Doctor who had opioid addiction is spared jail for stealing and forging prescriptions
Daniel Nevin (39) pleaded guilty at Mullingar Circuit Criminal Court to the theft of prescription pads from two hospitals, 46 counts of forgery and using false instruments between 2021 and last year.
His fiancee Rebecca Moylan (35), a qualified nurse, admitted stealing prescriptions and unlawfully using them in pharmacies.
Judge Keenan Johnson said these offences undermined the integrity of the medical prescription system and said Nevin was in the throes of an addiction but had never put a patient at risk.
READ MORE
He said the couple whose careers have been ruined and reputations tarnished had only damaged themselves, saying, 'The main victims of this are the two accused.'
Nevin achieved a PhD from Trinity College Dublin, specialising in pharmacology, and had worked in medical research in Australia before returning to Ireland to continue his studies. He qualified as a medical doctor in 2018.
When the addiction started in 2019 he tried to tackle the problem, but relapsed around the period of offending.
Judge Johnson said Nevin was a 'high achiever', but had removed himself from working onwards as a clinician and moved into a tutoring role at Midlands Regional General Hospital.
The judge was also mindful of the pressures placed on medical professionals working 24-hour shifts in busy environments.
He said the couple did not reach the threshold for a custodial sentence and said they had paid a huge price.
Judge Johnson said they could be spared convictions and would receive the benefit of the Probation of Offenders Act if Nevin and his fiancee donated €15,000 and €5,000 respectively to the Merchant Quay drug treatment project as a form of restorative justice.
Among Nevin's charges were thefts of prescriptions from University Hospital Galway between July 2021 and July 2023 and from the Midlands Regional General Hospital in Mullingar from July 10th, 2023, until February 18th last year.
The remaining charges he admitted included three counts of using false prescriptions in pharmacies in Kells, Co Meath, at Kilbeggan, Co Westmeath, and in Tullamore, Co Offaly.
Moylan admitted theft of prescription pads from St James's Hospital in Dublin from September 1st, 2023, until November that year and using prescriptions forged by her partner in several pharmacies.
The couple, of Greenpark Meadows, Mullingar, Co. Westmeath, used a fictitious patient's name on most of the prescriptions to get OxyContin, a highly addictive opioid-based medicine.
Their offending was exposed when a pharmacist in Mullingar became suspicious in May last year, the court heard.
He contacted University Hospital Galway and discovered they had no record of the prescription or the named patient.
In court, Nevin agreed with his barrister, Colm Smyth SC, that the 'stress and strain of the job precipitated and aggravated' Nevin's addiction. The doctor initially managed to buy opioids online before he sought help to tackle the problem.
He said after a substantial period of sobriety, he had a relapse, resulting in a prolonged absence from work and 'I took myself out of the clinician domain'. He said he switched to a teaching role in the hospital, saying he was passionate about education.
Nevin said the consequences had been devastating. He expressed remorse and said he was attending addiction counselling.
The court heard how Moylan, while studying to be a nurse, had cared for her terminally ill mother.
Dara Foynes SC, defending, said Moylan acted out of the highest level of compassion and concern for her partner and was trying to manage a situation that was out of control, resulting in self-inflicted harm and a fall from grace.
The court heard Moylan has resigned from her job, agreed not to work as a nurse again, while Nevin awaited a decision on the future of his medical career.
Their court case was adjourned until Friday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
3 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Gardaí arrest teenager in connection with murder of man in Co Tipperary
Gardaí investigating the murder of Iarnród Éireann employee Ian Walsh in Co Tipperary have t arrested a teenager for questioning. The teenager was arrested by officers in the Ballyneale area of Carrick-on-Suir early on Wednesday. He was taken to Clonmel Garda station for questioning . He is being detained under Section 4 of the Criminal Justice Act which allows Gardai to hold suspects for up to 24 hours before they must be charged or released. The arrest comes as gardaí focused on Mr Walsh's social media activity and began examining if he had possibly met his killer on line and arranged to meet them at his home in at Ravenswood off Cregg Road in Carrick-on-Suir. READ MORE Garda believe the fact that there was no sign of forced entry at Mr Walsh's house suggests that Mr Walsh either knew his killer or felt no threat from them when he admitted them to his property. Mr Walsh, a 49- year-old single man who lived alone, was found dead at about 3.30am on Monday, August 4th by gardaí carrying out a welfare check at the two-story property. They had been contacted by Ms Walsh's family who were concerned for his welfare. A native of Waterford, Mr Walsh used to travel to Waterford city a couple of times a week to visit his mother, Breda Forristal at her home on Barrack Street. When he failed to visit over the Bank Holiday weekend, family members became concerned and contacted gardaí. His body was found in the downstairs bathroom of the semidetached house in Ravenswood. Mr Walsh had suffered multiple stab wounds and was pronounced dead at the scene. State Pathologist Dr Yvonne McCartney carried out a postmortem examination on Mr Walsh's body at University Hospital Waterford on August 6th. It concluded that he had been the victim of a violent assault with a bladed weapon sometime over the Bank Holiday weekend. Garda technical experts spent several days carrying out a forensic examination of the house which investigators are hoping will yield DNA and other evidence which may prove crucial in their efforts to identify Mr Walsh's killer and build a case against them.
Irish Times
12 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Defence Forces lost stash of high-calibre ammunition for several months, official documents show
The Defence Forces was unable to locate a bag of high-calibre rounds, seized as part of an investigation into the alleged theft of military property by an Army officer, for several months, according to official documents. The apparent loss of the ammunition in 2022 sparked a major Garda investigation and a search operation in Co Kilkenny due to fears it may have fallen into criminal hands. The ammunition was located six months later in a secure area, close to where it had been originally stored. Despite this, the officer originally accused of misappropriating the ammunition was later sent forward for court martial on various charges. However, these charges were subsequently dropped by military prosecutors. The Defence Forces attributed the incident to an inadvertent error. Sources said the ammunition never left the secure storage area used to keep live rounds. The sequence of events is detailed in a series of official documents seen by The Irish Times and corroborated with military sources. The investigation into the officer began in 2021 when he was accused of a range of offences relating to improper possession of mostly historical military equipment, including rounds of .303 ammunition. This type of ammunition is no longer in use in the Defence Forces but has historical value and is still commonly used in civilian hunting rifles. The accusations against the officer related to equipment that was stored on military property and never left the base. During their investigation, military police enlisted the help of gardaí who searched the officer's home but found nothing. As part of their investigation, military police seized 129 rounds of .303 ammunition from Defence Forces stores as evidence. The rounds were divided into three bags. In December 2021, they were taken by a military transport to a secure storage facility in Stephens Barracks in Kilkenny. In February 2022, the evidence was moved to another secure storage area due to construction works. Later that month, a senior officer directed that the bullets should be transferred into steel boxes. Staff began to do this the following April while at the same time doing a routine check of the ammunition. At this point it was realised that one bag of ammunition was missing. Senior officers were alerted, as was the superintendent in Kilkenny Garda station, per standard procedure. The base was searched without success and a Garda detective sergeant was assigned to led a team to investigate 'the theft of ammunition' from the barracks, according to an official document. The Garda investigation looked into civilian construction workers who were on the base at the time as well as external security staff who were also on site. However, nothing suspicious was uncovered in relation to their presence. Investigators also examined the CCTV system at the base, which they were told had been damaged roughly around the time the missing ammunition was first noticed. One Defence Forces member told gardaí that in the weeks before the missing ammunition was first noticed, an issue was found with the system. According to an official report, clothes pegs had been inserted into the rear of the hard drive that records the CCTV footage in what an official said appeared to be an attempt to stop its cooling fans from working. In November 2022, the ammunition was located in a loosely tied sandbag. A staff member told investigators they believed they had inadvertently placed the ammunition in the sandbag during a routine inspection earlier in the year. In July of last year, days before his court martial was due to begin, the officer at the centre of the original investigation was informed the evidence had been missing for at least six months before being located. When the case began, the prosecution said it had difficultly in proceeding with the charges. Ultimately, the officer agreed to plead guilty to a single summary charge relating to the recording of historical equipment in military stores. The judge described it as a 'disciplinary matter' and fined the man three days pay. The officer was later promoted to a senior rank before retiring in good standing. A Defence Forces spokesman said it 'would be inappropriate for the Defence Forces to comment on the details of specific Military Police investigations'.
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Kneecap trial spotlights challenges for Irish speakers in British and Irish courts
When the case of Kneecap 's Liam Óg Ó hAnnaidh was before Westminster Magistrates Court earlier this summer, Ó hAnnaidh's legal team indicated that he might require an Irish-language interpreter for his trial. That trial, if it proceeds to hearing later this year, would be the most high-profile case involving testimony given through Irish in recent history. It is also likely to highlight at least some of the difficulties faced by Irish speakers in courtrooms both in the UK and Ireland. Perhaps the most basic difficulty is securing a right to use Irish at all. Had Ó hAnnaidh been prosecuted in Northern Ireland prior to February, 2024, a 1737 Act of Parliament would have prohibited the use of Irish in court. Even now, following the introduction of the Identity and Language (Northern Ireland) Act, there are no procedures in place to protect a right to use Irish in Northern Irish courtrooms. It will be for Northern Ireland 's Justice Minister, Naomi Long, to introduce the guidelines which will give effect to the new Act there. At present, the primary concern is how any procedures would define necessity. Will a person need to demonstrate a certain level of fluency, or that they will suffer a particular degree of prejudice in order to prove it is 'necessary' for them to use Irish during a hearing? Beyond the six counties, the position in Ireland is, on paper, more favourable, with statutory and constitutional protections of the right to speak Irish in court. Yet, even here, the practical challenges and negative impacts of speaking Irish can often deter parties from using it. The most basic obstacle facing Irish speakers across all the UK and Ireland was mentioned by the judge during Ó hAnnaidh's last appearance in court – it can often be difficult to locate an interpreter. In the UK, there is, at least, a National Register of Public Service Interpreters. The register determines who is qualified to interpret court proceedings. It requires interpreters to prove they have an approved qualification, while they must undertake training to act in courtroom settings. READ MORE Yet even with that infrastructure in place, an interpreter was still proving hard to find when Ó hAnnaidh was last in court. No such register is maintained in Ireland and there is no central registration or regulation of interpreters, let alone those sufficiently qualified to act in courtroom settings. As a result, although there is a constitutional and statutory right to speak Irish in court in Ireland, it may be harder to locate a qualified interpreter in Ireland than in the UK – where no such right exists. Even where an interpreter is located, judges and lawyers who are not familiar with interpretation may fail to grasp the potential for crossed wires and bias that result from linguistic differences and the process of interpretation itself. An Irish speaker will not, for example, be able to give the same monosyllabic yes or no answer that an English-speaking witness would. The potential impression of being evasive, vague or contradictory where small differences in language and meaning have tangible legal outcomes is real. In cases where interpreters lack specific courtroom experience, and legal proceedings lack guidelines for how to deal with interpreters, those risks can be realised all too easily. In Australia and the US, researchers have established that linguistic differences and small changes introduced by interpreters, such as hesitating words like 'ah' or 'um', can cause witnesses to appear untrustworthy or evasive. Negative perceptions of those who choose to speak a minority language, including Irish, can also have very real impacts on the choice to use a language in court. The choice to use a language, including Irish, is often seen as political - aligning the speaker (whether rightly or wrongly) with a particular ideology or political group. In such cases, the choice to speak (or refuse to speak) a particular language can be read as a rejection of institutions which operate through another tongue, or as an effort to shame non-speakers. Hardly the note to strike when appealing to a judge or a jury. It is likely Ó hAnnaidh will have to contend with at least some of these negative tropes if his hearing proceeds using an Irish interpreter Minority language speakers can be perceived as difficult; seeking to gain an advantage by inconveniencing the other parties in a trial. Similarly, they can be considered untrustworthy - using the delay interpretation requires to more carefully consider their answers, or to deliberately misunderstand a question to buy time. In Ireland, these perceptions are often based on the assumption that there is no such thing as a person who is more comfortable speaking Irish than English. Yet while English may be dominant in terms of the number of daily users, there are still those who – in the face of the formalities and consequences of the legal process – would rather have the security of the language they know best when they must answer questions on which their liberty or livelihood depend. It is likely Ó hAnnaidh will have to contend with at least some of these negative tropes if his hearing proceeds using an Irish interpreter. In being tried in the UK he will, at least, have the benefit of a system in which interpretation is regulated. On this side of the Irish sea, the case is an opportunity to reflect on why negative tropes concerning Irish speakers persist - inside and outside our justice system. It also presents an opportunity to give practical effect to the official status of Irish in courtrooms across the island. Furthermore, it presents an opening to recognise that the issues impacting Irish speakers are ones which reach through our society – and our justice systems - more broadly. Poor standards of interpretation, as well as the legal profession's lack of training on how to conduct a hearing in which interpreters are involved, are barriers to accessing justice and securing a fair trial. They profoundly impact all our minority language communities – including those navigating the international protection system. Irish speakers, Irish citizens, Irish residents and those seeking to make a life here all deserve a justice system in which the language they speak does not determine the reach of their voice, or the reception of their testimony. Dr Róisín Á Costello is an Assistant Professor at the School of Law, Trinity College Dublin and a practicing barrister.
