logo
Better EV Stock: QuantumScape vs. ChargePoint

Better EV Stock: QuantumScape vs. ChargePoint

Globe and Mail25-05-2025

QuantumScape (NYSE: QS) and ChargePoint (NYSE: CHPT) represent two different ways to invest in the growing electric vehicle (EV) market.
QuantumScape develops solid-state lithium metal batteries which provide better thermal resistance, faster charging times, and higher maximum capacities than traditional lithium ion batteries. ChargePoint is the largest builder of residential and commercial EV charging stations in North America and Europe.
Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Learn More »
QuantumScape and ChargePoint both closed at their record highs during the apex of the meme stock mania in December 2020. But today, they're both trading more than 95% below their all-time highs. Let's see why these two EV stocks ran out of juice -- and if they're worth buying now.
QuantumScape still has a lot to prove
QuantumScape has been developing its solid-state batteries for the past 15 years, but it still hasn't commercialized any of its products. Its first battery, the QSE-5, should have an energy density of over 800 Wh/L (watt hours per liter) and can be rapidly charged from 10% to 80% in less than 15 minutes. Most traditional lithium ion EV batteries have an average density of 300-700 Wh/L with an average fast charging time of 20 minutes to an hour.
QuantumScape has been working with Volkswagen for more than a decade to develop and test those batteries, but it's only shipped some low volume test samples so far. It doesn't expect to start mass-producing or commercializing its first batteries until 2026.
For 2025, ChargePoint expects to ship more low volume test samples as it transitions from its current Raptor separator process to the newer Cobra separator process. It expects that sweeping upgrade -- which should boost its yields, equipment productivity, and cell reliability -- to pave the way toward the commercialization of its batteries.
However, QuantumScape still faces a lot of competition from major automakers, including Toyota and Nio, which are developing their own solid-state batteries. Other start-ups like Blue Solutions and Solid Power are also rushing toward the same goal.
Without any revenue, QuantumScape is a tough stock to value. However, analysts expect its revenue to rise to $4 million in 2026 and $93 million in 2027 as it commercializes its first batteries. With an enterprise value of $1.63 billion, it might not seem cheap at 18 times its 2027 sales -- but its revenue could skyrocket over the following years if it successfully scales up its business.
ChargePoint looks extremely undervalued
At the end of fiscal 2025 (which ended this January), ChargePoint was managing 342,000 charging ports across North America and Europe. More than 33,000 of those ports were Level 3 fast chargers, while the rest were slower Level 2 chargers.
ChargePoint mainly sells its connected charging stations to businesses that want to set their own prices. It provides those customers with network access, billing, and customer support services. Those advantages set it apart from Tesla 's Superchargers, which operate as stand-alone stalls and extensions of the automaker's own digital ecosystem.
Therefore, Tesla, which operates more than 67,000 Superchargers worldwide, shouldn't be considered a direct competitor to ChargePoint. Instead, ChargePoint's closest competitor is EVgo, which operates a smaller domestic network of 4,240 charging stalls.
ChargePoint's revenue surged 65% in fiscal 2022 and 93% in fiscal 2023 as the EV market expanded, but it only grew 8% in fiscal 2024 and dropped 18% in fiscal 2025.
That slowdown was caused by rising interest rates, which chilled the EV market and discouraged its commercial and residential customers from installing new charging stalls. But in fiscal 2025, it significantly narrowed its net loss as it trimmed its workforce and rolled out a new dynamic pricing model that grants its station owners even more control over their pricing variables.
From fiscal 2025 to fiscal 2028, analysts expect ChargePoint's revenue to grow at a compound annual growth rate of 21% to $738 million as interest rates decline and the EV market stabilizes. They also expect its adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) to turn positive in fiscal 2027 and surge to $80 million in fiscal 2028.
With an enterprise value of $495 million, ChargePoint trades at just 1.1 times this year's sales. It could command a much higher valuation once the EV market warms up again.
The better buy: ChargePoint
QuantumScape's stock might soar once it starts selling its first batteries, but its stock could easily sink lower until that happens. So for now, I'd rather buy ChargePoint as an undervalued play on the EV market instead of putting too much faith in QuantumScape's ambitious long-term plans.
Should you invest $1,000 in QuantumScape right now?
Before you buy stock in QuantumScape, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and QuantumScape wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $639,271!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $804,688!*
Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is957% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to167%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of May 19, 2025

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

History repeats itself, says widow whose husband and son died in Titan sub implosion
History repeats itself, says widow whose husband and son died in Titan sub implosion

CBC

timean hour ago

  • CBC

History repeats itself, says widow whose husband and son died in Titan sub implosion

History repeats itself as unheeded warnings foreshadow the Titan's fatal implosion 9 hours ago Duration 1:48 Social Sharing On June 18, 2023, the Titan submersible disappeared during a dive to the iconic wreck of the Titanic. The world watched in shock as authorities mounted a laborious, four-day search-and-rescue operation that located debris on the sea floor, less than 500 metres from the bow of the Titanic. The submersible had imploded shortly after launch, killing all five on board. The Nature of Things documentary Implosion: The Titanic Sub Disaster, coming to CBC Gem on June 6, examines a series of warnings and red flags that were raised in the years and months leading up to the tragic implosion. With unprecedented access to the United States Coast Guard's Marine Board investigation and interviews with key witnesses and experts, the film details the systemic issues and design flaws that led to the Titan's ultimate failure. Who was OceanGate CEO Stockton Rush? In this clip, we meet Stockton Rush, the OceanGate CEO who died on the doomed expedition. He was an inventor with a grand vision to make deep-sea exploration more accessible. "His family legacy was really about the closest that you could get to royalty within the United States," says submersible pilot and designer Karl Stanley in the film. Two of his forefathers were signers of the Declaration of Independence, and his wife, Wendy, was the great-granddaughter of Isidor and Rosalie Ida Straus, the owners of Macy's department store who died when the Titanic sank in 1912. Rush was wealthy, with vast connections in the American business world, and deep-sea exploration was his life's passion. Was the Titan submersible doomed to fail? Rush had built the Titan submersible out of carbon-fibre, an unconventional material for deep-sea exploration that, in hindsight, doomed the vessel. The sub had already made 13 trips to the wreckage of the Titanic, some 3,800 metres below the surface, before its final trip. The 15-month investigation into the tragedy revealed that each trip to the depths weakened the hull. "Hardly anybody in the public is familiar with carbon-fibre," says OceanGate safety diver Tym Catterson in the film. "It's stable. All the way up until this magic point that it is not. When it finally pops, it will catastrophically fail." There were early signs that the Titan was unsafe; in 2020, a large crack formed during a dive and the hull had to be rebuilt entirely. In 2022, a l oud bang was heard as Titan was surfacing from the depths, suggesting that the carbon-fibre hull suffered structural damage. "In one of my emails, I tell [Rush] that the hull is yelling at him and he needs to listen," submersible expert Karl Stanley recalls. In spite of all this, Rush continued his missions, undeterred. "Why is arrogance more important than safety?" asks Christine Dawood, whose husband, Shahzada and 19-year-old son Suleman died on the dive. "The irony is not lost on me that the Titanic sunk for exactly the same reason. So history repeats itself." Watch Implosion: The Titanic Sub Disaster on CBC Gem and The Nature of Things YouTube channel on June 6, 2025. Airing on CBC TV Wednesday, June 18 at 8 p.m.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store