World Press Freedom Day: Farhatullah Babar concerned at weakening of economic model of media in Pakistan
On the eve of the World Press Freedom Day on Saturday, the President Human Rights Cell of the PPP ex-Senator Farhatullah Babar in his statement said, 'It is a grim thought that on the World Press Freedom Day today Pakistan, according to the 'Reporters Without Borders' has earned the dubious distinctions of joining the ranks of those 42 countries where either there is no press freedom at all or if there is some semblance of it the profession of journalism has become 'most dangerous' occupation.
He said, 'It is no less an agonizing thought that according to the same report Pakistan touched a new low of ranking 158 in terms of freedom of press in the comity of nations and is bracketed with Afghanistan and some other countries facing a 'very serious situation' in respect of freedom of press. The dubious distinctions places Pakistan almost at par with Palestine, at serial 163 on the scorecard, where Israeli forces killed nearly two hundred journalists during the last 18 months, 42 of them during the performance of their journalistic duties.
Farhatullah Babar said that the year 2025 started on a most inauspicious note for journalists as it began with changes to the PECA law that has exposed journalists reporting online to intimidation, harassment and subjected to grave abuse of judicial processes by the FIA with impunity and without accountability, as never before.
Farhatullah Babar called upon the political parties and members of Parliament to ensure implementation of section 53 of the PECA Act and compel the FIA to place six monthly reports before Parliament detailing the actions taken by it under the PECA.
He said that the failure of the Parliament to do so has emboldened the FIA to get away with torturing and humiliating journalists with total impunity. This situation cannot and must not be allowed to persist, he said.
He said that it also strongly condemns the blatant advertising restrictions on some media outlets by the government who refuse to peddle the 'official truth and official narrative.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
5 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Iran's rulers face existential choice
Photo: Iranian flag flies in front of the UN office building, housing IAEA headquarters, in Vienna, Austria, May 24, 2021. REUTERS Weakened by war and diplomatic deadlock, Iran's clerical elite stands at a crossroads: defy pressure to halt its nuclear activity and risk further Israeli and US attack, or concede and risk a leadership fracture. For now, the Islamic Republic establishment is focusing on immediate survival over longer-term political strategy. A fragile ceasefire ended a 12-day war in June that began with Israeli air strikes, followed by US strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites. Both sides declared victory but the war exposed the military vulnerabilities and punctured the image of deterrence maintained by a major Middle East power and Israel's arch regional foe. Three Iranian insiders told Reuters the political establishment now views negotiations with the US — aimed at resolving a decades-long dispute over its nuclear ambitions — as the only way to avoid further escalation and existential peril. The strikes on Iranian nuclear and military targets, which included killings of top Revolutionary Guard commanders and nuclear scientists, shocked Tehran, kicking off just a day before a planned sixth round of talks with Washington. While Tehran accused Washington of "betraying diplomacy", some hardline lawmakers and military commanders blamed officials who advocated diplomacy with Washington, arguing the dialogue proved a "strategic trap" that distracted the armed forces. However, one political insider, who like others requested anonymity given the sensitivity of the matter, said the leadership now leaned towards talks as "they've seen the cost of military confrontation". President Masoud Pezeshkian said on Sunday that resuming talks with the United States "does not mean we intend to surrender", addressing hardliners opposing further nuclear diplomacy after the war. He added: "You don't want to talk? What do you want to do? ... Do you want to go (back) to war?" His remarks were criticised by hardliners including Revolutionary Guards commander Aziz Ghazanfari, who warned that foreign policy demands discretion and that careless statements could have serious consequences. Ultimately, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei holds the final say. Insiders said he and the clerical power structure had reached a consensus to resume nuclear negotiations, viewing them as vital to the Islamic Republic's survival. Iran's Foreign Ministry said no decision has been made on the resumption of nuclear talks.
Express Tribune
5 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Israel unveils new West Bank settlement plan
Photo: Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich attends an inauguration event for Israel's new light rail line for the Tel Aviv metropolitan area, in Petah Tikva, Israel, August 17, 2023/Reuters Israeli far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich announced that work would start on a long-delayed settlement that would divide the West Bank and cut it off from East Jerusalem, a move his office said would "bury" the idea of a Palestinian state. The Palestinian government, allies and campaign groups condemned the scheme, calling it illegal and saying the fragmentation of territory would rip up peace plans for the region. Standing at the site of the planned settlement in Maale Adumim on Thursday, Smotrich, a settler himself, said Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and US President Donald Trump had agreed to the revival of the E1 development, though there was no immediate confirmation from either. "Whoever in the world is trying to recognise a Palestinian state today will receive our answer on the ground. Not with documents nor with decisions or statements, but with facts. Facts of houses, facts of neighbourhoods," Smotrich said. Asked about his remarks, a US State Department spokesperson said: "A stable West Bank keeps Israel secure and is in line with this administration's goal to achieve peace in the region," and referred reporters to Israel's government for further information. The spokesperson said Washington remained primarily focused on ending the war in Gaza. The United Nations urged Israel to reverse its decision to start work on the settlement. "It would put an end to prospects of a two-state solution," UN spokesperson Stephane Dujarric told reporters. "Settlements go against international law (and) further entrench the occupation." Israel froze construction plans at Maale Adumim in 2012, and again after they were revived in 2020, amid objections from the US, European allies and other powers who considered the project a threat to any future peace deal with the Palestinians. Restarting the project could further isolate Israel, which has watched some of its Western allies condemn its military offensive in Gaza and announce they may recognise a Palestinian state. Palestinians fear the settlement building in the West Bank - which has sharply intensified - will rob them of any chance to build a state of their own in the area. In a statement headlined "Burying the idea of a Palestinian state," Smotrich's spokesperson said the minister had approved the plan to build 3,401 houses for Israeli settlers between an existing settlement in the West Bank and Jerusalem. Nabil Abu Rudeineh, the Palestinian president's spokesperson, called on the United States to pressure Israel to stop settlement building. "The EU rejects any territorial change that is not part of a political agreement between involved parties. So annexation of territory is illegal under international law," European Commission spokesperson Anitta Hipper said. Palestinians were already demoralised by the Israeli military campaign which has killed more than 61,000 people in Gaza, according to local health authorities, and fear Israel will ultimately push them out of that territory. About 700,000 Israeli settlers live among 2.7 million Palestinians in the West Bank and East Jerusalem. Israel annexed East Jerusalem in 1980, a move not recognised by most countries, but has not formally extended sovereignty over the West Bank.
Business Recorder
7 hours ago
- Business Recorder
‘Hybrid' narrative
EDITORIAL: The stakeholders' narrative gaining traction on airwaves and the print media is that the hybrid system, rooted in ground realities, has made significant strides in all areas of governance — particularly foreign relations and the economy. Pakistan's relations with the West have improved markedly, however, it would be folly to deny the considerable influence of the Trump administration's deviations from previous US-led policies (fully supported by the European Union) that are attributable to the US President's entirely different policy thrust with respect to dealing with Russia and China, continuing to be joined at the hip with the genocidal policies of Israel, and, last but not least, the primacy of tariffs in forging trade deals with countries around the world. In this context President Trump's success in forging a ceasefire between India and Pakistan (subsequent to our indisputable win over the skies) and his lunch invitation to COAS Field Marshal Asim Munir, much to the chagrin of Indians, are certainly foreign policy coups that must be appreciated. Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif's nomination of President Trump for the coveted peace prize no doubt generated goodwill in the White House though the sentiment in this country was dampened after the Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu nominated President Trump for the same prize. These improved ties have not been at the cost of our long-term friends — China, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates — with reports suggesting that China had extended tacit support to our foreign policy initiatives. However, one would hope that the Foreign Office had duly deliberated on the Armenia-Azerbaijan peace deal signed in Washington DC, before announcing support. The Zangezur Corridor, a 43-kilometre road from Azerbaijan to Nakhchivan Autonomous Republic through Armenia, has been given to the US on a 99-year lease. This would link Azerbaijan to Turkey and beyond to Europe — a move opposed by Iran as it has been credibly reported that some Israeli strikes on Iran were from Azeri territory, and by Russia that fears that US control of the corridor may compromise its influence in the south Caucasus with the possibility of becoming a geopolitical and possibly military hotspot like Ukraine. On the economic front, however, the narrative remains under challenge on three counts. First, while the trade deal with the US reduced the threatened 29 percent tariffs on our exports to 19 percent yet the claim that we are at the most advantageous position in our region has little traction as no other country has yet agreed to US tariffs and the two major regional countries — China and India — unlike the European Union continue to resist succumbing to US demands that they have stated are unfair and unjustified. Second, foreign direct investment (FDI) pledged by the US in the trade deal has yet to bear fruit, and additionally two years after the establishment of the Special Investment Facilitation Council (SIFC) FDI has remained elusive with the latest data uploaded on the Finance Division website was USD 1.8 billion in July-June 2025 against USD 1.96 billion in the comparable period the year before. Portfolio investment suffered negative USD 650.9 million outflows in 2025 as opposed to negative USD 383.8 million in the comparable period the year before. In other words, more work is required to make a success of the SIFC, which allows for one forum where all possible impediments to FDI can and are being resolved. In addition, the reliance on rollovers has not yet abated with USD 16 billion in the current year with the foreign exchange reserves lower at USD 14.5 billion. The overarching focus of the economic team leaders is on a massive reduction in inflation and a current account deficit that is under control; however, what is being ignored is the rise in poverty levels in the country, 44.2 percent as per the World Bank, and an untenable unemployment rate of 22 percent, indicators that may well have the seeds of socio-economic unrest that, as per the IMF, could well derail the ongoing programme's reform efforts. The IMF programme conditions accepted by the economic team continue to be under implementation which are neither pro-poor nor pro-growth — as they are severely contractionary and include: (i) monetary policy — the decline in the discount rate from 21 to 11 percent maybe significant but no economist will define 11 percent as not being severely contractionary; and (ii) fiscal policy with the existing indirect taxes raised and/or widened to generate revenue rather than to reform the tax structure by reducing reliance on indirect taxes whose incidence on the poor is greater than on the rich. In-house out of the box policies are required to ease the rising pressure on the pressure cooker of public opinion. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
