logo
Winter is coming for oil — and not in a positive way

Winter is coming for oil — and not in a positive way

Time of India7 days ago
The oil market is deceptively calm. Below the apparent tranquility lies an underappreciated transformation that has slowly reshaped the market over the last 25 years — because the arrival of China and India as big consumers hasn't just given an enormous boost to demand, it's also altered the market's seasonality. And that matters a lot this year.
Until recently,
global oil demand
peaked every year with the arrival of the Northern Hemisphere's winter. As temperatures dropped from October onward,
heating oil and kerosene
consumption spiked from the US to Germany to Japan. Hence, as recently as 2014, the fourth quarter still marked the annual high for crude demand and, typically, prices. Since then, the seasonality has flipped: Now, the third quarter sees higher demand and prices.
The shift means the market is now at its tightest from July to September, rather than October to December. While one-time events can still have an effect — the 2008 global financial crisis, for example, or the Covid-19 pandemic that started in early 2020 — looking over a long enough timescale reveals the change clearly. Because it happened incrementally over a quarter of a century, it often doesn't get the attention it deserves. But the chart below makes it obvious.
The change has three notable features. First, consumption of winter fuels including heating oil and kerosene is on a structural decline in the industrialized world, replaced by natural gas and electricity. Back in 1990, about 17per cent of American families heated their homes by burning some kind of refined petroleum product; today, that share has fallen to 9per cent. The collapse in demand for heating oil in Europe is even more pronounced. At the same time, jet-fuel consumption in those regions, which typically peaks during the summer holidays, is growing fast.
Second, oil demand in fast-growing emerging nations follows different seasonal patterns, partly because of their locations closer to the equator, but also because of the larger role of their all-year-round industrial oil consumption. While industrialized nations mostly abandoned oil-fired power stations after the 1970s energy crisis, some emerging market countries, particularly in the Middle East, burn lots of crude for electricity generation and water desalination. At the peak last summer, Saudi Arabia burned more than 800,000 barrels a day to generate electricity for air conditioning — more than the daily total petroleum demand of Belgium.
And third, climate change is reducing heating consumption by making winters warmer, and boosting holiday travel by making summers hotter.
So this year, global third-quarter oil demand will be 500,000 barrels a day higher than fourth-quarter consumption. In a dataset going back to 1991, the current year will mark only the fifth time when winter demand will be lower than summer consumption.
Despite rising production from the OPEC+ cartel, oil prices have stabilized in recent weeks at just over $65 a barrel — about $10 above the lows seen in early May. If anything, the physical oil market even feels a bit tight. It helps that China has mopped up much of the oil surplus, putting in May and June barrels into its expanding strategic and commercial stockpiles.
But the squeeze will prove temporary; put another way, the market is defying gravity. Because of shifting seasonality, the Northern Hemisphere's summer is now the tightest period of the year. Winter — and an accompanying decrease in demand — is coming.
For now, the few remaining oil bulls have a few straws of hope to cling to. Global crude refinery intake is rising swiftly this month and looks set to peak in August at a record 85.4 million barrels a day — enough to absorb the series of
OPEC
output increases. As a result, global oil stocks aren't increasing meaningfully near where it matters most to the market: the pricing points in northwestern Europe, home of the Brent benchmark, and the central area of the US, home to the West Texas Intermediate yardstick.
But by October, when all of the cartel's supply hikes will have arrived, along with extra oil from Brazil, Guyana and Canada, refinery throughput will drop to 81.7 million barrels a day, according to the International Energy Agency. The difference – 3.7 million barrels a day – is equal to a couple of mid-sized OPEC nations. Even if China continues stockpiling as much as it has done over the last two months, the surplus would be so large that oil will flow into inventories elsewhere, including near the pricing points on both sides of the Atlantic.
For sure, the market – and I – may be wrong about demand, supply, or both. The expected oil surplus during the now seasonally weaker fourth quarter may be smaller than anticipated. Still, on paper, the glut is so big that even if it turns to be a bit smaller, it would still be enough to put a lot of downward pressure on the market.
As I said, winter is coming for the oil market.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Oil rises as US-EU deal boosts trade optimism
Oil rises as US-EU deal boosts trade optimism

Time of India

time29 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Oil rises as US-EU deal boosts trade optimism

Oil prices rose on Monday after the United States clinched a trade deal with the European Union and may extend a tariff pause with China, relieving concerns that higher levies could have hurt economic activity and limited fuel demand. Brent crude futures inched up 61 cents, or 0.89 per cent, to $69.05 a barrel by 0647 GMT, while US West Texas Intermediate crude stood at $65.75 a barrel, up 59 cents, or 0.91 per cent. The US-European Union trade deal and a possible extension in the US-China tariff pause are supporting global financial markets and oil prices, IG markets analyst Tony Sycamore said. "With the risk of a prolonged trade war and the importance of the August tariff deadlines being steadily defused, markets have responded positively," he added in a note. Sunday's US-EU framework trade pact sets an import tariff of 15 per cent on most EU goods, half the threatened rate. The deal averted a bigger trade war between two allies that account for almost one-third of global trade and could crimp fuel demand. Also set for Monday is a meeting in Stockholm of senior US and Chinese negotiators aiming to extend before an August 12 deadline a truce holding off sharply higher tariffs. Oil prices settled on Friday at their lowest in three weeks weighed down by global trade concerns and expectations of more oil supply from Venezuela. State-run oil company PDVSA is readying to resume work at its joint ventures under terms similar to Biden-era licences, once US President Donald Trump reinstates authorisations for its partners to operate and export oil under swaps, company sources said. Though prices were up slightly on Monday, gains were limited by the prospect of OPEC+ further easing supply curbs. A market monitoring panel of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and their allies is set to meet at 1200 GMT on Monday. It is unlikely to recommend altering existing plans by eight members to raise oil output by 548,000 barrels per day in August, four OPEC+ delegates said last week, though another source said it was too early to say. ING expects OPEC+ will at least complete the full return of 2.2 million barrels per day of the additional voluntary supply cuts by the end of September. That would work out to a supply hike in September of at least 280,000 barrels per day. However, there is clearly room for a more aggressive hike. The producer group is keen to recover market share while summer demand is helping to absorb the extra barrels. JP Morgan analysts said global oil demand rose by 600,000 bpd in July on year, while global oil stocks rose 1.6 million bpd. In the Middle East, Yemen's Houthis said on Sunday they would target ships of companies that do business with Israeli ports, regardless of nationality, in what they called a fourth phase of military operations against Israel over the Gaza conflict.

‘He knew where to hit us': Did Trump strongarm EU into signing trade deal? Steep price for shaky peace
‘He knew where to hit us': Did Trump strongarm EU into signing trade deal? Steep price for shaky peace

Time of India

time42 minutes ago

  • Time of India

‘He knew where to hit us': Did Trump strongarm EU into signing trade deal? Steep price for shaky peace

The United States and the European Union have averted a full-scale trade war, but the price of peace is steep. In a high-stakes, hastily arranged meeting at President Donald Trump's golf resort in Turnberry, Scotland, Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen announced a trade deal that will impose a 15% baseline tariff on most EU goods entering the US: a compromise designed to stave off Trump's threatened 30% tariff if no agreement had been reached by August 1. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Trump hailed the agreement as 'the biggest-ever,' while von der Leyen called it 'the best we could get.' But behind the triumphant rhetoric lies a deal many in Brussels quietly acknowledge as a strategic retreat. A deal under pressure The deal, struck in under an hour, came after months of threats, stalled talks, and tariff escalations that rattled European markets and unnerved EU leaders. According to CNN, the US president had threatened tariffs as high as 50%, pushing the EU to the negotiating table under mounting economic pressure and fears of NATO destabilisation. Trump's administration insisted on a 15% blanket tariff, covering cars, semiconductors, pharmaceuticals, and more. Although von der Leyen claimed some strategic products such as aircraft, select chemicals, and agricultural goods would see zero tariffs, many sectors remain exposed. The AP reported that energy and defence purchases sweetened the deal — with the EU agreeing to spend $750 billion on US energy and invest a further $600 billion in American industries. Yet steel and aluminium will still be hit with 50% tariffs. Trump was blunt: 'Steel stays the way it is.' Von der Leyen maintained that a quota system would eventually moderate those terms, but no final text has been released. EU countries must now ratify the agreement. Ireland said it 'regrets' the baseline tariff, and Germany's powerful BDI industry group warned of 'considerable negative repercussions.' The VCI chemicals association simply called the tariffs 'too high.' Tired of too many ads? go ad free now As CNN noted, while markets responded positively with the Dow rising 0.3% few in Europe are celebrating. Europe's pain threshold — and trump's street fight Multiple reports, including from Financial Times and BBC, paint a picture of a bloc outmanoeuvred. Trump's early-April 'Liberation Day' tariffs sent markets reeling, forcing Brussels to suspend retaliation and enter talks under duress. FT reported that EU diplomats believe the bloc's fragmented stance — especially Germany's desire to shield its car industry — prevented a stronger response. One EU diplomat told FT, 'He's the bully in the schoolyard and we didn't join others in standing up to him.' Former Commission negotiator Georg Riekeles said the EU 'would have been better off answering the US vigorously in April in a one-two combo with China.' The Commission had originally drawn up a strategy to offer purchases and tariff reductions. But the Trump administration moved faster, levying 25% tariffs on steel, aluminium, and vehicles. Meanwhile, internal divisions saw some states pushing for tough retaliation and others urging caution. Irish Trade Minister Simon Harris was reportedly a vocal advocate for protecting Irish pharmaceuticals and spirits, according to FT. The Trump camp saw opportunity in these divisions. He rejected a July proposal for a 10% 'reciprocal' tariff, demanding instead 15% across the board. As BBC pointed out, Trump viewed the EU as exploiting US openness while restricting access to its own markets — a sentiment echoed by his claim that the union was 'nastier than China.' Symbolic win? The final deal delivers predictability and avoids escalation — but at a cost. Most European exports now face higher tariffs than under the previous regime, where the US average was around 1.6%, FT found. The 15% rate, while lower than Trump's threats, is still a substantial barrier and could erode the EU's export competitiveness. Car manufacturers are particularly exposed. Volkswagen has already taken a $1.5 billion hit this year, and Mercedes-Benz warned of 'significant increases' in US prices. While Trump said pharmaceuticals were not part of the deal, von der Leyen later insisted they were 'on a separate sheet of paper' — hinting at continuing negotiations. Still, there's relief that a deeper trade war was averted. BBC noted that Brussels' chief concern was avoiding Trump's wrath spilling over into security cooperation, especially in Eastern Europe and Ukraine. The EU is now betting that stability is worth the compromise. In Trump's words: 'This was the big one.' For von der Leyen and EU officials, the deal may mark not a victory, but the moment the US president 'worked out exactly where our pain threshold is.'

TCS stock on verge to break this 16-year-old trend; can crash another 16%
TCS stock on verge to break this 16-year-old trend; can crash another 16%

Business Standard

time2 hours ago

  • Business Standard

TCS stock on verge to break this 16-year-old trend; can crash another 16%

TCS stock slipped 1.7 per cent to a low of ₹3,082 in intra-day trade on Monday, a day after the company said it would l ay-off 2 per cent or 12,260 employees of its global workforce. The job cuts by India's largest IT services company highlights the extent of challenges faced by technology-sector amid a sluggish global economy, geopolitical tensions and tariff concerns. Globally, Microsoft, IBM, Intel and Meta too have reduced head counts in the calendar year 2025 thus far. READ MORE On the earnings front, earlier this month, TCS reported a 6 per cent year-on-year (YoY) growth in net profit at ₹12,760 crore for Q1FY26 as against ₹12,040 crore in Q1FY25. Revenue from operations increased by 1.3 per cent YoY to ₹63,437 crore. Post the earnings announcement, TCS management remained optimistic overall, but admitted that high single-digit growth in FY26 looks tough. TCS stock performance thus far in 2025 TCS stock has been an under-performer so far in the calendar year 2025. The stock has dropped 22 per cent in the first seven months of the year, slightly more than the sectoral Nifty IT index - which has declined 18.3 per cent. In comparison, the NSE Nifty 50 has gained nearly 5 per cent in the same period. ALSO READ | Will Nifty end July above or below 25,000? These 3 key factors to set trend In July alone, the stock has declined over 10 per cent; while the Nifty IT has shed 9 per cent, and the Nifty 50 index was down around 3 per cent. Technical outlook on TCS stock Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) Current Price: ₹3,092 Likely Target: ₹2,590 Downside Risk: 16.2% Support: ₹3,100; ₹2,900; ₹2,750 Resistance: ₹3,212; ₹3,388 Following a sharp fall at the counter, TCS stock is now on verge of breaking a key 16-year bullish trend, as per the monthly scale. Historical chart shows that TCS stock has consistently traded above its super trend line support on the monthly scale since the breakout in July 2009. Even during the Covid-19 related panic sell-off, the stock briefly dipped below this key long-term trend line support, but eventually managed to close above the same on a monthly closing basis in March 2020. Today, July 28, 2025, for the first time since March 2020, TCS is once again trading below the monthly trend line support, which stands at ₹3,121. A monthly close below the same shall signal the end of the 16-year bullish run for the stock. The monthly chart further stocks presence of some support around ₹3,100 levels, which is the lower-end of the Bollinger Bands. Break and sustained trade below the same can accentuate the fall at the counter. The next key support for TCS, as per the monthly chart, stands around ₹2,590 levels - the 100-Month Moving Average (100-MMA). This implies a downside risk of around 16.2 per cent from present levels. Intermediate support for the stock can be anticipated around ₹2,900 and ₹2,750 levels. TCS stock is seen trading below the key moving averages on the daily and weekly charts; thus indicating presence of multiple overhead resistances. The near-term bias is likely to remain bearish as long as the stock trades below 3,212 levels; while the key medium-term hurdle stands at 3,388 levels.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store