Maine lawmakers look to increase testing for PFAS in private drinking wells
Rep. Bill Pluecker (I-Warren) said it's critical to test for PFAS, which have been linked to health concerns including cancer, liver damage, pregnancy complications, increased cholesterol levels and more. (Photo by Getty Images)
The Legislature's Health and Human Services Committee held a public hearing Tuesday afternoon for three bills seeking to better identify forever chemicals in private wells and address their presence in certain public water systems.
'No family should be left in the dark about what's in their water,' said Rep. Bill Pluecker (I-Warren), when introducing LD 500.
Pluecker's proposal would add perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances, commonly called PFAS, to the list of contaminants the Department of Health and Human Services recommends testing for in private wells. Additionally, it seeks to use money from the department's Health and Environmental Testing Laboratory account to provide free well water testing for low-income residents.
A similar proposal died last year due to concerns over that proposal's use of general funds to support the program, but Pluecker said he believed the department's dedicated fund should be sufficient to avoid the need for other state dollars.
More than half of Mainers get drinking water from private, residential wells, so Pluecker said it's critical to test for PFAS, which have been linked to health concerns including cancer, liver damage, pregnancy complications, increased cholesterol levels and more.
Rep. Laurie Osher (D-Orono) also introduced a similar proposal to expand testing for PFAS substances in private drinking wells, which aren't regulated under the federal Safe Drinking Water Act.
Landlords are already required to test for arsenic in wells that provide drinking water and share the test results with tenants within 10 days of being notified of the results. LD 493 would build upon that by requiring landlords to also test the water for PFAS, lead, uranium and other potentially harmful contaminants.
While the landlord would not be required to treat any contamination, they would have to disclose it to tenants and potential tenants within 10 days of receiving results. Similarly, the bill would require residential owners to disclose any water tests that indicate the presence of PFAS when selling the property.
The version of this bill introduced last session died on the special appropriations table, where bills are chosen by the budget committee for funding, with a fiscal note of a little more than $100,000 per year.
The health committee also heard a proposal from Rep. Daniel Shagoury (D-Hallowell) that targets forever chemicals in public water systems throughout the state. LD 1326 would establish maximum PFAS levels in the drinking water of certain public water systems that serve settings such as schools, factories, industrial parks or office buildings.
The Department of Health and Human Services is currently in the process of adopting rules that align with the National Primary Drinking Water Regulation announced by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in April 2024. Those new federal standards create enforceable limits for six PFAS in drinking water that can have adverse health effects.
Shagoury acknowledged that the department is opposed to his bill for being duplicative, but he argued it would underscore the Legislature's belief that standards for PFAS in drinking water are important.
The Maine Water Utilities Association also opposed the bill because it said Maine has adopted federal water standards rather than creating its own statute to make compliance with federal standards less burdensome. Changing that and adopting LD 1326 would create complexity and confusion for water systems, said Mike Cummons, who works for the Maine Water Company in Saco.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
32 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump likens Russia-Ukraine war to kids fighting ‘like crazy' on playground
WASHINGTON — President Trump said Thursday that Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky are similar to children fighting on a playground and that more time may be needed before 'pulling them apart.' 'Sometimes you see two young children fighting like crazy. They hate each other, and they're fighting in a park, and you try and pull them apart. They don't want to be pulled,' Trump told reporters while hosting German Chancellor Friedrich Merz in the Oval Office. 'Sometimes you're better off letting them fight for a while and then pulling them apart. And I gave that analogy to Putin yesterday. I said, 'President, maybe you have to keep fighting and suffering a lot' because both sides are suffering, before you pull them apart before they're able to be pulled apart.' Advertisement 3 President Trump likened Russia and Ukraine's leaders to angry children on Thursday. AFP via Getty Images Trump didn't say how Putin responded to the analogy, but revealed that the Russian leader shared plans to further attack Ukraine in the wake of Zelensky's covert operations over the past week to sabotage warplanes and infrastructure — including an audacious drone strikes to destroy bombers deep inside Russia and a fresh bombing of the Kerch Strait bridge to Crimea. 'He actually told me him and made it very clear, he said, 'We have no choice but to attack based on that, and it's probably not going to be pretty,'' Trump said. Advertisement 3 Trump said Russian President Vladimir Putin and his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelensky may need to fight more before being pulled apart. AP 3 Trump has attempted to force Putin and Zelensky to make peace. STRINGER/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock 'I don't like it. I said, 'Don't do it. You shouldn't do it. You should stop it.' But again, there's a lot of hatred.' Trump has attempted to browbeat both sides to the bargaining table — attacking Zelensky as a 'dictator without elections' in February in a sign of wavering US support before blasting Putin last month for continued bombing of civilian areas of Ukraine, saying he had 'gone absolutely CRAZY!' His remarks about the sides needing to fight it out for longer are a significant evolution from his campaign-trail prediction that he would bring peace immediately by calling the parties on the phone.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump Says ‘Great Relationship' With Elon Musk May Be Over
President Donald Trump speaks during a meeting with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, on June 5, 2025. Credit - Brendan Smialowski—AFP via Getty Images President Donald Trump on Thursday publicly acknowledged for the first time his deteriorating relationship with Elon Musk, the billionaire entrepreneur who once held a high-level advisory role in his Administration, saying he was 'very disappointed' in Musk's recent turn against the President's flagship tax-and-spending bill. 'Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore,' Trump told reporters during an Oval Office meeting with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. 'I'm very disappointed in Elon. I've helped Elon a lot.' Trump's remarks confirmed what had already been visible behind the scenes: a once-close alliance between two of the most powerful figures in the Republican Party is unraveling just days after Musk left his position as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency. Since leaving Trump's side, Musk has strongly criticized Trump's 'one big, beautiful bill,' which passed the House last month and now faces a contentious battle in the Senate. The package, a centerpiece of the President's domestic agenda, includes across-the-board tax cuts and sweeping reductions in federal spending. But it also phases out key incentives for electric vehicles—an industry on which Musk has built much of his wealth and influence through Tesla. Musk began his public campaign against the bill on Tuesday, using X, the social media service he owns, to call the package a 'disgusting abomination.' Dozens more posts attacking it followed, with the world's richest person warning that the bill would 'massively increase the already gigantic budget deficit' and urging his more than 200 million followers to pressure lawmakers to 'KILL the BILL.' Adding fuel to the fire was a new Congressional Budget Office estimate released this week that found the measure would increase the deficit by $2.4 trillion over the next decade, despite containing more than $1.2 trillion in proposed spending cuts. It was a striking about face for Musk, who spent more than a quarter of a billion dollars backing Trump and other Republican candidates in the past year. Now he's threatening to put his money behind voting out anyone who supports the party's signature legislation. 'In November next year, we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people,' Musk posted. While Trump and Musk previously exchanged public praise—Trump held a send-off ceremony for Musk in the Oval Office just days ago—the President now dismisses Musk's criticisms as self-serving. 'He knew every aspect of this bill,' Trump said. 'He knew it better than almost anybody, and he never had a problem until right after he left.' Trump accused Musk of being upset over the removal of electric vehicle subsidies, a key provision that had made Tesla vehicles more affordable. 'He only developed the problem when he found out that we're gonna have to cut the EV mandate,' Trump said. 'I know that disturbed him.' Trump also suggested that his break with Musk came after he withdrew the nomination of Jared Isaacman—a Musk ally and veteran private astronaut with ties to his SpaceX company—to lead NASA. The move reportedly stunned Musk, who had spent heavily to support Trump's re-election, only to see a key ally cast aside. Trump, in turn, criticized Musk's push for Isaacman, saying the nominee was 'totally Democrat,' and suggesting he didn't owe Musk political favors. 'Elon recommended somebody to run NASA and I didn't think it was appropriate,' Trump said Thursday. 'We won, we get privileges, and one of the privileges is we don't have to appoint a Democrat.' Musk worked to refute Trump's allegations on X, asserting that "this bill was never shown to me even once," and that he was fine if "the EV/solar incentive cuts" remained in the bill. The issue, Musk insisted, was "the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill." The President's tone on Thursday was notably subdued, a contrast to the bravado he often reserves for critics. He suggested Musk may be struggling with what he called 'Trump Derangement Syndrome,' a phrase he uses for former allies who grow critical after leaving his administration. 'He's not the first,' Trump said. 'People leave my administration, and they love us, and then at some point they miss it so badly… they wake up in the morning, and the glamor is gone, and they become hostile.' Trump suggested Musk's tone would soon mirror many of his other critics. 'He hasn't said [anything] bad about me personally, but I'm sure that'll be next,' he said. Soon after, in response to footage of Trump's remarks, Musk posted: Without me, Trump would have lost the election." He added in a separate post: "Such ingratitude." The timing of the split is politically delicate. Trump is pushing to have sweeping legislation on his desk by July 4, but it faces opposition from Democrats, and some fiscally conservative Republicans alarmed by its impact on the deficit. Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, one of the Republicans threatening to vote against the bill, told TIME on Wednesday that he thinks Musk's criticism will embolden some Republican skeptics in both the House and Senate. Last week, Musk said that he hoped to continue to be a 'friend and adviser to the President' after leaving the Administration. Write to Nik Popli at


New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Musk gets defensive in simmering feud with Trump: ‘Such ingratitude'
Elon Musk has slammed what he called President Trump's 'ingratitude' and denied he was ever shown his 'Big Beautiful Bill' as the war of words between the two former allies escalated on Thursday. The former head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) hit back after Trump told reporters he was 'very disappointed' in Musk, following his stinging attacks on the new bill. The Trump, Musk feud escalated today with Elon remarking 'such ingratitude' over Trump's remarks. Getty Images Advertisement 'Such ingratitude,' Musk declared, replying to his own post on X claiming that Trump 'would have lost the election' without his help. 'False, this bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!' he wrote in a second post shared on X on Thursday morning, rebuffing claims from Trump that he had known more about the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' than 'anybody sitting here.' The Tesla and SpaceX CEO was one of the most prominent members of President Trump's administration in the early months of his second term until his sudden departure last month after just 130 days in his post as a special government employee charged with tackling wasteful spending. Advertisement Musk appeared to leave the White House on good terms Friday, with Trump even gifting him a ceremonial key to the executive mansion. Trump told reporters he was 'very disappointed' in Musk. AP But on Thursday, Trump accused his former administration member of having 'Trump Derangement Syndrome,' as he addressed the media from the White House ahead of his sit-down with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz.