British teenager who killed family and planned school massacre gets minimum 49 years in prison
At the sentencing hearing at Luton Crown Court, Justice Bobbie Cheema-Grubb said she had considered handing Nicholas Prosper a full life sentence in prison but opted against that given his age — he was 18 at the time of the shootings — and the fact that he had pleaded guilty,
Last month, Prosper admitted at a hearing to murdering his mother Juliana Falcon, 48, and his 13-year-old sister Giselle Prosper and 16-year-old brother Kyle Prosper at the apartment the family shared in Luton, Bedfordshire, on Sept. 13. He had also stabbed his brother more than 100 times.
The judge said Prosper had wanted to emulate and outdo atrocities around the world, including the massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Connecticut in Dec. 2012, when 26 people, mostly children were killed, and the mass shooting at Virginia Tech in April 2007 when 30 people were killed.
'Your ambition was notoriety," she told Prosper, who had to be forced to come to the court to hear his fate. 'You wanted to be known posthumously as the world's most famous school shooter of the 21st century.'
The judge said Prosper's case featured many 'recurrent themes' seen in school shootings around the world, including a sexual interest in children, a withdrawal into an online world, a lack of empathy towards victims and the selection of a 'uniform' for the killings.
The court was told that Prosper, who had been unable to stay in education or hold down a job, had been planning the attack on his family and his old elementary school on Friday the 13th — the date was no accident, with Prosper thinking it would give him even more notoriety.
He managed to forge a gun license and used it to buy a shotgun and 100 cartridges from a legitimate firearms dealer the day before the murders.
Prosper had intended to kill his family in their sleep but his mother had woken up, and after realizing something was 'terribly wrong,' a struggle ensued. After shooting his mother, Prosper left a copy of the novel 'How to Kill Your Family' on her legs, before shooting his sister as she hid under a table, and then stabbing and shooting his brother.
'The lives of your own mother and younger brother and sister were to be collateral damage on the way to fulfil your ambition," the judge said.
She added that Prosper appeared 'cheerful' and had blood on his hands, clothes and glasses when he was picked up by police in a nearby street after the attack had been reported by a neighbor,
Bedfordshire Police Detective Superintendent Rob Hall read a statement on behalf of Prosper's father Raymond Prosper, in which he said the deaths of his ex-partner Juliana and his son Kyle and daughter Giselle, had 'much more meaning and importance.'
'Their deaths and the fast response of Bedfordshire Police stopped any other family in the community going through the pain we have suffered,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
4 hours ago
- The Sun
It's criminal that so many serious offences go unsolved but I have a solution – and it's time to get tough
LET me tell you about a typical British high street. Every morning outside the main supermarket, beggars gather to ply their trade, conning money and (if they're unlucky) sandwiches from kindly shoppers. 5 5 You have to admire their work ethic; they never miss a day's graft. One regular even commutes from his council-provided flat a few train stops away, listening to music on his smartphone which, of course, he hides away as soon as he jumps the ticket barrier and starts his Oscar-winning drunken act to fool people into donating. He's not the only person to dodge his fare. Dozens of people — mostly young men — walk straight through the barriers with impunity as the station staff watch on with a shrug. The police rarely turn up. They certainly don't when the muggers and shoplifters are at work. Boarded up A couple of men routinely wait and watch people using one of the few cashpoints left in the street (the banks have long shut up shop) to steal the freshly dispensed notes. The gangs of shoplifters have taken their toll on the shops along the high street that aren't already boarded up and empty. Many store owners lock their doors at peak times — known as the shoplifters' happy hour — while staff at a well-known coffee shop brand watch in despair as dozens of sandwiches and bottled drinks are swiped by men in masks. Not that they need bother covering their faces. Even when their identities are known, the police rarely arrest them. Moment parrot helps cops bring down huge drug gang with criminal squawking The manager of the local hardware store reported a break-in in the middle of the night, after addicts smashed in the glass window to steal goods to fund their habits. When she called the police, it is claimed they told her to enter the premises to check if the raiders were still there as there wasn't any point in police coming otherwise. She wisely declined. At the chemist — another familiar brand — the staff play a game of cat and mouse with the shoplifters, knowing that the moment popular make-up brands are put on to the shelves (now behind lockable Perspex doors) that the 'spotter' across the road will call his fellow gang members who then raid the store. The staff have been instructed not to try to stop them because they quickly turn violent and trash the store. The police often don't come when they call so the business just factors in the losses, which are ultimately paid for by law-abiding customers. Meanwhile, at the local supermarket, shoplifters operate on an industrial scale, threatening the staff with broken bottles if they are challenged, while some target elderly customers pretending to be their carers to steal their handbags. 5 The supermarket is also facing a war of attrition with a local heroin addict who set up his temporary home in a side doorway, barricaded in with shopping trolleys. Council staff won't remove his stuff because the addict becomes 'aggressive' when they approach, but they are happy to leave young children to walk past him. Children and their parents also have to dodge the armies of cyclists jumping red lights on the road crossings and, even worse, the frenzied e-bike and e-scooter riders speeding along the pavements, with few souls brave enough to tackle them. At one end of the high street, at the local comp, a young boy was recently stabbed on school grounds during what police called an 'altercation' with two older boys. We cannot go on like this. We can't continue to allow our political leaders to run this country into the ground At the other end of the litter-strewn and graffiti-covered road, the local hotel has been turned into an asylum hostel for up to 80 Channel migrant arrivals. Struggling for business after lockdown, the well-known brand decided to close their doors to the public and make the Home Office their only customer. Even though the public are still the ones paying for the rooms, of course. That was two years ago. There was no council meeting, no local residents were told and the local newspaper didn't bother to mention it. Does any of this sound familiar to you? Does it paint a picture of your local high street? Maybe you're one of the lucky ones and this creeping neglect and criminality hasn't hit your neighbourhood yet. But it soon will. Because these aren't stories I've made up about a fictional street, or tales I've heard about distant towns in some godforsaken, blighted and forgotten industrial heartland. 5 No, this is much closer to home because this is my own local high street in an affluent part of London with tree-lined streets and many hugely expensive homes. It wasn't always like this. We used to congratulate ourselves that the only problem we had in our leafy neighbourhood was wheelie bins being left on the pavement for too many days. According to official police statistics, 96 per cent of crimes in my area now go unsolved — including not just shoplifting and thefts but violent and sexual offences too But not now. Everything has changed. And everyone has started to notice. According to official police statistics, 96 per cent of crimes in my area now go unsolved — including not just shoplifting and thefts but violent and sexual offences too. That is a criminal state of affairs. Politicians with a spine We cannot go on like this. We can't continue to allow our political leaders to run this country into the ground. We used to live in one of the safest and most law-abiding countries in the world, where we were policed with our consent and crime didn't pay. But now it most definitely does. The experts will try to tell us that there is no simple solution but that's a lie. The answer is simple and it's staring us in the face: Punish the criminals. We need zero tolerance to every crime, every time. Every shoplifter, every ticket dodger, every graffiti lout, every litterer, every e-scooter pavement rider, every red-light running cyclist, every beggar, every thief, every robber, every violent thug, every harasser, every sex attacker: Arrest them, charge them and make the guilty pay. We haven't got enough police? Recruit more. We don't have enough court time? Open the courts 24/7 until the backlog is caught up. We haven't got enough prison spaces? Build more prisons. Yes, it will take time. Yes, it will cost billions. And, yes, we will need politicians with a spine. But if we want to wrestle back our streets from the criminals and return them to the law-abiding majority, isn't that a small price to pay? 5
Telegraph
4 hours ago
- Telegraph
Ban Britain's most dangerous drivers for life, say Tories
Britain's most dangerous drivers should be banned from the roads for life, the Conservatives have said. Just one per cent of people convicted of causing death by dangerous driving last year were handed a lifetime driving ban, new figures reveal. Just half a per cent of those convicted of causing serious injury by dangerous driving were banned for life. Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, said: 'Under this Government, you can kill someone with your car and be back on the road in just five years. 'In England and Wales, the most dangerous drivers are being let back behind the wheel every single day because of soft sentencing guidelines. This isn't justice – it's a system that clears killers to drive again and again and again. It's time to introduce automatic lifetime bans for the worst offenders. It costs nothing, it saves lives, it is time to act.' Sentencing Council rules set the minimum ban for causing death by dangerous driving at five years. Causing serious injury by dangerous driving attracts a minimum ban of two years, even at the highest culpability and harm levels. Sir Simon Clarke, the director of the Onward think-tank, which carried out the research, said: 'It's outrageous that killers and serial offenders are being handed their licences back like nothing happened. Lifetime bans should be the norm, not the exception.' Onward's research highlighted cases including that of Cain Byrne, 20, who – despite never having held a driving licence – ran over and killed an 81-year-old cyclist moments after inhaling laughing gas from a balloon. He was sentenced earlier this year to 11 years and six months in a young offenders' institution, and banned from driving for 17 years and eight months. In another case highlighted, a motorist who ran over a cyclist after the victim spat on his Land Rover during a road rage row was jailed for 18 months and banned from getting behind the wheel for three years. Nick Cook was left with a broken pelvis, six broken ribs and a punctured liver after the road rage incident. Alan Moult, then aged 74, admitted causing serious injury by dangerous driving over the July 2020 confrontation. Three years ago, the Conservatives toughened sentencing rules for causing death by dangerous driving, with offenders facing life sentences from 2022 onwards. The current Sentencing Council rules, which judges must obey, say the typical sentence will fall between two and 18 years imprisonment.
Telegraph
6 hours ago
- Telegraph
Labour's prisons gamble has made our streets less safe
When Labour came to power they inherited a justice system in crisis. Our prisons, awash with violence and drugs, were almost full. The country was weeks away from running out of jail cells, then running out of court and police cells in short order. So Labour gambled. They chose more controlled early releases under 'SDS40', under which certain prisoners would be released 40 per cent of the way through their sentence. The Government's aim was to buy enough time for prison-building, the Sentencing Review and Courts Review to avert catastrophe. Now, a year later, thanks to Charles Hymas's reporting, we know that gamble is failing. For every four prisoners released in the first three months of the year, three have been 'recalled' to prison. This happens either when an offender commits another offence, fails to attend meetings with probation officers or 'breaches their licence' – breaking conditions designed to prevent future offending and protect victims. The data from the Ministry of Justice covers the first quarter of this year and shows that recalls are up 36 per cent. The statisticians explicitly blame SDS40 and a 2024 change to recall rules for the increase, saying that the 'combined effect expected from these changes is… more opportunities for offenders to be recalled'. In theory prison should rehabilitate inmates, making them less likely to offend after release, and then the probation service should manage those people in the community, keeping them out of trouble. The reality is very different. We know that offenders who leave prison with a job, a home and a good social network are much less likely to reoffend. However, fewer than a third of prisoners have a job six months after release while over a quarter don't have a stable home three months after release. Part of the problem is overcrowding. When prisons have no room, they are often more violent and drug-filled, meaning staff struggle to maintain order. Often the first thing to go is 'purposeful activity' – work, study and training – which might help prisoners avoid crime on release. This is why the Government announced a significant prison-building programme last year, but it has admitted this week it is 'unachievable'. Meanwhile the probation service, desperately understaffed and struggling to retain experienced officers, is being asked to do more and more. If people spend just 40 per cent of their sentence in prison then that means they are supervised by probation for longer, meaning more work. Despite being a crucial part of the justice system and doing difficult, complex work, officers have seen their pay collapse both in real terms and in comparison to other public sector workers. In 2004 a probation officer's pay was equivalent to that of a police sergeant's whereas now it is equivalent to a police constable's. Staff often describe a management culture of fear and excessive demands. As a result of these pressures, Napo, the probation union, are balloting for strike action. The result will be known on August 22, and may herald another headache for Labour. More risks are on their way. In June, in a desperate attempt to delay prisons running out of space again, the Government announced a change meaning that most offenders recalled to prison would be sent back for a shorter 'fixed-term' recall of 28 days, rather than a much longer 'standard recall'. The idea is that with recalled prisoners spending less time back in jail, the prison population should fall. However, this may have the opposite effect. Probation officers may feel that recalling someone for just 28 days is less serious, and so may be more willing to use the power. Short recalls are also the worst of all worlds – 28 days is enough time for someone to lose any employment or home they may have, but provides no time for any real rehabilitation to take place. When the recall policy was announced in the spring, a Ministry of Justice spokesperson acknowledged that they had not conducted any modelling to estimate these risks. So this policy too is a gamble. When Parliament returns the Sentencing Review will begin its journey into law. This, along with the Courts Review, will increase the use of non-prison punishments, placing yet more pressure on probation. If the gamble goes wrong we may well see soaring reoffending, yet more recalls, and an ever more lawless Britain.
