In Our View: Too long for Dawson
One can look at Google Earth of our area and find home swimming pools dotted throughout the community. Not every family can afford to have a swimming pool in their back yard. We can recall the glory days of Southside swimming pool in Ashland.
After its closure in the early 1990s, that left Ashland with just one municipal swimming pool. Dawson Pool is located off Central Avenue near the Ashland Town Center Mall.
The pool did not open in 2024. Despite promises from city officials it would open later in the summer, it never did.
At the last city commission meeting, Parks and Recreation Director Sean Murray gave an update on progress of pool repairs.
Right now is the time to be working on a municipal swimming pool. Murray indicated the majority of the repairs have been concluded. He anticipates an on-time opening Memorial Day weekend.
We realize this is right in the middle of winter. Most of our minds are not focused on swimming. Too many area residents don't have access to swimming for recreational purposes. In 2024, Ashlanders wanting to use the pool had to meet at the pool and take a city bus to the Flatwoods municipal pool.
Ashland has been working on consolidating expenses. In Washington, they have Department of Government Efficiency, aka DOGE. It is led by non-elected officials. Ashland is taking a different approach with elected officials and newly appointed city manager, Tony Grubb.
One of the items that recently caught our eye Is an elimination of a $300,000 IT contract. Grubb, working with city department heads, determined it would be more cost-efficient to have some of the police officers and a firefighter perform this task. Those departments have personnel trained in IT.
We realize that that's not necessarily the role of a police or fire department. At any rate, saving $300,000 is an efficiency.
This is the kind of thinking local governments need in today's world. Soon to disappear will be Covid funding, and the infrastructure funding from a federal program.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Benny Johnson asks Karoline Leavitt if Trump would 'consider giving the Presidential Medal of Freedom to ‘Big Balls.''
Benny Johnson, a popular online MAGA personality, floated the idea of awarding Edward 'Big Balls' Coristine, a 19-year-old former Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) staffer who was allegedly assaulted by juvenile suspects in a recent attempted carjacking in Washington, D.C., the Presidential Medal of Freedom during the White House press briefing on Tuesday. 'Given the heroic actions of a member of this administration just a few blocks from this building, will the president consider giving the Presidential Medal of Freedom to 'Big Balls?'' Johnson asked White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt during the briefing. Johnson was given the briefing invite as part of the White House press office's 'new media' seat initiative to give more right-wing influencers and journalists prominent seats and opportunities to ask questions during the briefings. 'I haven't spoken to him about that, but perhaps it's something he would consider,' Leavitt replied. 'I'll ask him and get back to you, Benny. Thanks for being here.' Last week, President Trump posted a photo of Coristine apparently taken after the attempted carjacking, showing him sitting up on the ground, shirtless, with his face, chest, and pants stained with what appeared to be blood. 'Crime in Washington, D.C., is totally out of control,' Trump claimed in the post, and suggested that minors involved in such crimes should be prosecuted as adults. The suspects in the Coristine incident are underage. 'The Law in D.C. must be changed to prosecute these 'minors' as adults, and lock them up for a long time, starting at age 14,' the president said.
New York Post
10 hours ago
- New York Post
Sean Duffy recounts spat with Elon Musk over cutting air traffic controllers: 'The Senate confirmed me'
Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy opened up on the latest episode of 'Pod Force One' about his dispute with tech mogul Elon Musk over the billionaire's push to slash headcount in his department. Duffy told The Post's Miranda Devine in the new episode, out Wednesday, that he drew a red line at the prospect of firing so-called 'safety-critical positions,' including air traffic controllers. Every week, Post columnist Miranda Devine sits down for exclusive and candid conversations with the most influential disruptors in Washington. Subscribe here! 'I get along well enough with Elon,' Duffy began. 'He has a number of equities that come through DOT,' referring to Musk's SpaceX and Tesla companies. However, Duffy emphasized that 'Elon — or no one else — is the Secretary. I am. The Senate confirmed me.' 4 Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy told 'Pod Force One' that he took issue with Elon Musk's push to cut the headcount at his department. Ron Sachs – CNP for NY Post 'I think it might not have been intentional, might have been ham-handed [like] some of the requests that were made by [the Department of Government Efficiency], but my position was, we are not going to fire air traffic controllers.' 'Safety critical positions are not going to be fired within the Department of Transportation. We can do things more efficiently … but we are not going to fire air controllers. And so we had a little back and forth, [but] we got along very well after that. I think the papers made it a bigger deal than it was.' Duffy told Devine the dispute with Musk took place before the Jan. 29 midair collision between a Black Hawk helicopter and a regional jet near Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport which killed 67 people. 'Elon is an amazing innovator. He's creative. And again, there's a lot to learn from him, but I run this department, and again, I didn't want someone on the outside trying to tell me to fire people,' the secretary explained. 'Had I done that, had I actually fired controllers, oh, my—think what the liberal media would do to me. I would be slaughtered. We didn't, thank God, but [this] is why, throughout government, you have to make sure that the secretaries are the ones who are driving the policy.' 4 Elon Musk had clashed with multiple cabinet officials during his quest to shrink government bloat. AP 4 Duffy told The Post's Miranda Devine that he drew a red line over Musk cutting 'safety critical positions' like air traffic controllers. Ron Sachs – CNP for NY Post 4 Duffy praised Musk as an 'amazing innovator' — but stressed that he alone makes decisions about his department. Ron Sachs – CNP for NY Post Up until the end of May, Musk was the driving force behind the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), a cost-cutting initiative across the federal bureaucracy. During that time, Musk clashed with numerous cabinet officials, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, with former Trump White House strategist Steve Bannon claiming last month that Musk shoulder-checked Bessent 'like a rugby player.' Full Episode In early June, Musk and Trump had an epic falling-out over the One Big Beautiful Bill Act with the South Africa-born billionaire warning the legislation was 'utterly insane and destructive.' The space and electric car guru had been incensed that the megabill was projected to dramatically increase the national deficit, venting that it 'undermines the work that the DOGE team is doing.' 'I don't know if Elon was concerned about being able to access critical minerals from China, and if he was angry at the president for going after China and putting tariffs on China that can affect the critical minerals that he makes batteries with. I don't know if it was EV subsidies,' Duffy mused. 'I don't know what happened internally, but I would tell you this, the president couldn't be more generous and couldn't have been nicer to him.'
USA Today
a day ago
- USA Today
DC mayor says Trump takeover shows why US capital should be 51st state
Washington, DC Mayor Muriel Bowser is advocating for the city to become the 51st state after President Donald Trump announced the federal government would take control of the local Metropolitan Police Department. Bowser, who has been the city's mayor since 2015, made the remarks during an appearance on Charlamagne Tha God's radio show 'The Breakfast Club' on Tuesday, Aug. 12. 'It's times like this when America needs to know why your nation's capital, a place where 700,000 tax-paying Americans live, should be the 51st state,' said Bowser on the radio show. '[Trump] wants to send the message to cities that if he can get away with this in Los Angeles, if he can get away with this in DC, he can get away with it in New York, or Baltimore or Chicago, or any other place where millions of people live, work and are doing everything the right way.' On Monday, Aug. 11, Trump announced he'd be invoking Section 740 of the Home Rule Act to take control of the police department. The 1973 law grants Washington, DC residents limited authority to govern themselves. Under the law, the president can take control of local police for two days, but any additional time would require congressional notice or an amendment to the existing law. After 30 days, Trump would need congressional approval to retain control of DC police. Trump has touted the idea of taking over the police force since 2020, when the Black Lives Matter protests were taking hold of the city, and has since voiced his criticisms of Washington, DC leadership. His recent attempt to crack down on violent crime came after a Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) employee was assaulted during an attempted carjacking on Aug. 3. 'We're going to take our capital back,' said Trump during a news briefing at the White House on Aug. 11. 'Our capital city has been overtaken by violent gangs and bloodthirsty criminals, roving mobs of wild youth, drugged-out maniacs and homeless people.' The president also said he'd be deploying National Guard troops into the city as part of the effort. Bowser refuted the characterization that violent crime in the city has gotten out of control and disagreed with the president's actions. It's the first time a president has taken control of local police. According to data from the Metropolitan Police Department, violent crime in DC has fallen by 26% compared to the same period last year. 'The numbers just don't justify the action,' said Bowser. She said it's 'not a good idea' for local police, who have gained the trust of city residents, to be used in a way that makes communities fearful. Bowser said it appears the president is targeting urban areas where he is less popular, including DC. Trump, she said, is 'very aware' of the number of DC residents who voted for him in the 2024 election and has, in turn, taken an aggressive stance. About 6% of city residents voted for the president in the 2024 election. The president has named other liberal-leaning cities, like Chicago and Los Angeles, as places where he might send federal troops next. Charlamagne Tha God asked Bowser if she believes Trump's actions could be a 'trial run for a police state.' While she didn't directly respond to the question, she said: 'It is a step in fascism when the federal government can bigfoot sovereign states. 'Right now... he's trying to make it normal where citizens say the federal government should overtake local policing and try to make that a normal thing, so if he tries it in other places, people will be desensitized to it.' She continued: 'We can't be desensitized to it because it's not normal.' Michelle Del Rey is a trending news reporter at USA TODAY. Reach her at mdelrey@
