Pacific nation ponders taking asylum seekers from US
Palau President Surangel Whipps Jr last week received a request from Washington to accept "third-country nationals seeking asylum in the United States", his office said in a statement.
Whipps' office told AFP on Wednesday the proposal was still under consideration by the nation's powerful Council of Chiefs, an advisory body of traditional leaders.
"A meeting was held last week. So far no decision has come out of that meeting," a spokesman said.
US President Donald Trump campaigned on a promise to expel millions of undocumented migrants, saying the country had been "inundated" by unwanted arrivals.
He signed an executive order in January -- titled "Protecting the American People Against Invasion" -- that suspended admissions for countless refugees seeking haven in the United States.
Key details of the proposed deal between Palau and the United States were not immediately clear, such as how many asylum seekers it would cover, or what Palau may get in return.
"Based on the most recent draft agreement, Palau would have full discretion to decide whether or not to accept any individuals, and all actions would be consistent with our constitution and laws," the Palau president's office said in a statement.
US Ambassador Joel Ehrendreich was present at a meeting of senior officials to discuss the request, according to photos published last week by the Palau president's office.
The United States has reportedly considered dispatching asylum seekers to the likes of El Salvador, Libya and Rwanda.
With some 20,000 people spread across hundreds of volcanic isles and coral atolls, Palau is by population one of the smallest countries in the world.
A tricky ask
The Pacific microstate could find it difficult to deny Washington's request.
Palau gained independence in 1994 but allows the US military to use its territory under a longstanding "Compact of Free Association" agreement.
In return, the United States gives Palau hundreds of millions of dollars in budgetary support and assumes responsibility for its national defence.
The United States Embassy in Palau did not respond to an AFP request for comment.
Since coming to power in 2021, Whipps has overseen the expansion of US military interests in Palau.
This has included the ongoing construction of a long-range US radar outpost, a crucial early warning system as China ramps up military manuevers in the Taiwan Strait.
© 2025 AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
France 24
4 days ago
- France 24
At least 11 civilians killed as Thai, Cambodian border tensions spiral
05:13 24/07/2025 EU tariffs on chinese EVs strain trade and diplomatic ties with Beijing Economy 24/07/2025 Thailand and Cambodia clash with jets and rockets in deadly border row Asia / Pacific 24/07/2025 Thailand F-16 jet bombs Cambodian targets as border clash escalates Asia / Pacific 24/07/2025 Thailand and Cambodia border closed after weeks of tensions Asia / Pacific 24/07/2025 Xi urges deeper China-EU trust as Brussels calls for 'real solutions' Asia / Pacific 22/07/2025 Bangladesh plane crash kills at least 27, including 25 children Asia / Pacific 20/07/2025 Dozens dead after Ha Long Bay tourist boat capsizes in Vietnam Asia / Pacific 20/07/2025 Typhoon Wipha batters Honk Kong and brings disruptions Asia / Pacific 17/07/2025 Taipei holds annual air raid drill to prepare for Chinese attack Asia / Pacific
France 24
4 days ago
- France 24
Tariff negotiations with US 'not finished', says Philippines
President Ferdinand Marcos flew back to the country late Wednesday after a three-day trip to Washington that saw him emerge from a meeting with Donald Trump having shaved a single point off a 20 percent levy on Filipino goods. What might "seem like a very small concession" was in fact a "significant achievement", Marcos told reporters who questioned if the Philippines -- a longtime US treaty ally -- was getting the short end of the stick. The US president, meanwhile, touted "zero tariffs" on American goods headed to the archipelago nation of 115 million. But Marcos economic adviser Frederick Go said Thursday that tariffs would not be dropped in every category. "The negotiations are not yet finished. Our technical working groups will continue to work with their counterparts from America to finalize the details of this arrangement," he told reporters in Manila. "There are still many things to be discussed." Since the Trump meeting, the Marcos administration has downplayed the potential effects of the tariffs, noting just 16 percent of the country's exports go to the United States, with about two-thirds being electronic components not subject to levies. On Thursday, Go said that while tariffs would disappear for certain agricultural products like soy and wheat, key areas such as sugar, corn, rice, fish and pork would remain protected for Filipino farmers. "I can guarantee to you we studied our biggest industries in the country where we are a significant market producer. We didn't include those in our arrangements with the United States," he said. Go also touted the benefit to Filipino consumers of dropping some tariffs, particularly on pharmaceuticals. "Medicines are expensive in the Philippines. If they are tariff-free, then that can lower the price of medicine in our country," he said. Jesus Felipe, an economics professor at Manila's De La Salle University, told AFP the actual number of Philippine exports hit by the full tariff would likely be low. "That's the number (19 percent) that has been flagged, but our feeling is that many products -- a substantial share of Philippine exports to the US -- will have to be exempted." While predicting the effect on Philippine GDP would effectively be "nothing", Felipe said the "imperialist attitude" with which the United States was treating smaller countries remained worrying. Countries with far larger US trade deficits like China, Mexico and Canada had "much more power and leverage" to fight back, he said.
France 24
4 days ago
- France 24
Pacific climate pioneer still fears for island nation's future
Kiribati, a climate-threatened archipelago that is home to some 130,000 people, sits barely two metres (6.5 feet) above sea level, has little freshwater, no rivers and limited fertile land. The International Court of Justice in The Hague declared Wednesday that states are obliged under international law to tackle climate change. "There was a time when it really got me very depressed because of the realisation that there is not much that we can do about it," former Kiribati president Anote Tong, who led the remote nation for 12 years until 2016, told AFP. "I've heard people about talking about climate grief, and perhaps that is what climate grief is all about: realising that you have no future, and understanding that my grandchildren, I've got a lot of grandchildren, I don't know what is going to happen to them." "Previously, I spoke as a leader, now I speak as a grandfather on the climate issue." Tong welcomed the "wonderful achievement" of the international court decision but warned it risked overshadowing the voices of those at the forefront of climate change. "This is a human rights issue. It's not a legal issue," he said. "There is always a danger that we're not focusing on justice, but more on the legal aspects of the issue." 'How do we survive?' The UN's climate expert panel warned rising sea levels and coastal erosion could render some Pacific nations, including Kiribati, uninhabitable by 2060. Tong, 73, said that during his lifetime, extreme weather events had increasingly destroyed crops and fresh water sources. The climate leader said corals lie just off his property. "I used to play with my kids when the tide was at its highest. Now, you can never do that because the waves are too strong," he said. "That's definitely a change. The question is that, can our islands withstand the change?" Tong said he feared a window of opportunity has passed. He blamed the international community, including polluting countries and global bodies, which he said had "failed at every turn" to address climate change and ignored the plight of smaller island states. "Our future is not assured," he said. "I've all but given up, but I can never afford to give up."
