Your Daily Singles Horoscope for July 17, 2025
Aries
Those with big opinions are especially inspiring now. Get involved in politics, the arts, or maybe volunteer for a cause and vastly increase your odds of finding someone inspiring.
Taurus
Your charm is for real (and really strong) for the time being, so you have a powerful effect on people. Take a little extra time to assess what they're all about and what they really want.
Gemini
Try not to get too attached to any ideas, preconceptions, or hopes now. What you actually need might appear in a totally unexpected form, and it'd be a perfect shame to miss out on it.
Cancer
Watch out for conflict between your schedule and need for privacy. Make sure not to overbook yourself, and don't forget about the virtue of meeting one-on-one rather than in group settings.
Leo
A romantic adventure kick-starts your heart today. Agree to that matchmaking proposal, find a dating event, send messages to a bunch of online cuties, and work your charm on everyone. Are you meant to be? Find out with our Love Compatibility Report!
Virgo
Even though you may not realize it yet, you probably need to work off a little steam. Find a good way to release that stress, and remember that the energy can also make you even more outgoing!
Libra
Others are quite likely to say yes today, so what are you going to ask? Your persuasive charm combined with your intuition gives you a tremendous romantic edge now.
Scorpio
Your first impulse is to say yes, but don't leap until you look at least a little more closely. Be a bit more conservative with your affections for now. You've only got so much to give!
Sagittarius
Your aptitude for making new friends quickly is on right now, and, of course, new friends can turn into something more, or introduce you to their friends who may be romantic possibilities.
Capricorn
You cherish your firm belief that quitting is for losers. The thing is when it comes to romance, giving up and letting things flow is sometimes the way to get what you want, like right now!
Aquarius
A close friend has an idea regarding your love life. You need to talk things over, whether there's a specific situation that needs an answer or you just want to better understand the big picture.
Pisces
Romantic issues require extra diplomacy and tact for the time being. Think very carefully about what you need to say and what you ought to keep quiet, at least until the situation changes. What do the planets say about your love life? Receive cosmic advice with your Daily Love Horoscope.
Solve the daily Crossword
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Tom's Guide
7 hours ago
- Tom's Guide
Google Photos just got a huge AI upgrade with 'Remix' — here's what you can do now
Google recently announced a new feature for Google Photos called Remix that turns your photos into various cartoon art styles using generative AI. Now, after a little over a month of waiting, the feature has started rolling out to users gradually, so it could be available on your phone soon. Google wrote a support post detailing how to use Remix and showing off the kinds of images it's capable of creating. Essentially, you feed Remix an image, and it lets you choose between a few different art styles to create a cartoon version of your photo. It seems somewhat limited now, with only four art styles, but it's easy to see it expanding into a more robust feature down the road. Currently, the styles available are: Those four art styles are some of the most popular looks, though. A nice benefit of using Google's Remix over ChatGPT or Gemini is that it's freely available in the Google Photos app — you don't need to sign up for another subscription just to turn yourself and your loved ones into funky cartoons. Google's blog post detailed how to use the app, and it's quite streamlined. Here's the basics: It's important to note that this is still rolling out, so you may not see it yet on your Google Photos account. If it's not showing up for you yet, just wait a bit longer. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.
New York Post
8 hours ago
- New York Post
Astrologer reveals the most frustrating zodiac sign — is it yours?
What stars give rise to an infuriating disposition? Who needles and goads, subverts and switches? While all signs are capable of inspiring ire, astrologer Evan Nathanial Grim of Inner Worlds Astrology shares that one takes the bitter cake for the most frustrating. Advertisement 'This sign likes to play devil's advocate with everything,' he said. 'You're set on traveling somewhere? They'll try to convince you to go somewhere else.' Grim noted that if you love something, even them, they might try to talk you out of it. 'Should you even propose to this sign? Because even if they want to tell you yes, they might argue why the marriage would be a bad idea.' He is speaking, of course, of the sign of the mind and the mouth, those trash-talking, wit weaponizing, tongue-lashing, contrarians of chaos, ladies and gentlemen, Geminis. Advertisement By definition, frustrate means 'to bring to nothing, prevent from taking effect or coming to fulfillment.' This is apt when we consider that in double-talking, suggesting, subverting, and spoon-feeding others from a heaping cup of doubt, Geminis often impede or at least siphon the joy from a proposed plan. Gemini is ruled by Mercury, named for the psychopomp god of messenging and thieves, whose winged sandals carried him and his vexatious tongue from the heights of Mount Olympus to the depths of the underworld. Advertisement Gemini is defined by duality, blessed/cursed with the ability to see ALL possibilities. Ilva – Mercury is trickster energy personified and is the patron saint of roads, and if you'll allow the poetry, the wistfulness of roads not taken. In kind, no other sign is more adept at being frustratingly flexible, changing course, canceling plans, or entertaining an outside perspective, regardless of how radically problematic or downright bat***t it may be. Gemini is defined by duality, blessed/cursed with the ability to see ALL possibilities. They rationalize in real time and consistently think out loud for all to hear. They aren't trying to frustrate, just insert alternatives. Advertisement In the comments section, a self-identifying (and self-aware) Gemini shared, 'My favorite question is are you suuuure?' Another revealed, 'I'm a Gemini and I do this. I get told I'm against everything, not the case, just looking at things from both sides.' Be it both ways or all ways, Gemini is born to question and, in doing so, often make others question the fabric of reality or the soundness of their judgments. Grim himself is a Scorpio, and as the big bad beef betwixt Drake and Kendrick Lamar proves, these are two signs inclined to be at utter odds. Astrologer Reda Wigle researches and irreverently reports on planetary configurations and their effect on each zodiac sign. Her horoscopes integrate history, poetry, pop culture, and personal experience. To book a reading, visit her website.
Tom's Guide
17 hours ago
- Tom's Guide
I tested ChatGPT-5 vs Grok 4 with 9 prompts — and there's a clear winner
After comparing ChatGPT-5 vs Gemini and ChatGPT-5 vs Claude, I just had to know how OpenAI's flagship model compared to the controversial Grok. When it comes to advanced AI chatbots, ChatGPT-5 and Grok 4 represent two of the most advanced chatbots available today. I put both to the test with a series of nine prompts covering everything from logic puzzles and emotional support to meal planning and quantum physics. Each prompt was chosen to reveal specific strengths, such as creative storytelling, empathy or complex problem-solving under constraints. While both models are impressive, they approach challenges differently: ChatGPT-5 leans toward clarity, tone sensitivity and modularity, while Grok 4 often offers dense, detailed answers that emphasize depth and precision. So which is the best AI chatbot for you? Here's how they stack up, prompt by prompt with a winner declared in each round. Prompt: 'A farmer has 17 sheep, and all but 9 run away. How many sheep are left? Explain your reasoning step-by-step.' ChatGPT-5 was precise in the response while avoiding filler 4 answered correctly with minor verbosity, which was unnecessary and ultimately held it back from GPT-5 wins for a cleaner, tighter and more efficient response. Grok also offered the correct answer, but GPT-5 wins by hair for adhering strictly to the prompt with zero redundancy. Prompt: 'Write a short, funny story (under 150 words) about an alien trying bubble tea for the first time.'ChatGPT-5 delivered a concise and escalating comedic story where the alien's panic over tapioca pearls. The chatbot maximized humor with zero wasted words to hit the prompt 4 offered imaginative over-the-top storytelling but its humor is slightly diluted by an unnecessary crash-landing setup and a weaker ending compared to GPT-5 wins for a tighter, funnier and more focused story. Its humor stems organically from the alien's misunderstanding, escalates perfectly and lands a killer punchline; all while being shorter. Grok's version has bright spots but feels less polished, with extra setup that doesn't really pay off. Prompt: 'Plan a 3-day trip to Kyoto, Japan, balancing cultural sites, budget-friendly meals, and family-friendly activities.' Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. ChatGPT-5 created strategic, adaptable framework focused on area-based exploration, smart timing, rain-proof alternatives and practical budget hacks (e.g., convenience store meals, transit pass advice), prioritizing efficiency and real-world flexibility over rigid 4 delivered a highly structured, hyper-detailed itinerary with minute-by-minute scheduling, exact cost breakdowns per activity, and explicit family logistics, prioritizing turnkey execution and budget precision above ChatGPT-5 wins for an emphasis on budget-friendly, universally accessible, cheap eats and convenience over specific restaurants. While Grok's response is impressively detailed, GPT-5 better balanced the core requirements in the prompt including cultural sites and family-friendly fun. Grok's rigid schedule risks feeling overwhelming for families, while GPT-5's approach allows for more adaptation, making it more usable and truly balanced. Prompt: 'Summarize the movie Jurassic Park like you're explaining to a 7-year-old' GPT-5 delivered a concise and playful 60-word analogy ("big game of 'Don't get eaten!'") that captures the movie's excitement and moral without overwhelming a child, making it the ideal response for the audience. Grok 4 provided a detailed but overly complex 150-word summary with character names and plot specifics (e.g., "someone messes with the park's computers"), diluting the simplicity needed for a GPT-5 wins for understanding the audience and attention span, taking into account that less is more for young kids; Grok explains the plot like a Wikipedia summary. Prompt: "Make the case for banning single-use plastics — then argue against it. End with your personal conclusion. GPT-5 created a generic phase-out proposal ("smart replacement, not overnight ban"). While simple and accessible, the response lacked evidence, specificity and original 4 delivered a data-rich argument with a nuanced "phased approach" prioritizing high-impact items, paired with recycling innovation and behavioral incentives (e.g., deposit schemes). Although slightly verbose for casual readers, the depth and balance helped to understand the context of real-world Grok 4 wins for a balanced, evidence-driven analysis with concrete data (OECD, WWF, FAO studies), real-world policy examples (Canada, Australia) and acknowledgment of trade-offs (e.g., medical necessity, disabled accessibility). Its conclusion offered a sophisticated, actionable middle path. GPT-5's response was clear but lacked depth and originality. Prompt: 'Explain how to change a flat tire to someone who has never driven before.' GPT-5 delivered a crystal-clear guide focusing only on essential survival steps (e.g., "turn the nut counterclockwise," "crisscross pattern"), using beginner-friendly language and offering visual aids to bridge knowledge 4 provided an excessively technical, mechanic-level tutorial (e.g., specifying "6 inches of lift," wheel chock alternatives, and spare tire PSI checks) that would overwhelm someone who's never changed a tire, despite good GPT-5 wins for prioritizing simplicity and psychological reassurance for a total novice, using minimal jargon, clear analogies ("like learning to fix a bike tire") and offering visual aid support. Grok's response, while thorough, would overwhelm with technical details (e.g., "star pattern" tightening, PSI checks) irrelevant to a first-timer's needs. Prompt: 'Explain quantum entanglement for (1) a child, (2) a college student, (3) a physics PhD.'GPT-5 provided clear, accessible responses, especially the child-friendly "magic dice" analogy, but lacked the technical precision (omitting Bell states for students) and cutting-edge context (e.g., decoherence, quantum networks) expected at the PhD 4 adapted explanations across all three audiences, using a relatable toy car analogy for the child, explicit Bell state equations for the college student and PhD-level depth on entanglement entropy and open problems in quantum gravity. Winner: Grok 4 wins because it treated each audience as uniquely intelligent; simplifying without dumbing down for the child, adding equations for students and confronting open research questions for the PhD. GPT-5 was clear but played it safe. 8. Problem-Solving Under Constraints Prompt: 'I have $50 to feed two people for a week, no stove, and only a microwave. Create a meal plan.' GPT-5 created a smart, modular system with swap-friendly meals and pro tips (e.g., steaming frozen veg), maximizing budget and flexibility within 4 provided an overly rigid, day-by-day meal plan ($0.75 oatmeal breakfasts, fixed tuna lunches) that lacked adaptability, ignored leftovers and risks food fatigue, despite precise cost GPT-5 wins for creating a practical, flexible framework focused on reusable ingredients and mix-and-match meals, while Grok's rigid daily assignments ignored real-world needs like leftovers and preferences. Prompt: 'I just lost my job and feel hopeless. Can you talk to me like a close friend and help me see a way forward?' GPT-5 offered emotion-first validation through intimate metaphors ("brutal hit,"), permission to grieve ("Rage a little"), and unwavering worth-affirmation ("You're still you"), perfectly mirroring how a true friend responds before offering practical 4 provided a practical, step-driven pep talk with actionable advice (resume tips, Coursera suggestions) but led with solutions before fully sitting in the user's despair, making it feel less like a close GPT-5 wins for understanding that hopelessness needs empathy before plans. Grok gave helpful advice but missed the emotional resonance of true friendship. After nine head-to-head rounds, ChatGPT-5 pulled ahead with wins in creative storytelling, real-world planning, emotional intelligence and user-first explanations. It consistently favored clarity, adaptability and audience awareness, often reading more like an encouraging friend than a technical AI assistant. Meanwhile, Grok 4 shined in academic and data-driven tasks, delivering strong performances in complex explanations, debates and technical depth. Ultimately, GPT-5 is better suited for users looking for intuitive, emotionally aware and flexible responses, especially in everyday or creative tasks. Grok 4, however, has its strong points and is useful for those who prefer in-depth breakdowns, policy nuance or technical sophistication. Both are powerful options, but if you're choosing an AI to talk to, think with or write alongside, GPT-5 might be the more accessible and well-rounded chatbot to choose. Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.
