Former Nenggiri assemblyman withdraws lawsuit over Bersatu expulsion
KUALA LUMPUR: Former Nenggiri state assemblyman Mohd Azizi Abu Naim has withdrawn the originating summons he filed at the High Court here, challenging the termination of his membership from the Bersatu party.
Mohd Azizi's lawyer, Nur Irdina Syahirah Mohammad Wardi, informed judge Roz Mawar Rozain that the suit was withdrawn as it had become academic, given that the Nenggiri by-election had already taken place, resulting in the election of a new state assemblyman.
Meanwhile, the defendants, including Kelantan State Assembly Speaker Datuk Mohd Amar Nik Abdullah, who was represented by counsel Awang Armadajaya Awang Mahmud, applied for RM250,000 in costs.
They argued that the case was of public interest and had required significant legal work due to its complexity, particularly with the involvement of the speaker's position, which has wider implications for the country's legislative body.
Counsel Chetan Jethwani, representing Bersatu president Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin and Bersatu secretary-general Datuk Seri Hamzah Zainudin, who were also named as defendants, sought RM250,000 in costs for both his clients.
"This lawsuit has no merit and would ultimately fail. This is evidenced by the withdrawal of the suit," said Chetan.
Judge Roz Mawar subsequently struck out the suit and ordered Mohd Azizi to pay costs of RM50,000 to Mohd Amar and RM50,000 to Muhyiddin and Hamzah.
Mohd Azizi had originally filed the lawsuit on June 24 last year, challenging his expulsion from Bersatu. He sought a declaration that his termination, communicated via a notice dated June 12, 2024, was unlawful and void, claiming the notice was issued with malice.
Mohd Azizi argued that an amendment to Article 10 of Bersatu's constitution, which allows revocation of membership if a member supports a political rival, was unconstitutional. - Bernama
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
15 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Petros standoff adds pressure as Petronas staff face job cuts, says Muhyiddin
PN chairman Muhyiddin Yassin urged the government to exercise prudence in its use of Petronas funds, especially at a time when national debt was rising and the economy remained weak. PETALING JAYA : Perikatan Nasional chairman Muhyiddin Yassin said today that Petronas's ongoing dispute with Petroleum Sarawak Bhd (Petros) is putting more pressure on the energy producer amid its company-wide restructuring exercise. Muhyiddin said Petronas urgently required a long-term strategy to safeguard its sustainability and competitiveness as a state-owned enterprise, especially in the face of global headwinds such as falling oil prices and the accelerating transition to renewable energy. 'The unresolved dispute between Petronas and Petros regarding gas distribution rights in Sarawak not only impacts Petronas's revenue, but also destabilises the wider oil and gas industry in Malaysia,' he said in a statement. Muhyiddin, who is also the Bersatu president and Pagoh MP, cited a June 2 report by The Edge, which stated that several oil and gas companies in the country reported declining earnings or losses in the first quarter of 2025. A key reason cited was the underutilisation of vessels and delays in exploration activities, both stemming from Petronas's dispute with Petros. 'If this situation persists, it will not only place Petronas and its employees in a state of uncertainty, but also jeopardise the entire oil and gas ecosystem. Currently, over 70,000 Malaysians are employed in the oil and gas services and equipment sector,' he said. Last week, Petronas president and group CEO Tengku Muhammad Taufik Aziz announced that the company would reduce its headcount by more than 5,000 people to cut costs due to falling crude prices. Yesterday, Petronas reaffirmed its commitment to safeguarding employee welfare amid a company-wide restructuring exercise that will cut about 10% of its workforce, including by offering competitive separation packages. On Saturday, deputy prime minister Fadillah Yusof said Petronas's move to trim its workforce stemmed from global challenges and was not connected to the national oil firm's issues with Petros. Muhyiddin urged the government to exercise prudence in its use of Petronas funds, especially at a time when national debt was rising and the economy remained weak. He said the government should urgently table a sustainability plan for Petronas, along with a clear roadmap for the future of Malaysia's oil and gas industry.
The Star
a day ago
- The Star
Najib's RM27mil money laundering trial to proceed, AGC dismisses review request
KUALA LUMPUR: The RM27mil money laundering trial involving Datuk Seri Najib Razak and SRC International Sdn Bhd will proceed to a full trial, the High Court has announced. This follows the Attorney General's Chambers (AGC) dismissal of a representation sent by the former Pekan MP seeking a review of his charges. During proceedings on Wednesday (June 11), Deputy Public Prosecutor Mohd Ashroff Adrin Kamarul informed Justice K. Muniandy that the AGC had rejected the representation. ALSO READ: RM27mil SRC case: AGC asks for one more month to decide on Najib's representation On Feb 3, 2019, Najib claimed trial to three charges of money laundering by accepting proceeds from unlawful activities amounting to RM27mil through his three AmPrivate Banking accounts at AmIslamic Bank Berhad, AmBank Group Building, Jalan Raja Chulan on July 8, 2014, under Section 4(1)(a) of the Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities Act (AMLATFPUAA) 2001. He faces a maximum fine of RM5mil or imprisonment of up to five years, or both, if convicted. More To Come Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!
The Star
a day ago
- The Star
Anwar granted temporary stay in civil lawsuit
PUTRAJAYA: The Court of Appeal has allowed an application by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim to temporarily stay the hearing of a civil lawsuit filed by his former research assistant Muhammed Yusoff Rawther over allegations of sexual assault. In a unanimous decision, a three-judge panel chaired by Justice Supang Lian said the appellate court was empowered under Section 44 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964 to make an ad interim order to preserve the integrity of the appellant's stay application pending the disposal of his appeal against the High Court's decision. The High Court had dismissed Anwar's application to refer eight legal questions to the Federal Court. 'Accordingly, we hereby make an ad interim order to stay all proceedings, including the full trial at the High Court,' Justice Supang said in an online proceeding here yesterday. The hearing of the main lawsuit by Muhammed Yusoff was initially fixed to begin next Monday. Other judges on the bench were Justices Faizah Jamaludin and Ahmad Fairuz Zainol Abidin. Earlier, the panel heard from Anwar's counsel, Alan Wong, that if the full trial proceeds, the effects would be 'irreversible'. 'The constitutional issues raised (in the application) would have been overtaken by events,' he said. Wong submitted that as the appellant was a sitting prime minister, he would be required to divert his attention and resources from the government's business to attend to the trial, causing disruption to his government function. 'To assist the court in appreciating the scale of this disruption, I have instructions to tender a copy of the Prime Minister's schedule during the trial period,' he said, requesting that the document be received under seal. Lawyer Muhammad Rafique Rashid Ali, who represented Muhammed Yusoff, however, objected on the grounds that any introduction of material should have been done in an affidavit form. Muhammad Rafique also submitted that the trial dates, which should begin on June 16, were fixed a year ago on June 6, 2024, and this meant the appellant had 'very well known' he was due in court. 'The trial is supposed to commence next week. He (Anwar) had more than enough time to prepare for this trial, knowing fully well that everyone has to submit to the court system.' Muhammad Rafique also submitted that the court should consider whether the appeal has any chance or prospect of success. 'Simply put, the appeal is doomed to fail. 'There are no special circumstances (to warrant the stay),' he said, adding that the trial must proceed. On the application to insert the Prime Minister's schedule, the panel said it took judicial notice of the matter. 'We take judicial notice that the Prime Minister is busy and has a full schedule on any day. Therefore, there is no necessity to tender the schedule as proposed,' Justice Supang said. On June 4, High Court judge Justice Roz Mawar dismissed Anwar's application on the grounds that the eight questions failed to meet the threshold for referral under the Federal Constitution and the Courts of Judicature Act. The questions include whether a sitting prime minister enjoys limited immunity from lawsuits involving allegations of personal conduct that occurred before his appointment under Articles 39, 40 and 43 of the Federal Constitution. Anwar's application was in relation to a lawsuit filed by Muhammed Yusoff on July 14, 2021, claiming he was sexually assaulted in 2018. Anwar, in his defence, contended that the plaintiff had lied under oath to authorities regarding the alleged sexual assault. Anwar then filed a counterclaim on Sept 28, 2021, alleging that Muhammed Yusoff had fabricated it to tarnish his political career and prevent him from becoming prime minister. The hearing for a full stay application has been fixed for July 21.
