Uncertainty over sports field development irks Phoenix residents
Phoenix residents held a placard protest on the Eastbury recreational grounds seeking clarity on whether a housing complex will be built after a bulldozer was seen clearing the ground.
Image: KZN VIP Protection Services
Phoenix residents held a placard protest on the Eastbury recreational grounds seeking clarity on whether a housing complex will be built after a bulldozer was seen clearing the ground.
Democratic Alliance eThekwini ward 49 Councillor Tino Pillay said there was no development taking place and that a private individual was clearing the vegetation alongside the sports field. This was on the basis of creating additional parking bays because he had applied for an informal trade permit at the grounds.
"People assumed that he was a developer and he was clearing the place for a development. All this drama taking place currently with the protest is basically irrelevant and there is no development taking place on the grounds," Pillay said.
Pillay shared a document from Woodglaze Trading manager Pravashkumar Inderjeeth which stated that they had not consented for anyone to clear the vegetation from the grounds.
"We immediately informed them to cease all activities with immediate effect and refrain from trespassing on the property, failing which we will seek legal action. We have no intention of developing the Eastbury sports field for housing," Inderjeeth stated.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Pillay further advised that in this financial year the municipality is expected to transfer all Phoenix sports fields to the Parks Department and for them to be rezoned.
"There is no proof, nor did any member of the community contact me for clarity. If they had given me a courtesy call I would have advised them accordingly and prevented an escalation of false narratives," Pillay said.
Cyril Xaba, the Mayor of eThekwini Municipality, stated that all parcels of land earmarked for development under the Phoenix Infill Housing project are zoned special residential areas and fall under the Human Settlements Unit.
However, Xaba stated, some of these sites were used as parks, playgrounds and sport fields.
'Realising that, Human Settlements engaged its planners and the sites were reallocated back to Parks and Recreation Unit. To that effect, a council resolution was passed to keep them as open public spaces,' Xaba said.
This was done in consultation with relevant stakeholders like the South African Football Association Phoenix (SAFA), Xaba said, adding that the process entails subdividing and rezoning of the affected sites which will be carried out in the next financial year as it has financial implications.
'The suggestion or allegations that these sites have been given back to Human Settlements developers are incorrect and misleading. We want to assure the community that the municipality has not reneged on the council resolution to hand over some of these sites to the Parks, Recreation and Culture Unit as open public spaces and sport fields,' Xaba said.
zainul.dawood@inl.co.za
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
4 days ago
- IOL News
Uncertainty over sports field development irks Phoenix residents
Phoenix residents held a placard protest on the Eastbury recreational grounds seeking clarity on whether a housing complex will be built after a bulldozer was seen clearing the ground. Image: KZN VIP Protection Services Phoenix residents held a placard protest on the Eastbury recreational grounds seeking clarity on whether a housing complex will be built after a bulldozer was seen clearing the ground. Democratic Alliance eThekwini ward 49 Councillor Tino Pillay said there was no development taking place and that a private individual was clearing the vegetation alongside the sports field. This was on the basis of creating additional parking bays because he had applied for an informal trade permit at the grounds. "People assumed that he was a developer and he was clearing the place for a development. All this drama taking place currently with the protest is basically irrelevant and there is no development taking place on the grounds," Pillay said. Pillay shared a document from Woodglaze Trading manager Pravashkumar Inderjeeth which stated that they had not consented for anyone to clear the vegetation from the grounds. "We immediately informed them to cease all activities with immediate effect and refrain from trespassing on the property, failing which we will seek legal action. We have no intention of developing the Eastbury sports field for housing," Inderjeeth stated. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Pillay further advised that in this financial year the municipality is expected to transfer all Phoenix sports fields to the Parks Department and for them to be rezoned. "There is no proof, nor did any member of the community contact me for clarity. If they had given me a courtesy call I would have advised them accordingly and prevented an escalation of false narratives," Pillay said. Cyril Xaba, the Mayor of eThekwini Municipality, stated that all parcels of land earmarked for development under the Phoenix Infill Housing project are zoned special residential areas and fall under the Human Settlements Unit. However, Xaba stated, some of these sites were used as parks, playgrounds and sport fields. 'Realising that, Human Settlements engaged its planners and the sites were reallocated back to Parks and Recreation Unit. To that effect, a council resolution was passed to keep them as open public spaces,' Xaba said. This was done in consultation with relevant stakeholders like the South African Football Association Phoenix (SAFA), Xaba said, adding that the process entails subdividing and rezoning of the affected sites which will be carried out in the next financial year as it has financial implications. 'The suggestion or allegations that these sites have been given back to Human Settlements developers are incorrect and misleading. We want to assure the community that the municipality has not reneged on the council resolution to hand over some of these sites to the Parks, Recreation and Culture Unit as open public spaces and sport fields,' Xaba said.
Daily Maverick
08-05-2025
- Daily Maverick
Nuclear and gas ‘forced in' SA's draft updated electricity masterplan
South Africa's draft Integrated Resource Plan 2024 (IRP) is 'deeply flawed' in both process and outcome, according to a panel of independent energy economists, climate policy specialists and engineers. A group of eminent South African technical experts have roundly criticised the draft Integrated Resource Plan 2024 (IRP) – the country's electricity blueprint for the future – as being flawed in both process and outcome, with at least one expert saying that nuclear energy and gas were 'forced in' despite there being no techno-economic rationale for their inclusion. These extra costs could be 'socialised' and filter through to taxpayers and electricity tariffs. The Electricity Regulation Act defines the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) as 'an indicative, forward-looking plan [established by the national sphere of government to give effect to] for electricity generation, which reflects national policy on electricity planning, which plan specifies the types of energy sources and technologies from which electricity may be generated and indicates the amount of electricity that is to be generated from each of such sources or technologies.' The current draft of the IRP is being discussed at the National Economic Development and Labour Council (Nedlac) before Cabinet considers a final version later this year. Subesh Pillay, acting director-general of the Ministry of Electricity and Energy, gave the opening address at a webinar focused on policy and planning considerations for energy and electricity in South Africa in the years to 2050. He said conversations around the IRP were happening as the country was at an inflexion point from an energy perspective. Pillay said past energy debates were framed by scarcity and load-shedding, but improved generation performance now allowed 'long-term thinking' and 'evidence-based planning'. However, other attendees would later suggest that the document best exemplifying this long-term thinking – the IRP – was anything but a display of 'evidence-based planning'. Dr Grové Steyn is MD at Meridian Economics. He specialises in infrastructure regulation, policy and restructuring. He said executive policy-making was bound by the constitutional principle of legality, which essentially required a minimum level of rationality and that least-cost power-system planning mattered greatly – tariffs were likely to increase as old Eskom coal plants were retired. 'Securing a reliable supply at the lowest possible economic and environmental cost is one of the most critical challenges in supporting our long-term development. This challenge is immensely complex and requires rigorous analysis.' A credible IRP, Steyn said, was one where, in terms of process, 'outcomes must follow logically from the results of proper analysis, outcomes have to be evidence-based, it should be grounded in sound, transparent and well-documented techno-economic analysis.' The IRP should also be consistent with other policy frameworks such as South Africa's climate commitments, local air quality regulations and broader socioeconomic goals. Based on these considerations and others, he described the draft IRP as deeply flawed. Integrated Resource Plan 2024 by Ethan van Diemen on Scribd Nuclear 'forced in' 'So the IRP, as in earlier years, develops essentially a 'modelled optimised reference case'. In this case, this includes the existing committed public procurement projects and also the private sector plans that are very far advanced,' said Steyn. He noted that the optimiser's 'emerging technology mix' pointed only to wind, solar PV, gas and storage, with no new nuclear, coal or pumped storage in the least-cost case. 'The modelled scenarios using the actual optimiser in the model does not build nuclear so the IRP modellers wanted to have a nuclear scenario and I presume the policy makers – the government – wanted that investigated and the only way they could do that was essentially to take away the other generation options that [were] available to the model to build the power system to meet demand.' He said modellers disabled new gas options after 2030, in effect, forcing the model to 'build nuclear.'. 'That is how the nuclear scenario was built. So the nuclear case is not an outcome of the model's optimisation, it's a forced-in scenario.' Gaps in the data Steyn highlighted more flaws he said undermined the credibility of the IRP. 'It's astonishing that the document does not show data on the technology capacity, energy mix costs or emissions for the modelled scenarios or the actual proposed balanced plan. Technically, of course, this means that it does not qualify as an IRP in terms of the legal definition.' 'It's not clear to us how Nedlac can participate in a meaningful consultation process if this information is simply not in the document.' 'The assumptions about nuclear technology are overly optimistic… The analysis does not test compliance or alignment with other policies, whether it is our net-zero emissions objectives or our local air quality objectives, etc, no information is available on how we meet those requirements.' 'The key concern here is that the proposed balanced plan is not logically derived from the underlying analysis presented in the IRP document. The conclusions and the plan are not the result of the analysis presented in the IRP document,' Steyn said. The IRP creates an illusion of science-based planning when its recommendations do not follow the evidence, Steyn argues. 'We have an IRP that neither went through a meaningful public consultation process nor benefited from review by independent experts, an IRP that contains lots of technical descriptions of our power system modelling, but does not adequately investigate the most critical uncertainties affecting future outcomes, an IRP that presents recommendations that do not follow logically from the analysis or are not otherwise substantiated or for which the technical and cost implications are not presented and, in fact, creates an illusion that the recommendations are based on scientific and economic principles when they are clearly not.' 'The technologies that are uneconomically forced into the plan, especially gas and nuclear, will actually rely on public procurement with limited competition, where risks and costs of these investments will be socialised,' Steyn warned. 'Unfortunately, as we all know, South Africa's recent empirical experience with these types of projects provides stark warnings about the enormous risk for cost overruns, opportunities for rent-seeking and even corruption.' Lebogang Mulaisi, executive manager responsible for policy and research at the Presidential Climate Commission (PCC), questioned whether short notice for stakeholder meetings constituted 'meaningful consultation', noting no public record of how inputs changed the document had been made available to her. Policy-based evidence-making Professor Harald Winkler with the Policy Research in International Services and Manufacturing (Prism) unit in the School of Economics at the University of Cape Town (UCT) summarised the views of others and shared his thoughts about the draft plan. 'I don't think the current draft of the IRP meets the standards of a good IRP in terms of its outcome, and in terms of process.' 'The fundamental approach should be one of evidence-based policy making based on clearly stated data and assumptions,' said Winkler. Winkler, whose research includes equitable transitions away from fossil fuels and low-emission development strategies, continued, 'It's remarkably clear that this is not a least-cost plan, but even more in terms of process, the balanced plan is not logically derived from the underlying analysis. 'It's more like an exercise in policy-based evidence-making… which is the opposite of what we need, which means policy determines outcome.' 'It must be the other way around, policy must be evidence-based, plans must be based on strong evidence, and I think that was not the case.' Chris Yelland, managing director at EE Business Intelligence, said, 'The current draft IRP currently before Nedlac is deeply flawed both in terms of process and in terms of substance. In terms of collaboration, in terms of consultation and the way it's been put together, I think it's deeply lacking.' 'I take heart from one thing… We're moving from a time of prescriptive IRPs into a time of indicative IRPs because, ultimately, Eskom and government don't have the balance sheet to finance this, it relies on external finance and government and National Treasury do not have the appetite to give government guarantees, and therefore everything hinges upon the business case of the different proposals. 'It's easy to put something in an IRP like 10,000 megawatts of new nuclear power that was in IRP 2010 that never happened, and we're moving to a stage where if it does not make business sense, it will not fly. And because it will have to fly without government guarantees, and external investment will insist on a business case that makes sense for their investment… I just don't see some of the ideas put in the IRP as flying.' 'They'll be in there, but they will not happen. So, in a way, the situation is moving to a stage where it just has to make sense as opposed to being ideologically driven,' said Yelland. 'It worries me when a Minister of Energy and Electricity says long before the finalisation of the IRP that 'there will be significantly new nuclear and gas in the IRP' because it presents an ideological position as opposed to a rational position one has taken after doing a socio- and techno-economic study like the IRP should be.' DM
Daily Maverick
08-05-2025
- Daily Maverick
From recovery to resilience – acting electricity DG Pillay charts a bold vision to 2050
In an address that signalled a significant and welcome shift in tone and substance in South Africa's energy discourse, acting Director-General at the Ministry of Energy and Electricity Subesh Pillay called for structural transformation in the country's electricity and energy planning regime. Speaking under the theme, Policy and Planning Considerations for Energy and Electricity in South Africa in the Years to 2050, acting Energy and Electricity DG Subesh Pillay opened the EE Business Intelligence webinar on Wednesday, 7 May 2025 by saying the country now stood at a strategic inflection point. 'We gather not in the shadow of crisis,' he said, 'but at a rare moment of inflection – one where signs of operational recovery offer us the space to shift our gaze beyond the immediate.' He cited Eskom's latest Winter 2025 Outlook as evidence of this shift. Notably, South Africa experienced nine months of uninterrupted power supply from July 2024 to March 2025. Unplanned generation losses dropped from more than 18GW in early 2023 to less than 13GW by April 2025, and energy availability has climbed to 61%, with a trajectory toward a target of 70%. Crucially, these gains were not driven by diesel overuse, but by structural improvements, including the return to service of a number of large Eskom generator units together with public and private sector renewable energy procurements. Pillay made it clear that the time for reactive management was over. 'We now have the opportunity, responsibility and indeed the obligation, to reposition our planning focus – not simply to avoid load shedding, but to power inclusive growth, industrial expansion and climate resilience.' Beyond technical fixes – addressing structural fragmentation Tracing the roots of South Africa's systemic energy fragility, Pillay criticised the past two decades of underinvestment, misalignment between policy and execution and governance inertia. Deferred updates to the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP), a long-stalled Integrated Energy Plan (IEP) and fragmented institutional mandates left the country overexposed to breakdowns and unprepared for decentralised energy realities. Yet, the address was not solely diagnostic. Pillay acknowledged recent progress, indicating his view that the Draft IRP 2025 now integrated industrial and spatial planning more closely, and the Gas Master Plan – said to be in an advanced stage of preparation – aimed to address the looming 'gas cliff' while fostering regional integration. Still, he warned, 'Until the IEP is finalised and the various planning instruments are nested under a common strategic umbrella, the risk of fragmentation remains.' A sector redefined – unbundling, competition and market redesign Pillay also highlighted South Africa's electricity market transformation, driven by Eskom's unbundling and the operationalisation of the National Transmission Company of South Africa (NTCSA). This, along with the National Energy Regulator of South Africa's new Grid Access Rules and the Electricity Regulation Amendment Act, signals a shift toward competitive markets. 'This is a fundamentally new planning and market environment,' he said. Drawing lessons from countries like Vietnam and Chile, he called for a 'whole-system approach' integrating generation, transmission, embedded supply and storage, with robust coordination across national, municipal and regional levels. Planning with purpose – five lenses to 2050 To shape a future-ready energy system, Pillay laid out five core planning lenses: Energy security as a developmental imperative: A resilient mix of renewables, gas, clean coal, nuclear and storage – including regional projects like the Mozambique-South Africa gas pipeline. Decarbonisation without destabilisation: Emphasising carbon capture, small modular reactors (SMRs) and green hydrogen, while sequencing coal retirements alongside industrial repurposing. A fit-for-purpose distribution system: With more than R15-billion lost annually in municipal distribution inefficiencies, he called for electricity distribution industry (EDI) restructuring and readiness for rooftop solar, microgrids and bidirectional power flows. Flexibility, technology and digitalisation: Expanding smart grids, real-time digital dispatch and Eskom's Virtual Wheeling platform, while stabilising grid performance with new technologies. Planning as an industrial lever: Tying energy to new industries – green hydrogen, battery minerals and local manufacturing – while driving socioeconomic inclusion and asserting South Africa's leadership in global forums. Institutions to match ambitions However, Pillay cautioned that robust modelling meant little without institutional delivery. He outlined three foundational governance imperatives: Policy certainty and regulatory clarity: Clear rules under the ERA Act, aligned procurement tools and synchronised planning frameworks. A capable and coordinated state: Enhanced local capacity, improved alignment among Eskom, Independent Power Producers, municipalities and regulators. Institutionalising planning: Embedding scenario analysis, social inclusion and learning processes within dynamic planning functions. Energy planning as nation building Pillay closed his address by reframing energy planning as more than a technocratic duty – it was, he asserted, 'a nation-building endeavour.' He stressed that the decisions made today would either entrench inequality or catalyse opportunity; lock in fragility or build resilience. 'As we look toward 2050,' he concluded, 'may this webinar not only interrogate models and assumptions, but also challenge institutions, expand inclusion and catalyse the leadership required to deliver the energy future that South Africa and Africa deserves.' The address sets a bold new tone for what is likely to be a highly contested yet pivotal planning period for South Africa's energy sector – one that demands not just recovery, but systemic reinvention. DM Chris Yelland is managing director, EE Business Intelligence.
