Islamabad traders defy strike call
The federal capital witnessed uninterrupted commercial activity, with residents engaged in routine shopping throughout the day.
All major markets, shopping malls, commercial centres, and supermarkets — including Jinnah Super, G-9 Markaz, Blue Area, G-10, and I-8 — remained open, and stores operated normally.
Neither the Islamabad Chamber of Commerce and Industry (ICCI) nor any major traders' alliance announced participation in the strike call given by Karachi and Lahore chambers against tax measures and arrest powers of the federal tax authority.
According to the Chamber, recent negotiations with the government addressed the concerns of the business community, and assurances were given to resolve key issues. As a result, the decision was made to keep businesses open in Islamabad.
In other parts of the country, however, factions of the trader community did call for protests and strikes, citing concerns over the FBR's increased powers, particularly the crackdown on non-filers and the broad authority granted to field officers to conduct raids. These measures, they argue, are fuelling uncertainty and distrust among business owners.
Nevertheless, no strike-related closures or demonstrations were reported anywhere in Islamabad.
On Friday, talks between the government and the Federation of Pakistan Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FPCCI) had concluded on a positive note, calling for the postponement of the nationwide shutter-down strike initially scheduled for Saturday. However, Karachi Chamber of Commerce and Industry (KCCI) maintained its call for a strike, citing unresolved concerns with the Finance Act 2025.
A special committee was formed to address the grievances of traders regarding the controversial Finance Act. The committee, chaired by Prime Minister's Special Assistant on Industries, Haroon Akhtar, convened with representatives from various chambers of commerce to discuss the amendments in the act.
The negotiations saw progress, with a consensus reached on several amendments. Among the most notable changes was the decision to remove Clause 9 of the act, which had been a key point of contention for traders. A proposal to amend Article 37A was also tabled, with the government agreeing to review it further.
Despite these developments, KCCI President Jawed Bilwani expressed that while their demands were largely accepted, no written assurance was provided.
In contrast, the FPCCI, led by Atif Ikram Sheikh, reached an agreement with the government to call off the nationwide strike. He thanked the authorities for their serious engagement and expressed hope that the prime minister would approve the proposed amendments.
Effect in other cities
Meanwhile, the strike led to widespread partial and complete market closures across Pakistan on Saturday. The strike divided traders into opposing camps. Major business centres in Karachi, Lahore, Hyderabad, Quetta, Peshawar, and several smaller cities observed shutdowns.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
13 hours ago
- Business Recorder
SRO 706 (I)/2010 tractor tax refund: FBR to seek Law Division's opinion
ISLAMABAD: The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) will legally file reference with the Law and Justice Division seeking clarification whether SRO 706 (I)/2010 was legally issued under which input tax on agricultural tractors was exempted to the tractor manufacturers through refund. Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) Member Inland Revenue (Operations) Dr Hamid Ateeq Sarwar, Friday, informed the Public Accounts Committee that the FBR has accurately issued SRO706 (I)/2010 to ensure that the prices of tractors should not increase at that time. To clear ambiguity, the Auditor General of Pakistan (AGP) and the FBR can seek clarification from Law and Justice Division about the legality of this SRO. Tractor-manufacturing company: FBR raises Rs18bn sales tax demand During the PAC meeting, officials of the AGP directed the FBR to submit the update on the demand of Rs18 billion raised against a tractor company during an internal audit conducted on the directions of the Federal Tax Ombudsman (FTO). The officials of the AGP further pointed out whether the farmers were able to get the benefit of SRO706 (I)/2010. As the matter involves interpretation of law, the same should be referred to the Law and Justice Division, FBR Member Inland Revenue operations added. According to the audit brief submitted by the AGP before the PAC on Friday, as provided in Section 13(1) read with Sixth Schedule of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, the supply of tractors has been exempted from the chargeability of sales tax. Conflicting with the above provision of the law, FBR issued SRO706 (I)/2010 dated 2nd August 2010 by exercising its powers under Section 13(2) of the law, wherein, the input tax on agricultural tractors was exempted to the tractor manufacturers by way of refund subject to the condition that 'manufacturer shall sell exempt agricultural tractors against proper tax invoice with zero sales tax at the price agreed with federal government'. The condition 'at the price agreed with the Federal Government' was also deleted on 28.04.2007. Audit is of the view that through said SRO, supply of tractors has been turned zero rated whereas it was an exempt commodity as contained in the 6th Schedule to the Act. The refund of input tax against supply of tractors by treating them as zero rated through an SRO was in conflict with the basic provisions of the Act. Hence, refund sanctioned in this way was unlawful causing a loss of government revenue to the tune of Rs7,069.311 million during tax periods in case of one manufacturer only, as per information available to Audit. The LTU, Lahore informed that refund of sales tax was allowed as per existing law/rules/instructions of FBR. As per Sections 72 and 42 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 and Federal Excise Act, 2005, the field officers were bound by such law/rules/instructions of FBR. As such no loss occurred on the part of officers of LTU. Audit is of the view that administrative officers were bound to comply with the provisions of the Act of the parliament in public interest rather than to blindly follow the instructions of FBR while sanctioning such refunds. Hence, the reply given by the department is irrelevant and not tenable. The AGP objected that special excise duty was levied under Section 3A of the Federal Excise Act, 2005 on goods specified in SRO 655(1)/2007 dated 29-06-2007. Later on, special excise duty was exempted vide SRO 675 (1)/2011 dated 01.07.2011 issued under Section 16(2) of the Act, effective from 01.07.2007 by way of refund to the purchaser i.e. manufacturer of tractors. After issuance of SRO of 2007, vendors of agricultural tractors kept on charging this duty and the same was also being paid by the tractor manufacturers while making taxable supplies. Tax authorities of FBR allowed a refund of special excise duty (SED) to M/s Millat Tractors (Pvt) Ltd by giving the benefit of SRO dated 01.07.2011 from back date i.e. July 1, 2011 to the taxpayer. Audit is of the view that Section 16(2) of the Federal Excise Act, 2005 does not empower the federal government to exempt duty from retrospective effect as specifically allowed in case of sales tax under Section 13(4) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990. Hence, refund of SED of Rs242.826 million to Millat Tractors (Pvt) Ltd, allowed during July 2007 to May 2011, was unlawful. Moreover, the amount of special excise duty became part of the price of tractor and was passed on to consumers/farmers. In this way, tractor manufacturers enjoyed double benefit i.e. higher prices of product and refund. The officers of LTU allowed refund of special excise duty as per Sections 72 and 42 of Sales Tax Act, 1990 and Federal Excise Act. The reply was irrelevant and did not address the issue. The lapse was pointed out to the department during June to October 2013. In this regard, it is stated that recovery notice dated 03.07.2025 has been issued to M/s Millat Tractors Limited for payment of sales tax amounting to Rs1,847,840 by 15.07.2025. Further, DGAIR (North)'s letter dated 03.01.2017 has been forwarded to the board for necessary guidance and its reply is awaited. The DAC directed the LTO, Lahore to get its stance verified from audit in the light of board's clarification issued on 07.04.2017 and submit progress to audit and FBR by 30.07.2025. The PAC may like to direct the department to: i)expedite recovery of government dues; ii) justify issuance of SROs conflicting with Acts of the Parliament and fix responsibility on person(s) at fault; iii) submit SROs pertaining to exemptions, concessions and zero rating of supplies, issued during a financial year, for Parliamentary approval; and iv) conduct a fact finding enquiry on the issue as FBR has already conducted internal audit of a tractor company for the subsequent period(s) on the directions of honourable FTO and raised demand of Rs.18.7 billion on the same issue, the AGP report added. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Express Tribune
13 hours ago
- Express Tribune
FBR's lapses cost govt Rs397b, PAC panel told
Policymakers are expected to continue improvements on tax collection side to widen the tax net by signalling reduction in corporate and salary tax by 1% per year for the next 10 years and by reducing industrial energy tariffs. photo: file A subcommittee of the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) was left stunned on Friday after uncovering gross mismanagement within the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR), which resulted in a staggering Rs397 billion loss to the national exchequer. The meeting of the subcommittee, chaired by its convener Shahida Akhtar Ali, was informed that the losses stemmed from the non-recovery of direct and indirect taxes as well as customs duties, due to negligence and inefficiency within the FBR. The subcommittee reviewed audit reports of the FBR for fiscal years 2010, 2011, 2013, and 2014. Audit officials disclosed alarming lapses, pointing out that Rs6.5 billion worth of sales tax and Federal Excise Duty (FED) had remained uncollected. They revealed that 633 individuals had either underpaid or evaded taxes, yet officials at 10 FBR offices failed to take action against them. Moreover, despite the presence of legal provisions allowing for forced recovery without show-cause notices, these measures were not implemented. It was further disclosed that the Pakistan International Airlines (PIA) had collected FED on tickets but failed to transfer Rs2.5 billion to the FBR. Officials added that, since PIA's privatisation remains incomplete, the government would now bear this liability. The committee directed authorities to verify the recoverable amount. The meeting was informed that 514 FBR agents did not deduct withholding tax during 2013-14, resulting in a shortfall of Rs24.15 billion. Additionally, the subcommittee was apprised that Rs71 million was assessed but never recovered. An FBR member informed the subcommittee that Rs16 billion had been retrieved and verified, while Rs452 million remained under audit scrutiny.
Express Tribune
18 hours ago
- Express Tribune
The fix and fraud
Listen to article The tax collection machinery is in an enigma as vested interests in the business circles are defiant, and are unwilling to come under the tax net. This has landed Pakistan in a fix with the IMF, which is now insisting on a one-fourth increase in sales tax base. The Fund has also outright rejected the appeasement package doled out by the government to unregistered persons in the form of an additional 4% sales tax. This was to be charged over and above the standard 18% sales tax. A glance at this crisscross hints at capitulation of the revenue generation system, and its utter inability to broaden the tax net which is hardly composed of 200,000 registered sales tax persons, of which only 60,000 pay any tax. The tactic on the part of unregistered business circles to accept the punitive 4% extra tax is a ploy. First, the cost of it is passed on the consumers, and second, it offers them a convenient route to evade direct taxation. What makes it more horrendous is the authorities' audacity to accede to the unfair demands of the business community, and that too at the cost of national interest. It is ironic that the government has no consolation or relief for the salaried persons who are taxed at source of their income and have contributed a staggering Rs545 billion during FY25, as big-ticket business, feudal, real-estate and holy cows go unscratched. The tax sleuths must work on a realistic format of broadening the scope of taxation, and that means not only genuine reforms in the culpable bureau but also application of stringent laws to rope in the dodgers. It has no choice but to be obliged to the IMF that wants, at least, 50,000 more persons in the sales tax net. It's high time for the FBR to focus on the budgetary tax target of Rs14.13 trillion, which is 9% more than in the previous year, and not to be content with unverified claims of collecting Rs455 billion additional tax from retailers. A new and ordained across-the-board tax regime is indispensable if the economy has to stand on its feet.
