
The Filmmakers Behind the New I Know What You Did Last Summer on What They Changed This Time Around
At least, that's how writer-director Jennifer Kaytin Robinson (Do Revenge, Someone Great) and her I Know What You Did Last Summer co-writer Sam Lansky (a TIME contributor and author of The Gilded Razor and Broken People) describe the category of films that their legacy slasher sequel belongs to. (Think cult classics like Jawbreaker, Prom Night, and The House on Sorority Row, for example.)
Now in theaters, I Know What You Did Last Summer follows in the footsteps of the 1997 original by setting its group of privileged 20-somethings on a crash course for serial killer vengeance in the idyllic seaside town of Southport, N.C. This time around, rather than accidentally hitting someone with their car while driving back from the beach on Fourth of July night, as in the first film, the friends—Ava (Chase Sui Wonders), Danica (Madelyn Cline), Milo (Jonah Hauer-King), Teddy (Tyriq Withers), and Stevie (Sarah Pidgeon)—cause an accident that leaves an injured driver dangling over the side of a cliff before his truck plummets to the rocks below. Instead of remaining at the scene of the crime and waiting for the cops to arrive, the group flees and calls on Teddy's rich and powerful father to cover up what they did.
If you're at all familiar with the franchise, you'll know what comes next. The following year, when the guilt-ridden and now-somewhat estranged friends reconvene in Southport, Danica receives an ominous note: "I know what you did last summer." And thus, an even more brutal murder spree, orchestrated by a mysterious new Fisherman wielding more than just a hook, commences. "A reference that we talked about was David Fincher's Se7en," Lansky says of the leveled-up violence. "There is an element of performance to these kills in the world of the movie that is not present in the original."
While it wasn't a critical darling, the 1997 I Know What You Did Last Summer, directed by Jim Gillespie and written by Scream's Kevin Williamson, coasted to a strong box-office showing (earning over $125 million worldwide) and cult-favorite status, largely on the strength of the chemistry between its then-up-and-coming core cast members: Jennifer Love Hewitt (who plays Julie James), Sarah Michelle Gellar (as Helen Shivers), Freddie Prinze Jr. (as Ray Bronson), and Ryan Phillippe (as Barry Cox).
"There is a depth and poignance to the friendships in that movie that transcends what most films of that era were able to do. You really feel it in a pretty deep way," Lansky says. "Julie and Helen and Ray and Barry are your people. So when things start to unravel, it's heartbreaking."
Now, nearly 30 years on, Robinson and Lansky are aiming to give a new generation of horror fans that same feeling, that these gruesome attacks are "happening to your friends."
"We wanted to make sure we assembled a cast that felt like it could be as bright, shiny, and wonderful as the original," Robinson says. "That was always the North Star—not necessarily to replicate it, because we didn't want to go one for one with any of the characters, but to replicate the feeling."
The new film also brings back Hewitt and Prinze Jr., who previously returned for the 1998 sequel I Still Know What You Did Last Summer alongside Brandy as the iconic Karla Wilson, but were absent from 2006's I'll Always Know What You Did Last Summer and the 2021 TV adaptation of the story, which was canceled after one season.
"You don't want to lose the thread of fun while realistically addressing how massively traumatized somebody would be after going through what Julie [and Ray] did in those first two movies. There's a reason there's a joke about The Body Keeps the Score in like the first five minutes of the movie," Lansky says of what he and Robinson hoped to convey about the lives of their legacy leads. "We wanted to be conscious of how serious and horrific what these characters experienced was, while also making sure it didn't feel heavy-handed or self-serious. Fun was the imperative for us the whole way through."
Just as the 1997 movie was held up against the original Scream, the reboot is bound to draw comparisons to the latter franchise's recent two "requels," which both achieved critical and commercial success, grossing a combined total of nearly $309 million globally. While I Know What You Did Last Summer is tracking similarly to the original in terms of initial critical reception, it's looking solid heading into its opening weekend, with an anticipated $17 million at the domestic box office on a reported budget of $18 million. The movie's association with the Scream series is something Robinson says she feels "agnostic" about. "I love those movies. They're really fun," she says. "I would hope ours feels like it stands on its own and is its own thing."
As for what she believes allows a horror reboot to accomplish that feat, Robinson says it's all about getting audiences hooked on your new take on a tried-and-true premise. "It's about rooting every choice, every twist and turn and death, in the specific story you're telling rather than trying to retcon or figure out how to make something fit," she says. "The homages in this film are woven in in a way where you don't have to know anything about the original movie to enjoy this one. There are Easter eggs and jokes that will play on multiple levels if you have a deep familiarity with the canon. But if you don't, it's still a blast."
In the end, fans will simply have to decide for themselves whether they're on board with this fresh stab at a franchise revival. As Julie James would say, "What are you waiting for, huh?"
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
8 hours ago
- New York Post
Jennifer Love Hewitt slams Sarah Michelle Gellar feud rumors
She knows what they did last summer. As the modern classic 1997 horror movie 'I Know What You Did Last Summer' has gotten a 2025 revival (now in theaters), there have been rumors of a feud between original stars Jennifer Love Hewitt, 46, and Sarah Michelle Gellar, 48. 'I honestly remain still so confused by all of that stuff,' Hewitt exclusively told The Post. The 'Can't Hardly Wait' actress, who was talking to The Post to promote her ID series 'A Killer Among Friends (airing Mondays 10 p.m. on ID and streaming on HBO Max), added, 'I just feel like we're in a business where they always want women to have a problem with each other.' 11 Sarah Michelle Gellar and Jennifer Love Hewitt in 1998. Bei/Shutterstock 11 Jennifer Love Hewitt at the premiere of 'I Know What You Did Last Summer' in LA on July 14, 2025. Sony Pictures via Getty Images 11 Sarah Michelle Gellar, Ryan Phillippe. Jennifer Love Hewitt, and Freddie Prinze Jr in 1997's 'I Know What You Did Last Summer.' Mandalay Ent/Kobal/Shutterstock 'Nobody asked how often Freddie and Ryan have seen each other since the original movie,' she added, referring to Freddie Prinze Jr. 48, and Ryan Phillippe, 50. The rumors of bad blood between Gellar and Hewitt started after the pair didn't pose together for pictures on the red carpet of the sequel's premiere on July 14. Hewitt told The Post that feud rumors, 'seems to be things that they do to women in particular, and it's not necessary.' 'I have absolutely zero beef with Sarah at all,' she went on. 'In fact, I applaud her for being a long-standing badass career woman, a mom, wife – all the things that I am, that we have in common.' 11 Freddie Prinze Jr., Sarah Michelle Gellar, Jennifer Love Hewitt and Ryan Phillippe in 1997's 'I Know What You Did Last Summer.' ©Columbia Pictures/Courtesy Everett Collection 11 Jennifer Love Hewitt in the 2025 horror flick 'I Know What You Did Last Summer.' ©Columbia Pictures/Courtesy Everett Collection 11 Freddie Prinze Jr. and Jennifer Love Hewitt in 1997's 'I Know What You Did Last Summer.' ©Columbia Pictures/Courtesy Everett Collection The '9-1-1' actress shares three kids with her husband, actor Brian Hallisay, who she married in 2013: Autumn, 11, Atticus, 10, and Aidan, 3. The 'Buffy The Vampire Slayer' star, meanwhile, shares two kids with Prinze Jr., who she married in 2002: Charlotte, 15, and Rocky, 12. Hewitt concluded to The Post that that the feud rumors are 'just really unfortunate.' 'We run in different circles,' Prinze Jr. recently told Variety. 'I hadn't seen [Hewitt] since we wrapped the second movie in '98, but we care a lot about these characters, and it was all still there.' Hewitt previously said that she hasn't talked to Gellar since they were 18 in the 1997 movie. Gellar also addressed the rumors on social media. 11 Sarah Michelle Gellar and Freddie Prinze Jr. at the July 2025 premiere of 'I Know What You Did Last Summer.' Matt Baron/BEI/Shutterstock 11 Freddie Prinze Jr., Ryan Phillippe, Sarah Michelle Gellar and Jennifer Love Hewitt in the original 'I Know What You Did Last Summer.' Moviestore/Shutterstock 11 Freddie Prinze Jr., Jennifer Love Hewitt, Sarah Michelle Gellar and Ryan Philippe in 'I Know What You Did Last Summer.' ©Columbia Pictures/Courtesy Everett Collection 'For everyone asking — I never got to see @jenniferlovehewitt, who is fantastic in the movie,' she wrote via Instagram on July 16. 'I was inside with my kids when the big carpet happened. And unfortunately, JLH didn't come to the after-party.' The 'Buffy the Vampire Slayer' star added, 'If you have ever been to one of these, it's crazy. I sadly didn't get pics with most of the cast. But that doesn't change how amazing I think they all are. Unfortunately, some things happen only in real life and not online.' The 1997 Kevin Williamson-written film followed a group of four friends who accidentally kill a man. One year later, they're stalked by a hook-wielding killer. Hewitt and Prinze Jr's characters were the only ones to survive – Gellar and Phillippe's characters both kicked the bucket. Taking to The Post in May, Phillippe joked about how often he dies onscreen. 11 Sarah Michelle Gellar, Ryan Phillippe and Jennifer Love Hewitt in 1997's 'I Know What You Did Last Summer.' ©Columbia Pictures/Courtesy Everett Collection 11 Sarah Michelle Gellar, Ryan Phillippe and Jennifer Love Hewitt in 1997's 'I Know What You Did Last Summer.' ©Columbia Pictures/Courtesy Everett Collection '[For 'Big Sky'] they put me all over the key art and the billboards, and then I died in the first episode,' he said, referring to his ABC series, which ran from 2020 to 2023. 'So I had a lot of people that were very angry with me about that. A lot of friends or fans were like, 'Oh, we're going to watch this show and you die in the first episode!' Now, I have to assure anyone when I'm in a project that I'm going to be in more than one episode.' The latest 'I Know What You Did Last Summer' ended with a wild post-credits scene, suggesting more movies in the franchise could happen. 'Oh my gosh, I have no idea. I mean, truthfully, I was just excited to be asked back for this one. So I don't want to be too greedy,' Hewitt told The Post. 'But as long as there's a really interesting, fun story to tell, and as long the people still care about the characters, I'm always happy to hopefully find my way back there.'
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
Can Jamming Remotely Truly Match a Live Experience For Bands?
During the pandemic, we all got a hall pass to do remote work, mostly using Zoom to connect with coworkers, clients, friends, and even family members. But if you were a musician in a band, being remote created a particularly unique set of challenges. There were online music collaboration platforms and hacks out there at the time, yet most of them had quirks such as network latency delays, poor audio, and internet instability. The Virtual Jam Revolution Is Here Today, there is something that actually works: an advanced streaming solution that allows you to play with other musicians without the usual audio hiccups, workarounds, and lag time of previously released products. Think of the new online music collaboration platform, Lutefish, as a highly effective Zoom for musicians. It uses a dedicated hardware device that allows musicians to play in real-time jam sessions with players streaming in from as many as five different locations. The company advertises that musicians can be up to 500 miles apart, but some users report on social media that they can be 1,000+ miles away and still practice seamlessly. That creates a lot of new possibilities. More from Spin: The 10 Best Collective Soul Songs X and Los Lobos: Celebrating '99 Years of Rock n' Roll' Together 5 Things Everyone in the Music Industry Should Know But how big of an impact does Lutefish have for musicians? Orange County thrash metal band Trip To The Morgue has been experiencing a resurgence in popularity, leading to a very hectic schedule. They just signed to a new record label and are releasing an album, alongside maintaining a relentless national touring schedule. Recently, they needed to audition for a new backup guitarist, and found one who lived in Las Vegas, Nevada, while they remain in Orange County, California – a state away. Lead guitarist, James Patrick McCosar, explains that Lutefish was essential for helping the band adapt to their crazy scheduling, auditioning new faraway guitarists, finding one, then practicing together from different locations. 'So it was just in the nick of time that Lutefish came within our possession to be able to say this is going to work out perfectly… It's been super easy for us to not only collaborate on working with a new guitar player, but also with being able to write new music and being able to practice and get things up to speed for everything that's happening so quickly.' In fact, the band went from practicing online with their new guitarist on Lutefish straight into a live show in Las Vegas. They had never once had a face-to-face practice session. 'It was seamless,' adds McCosar. Check out the band's full online jamming experience on the Lutefish blog. Where Remote Rehearsals Meet Real Connections In addition to real-time collaboration, the Lutefish platform (sign up is free) connects users to a music community where they can meet like-minded musicians, find people to jam with, and even find new band members. Musicians and artists can also find gigs in their area and promote projects and shows. There are other musician-focused social platforms, but the difference is Lutefish users can start playing together right away, provided they've purchased the hardware. The platform allows people to share their music with the community, discover and play with strangers who have similar musical abilities, form a new band, or simply jam with new and old friends who live far away. Lutefish's technology also eliminates the time-suck of packing up and moving musical equipment and setup for band practice in yet another physical location. That's a lot of benefits. The platform also has a great track record with frequent updates and new features. The following features are all slated to arrive within the year: Stem Recording (aka multi-tracking) allows groups to record their individual audio streams separately, enabling more capacity for post-processing sessions. Live Streaming, musicians can livestream their performance to an audience. In-platform audio and video performance recording allows musicians to record audio and video from a performance, then adjust the start and end time of the media – all within Lutefish. Here's Why This Hardware Wins Lutefish's plug-n-play platform outperforms streaming platforms released in the past that relied on Wi-Fi and additional computer software to connect with remote players. If chat rooms are to be trusted, especially on Reddit, these other platforms exhibit a lot of issues with reliability, loss of live audio quality, time delays, and lack the ability to record with clarity and edit effectively. Lutefish's hardware, the Lutefish Stream, connects directly to your router using an Ethernet cable to deliver ultra-low latency and clear audio through high-quality preamps as if you're standing 30 feet away from other players. If you want to get really technical, that means devices can stream 48k audio with less than 30 milliseconds of latency. This helps reduce connectivity issues and lag times, allowing musicians to rehearse and record together via the Internet while being in sync. Having dedicated hardware is a big part of what sets Lutefish apart, as it provides the platform with key technical benefits: The operating system is optimized solely for real-time audio processing Third-party products and software like audio interfaces DAWs are not needed. Audio paths are tightly managed to prevent unpredictable slowdowns. These technical advantages are really what make Lutefish feel more like an in-person playing experience. Based in Minnesota, not Silicon Valley, Lutefish says it was founded 'by musicians for musicians' who created the technology to enable players of all abilities to share in the joy of making music together. And if you're looking for Minnesota's music cred, the star of the north state lays claim to Lizzo, Prince, Bob Dylan, The Replacements, and Babes in Toyland, just to name a few. Lutefish founders explain, 'We built Lutefish as a dedicated hardware unit to eliminate as many sources of latency and variability as possible, while providing an easy plug-and-play platform.' Skip the Tech Headaches—Here's How It Works 1. Purchase the Lutefish unit ($299 USD). 2. Activate your subscription ($12.99 USD/month, including 2 free months). 3. Plug in your gear and start jamming instantly. Once you have the hardware, simply plug it into power, connect it to your router via Ethernet, and then plug in your instrument and mic. Connect to the Internet through the Ethernet cable and fire up the app to connect face-to-face with five other performers in five different locations. Lutefish offers all the positives for a remote band experience in one product. Once you and your bandmates are on Lutefish, you won't need to leave your house or studio to make and play quality music. Unless, of course, you get signed to a major tour. Then rock on! To see our running list of the top 100 greatest rock stars of all time, click here.
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
Ari Aster on Gruesome ‘Eddington' Ending, Full-Frontal Joaquin Phoenix and Soothing His Notorious Anxiety
SPOILER ALERT: This interview contains spoilers for, including the ending of, 'Eddington,' now playing in theaters. Does anything relax Ari Aster? More from Variety Box Office: 'Superman' Still on Top as 'I Know What You Did Last Summer' Hooks $5.8 Million Opening Day Ahead of 'Eddington' and 'Smurfs' Box Office: 'I Know What You Did Last Summer' Scares Up $2.2 Million in Thursday Previews, A24's 'Eddington' Earns $625K Micheal Ward on Finally Having His Cannes Moment With 'Eddington,' What He Learned From 'Cool Cat' Joaquin Phoenix and Why His Next Film Should Excite 'Top Boy' Fans The ramp-up to the celebrated indie filmmaker's latest release, 'Eddington,' reminds us just how much crushing anxiety informs his work and daily life. Take last week's exhaustive New York Times profile, in which Aster threatened to walk into traffic at the thought of answering routine publicity questions. But his demons aren't without benefits, having produced disruptive and culture-consuming movies like 'Hereditary,' 'Midsommar' and 'Beau Is Afraid.' On a recent Zoom with Variety, Aster sat in the office of his distributor A24 and considered the things that bring him joy and calm. 'I like to read. I like watching movies. Making films provides a healthy level of distraction. Being idle isn't my thing,' he said. The director also confessed to enjoying junk food (calling himself an 'over-orderer' on apps like Uber Eats) and low-brow comedy (he couldn't name any recent favorites off the cuff). He meditates. Sadly, he does not partake in any of Bravo's 'Real Housewives' installments, as the Times hinted he might. Escapes from his prison of anxiety are minimal, but perhaps that's why we have 'Eddington.' The Cannes selection follows antihero Joaquin Phoenix as Joe Cross, a New Mexico law enforcer whose personal life explodes in scandal and violence at the exact time COVID rattles the world and undoes his small town. The film was divisive from the jump, with some critics saying Aster's film is incendiary on purpose – meant to rile conspiracy theorists, incite liberal outrage and foreshadow the inevitability of a second Trump term. Variety's Owen Gleiberman, in his positive review, said some viewers might wonder if Aster had 'turned into some right-wing hipster auteur tossing cherry bombs attached to Fox News talking points.' Political and social indictments aside, Aster crafts the kind of bleak ending he's become famous for. [Last chance to avoid spoilers] Much of the film's action centers on a haphazard mayoral campaign Cross is running while trying to keep the peace in his town. After smiting his opposition (Pedro Pascal) and quite a few others, Cross claims victory at a high price. A climactic action piece just before the film's final scenes brings Antifa to town – puppets of the elite paid to stage havoc in service of darker goals, the theory goes. Phoenix's Cross confronts them head on through air assaults, multi-car explosions and a town square shoot-out that feels like Paul Verhoeven guest directed 'Grand Theft Auto.' In the end, Cross takes a knife to the skull. Since this is an Aster movie, death is nowhere near the worst thing that can happen to his protagonist. 'I wanted it to feel as desolate as possible,' Aster said of the ending. Cross survives but is left paraplegic by the stabbing. He holds the mayor's office but can't enjoy its power and privilege, instead a symbol now cared for by his unhinged mother-in-law (the underrated Deirdre O'Connell). Cross spends his days reflecting on his sins and getting abused by caretakers. In a montage looking at Cross' new daily routine, Phoenix offers some rare full-frontal nudity from a male movie star ('If you got it, you might as well [flaunt it],' the director said of his lead). One of the final glimpses we see of Cross is at the grand opening of a data center, built right next to the paltry town of Eddington. Many theorize that the data center, the construction of which is opposed by some locals and indigenous people, was the real evil in the story. 'What you'll see in the film is that I have some frustration towards one side of this ideological battle, but I'm terrified of the other side. And part of my frustration with that first side is that it's failing to meet the threat of the other side,' he said. 'This film is about a bunch of people who are in the same situation, and they're all boring, and they're all going at each other. But they're all subject to the same forces and the same big power that is working on them.' Best of Variety New Movies Out Now in Theaters: What to See This Week 'Harry Potter' TV Show Cast Guide: Who's Who in Hogwarts? Final Emmy Predictions: Talk Series and Scripted Variety - New Blood Looks to Tackle Late Night Staples Solve the daily Crossword