navios Alegria reaches the Lincolnshire port will be the culmination of the government's high-wire act to keep the UK's last steel furnaces running.
MPs were recalled from their Easter recess last Saturday to pass emergency legislation handing the government control over British Steel, which operates Britain's last two blast furnaces capable of producing steel from scratch using coke and iron ore.
Long-running talks between the government and Jingye Group, the Chinese conglomerate that owns the Scunthorpe plant, broke down 10 days ago after executives declined an offer of £500m to keep the furnaces running. Ministers became convinced that Jingye bosses were determined to shut them down come what may.
Senior figures in Downing Street and Whitehall believe the company's decisions were motivated by a desire in Beijing to make the UK a dumping ground for Chinese steel exports, particularly in the context of Donald Trump's tariffs.
'It became clear that when they saw the writing was on the wall they tried to shut down our steelmaking,' one senior official told colleagues. Another senior government source told the Guardian: 'They decided to shut it down because China needs to dump its steel somewhere.' Jingye has argued the plant is no longer financially sustainable and running a loss of £700,000 a day.
Keir Starmer asked to receive hourly updates between his engagements on Thursday of last week after the talks with Jingye broke down. In the early hours of Friday, he was informed that ownership of the cargo on Navios Alegria had been transferred from British Steel to Jingye – a sign that the Chinese company intended to sell off the coal needed to keep the blast furnace running. Unions have claimed that Jingye had turned away the Amstel Tiger, a second cargo ship that was carrying coking coal to Scunthorpe and had set off from the US.
The prime minister convened cabinet at 9am on Friday and told ministers they would gather again for a 15-minute meeting at lunchtime. Aides say he was concerned about the prospect of steelworkers being caught between the government and Jingye's orders, and that he asked the attorney general, Richard Hermer, to look at how workers defying Jingye bosses could be protected in that scenario. He also resolved to recall parliament on Saturday and travel to Scunthorpe in a show of support.
The other overriding concern in No 10 was ensuring the delivery of the Navios Alegria's cargo. Starmer was convinced the move to transfer ownership of it away from British Steel was illegal. While government lawyers pored over the details, aides drew up a plan to divert the vessel – which was travelling up the coast of Liberia and was due to refuel in Spain – to Gibraltar, on the basis that if it docked at a British port its cargo could be seized.
This gambit, which would have required some diplomatic manoeuvring with Spanish authorities, was nicknamed 'Steelback' by aides – a reference to the nickname of the British army regiment that received battle honours during the siege of Gibraltar in 1779.
Officials also drew up contingency plans to source coking coal from other suppliers such as commodity traders and Tata Steel. By Saturday morning when Jonathan Reynolds, the business secretary, was addressing the Commons everything hung in the balance.
'Commodities traders were telling us they couldn't get there on time,' a senior No 10 source said. 'No one knew what would happen with the Liberian vessel [Navios Alegria]. We were on edge.' There were suggestions that the navy would need to be deployed to escort shipments of coking coal to Immingham.
Sign up to First Edition
Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
A breakthrough came on Saturday afternoon in the unlikely form of a legal wheeze. Government lawyers overseen by Hermer concluded that the person who had signed away the Navios Alegria cargo did not have the relevant permissions to do so. This discovery – which meant the cargo legally belonged to British Steel and would therefore soon be under the government's control – shifted the mood in Downing Street. Starmer was in Scunthorpe when he was given the news. At 6pm, the government's emergency bill received royal assent and gave ministers powers to exercise control over British Steel.
On Tuesday, shipments of coking coal and iron ore from the US completed their comparatively uneventful journey to Immingham after the government settled the payment to deliver the supplies needed to keep the furnaces running.
Downing Street figures say they took the decisions they did because amid an escalating global trade war and European rearmament, producing steel in the UK is a matter of national security. Officials believe the crisis may lead to a reassessment of what is deemed critical national infrastructure. Steel is not, but unions have called for a rethink in the wake of Trump's 25% tariffs on steel imports.
Serious questions remain over the future of the Scunthorpe plant and the beleaguered British steel industry. The two blast furnaces at Scunthorpe are nearing the end of their lives. The cleaner electric arc furnaces that are slated to replace them would not produce steel from scratch, but instead smelt existing steel scrap. The government is due to publish a steel strategy within weeks, including a verdict on whether the UK needs to produce virgin steel.
In the meantime, the government is looking for private sector investment to avoid the need to nationalise British Steel in the longer term – a route the Conservatives were keen to avoid in 2019 when Jingye was the only bidder. If no others emerge this year, ministers will face mounting questions about the cost to the taxpayer.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
24 minutes ago
- The Sun
Frantic moment CNN reporter is hauled away by cops live on air at LA protests as anchor screams ‘what's going on?!'
COPS have detained a CNN reporter live on-air as he covered the tense Los Angeles protests. Anchor Laura Coates yelled out, "What's going on?" after watching national correspondent Jason Carroll being led away with his hands behind his back. 7 7 7 Carroll had been covering the fourth day of protests over Donald Trump's crackdown on illegal immigration when he suddenly lost touch with Coates on Thursday evening. "Jason? What's going on? I hear you. What happened Jason?" Coates said live on air. "I am being detained," said Carroll in the distance as his cameraman filmed several feet behind him. Carroll then chatted with the cops, who confirmed that he wasn't being arrested. "We're letting you go, but you can't come back," said the officer before threatening to arrest Carroll if he returned to the scene. The two appeared to have a friendly interaction before Carroll was put behind a wall of cops and lost touch with Coates. Later, Carroll explained that the officers didn't put him in zip ties but did grab both of his hands and told him, "you are being detained." The reporter was stunned by the sudden change as he had been roaming the streets of Los Angeles covering the protests since that morning. "It is something that I wasn't expecting simply because we have been out here all day," he said. "Normally, the officers [...] realize the press is there doing a job." Trump sends another 2k National Guard to riot-ravaged LA as chaos spreads with arrests in NYC & Texas Carroll was led away around the same time that officials told demonstrators that they had to leave or else they would be arrested. They cuffed a number of protesters and charged them with failure to disperse to finally break up Thursday's demonstration. 7 7 PROTESTS RAGE ON The protests, which started over the weekend, heated up after Trump sent around 2,000 National Guard troops to help keep the peace, despite California Governor Gavin Newsom warning him to back off. Newsom claims that the peaceful protests criticizing Trump's immigration crackdown turned into a protest once the troops arrived. Meanwhile, Trump has insisted that Los Angeles would have "burned to the ground" if he hadn't sent the soldiers, as he plans to send 700 Marines to the city. "If I didn't 'SEND IN THE TROOPS' to Los Angeles the last three nights, that once beautiful and great City would be burning to the ground right now," Trump wrote on Truth Social Tuesday morning. California has filed a lawsuit against Trump, accusing him of breaking the 10th Amendment when he sent in the guard. The protests have spawned more protests across the country, and hundreds of participants have been arrested. Trump has vowed to maintain law and order despite Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass begging him to pause the ICE raids. "There is a real fear in Los Angeles right now. Parents, workers, grandparents, young people scared to go about their daily lives," she said. "We are a city of immigrants. Washington is attacking our people, our neighborhoods and our economy." 7


ITV News
27 minutes ago
- ITV News
The 'nuclear gold rush': What could Sizewell C bring to coastal community?
Ten miles down the road from Britain's biggest building site lies the market town of Bridgwater. A historic centre of trade at the mouth of Somerset's chief river, it is famed for hosting the UK's oldest carnival celebrating Guy Fawkes' failed plot to blow up the Houses of Parliament in 1605. Now there is a boom going on - but not everybody is feeling the benefit. Hinkley Point C, where construction work on the two giant nuclear reactors is about to reach its peak, has brought thousands of workers to the local area. Bridgwater high street is often awash with high-vis. The bed-and-breakfasts' midweek trade has been revitalised. If you're looking for a haircut, a bet, a takeaway or a pint, you've got plenty of options. Becky Webber has run The Fountain Inn for 14 years. The 'Hinkley effect' means it is as busy as ever. "The town's booming with people now," she says. "It does have a massive impact having Hinkley down here. "It does help us hugely, especially after Covid as well. If we didn't have that extra group we would have struggled." In a cafe overlooking the River Parrett, I'm pointed in the direction of Alan. He came here to work on Hinkley Point A in 1963 and has stayed ever since. But he insists the town hasn't seen the benefits it could have from its nuclear neighbour. The pensioner is being served by 28-year-old Josh. He still lives with his parents - trying to buy his first home is proving difficult and the 'Hinkley effect' means renting is out of the question. "People are constantly coming and going," he says. "Landlords are just looking to rent out to these Hinkley workers where they can charge a lot of money and get a lot of money in. "The houses go so fast now. They can be up for sale and go within a week because people see it as a goldmine. It's made the housing market difficult for first-time buyers, for sure." So what happens when the workers disappear? That's a question posed by Roy Pumfrey. He's been campaigning against Hinkley Point C since before I was born. Sporting a Panama hat and showing off a car registration plate that reads 'N002 HPC', Roy tells me can see the cranes of Hinkley from his bedroom window in nearby Cannington. "If you've jumped aboard the gravy train and are part of the golden side of the gold rush economy then you're getting a once-in-a-lifetime boost to your salary," he says. "But it won't last." EDF, the French firm behind Hinkley, disagrees. "There is an amazing legacy from this project," says Andrew Cockcroft, the company's head of stakeholder relations and social impact. "Hinkley Point C is a driver of growth and productivity here. We've seen thousands of people locally get trained into higher skilled, higher paid jobs." EDF's annual 'socio-economic impact' report is packed with numbers. It says Hinkley Point C is supporting 26,000 jobs across Britain. More than £5bn has been spent with local businesses. There are 4,600 British firms in the project's supply chain. And more than 1,500 apprentices have been trained - people like 22-year-old Megan Ellicott. She grew up in Bridgwater and is coming to the end of a three-year pipe-fitting apprenticeship. "I hope to stay here," she says. "But, possibly in the future, there will be other power stations like Sizewell. Hopefully over time I'll be able to move and go there." Sizewell C will be an "exact replica" of Hinkley C, says Mr Cockcroft. "A replicated project, making no changes, reduces cost and increases efficiency so we can make sure that the nuclear of the future is cheaper and also faster to build," he no doubt, those in Suffolk who've had one eye on Somerset will have a list of questions.


STV News
28 minutes ago
- STV News
UK sanctions Israeli ministers over Gaza comments
Israeli government ministers Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich have been sanctioned by the UK government for 'inciting violence against the Palestinian people'. The sanction means their assets will be frozen, and the men will be banned from entering the UK. The UK is taking action alongside Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Norway. In a joint statement with foreign ministers from the four other countries who have announced sanctions, foreign secretary David Lammy said the two senior Israelis had incited 'serious abuses of Palestinian human rights'. The statement added: 'We have engaged the Israeli government on this issue extensively, yet violent perpetrators continue to act with encouragement and impunity. 'These actions are not acceptable. This is why we have taken action now – to hold those responsible to account.' Foreign Secretary David Lammy announces sanctions against Israeli ministers Ben-Gvir and SmotrichLammy says the men 'have been inciting violence against Palestinian people for months' He reiterated the government's support for a two-state solution — ITVPolitics (@ITVNewsPolitics) June 10, 2025 David Lammy has described Israel's actions as 'monstrous' and condemned the actions of 'extremist' settlers in the West Bank, saying Netanyahu's administration has a responsibility to intervene to halt their actions. In a sign of mounting pressure on Israel over its actions in Gaza, last month the UK suspended trade talks with Israel and sanctioned West Bank settlers. Lammy said: 'We have suspended negotiations with this Israeli government on a new free trade agreement.' Adding that the UK is reviewing its co-operation with the Israeli administration, he said: 'The Netanyahu government's actions have made this necessary.' The sanctions were sparked by a series of comments made by the two men about Gaza – finance minister Smotrich recently said he would allow 'not even a grain of wheat' into Gaza, that 'Gaza will be entirely destroyed', and Palestinian people 'will leave in great numbers to third countries.' Security minister Ben-Gvir has also said Israel should 'encourage the voluntary emigration of the residents of Gaza', and that 'there is no need to bring in aid'. The government has been drawing up the plans to sanction the two men for months. Ben-Gvir also called for the al-Aqsa mosque in Jerusalem to be replaced with a synagogue. Israel's government responded to the sanctions saying they were 'outrageous'. Minister of foreign affairs Gideon Sa'ar's said: 'We were informed about the UK decision to include two of our Ministers on the British Sanctions list. 'It is outrageous that elected representatives and members of the government are subjected to these kind of measures. 'I discussed it earlier today with PM Netanyahu and we will hold a special government meeting early next week to decide on our response to this unacceptable decision.' Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country