
UN80 Initiative Should Be ‘Inclusive And Transparent', Recognises General Assembly
The text, introduced by Russia and adopted without a vote, 'welcomes the efforts of the SecretaryGeneral to strengthen the United Nations in order to keep pace with a changing world' and calls on UN entities and specialised agencies to align their reform efforts 'as appropriate'.
In the resolution, the 193-member Assembly 'recognises the central role of Member States in the reform process, which should be inclusive and transparent'.
It also 'looks forward to receiving, in accordance with established procedures' the SecretaryGeneral's proposals under the initiative, 'taking into account the necessity to have clearly defined objectives and an evidence-based approach, and aiming at strengthening the impact of the United Nations and enhancing its agility, responsiveness and resilience while addressing the issue of duplicative efforts and ensuring effective and efficient mandate delivery across all three pillars of the work of the United Nations.'
Launched by the Secretary-General in March, the UN80 Initiative centres on three priorities: enhancing operational efficiency, assessing how mandates – or key tasks – from Member States are implemented and exploring structural reforms across the UN system.
Mixed reactions on timing
Several delegations voiced backing for the reform effort, but questioned the timing of the resolution.
Speaking for the European Union, Denmark said the process was 'premature and unnecessarily rushed', noting that limited time for consultations 'did not allow for the constructive engagement such an initiative requires'.
Australia, on behalf of the CANZ group (Canada, Australia and New Zealand), echoed that view, warning that an early resolution 'risks limiting both the scope and ambition of the forthcoming proposals'.
Switzerland, speaking for a group including Iceland, Norway and Liechtenstein, also stressed that reform should be 'ambitious and strategic', building on existing assets while ensuring longterm efficiencies.
Japan emphasised its 'commitment to multilateralism' and said the initiative responds to the urgency of revitalising the UN.
'The success of the UN80 initiative relies on our shared and complementary responsibilities,' its delegate said.
Member States in the driving seat
Exercising its right of reply, Russia rejected claims that the text was rushed, saying it had 'conducted several rounds of consultations' and 'took into account the red lines specified by delegations, which came out in the silence procedure'.
The silence procedure sets out a window of time for delegations to express objections to a draft resolution or decision before it is formally acted upon.
The Russian delegate said the resolution puts Member States 'into the driving force of this process' while recognising the SecretaryGeneral's prerogative as chief administrative officer under the UN Charter.
'We seek success in the UN's adaptation to current and future challenges,' the Russian delegate said, calling the resolution's adoption 'a very important step' to ensure universal support for the initiative.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scoop
an hour ago
- Scoop
Historic Multi-Movement Call To Action: World Must Choose Peace Over Profit, Democracy Over Destruction
As the world marks 80 years since the atomic bombings of Japan, the ITUC has joined forces with organisations for peace, climate and economic justice in a global call for a new model of common security. The joint, multi-movement declaration warns of a growing existential threat from a 'billionaire coup' that is undermining democracy, fuelling militarism and accelerating inequality. Governments must reorient global priorities from weapons and war to social justice and human development. ITUC General Secretary Luc Triangle said: 'Democracy is being stolen by a handful of billionaires and far-right forces, while public money is being poured into weapons instead of healthcare, education or climate solutions. This historic joint statement is a wake-up call and a call to action. We need governments to act with urgent commitments to peace, justice and dignity for all. Working people demand a world built on democracy, sustainability and shared prosperity.' The ITUC and its allies call for: Universal ratification of the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, and full-scale nuclear disarmament. Adoption of progressive and coordinated global tax reforms, including a UN Framework Convention on International Tax Cooperation. Implementation of living wages and decent work for all, with strong labour rights and support for union organising and collective bargaining. Reduction in global military expenditures, to redirect funds towards public services, social protection and climate action. Creation of a United Nations Fair Conversion mechanism to support countries shifting from military-based economies to sustainable industries. Universal expansion of social protection systems, especially for marginalised groups such as women, migrant workers and those in informal work. Integration of disarmament and sustainability into national climate plans, ensuring military industries are part of emissions reduction strategies. The statement also stresses the need to democratise and reform multilateral institutions, such as the UN, to place peace, human rights and sustainable development at the centre of global governance. It calls on governments at the World Social Summit to adopt the New Social Contract to tackle the root causes of inequality and conflict, while the G20 summit should align economic policies with principles of peace and sustainability by reducing military spending and investing in climate resilience and human development. Key facts from the joint statement include: In 2024, the top 1 per cent owned more wealth than 95% of the global population combined. Global military spending reached $2.718 trillion in 2024, a 9.4% rise from the previous year. Low- and middle-income countries, many struggling with poverty, accounted for 35% of global military spending in 2022. Over 100 million people are currently displaced by conflict and persecution. Militaries collectively have the fourth largest carbon footprint in the world. Along with the ITUC, the statement is anchored by Greenpeace International, the International Peace Bureau (IPB), the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN), Oxfam and Additional signatories include:


NZ Herald
6 hours ago
- NZ Herald
British Prime Minister expected to set out proposals in what insiders envisage as public ‘moment'
Emmanuel Macron, the French President, last week became the first leader of a G7 nation to announce that he would take the step , with the formal change coming at the United Nations General Assembly in September. It came after weeks of private discussions with the United Kingdom and other allies about how and when to announce the recognition of Palestine. British officials have long favoured attaching conditions to the move to deliver tangible changes in the stance taken by Hamas, the terror group that rules Gaza and was responsible for the October 7, 2023 attacks on Israel. Macron argued that the announcement alone could trigger progress towards peace. Today Donald Trump, the United States President, appeared to clear the way for Starmer to change the UK's stance on recognition, saying the Prime Minister was free to take a new position. But No 10 will still be carefully calibrating Washington's reaction to any new declaration after Marco Rubio, the US Secretary of State, last week accused Macron of serving 'Hamas propaganda'. Today a US State Department spokesman described a United Nations conference to discuss recognition of Palestine – being attended by David Lammy, the Foreign Secretary – as 'unproductive and ill-timed'. The spokesman said: 'This is a publicity stunt that comes in the middle of delicate diplomatic efforts to end the conflict'. Around 150 of the countries that are members of the UN, some three-quarters of the total, have already recognised Palestine as a state – but not the UK, the US or the biggest European economies. Britain's long-standing position has been that the step will be taken but only when it can help the peace process in the Middle East. The images of malnutrition in Gaza, including of starving children, that have made the front pages as Israel limits access to aid have fuelled renewed debate within the UK about recognition. Behind the scenes, Cabinet ministers including Angela Rayner, the Deputy Prime Minister, and Wes Streeting, the Health Secretary, are pushing Sir Keir to take the step. Last week, 135 Labour MPs signed a letter calling for the recognition of Palestinian statehood, while Labour mayors and the party's Scottish leadership are also piling on the pressure. Starmer has recalled his Cabinet from the northern summer parliamentary recess for a discussion about Gaza at 2am Wednesday NZT which is expected to include the approach on statehood and increased delivery of aid. Speaking to reporters during his meeting with Trump in Scotland today, the Prime Minister made clear his shock at the photographs of starvation coming from Gaza. He said: 'Certainly, speaking for the British public and myself, those images of starving children in particular are revolting and there's a sense of revulsion in the British public at what they're seeing. And they know and we know that humanitarian aid needs to get in at speed, at volume.' Trump also publicly pressed Israel to do more to get food to the Palestinians, saying there was 'real starvation' in Gaza and that the US would be setting up places with 'no boundaries' that people could reach by walking. Starmer has been hardening his rhetoric on recognising Palestine in recent days, when he also has been talking to both Macron and Friedrich Merz, the German Chancellor, about Gaza. On Friday NZT, he said it was the 'inalienable right' of Palestinians to have their own state. The following day he said he was 'unequivocal' that recognition was necessary for 'lasting peace'. But placing caveats on the declaration when he unveils his plan later this week, rather than announcing the move immediately, would risk a backlash from some in Labour. Labour MPs have expressed concerns to the Telegraph that delays could benefit the new hard-left party being set up by Jeremy Corbyn, the former Labour leader, which is championing Palestine. One Labour MP said: 'There are millions of voters deeply worried about Gaza. I think the Government are in deep trouble on the issue. 'They need to move fast but it may be too late to win voters back … This is why so many Labour MPs are so worried about their own seats.' Sir Keir is taking part in discussions, led by Jordan, about whether aid can be dropped into Gaza to help ease malnutrition. At the weekend, Israel announced that it would suspend fighting in three areas of Gaza for 10 hours a day and open secure routes for aid delivery. Starmer's official spokesman said the plan coming later this week would build 'on the collaboration to date that paves the way to a long-term solution on security in the region'. He added: 'The Prime Minister will be presenting that plan to other key allies, including the US and Arab states, over the coming days, and indeed convening Cabinet this week. You can expect to see more coming out of that.'


NZ Herald
9 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Ukraine says at least 20 killed in Russian strikes
At least 20 people were killed and more than 40 wounded in overnight Russian strikes on Ukraine, regional officials said today. Russia carried out eight strikes on the Zaporizhzhia region, hitting a prison, according to Ivan Fedorov, the head of the military administration. 'Sixteen people were killed, 35 were wounded,'