Trump injects new dose of uncertainty in tariffs as he pushes start date back to Aug. 7
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
WASHINGTON: For weeks, President Donald Trump was promising the world economy would change on Friday with his new tariffs in place. It was an ironclad deadline, administration officials assured the public.But when Trump signed the order Thursday night imposing new tariffs on 66 countries, the European Union, Taiwan and the Falkland Islands, the start date of the punishing import taxes was pushed back seven days so that the tariff schedule could be updated. The change - while potentially welcome news to countries that had not yet reached a deal with the U.S. - injected a new dose of uncertainty for consumers and businesses still wondering what's going to happen and when.Trump told NBC News in a Thursday night interview the tariffs process was going "very well, very smooth." But even as the Republican president insisted these new rates would stay in place, he added: "It doesn't mean that somebody doesn't come along in four weeks and say we can make some kind of a deal."Trump has promised that his tax hikes on the nearly $3 trillion in goods imported to the United States will usher in newfound wealth, launch a cavalcade of new factory jobs, reduce the budget deficits and, simply, get other countries to treat America with more respect.The vast tariffs risk jeopardizing America's global standing as allies feel forced into unfriendly deals. As taxes on the raw materials used by U.S. factories and basic goods, the tariffs also threaten to create new inflationary pressures and hamper economic growth - concerns the Trump White House has dismissed.Questions swirl around the tariffs despite Trump's eagerness As the clock ticked toward Trump's self-imposed deadline, few things seemed to be settled other than the president's determination to levy the taxes he has talked about for decades. The very legality of the tariffs remains an open question as a U.S. appeals court on Thursday heard arguments on whether Trump had exceeded his authority by declaring an "emergency" under a 1977 law to charge the tariffs, allowing him to avoid congressional approval.Trump was ebullient as much of the world awaited what he would do."Tariffs are making America GREAT & RICH Again," he said Thursday morning on Truth Social.Others saw a policy carelessly constructed by the U.S. president, one that could impose harms gradually over time that would erode America's power and prosperity."The only things we'll know for sure on Friday morning are that growth-sapping U.S. import taxes will be historically high and complex, and that, because these deals are so vague and unfinished, policy uncertainty will remain very elevated," said Scott Lincicome, a vice president of economics at the Cato Institute. "The rest is very much TBD."The new tariffs build off ones announced in the spring Trump initially imposed the Friday deadline after his previous "Liberation Day" tariffs in April resulted in a stock market panic. His unusually high tariff rates unveiled then led to recession fears, prompting Trump to impose a 90-day negotiating period. When he was unable to create enough trade deals with other countries, he extended the timeline and sent out letters to world leaders that simply listed rates, prompting a slew of hasty agreements.Swiss imports will now be taxed at a higher rate, 39%, than the 31% Trump threatened in April, while Liechtenstein saw its rate slashed from 37% to 15%. Countries not listed in the Thursday night order would be charged a baseline 10% tariff.Trump negotiated trade frameworks over the past few weeks with the EU, Japan, South Korea, Indonesia and the Philippines - allowing the president to claim victories as other nations sought to limit his threat of charging even higher tariff rates. He said on Thursday there were agreements with other countries, but he declined to name them.Thursday began with a palpable sense of tension The EU was awaiting a written agreement on its 15% tariff deal. Switzerland and Norway were among the dozens of countries that did not know what their tariff rate would be, while Trump agreed after a Thursday morning phone call to keep Mexico's tariffs at 25% for a 90-day negotiating period. The president separately on Thursday amended an order to raise Canada's fentanyl-related tariffs to 35%.European leaders face blowback for seeming to cave to Trump, even as they insist that this is merely the start of talks and stress the importance of maintaining America's support of Ukraine's fight against Russia. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney has already indicated that his country can no longer rely on the U.S. as an ally, and Trump declined to talk to him on Thursday.India, with its 25% tariff announced Wednesday by Trump, may no longer benefit as much from efforts to pivot manufacturing out of China. While the Trump administration has sought to challenge China's manufacturing dominance, it is separately in extended trade talks with that country, which faces a 30% tariff and is charging a 10% retaliatory rate on the U.S.Major companies came into the week warning that tariffs would begin to squeeze them financially. Ford Motor Co. said it anticipated a net $2 billion hit to earnings this year from tariffs. French skincare company Yon-Ka is warning of job freezes, scaled-back investment and rising prices.It's unclear whether Trump's new tariffs will survive a legal challenge Federal judges sounded skeptical Thursday about Trump's use of a 1977 law to declare the long-standing U.S. trade deficit a national emergency that justifies tariffs on almost every country on Earth."You're asking for an unbounded authority," Judge Todd Hughes of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit told a Justice Department lawyer representing the administration.The judges didn't immediately rule, and the case is expected to eventually reach the Supreme Court.The Trump White House has pointed to the increase in federal revenues as a sign that the tariffs will reduce the budget deficit, with $127 billion in customs and duties collected so far this year - about $70 billion more than last year.New tariffs threaten to raise inflation rates There are not yet signs that tariffs will lead to more domestic manufacturing jobs, and the U.S. economy now has 14,000 fewer manufacturing jobs than it did in April.On Thursday, one crucial measure of inflation, known as the Personal Consumption Expenditures index, showed that prices have climbed 2.6% over the 12 months that ended in June, a sign that inflation may be accelerating as the tariffs flow through the economy.The prospect of higher inflation from the tariffs has caused the Federal Reserve to hold off on additional cuts to its benchmark rates, a point of frustration for Trump, who on Truth Social, called Fed Chair Jerome Powell a "TOTAL LOSER."But ahead of Trump's tariffs, Powell seemed to suggest that the tariffs had put the U.S. economy and much of the world into a state of unknowns."There are many uncertainties left to resolve," Powell told reporters Wednesday. "So, yes, we are learning more and more. It doesn't feel like we're very close to the end of that process. And that's not for us to judge, but it does - it feels like there's much more to come."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
7 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump's America First biodiesel policy could cost US companies, consumers, trade groups warn
The Trump administration's push to discourage the use of foreign feedstocks in domestic biodiesel could lead to higher energy prices for US consumers and restricted domestic production, according to some refining and biofuel trade groups. The warning reflects ongoing friction between President Donald Trump's Environmental Protection Agency and the administration's traditional allies in the energy and agriculture industries over biofuels policy. Trump has promised to slash consumer energy costs , but is also trying to advance his America First agenda to support domestic production through trade protectionism - which can often make costs go up instead. At issue is a proposal from the EPA in June that would for the first time allocate only half as many tradable renewable fuel credits to biodiesel that is either imported or made with foreign feedstocks. Under the Renewable Fuel Standard, refiners must blend large volumes of biofuels into the US fuel supply or purchase the credits, called RINs, from those that do. While meant to help domestic farmers and producers, the new proposal - set to be finalized this autumn - would place unprecedented demand on domestic raw materials needed to make biodiesel like soybean oil, used cooking oil, and animal fat, in a market that currently must look abroad to meet its needs. Meanwhile, restricting the number of RINs that can be generated through such imports will raise credit prices, with a potential spillover impact on diesel and home heating oil, according to the industry groups. "This credit restriction ... will jeopardize the economic viability of renewable fuel production assets and raise overall compliance costs for all obligated parties, which ultimately harms US consumers," Chet Thompson, head of the American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers group representing refiners, said in a July 25 letter to top Republican lawmakers. The Advanced Biofuels Association also said the policy could mean ramped up consumer costs, by putting a $250 per metric ton premium on domestic versus imported feedstocks, according to a study it commissioned. "Economic analysis shows this would impose significant costs on US biorefineries, raise fuel prices for millions of Americans, and benefit only a narrow set of stakeholders," ABFA President Michael McAdams said in a statement. The White House and EPA declined to comment directly on the price concerns, saying the administration is still seeking public comment on the proposal until August 8. Others in the biofuel industry backed the proposal. "American farmers need all the demand they can get. We should be developing our capacity here, rather than relying on imported used cooking oil from China, or giving Brazilian feedstocks preferential treatment at the expense of US producers and their farm partners," said Emily Skor, CEO of Growth Energy. However, US companies such as ADM, Bunge and Cargill that have global assets and process US soy, as well as foreign companies with significant US operations, will likely see negative effects. That includes Australia's Nufarm , which contracts with farmers in South America to grow new oilseed crops. Uncertain numbers The biofuel industry had not been seeking the import shift in EPA's June proposal, according to multiple renewable fuel lobbyists and company officials. The White House has since held several meetings with industry officials to hear about potential unintended consequences of the changes, according to multiple sources. The EPA's proposal in June was meant to set out biofuel blending mandates for the next two years. It included a quota of 7.12 billion biomass-based diesel RINs for 2026 - a measurement of the number of tradable credits generated by blending the fuel - and projected that mandate would lead to the blending of 5.61 billion gallons. The biofuels industry and the American Petroleum Institute, an oil trade group, had banded together to lobby the administration to set biomass-based diesel mandates to at least 5.25 billion gallons. The mandate was just 3.35 billion gallons in 2025. Still, there are scenarios in the EPA's accounting that could lead to a lower volume outcome. If all the biodiesel and renewable diesel used in the US next year came from domestic feedstocks, for example, the RIN mandate would yield just 4.45 billion gallons, according to several industry analyses reviewed by Reuters. Ditching the penalty on imported feedstocks could help raise that number, according to the analyses. "That probably aligns with what the administration was trying to do in terms of supporting the agricultural side and farmers," said one industry analyst, who asked to remain anonymous to speak candidly.
Time of India
20 minutes ago
- Time of India
Guns, Jeans, and Republican: How Syndey Sweeney became MAGA's new muse – and a Conservative icon
In the first of the Republican National Conservative debates, when Trump steadfastly refused to participate to show Fox who was the man, his surrogate attack dog summed up the inflection point that was about to overshadow America: 'You want to be a rebel? You want to be a hippie? You want to 'stick it to the man'? Show up on your college campus and try calling yourself a conservative. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now ' It's true. Being liberal used to be an act of rebellion. But that rebellion became mainstream, corporatised, and institutionalised. It now lives on as HR slideshows, Twitter mobs, and avocado ad campaigns. Being young and Republican in 2025 is an act of defiance. And today's protestants become tomorrow's mainstream—evidenced by the fact that there are now more young people who identify as Republican than Democrat in America. It's not clear when the Left lost the youth. Perhaps it was the cascade of madness: the woke craze of pushing trans behaviour in grammar schools. Demanding biological males be allowed to play in women's sports. Saying illegal immigrants should have unfettered access to welfare. Shouting 'Defund the Police' while shoplifting turned into organised retail looting. Declaring obesity a form of body positivity. Telling working-class white kids that their skin colour was an inherited sin. Declaring that whiteness ought to be apologised for. Slowly, the country shifted. Not by campaign ads or policy briefings—but by exhaustion. And as America began tuning out the moral lectures from elites, late-night comedians, and Hollywood, a new icon quietly emerged. Not a pundit. Not a senator. Not a firebrand. A muse. . In an era where even a sneeze can be interpreted as a political statement, Sydney Sweeney has become the conservative darling of the year—without attending a single rally or issuing a single press release. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The star of Euphoria and The White Lotus has, quite by accident, become a MAGA icon. All it took was a leaked Republican voter registration, a denim ad campaign misread as a white supremacist dog whistle, and a shooting range video that could've doubled as NRA propaganda. Welcome to 2025, where political identity is crafted less by what you say, and more by which side claims you. The Republican Registration That Launched a Thousand Memes It recently emerged that That was it. She didn't make a political speech. She didn't wear a MAGA hat. She didn't retweet Ben Shapiro. All she did was file the correct paperwork, and the internet found it. Her name. Her address. Her party. Suddenly, the Right had its new pin-up girl. The Left had a meltdown. For conservatives, this was a cultural coup. A beautiful, talented Hollywood starlet—young, blonde, wildly popular—was officially red. Not pink. Not centrist. Red. And best of all? She wasn't saying sorry for it. The silence was glorious. No apology tour. No clarifying tweet. No 'I was hacked' statement. Liberals demanded answers. Progressives called it a betrayal. But Sydney Sweeney didn't flinch. And in an age where even Instagram captions are pored over for political subtext, saying nothing is a weapon. 'Great Jeans' and the Eugenics Panic of Summer 2025 Then came the American Eagle campaign. Sydney Sweeney, in tight denim and a tank top, staring into the camera under the caption: 'Great Genes.' That's it. That's the ad. Within hours, the internet exploded. Not because of the fashion. Not because of the cut. But because of the word: 'genes.' Not jeans. Genes. The Left read it as a eugenics dog whistle. A blonde-haired, blue-eyed woman fronting a brand with a tagline that sounded suspiciously like white supremacy. Satirical Twitter lit up: 'This is Leni Riefenstahl for Gen Z.' 'Are they selling pants or the master race?' But the Right? The Right cackled. This was proof. Proof that the outrage industry had gone too far. That even a pun could be labelled fascist. That Sydney Sweeney, just by existing in her natural body and not issuing trigger warnings, was now enemy number one. American Eagle didn't back down. Sales spiked. The controversy became the campaign. Sydney didn't write the tagline. She was just the face. But once again, the narrative moved around her. She became the accidental symbol of conservative resistance to liberal hysteria. Shooting Range Superstar: From HBO to the NRA And then the final seal was pressed: the shooting range video. Sydney, in casualwear and earmuffs, loading a Glock like she was born in Fort Benning. First-time shooter? Didn't look like it. Her stance, her focus, her shot grouping—it was enough to make half of Republican Twitter swoon. Clips went viral: 'Sydney Sweeney: America's New Annie Oakley .' .' 'She can shoot AND act? Wife me.' 'Meanwhile your favourite liberal thinks Nerf is a hate crime.' The symbolism was perfect. A young woman in Hollywood, not just pretending to shoot in a Netflix movie—but actually firing rounds at a paper target, calmly, confidently. No virtue signalling. No trembling hands. Just recoil and resolve. The Right didn't need words. The imagery was enough. Mainstream Republicans quickly rallied behind Sydney Sweeney. Vice President JD Vance criticised Democrats for 'calling everyone who thinks Sydney Sweeney beautiful a Nazi,' saying it showed how out of touch the party had become with young voters. Senator Ted Cruz also weighed in, posting on X: 'Wow. Now the crazy Left has come out against beautiful women. I'm sure that will poll well. ' Inside the White House, officials saw the controversy as a win, saying it helped highlight what they view as liberal overreach and cultural policing. For many Republicans, Sweeney's party registration wasn't just a detail—it was confirmation that the culture war was breaking their way. The Power of Saying Nothing What makes Sydney Sweeney such a potent figure is precisely her ambiguity. She doesn't tweet about taxes. She doesn't complain about feminism. She doesn't post 'I Voted' stickers or abortion fundraisers. She doesn't do red carpet activism. And in 2025, that absence speaks louder than any hashtag. Hollywood thrives on performative wokeness. Stars compete to signal their virtue—whether it's climate guilt on private jets or apologies for being cast as straight characters. Sydney Sweeney has opted out. That, to a large chunk of America, makes her radical. Because silence is now seen as alignment. Refusing to bend the knee is tantamount to opposition. And that's why both sides are fighting to frame her. To liberals, she's naive at best, complicit at worst. To conservatives, she's a unicorn: the apolitical star who still represents everything they believe in—beauty, freedom, guns, and denim. The Post-Woke Celebrity Archetype What Sydney Sweeney represents is something new: the post-woke Hollywood icon. Not a right-wing activist. Not a left-wing darling. But someone who has managed to float above the trench warfare. This new archetype is defined by: Ambiguity over affirmation Style over slogans Presence over preaching She's not talking about CRT, climate change, or colonialism. She's talking about her dog. Or her workout. Or her skincare routine. And yet, her silence makes her subversive. She isn't against the Left in any direct sense. She's just not of it. And that distinction matters. Why MAGA Can't Stop Posting Her There's a reason conservative media can't get enough of her: She's young. The GOP's problem has always been youth appeal. Sydney solves that. She's beautiful. Liberal feminists would call that 'problematic.' The Right calls it reality. She's talented. Awards, praise, and prestige roles, all without being preachy. She's silent. No need to cancel. No need to apologise. No moral panic. Just vibes. In other words, she's the anti-Lena Dunham. The anti-Alyssa Milano. The anti-everything that drove red-state Americans away from Hollywood. The Culture War's Most Valuable Pawn Sydney Sweeney didn't ask to be drafted into the culture war. She just voted. Then modelled. Then fired a gun. But in the content economy, you don't get to choose how you're used. She became a screen onto which America projected its anxieties and aspirations. And the fact that she never pushed back made her more powerful. The Right turned her into a meme. The Left turned her into a warning. And Sydney? Sydney went back to work. To movies. To photo shoots. To her life. That may be the most radical thing of all. The Mirror, Not the Mouthpiece Sydney Sweeney is not giving speeches. She's not asking for your vote. She's not applying to be the next Kayleigh McEnany. She is simply existing. But in 2025, that's all it takes. She is a mirror—reflecting everything America wants to believe, or fears to acknowledge. To the Right, she's the proof that Hollywood doesn't own the narrative. To the Left, she's a reminder that silence can be resistance too. And in a country where every movie, every tweet, every ad campaign becomes a battleground, Sydney Sweeney has done the unthinkable. She said nothing. And everyone heard it.
Time of India
23 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Work smarter, not bigger': Google is rewriting how work gets done, tells staff to rely on AI, not colleagues
Live Events Competition pushing the AI agenda Making Google's engineers more 'AI-savvy' DeepMind partnership and new internal tools Windsurf deal adds firepower (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel At a recent all-hands meeting, Google's top brass made their expectations clear. The company isn't just investing in artificial intelligence; it wants its employees to adapt to it quickly. Sundar Pichai , Google's CEO, spoke directly to staff about the balance between big investment and tight resources.'Anytime you go through a period of extraordinary investment, you respond by adding a lot of headcount, right? But in this AI moment, I think we have to accomplish more by taking advantage of this transition to drive higher productivity,' he said, according to an internal audio recording obtained by Google's parent company, is now planning to spend $85 billion on capital projects in 2025. That's up from the earlier $75 billion projection. Most of that spending will likely go into infrastructure to support AI models and while capital spending is rising, hiring is not.'We are going to be going through a period of much higher investment and I think we have to be frugal with our resources, and I would strive to be more productive and efficient as a company,' Pichai added. He also said he was 'very optimistic' about how the company is currently also acknowledged the broader competition in the tech world, saying, 'We are competing with other companies in the world. There will be companies which will become more efficient through this moment in terms of employee productivity, which is why I think it's important to focus on that.'The push towards tighter teams and AI-driven work isn't unique to Google. Amazon CEO Andy Jassy recently told his staff that its corporate workforce would shrink over time as more tasks are handled by AI a company-wide email, Jassy wrote employees should start 'to get more done with scrappier teams.'Microsoft's Julia Liuson, who leads its developer tools division, told staff in June that 'using AI is no longer optional.' Shopify CEO Tobi Lutke went even further in April, telling teams they must show that AI cannot do the job before asking for more people or the same meeting, Brian Saluzzo laid out the company's internal roadmap for rolling out AI tools across engineering teams.'We feel the urgency to really quickly and urgently get AI into more of the coding workflows to address top needs so you see a much more rapid increase in velocity,' said Saluzzo, who oversees the technical foundations behind Google's core do that, Google has been building a suite of internal tools and learning platforms. Saluzzo pointed to a site called AI Savvy Google, which includes toolkits, courses and sessions tailored to specific product areas. The goal is to make sure all engineers — not just AI specialists — can use these technologies in their daily added, 'We have a portfolio of AI products available to employees so folks can go faster.'Google's engineering education team has partnered with DeepMind to create a training programme titled Building with Gemini. The course is aimed at teaching employees how to build effectively using Google's Gemini AI platform and will be rolled out key tool is Cider, an internal AI-powered coding assistant. Since launching in May, it has already seen 50 percent weekly usage among staff. Saluzzo said this kind of tool will soon become part of everyday software development.'They'll become a pretty integral part of most SWE work,' he said, referring to software also noted, 'Employees should expect them to continuously get better.'Google is not just building tools. It's bringing in top talent to accelerate the shift. Earlier this month, the company acquired Windsurf, a high-profile AI startup, in a $2.4 billion deal. As part of the acquisition, co-founder and CEO Varun Mohan, along with key research and engineering staff, joined on the hire, Pichai said, 'I think they will end up helping a lot in this area as well.'Alphabet's employee numbers have risen slightly in recent quarters, but remain below the company's 2023 peak of nearly 191,000 full-time staff. As of the end of June, that figure stands at just over 187,000, based on Alphabet's latest financial in early 2023, Google cut about 6 percent of its workforce and has continued making targeted reductions, including offering buyouts in some message from leadership is consistent: leaner teams, smarter tools, and faster declined to comment on the contents of the the direction is clear. The company is placing its bets on AI — and expects its people to move with it.
