
Loretta Swit, Emmy-winner who played Maj. Houlihan on pioneering series 'M.A.S.H.,' has died at 87
Publicist Harlan Boll says Swit died Friday at her home in New York City, likely from natural causes.
Swit and Alan Alda were the longest-serving cast members on "M.A.S.H.," which was based on Robert Altman's 1970 film, which was itself based on a novel by Richard Hooker, the pseudonym of H. Richard Hornberger.
The CBS show aired for 11 years from 1972 to 1983, revolving around life at the 4077th Mobile Army Surgical Hospital, which gave the show its name. The two-and-a-half-hour finale on Feb. 28, 1983, lured over 100 million viewers, the most-watched episode of any scripted series ever.
Rolling Stone magazine put "M.A.S.H." at No. 25 of the best TV shows of all time, while Time Out put it at No. 34. It won the Impact Award at the 2009 TV Land annual awards. It won a Peabody Award in 1975 "for the depth of its humor and the manner in which comedy is used to lift the spirit and, as well, to offer a profound statement on the nature of war."
In Altman's 1970 film, Houlihan was a one-dimensional character — a prickly, rules-bound head nurse who was regularly tormented by male colleagues, who gave her the nickname "Hot Lips." Her intimate moments were broadcast to the entire camp after somebody planted a microphone under her bed.
Sally Kellerman played Houlihan in the movie version and Swit took it over for TV, eventually deepening and creating her into a much fuller character. Her sexuality was played down and she wasn't even called "Hot Lips" in the later years.
The growing awareness of feminism in the '70s spurred Houlihan's transformation from caricature to real person, but a lot of the change was due to Swit's influence on the scriptwriters.
"Around the second or third year I decided to try to play her as a real person, in an intelligent fashion, even if it meant hurting the jokes," Swit told Suzy Kalter, author of "The Complete Book of 'M.A.S.H.'"
"To oversimplify it, I took each traumatic change that happened in her life and kept it. I didn't go into the next episode as if it were a different character in a different play. She was a character in constant flux; she never stopped developing."
Alda praised Swit as a "supremely talented actor" in a post on X. "She worked hard In showing the writing staff how they could turn the character from a one joke sexist stereotype into a real person — with real feelings and ambitions. We celebrated the day the script came out listing her character not as Hot Lips, but as Margaret. Loretta made the most of her time here."
"M.A.S.H." wasn't an instant hit. It finished its first season in 46th place, out of 75 network TV series, but it nabbed nine Emmy nominations. It was rewarded with a better time slot for its sophomore season, paired on Saturday nights with "All in the Family," then TV's highest-rated show. At the 1974 Emmys, it was crowned best comedy, with Alda winning as best comedy actor.
The series also survived despite cast churn. In addition to Swit and Alda, the first season featured Wayne Rogers, McLean Stevenson, Larry Linville and Gary Burghoff. Harry Morgan, Mike Farrell and David Ogden Stiers would later be added, while Jamie Farr and William Christopher had expanded roles.
"Loretta Swit's portrayal of Margaret 'Hot Lips' Houlihan was groundbreaking — bringing heart, humor, and strength to one of television comedy's most enduring roles. Her talent extended well beyond that iconic character, with acclaimed work on both stage and screen that showcased her intelligence, versatility, and passion," National Comedy Center Executive Director Journey Gunderson said in a statement.
Swit appeared in all but 11 episodes of the series, nearly four times longer than the Korean War itself, exploring issues like PTSD, sexism and racism. Swit pushed for a better representation for women.
"One of the things I liked, with Loretta's prodding, was every time I had a chance to write for her character, we'd get away from the Hot Lips angle and find out more about who Margaret was. She became more of a real person," Alda told The Hollywood Reporter in 2018.
The series ended on a happy note for Houlihan, who spends much of the finale debating whether she wants to head to Tokyo or Belgium for her next overseas post. Ultimately she opts to return to America and work at a hospital, citing her father — a career Army man.
Swit didn't personally agree that was the correct decision for a military-minded official: "I didn't think that was correct for my Margaret," she told Yahoo Entertainment in 2023. "I think her next move was Vietnam. So I didn't agree with that, but that's what they wanted her to do."
But the actor did get to write the speech that Houlihan delivers to her fellow nurses on their final night together, in which she says: "It's been an honor and privilege to have worked with you. And I'm very, very proud to have known you."
"I was consumed with writing that. And I still get letters from women all over the world who became nurses because of Margaret Houlihan. To have contributed to someone's life like that is remarkable," she told Yahoo Entertainment.
During her run, Houlihan had an affair with Hawkeye's foil, the bumbling Frank Burns, played by Linville in the TV version, and in Season 5, Houlihan returns from a stay in Tokyo engaged to a handsome lieutenant colonel, a storyline that Swit says she advocated for with the writers.
"I told them: 'Can you imagine what fun you're going to have with Larry when I come back to town and I tell him I'm engaged? He'll rip the doors off of the mess tent!' And that's exactly what they had him do. So we were all of the same mind."
Toward the end, Swit was tempted to leave the show. She played the role of Chris Cagney in a 1981 television movie, "Cagney & Lacey," and was offered the part when it was picked up as a midseason series for the spring of 1982. But producers insisted she stay with "M.A.S.H." for its last two seasons.
Swit told The Florida Times-Union in 2010 she might have stayed with "M.A.S.H." anyway. "You can't help but get better as an actor working with scripts like that," she said. "If you're in something that literate, well, we got spoiled."
In 2022, James Poniewozik, The New York Times's chief television critic, looked back on the show and said it held up well: "Its blend of madcap comedy and pitch-dark drama — the laughs amplifying the serious stakes, and vice versa — is recognizable in today's dramedies, from 'Better Things' to 'Barry,' that work in the DMZ between laughter and sadness."
After the TV series, Swit became a vocal animal welfare activist, selling SwitHeart perfume and her memoir through her official website, with proceeds benefiting various animal-related nonprofit groups.
In 1983, she married actor Dennis Holahan, whom she'd met when he was a guest star on "M.A.S.H." They divorced in 1995.
Born in Passaic, New Jersey, the daughter of Polish immigrants, Swit enrolled in the American Academy of Dramatic Arts, then paid her dues for years in touring productions.
In 1969, she arrived in Hollywood and was soon seen in series such as "Gunsmoke," "Hawaii Five-O," "Mission Impossible" and "Bonanza." Then in 1972, she got her big break when she was asked to audition for the role of "Hot Lips."
She would regularly return to theater, starring on Broadway in 1975 in "Same Time, Next Year" and "The Mystery of Edwin Drood" in 1986. She was in "Amorous Crossing," a romantic comedy, at Alhambra Theatre & Dining in 2010 and in North Carolina Theatre's production of "Mame" in 2003.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Ex-Boston news anchor sues station for $4M claiming she was discriminated against for being white
A former morning news anchor at the Boston-based broadcaster WBZ is suing the company for $4 million, claiming she was discriminated against for being white and for being a woman. Kate Merrill joined the broadcaster as an anchor in 2004 and stayed with the company until 2024, according to the lawsuit. WBZ, its parent companies CBS and Paramount, two of Merrill's former on-air co-workers, and station management were named as defendants in the case. According to the lawsuit, Merrill was accused of of committing "microaggressions" and displaying unconscious bias toward a pair of recently hired Black employees at WBZ. It' is unclear who made the accusations against her. In response to her alleged actions, Merrill was demoted in May 2024 and sent to work on weekend nights, reports. According to the lawsuit, Merrill's demotion was celebrated outwardly by her manager, Justin Draper. She claims the manager never made similar celebratory remarks about her demoted male colleagues. 'Draper unnecessarily broadly announced Ms. Merrill's demotion, humiliating her. In so doing, Defendant Draper acted with malice and ill will,' the lawsuit says. 'Draper had not similarly broadly announced the demotions of any male anchors at WBZ.' The lawsuit goes on to call the demotions "career ending." Merrill resigned in May 2024, and a non-compete clause in her contract kept her off the air until June of 2025. In addition to the allegations about her workplace, Merrill also denies that any of her actions were "motivated by overt racism or unconscious bias." The bulk of the lawsuit revolves around Merrill's relationship with Jason Mikell, a Black meteorologist who was hired to work at the station in 2023. He replaced an outgoing white meteorologist. The lawsuit alleges that the outgoing weatherman had been fired despite never being given any warnings about his work performance. The lawsuit claims that Merrill and Mikell got along fine and that he even asked the anchor to help him learn correct local pronunciations. 'Kate, as I mentioned a short time ago to Liam, I truly appreciate the kindness, helpfulness, and openness during this transition to the show. I care about each of you and certainly the show and its performance,' Mikell allegedly said in January 2024, according to the lawsuit. In 2024, Mikell allegedly made an inappropriate joke in which he implied that he and Merrill "had sexual relations at a gazebo," the lawsuit claims. The station's news director reportedly took no corrective action after the incident. The filing further states that in April 2024, Merrill privately offered Mikell a correction on the word "Concord," which allegedly caused a confrontation between her and Mikell. Merrill's lawsuit claims that Mikell began screaming at her and insisting she was being critical of him. After that alleged incident, Merrill filed a complaint with the station's human resources department. The lawsuit invokes a reckoning that CBS and the WBZ station reportedly had in 2020 about its lack of diversity. A former CBS executive told Variety that WBZ was "too white" at the time, and insisted it had the "least diverse station for on air talent," the lawsuit claims. The lawsuit claims that Courtney Cole – a Black anchor named in the lawsuit who was hired in 2022 to replace a white man who had been demoted – was given time on the anchor desk over her more experienced white colleague in an attempt to boost the number of Black faces on the station. 'Ms. Merrill became concerned that WBZ was not providing sufficient support to her less experienced and recently hired colleagues, a number of whom were persons of color,' the lawsuit says. After Merrill made her complaint to HR, the company told her she was being investigated for racial discrimination brought on by complaints from Cole and Mikell. According to the lawsuit, the acts of racism that Merrill was accused of included telling Mikell he would "find his people" and that she was frequently critical of him and did not ask him about his weekends. Cole claims that Merrill recommended she move to Nashville and aim to become a main anchor there. Merrill previously worked in Nashville. 'Cole apparently interpreted as a suggestion that she go to Nashville because it would be a better racial fit for Defendant Cole (who is Black) rather than a comment about career opportunities and how much she (Ms. Merrill) enjoyed Nashville," the lawsuit says. Merrill notes on the lawsuit that Nashville is not a majority-minority city. The Independent has requested comment from WBZ and CBS.


New York Post
4 hours ago
- New York Post
John Oliver slams Jay Leno's late-night TV advice: ‘Hard pass'
John Oliver doesn't care about Jay Leno's opinions. The 'Last Week Tonight' host, 48, responded to Leno, 75, recently criticizing late-night TV hosts for alienating half their audience with one-sided political jabs. 'I'm going to take a hard pass on taking comedic advice from Jay Leno,' Oliver told The Hollywood Reporter in an interview published Tuesday. 9 John Oliver on 'Last Week Tonight.' Courtesy of HBO The British comedian also defended sometimes upsetting viewers with jokes on his show. 'Comedy can't be for everyone. It's inherently subjective,' Oliver said. 'So, yeah, when you do stand-up, some people try to play to a broader audience, which is completely legitimate. Others decide not to, which is equally legitimate.' 9 Jay Leno on 'The Tonight Show' in 2001. AP 9 Jay Leno performs at the Orpheum Theatre in Wichita, Kansas on May 8. Getty Images 'I guess I don't think it's a question of what you should do because I don't think comedy is prescriptive in that way,' he continued. 'It's just what people want. I think our show clearly comes from a point of view, but most of those long stories we do are not party political. They're about systemic issues.' Oliver, who has hosted 'Last Week Tonight' since 2014, pointed out that he doesn't only discuss divisive political issues on the HBO show. 9 John Oliver during an episode of HBO's 'Last Week Tonight.' 'Our last few shows were about gang databases, AI slop, juvenile justice, med spas, air traffic control,' he said. 'I'm not saying that these don't have a point of view in them. Of course they do. But I hope a lot of them actually reach across people's political persuasions.' 'You want people to at least be able to agree on the problem,' Oliver added, 'even if you disagree on what the solution to it is.' During his interview last month with Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation CEO David Trulio, Leno called out late-night hosts for their political talk after CBS announced it was canceling Stephen Colbert's run on 'The Late Show.' 9 Jay Leno at the opening night premiere of 'Midas Man' at the 20th Los Angeles Jewish Film Festival in June 2025. Getty Images 'I don't understand why you would alienate one particular group, you know, or just don't do it at all,' Leno said. 'I'm not saying you have to throw your support or whatever, but just do what's funny.' 9 Stephen Colbert on 'The Late Show.' CBS Leno also recalled how he tried to be politically neutral when he hosted 'The Tonight Show' for 21 years. 'It was fun to me when I got hate letters, 'Dear Mr. Leno, you and your Republican friends' and, 'Well, Mr. Leno, I hope you and your Democratic buddies are happy' — over the same joke,' he shared. 'I go, 'Well, that's good,'' Leno added. 'That's how you get a whole audience.' 9 Jay Leno interviewing John McCain on 'The Tonight Show' in 2001. REUTERS The Emmy Award winner said that late-night hosts today 'have to be content with half the audience because you have to give your opinion.' 'I don't think anybody wants to hear a lecture,' Leno went on. 'I love political humor, don't get me wrong, but what happens is people wind up cozying too much to one side or the other.' 9 Jay Leno attends the 20th Los Angeles Jewish Film Festival. Getty Images Late-night comedy was thrown into turmoil in July following CBS' decision to cancel 'The Late Show with Stephen Colbert.' The move has been accused of being politically motivated move since President Donald Trump won a huge election interference lawsuit against CBS' parent company Paramount just days later. 9 Stephen Colbert on 'The Late Show' in 2017. AP Oliver said after Colbert's show was axed that the decision was 'terrible news for the world of comedy.'


The Hill
5 hours ago
- The Hill
Colbert's ‘Late Show' wasn't canceled — it was euthanized
Late-night host Stephen Colbert announced on July 17, during a live broadcast, that CBS would be canceling 'The Late Show.' Colbert was quick to cast the move as political, with longtime friend Jon Stewart going further on 'The Daily Show,' portraying Colbert as a victim of Trumpian machinations — complete with a gospel choir chorus of 'Go f— yourself' aimed squarely at CBS executives. It made for enjoyable theater but conspicuously lacked counterfactual arguments. Amid the bluster, neither Stewart nor Colbert offered a serious defense of the show's underlying business performance. Let it be stated with clarity: 'The Late Show' was not primarily felled by politics. It was a casualty of audience migration — away from legacy television and toward streaming, social media and podcasts. 'The Late Show' wasn't merely canceled — it was euthanized. Colbert built 'The Late Show' around political comedy, an extension of his Comedy Central persona rooted in partisan satire. It worked in the linear TV era, especially during the Trump presidency. But it's ill-suited for the digital economy where content lives or dies by shareability and replay value. Jimmy Fallon's 'Tonight Show,' shaped by his Saturday Night Live roots, mixes sketch comedy, musical impersonations and celebrity games. This format isn't entirely apolitical — it often contains soft political touches — but it is built for viral clips that can thrive for years on TikTok, YouTube and Instagram long after the original broadcast. Fallon boasts 76.3 million social followers — over three times Colbert's 20.7 million — and drew 9.2 billion social views from June 2024 to May 2025. Pew Research shows 75 percent of TikTok creators with over 1 million followers focus on entertainment, while only 6 percent create political content. Political monologues decay quickly. Sketches, musical bits and celebrity impressions accrue long-tail value, driving both cultural currency and incremental revenue. Colbert may have edged Fallon in TV ratings, but Fallon won where it matters now: digital relevance and monetization. Even acclaimed shows must make money. Running 'The Late Show' was like CBS funding a tentpole blockbuster every year, only without the box office returns. CBS insiders estimate the show lost $40 to 50 million annually for years. Production costs, including a staff of nearly 200, approached $100 million a year. Revenues never came close — ad sales fell 25 percent to about $70 million by 2024, and streaming added just $60 million over four years. Megan Kelly recently noted that her Fox News primetime show, 'The Kelly File,' generated $100 million in revenue with never more than 12 employees, at one-tenth Colbert's cost. 'Gutfeld!' (late-night's current ratings king) reportedly operates on similar lean metrics. Like Colbert, Greg Gutfeld's Fox show lacks Fallon's variety-show appeal, but unlike Colbert, he isn't shackled to a massive budget and consistently delivers wide operating margins. Paramount's phrase 'challenging revenue environment' was boardroom code for this truth: 'The Late Show' was structurally unprofitable and had been for years. Cancellation was not political. It was a financial inevitability. It's also critical to understand that ratings are not enough on their own. In his on-air cancellation announcement, Colbert cited his Nielsen ratings lead — 2.4 million viewers vs. Fallon's 2.1 million in the second quarter of 2025 — as proof of his unjustified cancellation. But ratings don't pay the bills. Advertisers buy monetizable reach, increasingly found online. Fallon's broader appeal across digital platforms drew far more advertiser dollars, despite his smaller television audience. A narrow win in a shrinking broadcast demographic is meaningless when the ad dollars flow elsewhere. Colbert led the wrong scoreboard, and CBS executives knew it. Late-night TV also cannibalizes itself. CBS, NBC, and ABC chase the same progressive-leaning audience according to Pew Research, splitting an already shrinking base three ways. 'The Late Show' never truly owned its audience, it shared it. 'Gutfeld!' doesn't have that problem. As the only mainstream right-leaning comedy show, it drew approximately 3.3 million viewers in the second quarter of 2025, regularly outpacing Colbert. It operates on a far leaner budget and is likely the only consistently profitable late-night show. Colbert's partisan guest list — 176 left-leaning guests versus one Republican since 2022 — left no room for growth beyond his base. Cable news offers the same lesson: ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC and CNN carve up the progressive pie, whereas Fox consolidates the right and often wins nightly ratings outright. Fragmentation kills margins. Fox dominates because it owns an unshared lane. All of these business failures — the weak content strategy, chronic losses, hollow ratings, and fractured audience — sit atop a deeper truth: Colbert's cancellation was less about politics than about migration. A tectonic shift is occurring in how audiences consume comedy, and it has left the entire late-night format stranded in a dying medium. Cord-cutting surged after the 2008 financial crisis, and a new generation is being raised on iPhones and streaming apps, never having subscribed to TV in the first place. Pew Research data shows that by 2015, U.S. television subscriptions had already peaked and then began a steep, irreversible decline. Audiences pivoted to streaming platforms, podcasts and on-demand comedy specials, where authenticity and autonomy replaced the old nightly broadcast ritual. Today, late-night variety comedy TV hosts are experiencing the whiplash of that unabated 10-year migration. Against this backdrop, the big-budget, five-nights-a-week variety format is a legacy product — a typewriter in a PC world. Poking the orange bear may have accelerated Colbert's demise, but it was merely a leading indicator of the larger truth: The industrial model that sustained late-night television is collapsing, and no amount of political framing by Colbert, Stewart or anyone else can disguise that fact. The late Cambridge physicist Stephen Hawking's famous line was that 'intelligence is the ability to adapt to change.' Colbert and his team showed little of that adaptive intelligence in the face of a rapidly evolving audience landscape. Stephen Lile is a strategy and innovation fellow at the University of Cambridge Judge Business School. He is coauthor of the forthcoming book 'Organized Science Denial,' (Oxford University Press which discusses the news media's role in misinformation and disinformation.